Mixed Aortic Valve Disease: A Diagnostic Challenge, a Prognostic Threat

References

• Andell P, Li X, Martinsson A, et al. Epidemiology of valvular heart disease in a Swedish nationwide hospital-based register study. Heart. 2017;103(21):1696–1703. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310894.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rashedi N, Popović ZB, Stewart WJ, Marwick T. Outcomes of asymptomatic adults with combined aortic stenosis and regurgitation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014;27(8):829–837. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2014.04.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins DA, Johnson CO, Colquhoun SM, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of rheumatic heart disease, 1990–2015. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(8):713–722. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1603693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger P, Tribouilloy C. Aortic stenosis with other concomitant valvular disease. Aortic regurgitation, mitral regurgitation, mitral stenosis, or tricuspid regurgitation. Cardiol Clin. 2020;38:33–46. doi:10.1016/j.ccl.2019.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egbe AC, Luis SA, Padang R, Warnes CA. Outcomes in moderate mixed aortic valve disease: is it time for a paradigm shift? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(20):2321–2329. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker MW, Aurigemma GP. The simple arithmetic of mixed aortic valve disease: LVH + Volume Load = Trouble. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(20):2330–2333. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.549.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess OM, Ritter M, Schneider J, Grimm J, Turina M, Krayenbuehl HP. Diastolic stiffness and myocardial structure in aortic valve disease before and after valve replacement. Circulation. 1984;69(5):855–865. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.69.5.855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, et al. ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease: the task force for the management of valvular heart disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2739–2791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129(23):e521–643. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. AHA/ACC focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2017;135(25):e1159–95. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krayenbuehl HP, Hess OM, Monrad ES, Schneider J, Mall G, Turina M. Left ventricular myocardial structure in aortic valve disease before, intermediate, and late after aortic valve replacement. Circulation. 1989;79(4):744–755. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.79.4.744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michail M, Davies JE, Cameron JD, Parker KH, Brown AJ. Pathophysiological coronary and microcirculatory flow alterations in aortic stenosis. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018;15(7):420–431. doi:10.1038/s41569-018-0011-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindman BR, Clavel MA, Mathieu P, et al. Calcific aortic stenosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16006. doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honda S, Kitai T, Okada Y, et al. Impact of aortic regurgitation on the prognosis of severe aortic stenosis. Heart. 2012;98(21):1591–1594. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zilberszac R, Gabriel H, Schemper M, et al. Outcome of combined stenotic and regurgitant aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(14):1489–1495. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egbe AC, Poterucha JT, Warnes CA. Mixed aortic valve disease: midterm outcome and predictors of adverse events. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(34):2671–2678. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenhek R, Zilberszac R, Schemper M, et al. Natural history of very severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2010;121(1):151–156. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.894170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaza N, Desai MY, Kapadia SR, et al. Long-term outcomes in patients with mixed aortic valve disease and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(7):e014591. doi:10.1161/JAHA.119.014591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang LT, Pellikka PA, Enriquez-Sarano M, et al. Can aortic regurgitation evolve into aortic stenosis? New insights on mixed aortic valve disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020;33(3):406–408. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2019.10.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grayburn PA, Smith MD, Harrison MR, Gurley JC, DeMaria AN. Pivotal role of aortic valve area calculation by the continuity equation for Doppler assessment of aortic stenosis in patients with combined aortic stenosis and regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 1988;61(4):376–381. doi:10.1016/0002-9149(88)90948-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamaza-Chulián S, Díaz-Retamino E, Camacho-Freire S, Ruiz-Fernández D, Gutiérrez-Barrios A, Oneto-Otero J. Acceleration time and ratio of acceleration time to ejection time in aortic stenosis: new echocardiographic diagnostic parameters. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;10:947–955. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2017.06.001.
   Google Scholar
• Blais C, Burwash IG, Mundigler G, et al. Projected valve area at normal flow rate improves the assessment of stenosis severity in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) study. Circulation. 2006;113(5):711–721. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.557678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancellotti P, Tribouilloy C, Hagendorff A, et al. Scientific Document Committee of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Recommendations for the echocardiographic assessment of native valvular regurgitation: an executive summary from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;14(7):611–644. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jet105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoghbi WA, Adams D, Bonow RO, et al. Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography developed in collaboration with the society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2017;30(4):303–371. doi:10.1016/j.echo.2017.01.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Marchi SF, Windecker S, Aeschbacher BC, Seiler C. Influence of left ventricular relaxation on the pressure half time of aortic regurgitation. Heart. 1999;82(5):607–613. doi:10.1136/hrt.82.5.607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kammerlander AA, Wiesinger M, Duca F, et al. Diagnostic and prognostic utility of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in aortic regurgitation. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2019;12(8):1474–1483. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.08.036.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JKT, Franzone A, Lanz J, et al. Early detection of subclinical myocardial damage in chronic aortic regurgitation and strategies for timely treatment of asymptomatic patients. Circulation. 2018;137(2):184–196. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029858.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo CF, Nigri M, Higuchi ML, et al. Prognostic significance of myocardial fibrosis quantification by histopathology and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with severe aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(4):278–287. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong G, Pibarot P. Combined aortic stenosis and regurgitation: double the trouble. Heart. 2019;105(19):1515–1522. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egbe AC, Khan AR, Boler A, et al. Role of diastolic function indices in the risk stratification of patients with mixed aortic valve disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;19(6):668–674. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jex148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egbe AC, Warnes CA. Predictor of left ventricular dysfunction after aortic valve replacement in mixed aortic valve disease. Int J Cardiol. 2017;228:511–517. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magne J, Cosyns B, Popescu BA, et al. Distribution and prognostic significance of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in asymptomatic significant aortic stenosis: an individual participant data meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2019;12(1):84–92. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.11.005.
   Google Scholar
• Alashi A, Khullar T, Mentias A, et al. Long-term outcomes after aortic valve surgery in patients with asymptomatic chronic aortic regurgitation and preserved LVEF: impact of baseline and follow-up global longitudinal strain. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2020;13(1):12–21. doi:10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.12.021.
   Google Scholar
• Kong WKF, Vollema EM, Prevedello F, et al. Prognostic implications of left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients with bicuspid aortic valve disease and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. Oct 21, 2019:pii: jez252. doi:10.1093/ehjci/jez252. [Epub ahead of print].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers JB, Prendergast B, Iung B, et al. Standards defining a ‘Heart Valve Centre’: ESC working group on valvular heart disease and European association for cardiothoracic surgery viewpoint. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(28):2177–2183. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehx370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancellotti P, Rosenhek R, Pibarot P, et al. ESC Working Group on Valvular Heart Disease position paper–heart valve clinics: organization, structure, and experiences. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(21):1597–1606. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chahine J, Kadri AN, Gajulapalli RD, et al. Outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in mixed aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12(22):2299–2306. doi:10.1016/j.jcin.2019.06.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidari B, Al-Hijji MA, Alkhouli MA, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement outcomes in mixed aortic valve disease compared to predominant aortic stenosis. Int J Cardiol. Jan 15, 2020;299:209–214. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.07.099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colli A, Besola L, Salizzoni S, et al. Does pre-existing aortic regurgitation protect from death in patients who develop paravalvular leak after TAVI? Int J Cardiol. 2017;233:52–60. doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar