References
- Généreux P, Piazza N, Alu MC, et al. Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(19):1825–1857. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa799.
- Head S, Mokhles M, Osnabrugge R, et al. The impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on long-term survival after aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 34 observational studies comprising 27,186 patients with 133,141 patient-years. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(19):1518–1529. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs003.
- Pompeu SM, Cavalcanti LRP, Rayol SDC, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch negatively affects outcomes after mitral valve replacement: meta-analysis of 10,239 patients. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;34(2):203–212. doi:https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0069.
- Vriesendorp MGR, Herrmann H, Head S. OnlyThe clinical implications of body surface area as a poor proxy for cardiac output. Struct Heart. 2021. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/24748706.2021.1968089.
- Anjan VY, Herrmann HC, Pibarot P, et al. Evaluation of flow after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with low-flow aortic stenosis. A secondary analysis of the PARTNER randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2016;1(5):584–592. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2016.0759.
- Ternacle J, Pibarot P, Herrmann HC, et al. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement in the PARTNER 2 trial and registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(13):1466–1477. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.069.
- Ternacle J, Abbas AE, Pibarot P. Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: has it become obsolete? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(9):977–980. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.039.
- Collis T, Devereux RB, Roman MJ, et al. Relations of stroke volume and cardiac output to body composition. The strong heart study. Circulation. 2001;103:820–825.