Lineaments of Kodaikanal-Palani massif, Southern Granulitic Terrain of Tamil Nadu, India: a study using SRTM DEM and LANDSAT satellite’s OLI sensor’s FCC

References

• Argialas, D. P., & Mavrantza, O. D. (2004, July 12–23). Comparison of edge detection and Hough transform techniques for the extraction of geologic features. In O. Altan (Ed.), Proceedings XXth ISPRS Congress of the International Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Istanbul, Turkey. ISPRS Archives XXXV (Part B3), (pp. 790–795). Retrieved from http://www.isprs.org/proceedings/XXXV/congress/comm3/papers/376.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, J. M., Harris, N. B. W., Hawkesworth, C. J., & Santhosh, M. (1995). New isotope constraints on the crustal evolution of South India and pan-African granulite metamorphism. Memoir of Geological Society of India, 34, 391–397.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett, J. M., Harris, N. B. W., Dougherty, Jon S., Hawkesworth, C. J., & Santhosh, M. (1998). The application of single zircon evaporation and model Nd ages to the interpretation of polymetamorphic terrains: an example from the Proterozoic mobile belt of south India. Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology, 131(2–3), 181–195.
   Google Scholar
• Blanchet, P. H. (1957). Development of fracture analysis as exploration method. Bulletin of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists, 41(8), 1748–1759.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, S., Schenk, V., Raith, M. M., Appel, P., Gerdes, A., &Srikantappa, C. (2011). Late neoproterozoic P-T evolution of HP-UHT granulites from the palni hills (South India): New constraints from phase diagram modelling, LA-ICP-MS zircon dating and in situ EMP monazite dating. Journal of Petrology, 52, 1813–1856. doi:10.1093/petrology/egr032
   Google Scholar
• Braun, I., & Kriegsman, L. M. (2003). Proterozoic crustal evolution of southernmost India and Sri Lanka. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 206, 169–202.10.1144/GSL.SP.2003.206.01.10
   Google Scholar
• Cenki, B., Braun, I., & Brocker, M. (2004). Evolution of the continental crust in the Kerala Khondalite Belt, southernmost India: Evidence from Nd isotope mapping, U–Pb and Rb–Sr geochronology. Precambrian Research, 134, 275–292.10.1016/j.precamres.2004.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekhar, P., Martha, T. R., Venkateswarlu, N., Subramanian, S. K., & Kamaraju, M. V. V. (2011). Regional geological studies over parts of Deccan Syneclise using remote sensing and geophysical data for understanding hydrocarbon prospects. Current Science, 100(1), 95–99.
   Google Scholar
• Chetty, T. R. K., & Bhaskar Rao, Y. J. (2006). Constrictive deformation in transpressional regime, field evidence from the Cauvery Shear Zone, Southern Granulite Terrain, India. Journal of Structural Geology, 28, 713–720.10.1016/j.jsg.2006.01.007
   Google Scholar
• Clark, C., Collins, S., Timms, N. E., Kinny, P. D., Chetty, T. R. K., &Santhosh, M. (2009). SHRIMP U–Pb age constraints on magmatism and high-grade metamorphism in the Salem Block, southern India. Gondwana Research, 16, 27–36.10.1016/j.gr.2008.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A. S., Santosh, M., Braun, I., & Clark, C. (2007). Age and sedimentary provenance of the Southern Granulites, South India: U– Th–Pb SHRIMP secondary ion mass spectrometry. Precambrian Research, 155, 125–138.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A. S., & Pisarevsky, S. A. (2005). Amalgamating eastern Gondwana: The evolution of the Circum-Indian Orogens. Earth-Science Reviews, 71, 229–270.10.1016/j.earscirev.2005.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drury, S. A., & Holt, R. W. (1980). The tectonic framework of the South Indian craton: A reconnaissance involving LANDSAT imagery. Tectonophysics, 65, T1–T15.10.1016/0040-1951(80)90073-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edet, A. E., Okereke, C. S., & Esu, E. O. (1998). Applications of remote sensing data to groundwater exploration: A case study of the Cross River State, SE Nigeria. Hydrogeology Journal, 6, 394–404. doi:10.1007/s100400050162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geological Survey of India. (2006). Geology and mineral resources of the states of India Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry ( Miscellaneous Publication No. 30). G.S.I, Chennai, 71p.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, J. G. Wit, M. J. D., Zartman, R. E. (2004). Age and tectonic evolution of neoproterozoic ductile shear zones in the Southern Granulite Terrain of India with implications for Gondwana Studies. Tectonics, 23, TC3006.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, B. E., Mack, T. J., & Thompson, A. L. (2012). Lineament analysis of mineral areas of interest in Afghanistan (28 p). U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2012–1048.
   Google Scholar
• Jayananda, M., Janardhan, A. S., Sivasubramanian, P., & Peucat, J. J. (1995). Geochronologic and Isotopic constraints on granulite formation in the Kodaikanal area, Southern India. Memoir Geological Society of India, 34, 373–390.
   Google Scholar
• Jawahar Raj, N., Prabhakaran, A., & Muthukrishnan, A. (2017). Extraction and Analysis of Geological Lineaments of Kolli Hills, Tamil Nadu: A study using remote sensing and GIS. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 10, 195. doi:10.1007/s12517-017-2966-4
   Google Scholar
• Kiran, Raj S., & Ahmed, S. A. (2014). Lineament extraction from Southern Chitradurga Schist belt using Landsat TM, ASTERGDEM and geomatics techniques. International Journal of Computer Applications, 93(12), 12–20.
   Google Scholar
• Majumdar, T. J., & Bhattacharya, B. B. (1988). Application of the Haar transform for extraction of linear and anomalous patterns over part of Cambay Basin, India. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 9(12), 1937–1942.10.1080/01431168808954992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masoud, A., & Koike, K. (2011). Auto-detection and integration of tectonically significant lineaments from SRTM DEM and remotely-sensed geophysical data. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 66, 818–832.10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.08.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meert, J. G., Pandit, M. K., Pradhan, V. R., Banks, J., Sirianni, R., Stroud, M.,Newstead, B., & Gifford, J. (2010). Precambrian crustal evolution of Peninsular India: A 3.0 billion year odyssey. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 39, 483–515.10.1016/j.jseaes.2010.04.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mollard, J. D. (1957). Aerial photographs aid petroleum search. Candian Oil and Gas Industries, 10(7), 89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Ni, C.Z., Zhang, S., Liu ,C., Yan, Y., & Li, Y. (2016). Lineament length and density analyses based on the segment tracing algorithm: A case study of the Gaosong Field in Gejiu Tin Mine, China. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. Article ID 5392453, 1–7, doi:10.1155/2016/5392453
   Google Scholar
• Plavsa, D., Collins, A. S., Foden, J. F., Kropinski, L., Santosh, M., Chetty,T. R. K., & Clark, C. (2012). Delineating crustal domains in Peninsular India: Age and chemistry of orthopyroxene-bearing felsic gneisses in the Madurai Block. Precambrian Research, 198–199, 77–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porwik, P., & Lisowska, A. (2004). The Haar-Wavelet transform in digital image processing: Its status and achievements. Machine Graphics & Vision, 13(1–2), 79–98.
   Google Scholar
• Rakshit, A. M., & Prabhakar Rao, P. (1989). Megalineaments on the face of the Indian sub-continent and their geological significance. Memoirs of Geological Sur vey of India, 12, 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Sabins, F. F. (1996). Remote sensing: Principles and interpretation (3rd ed., 494p). New York, NY: W. H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Santosh, M., Tanaka, K., Yokoyama, K., & Collins, A. S. (2005). Late Neoproterozoic Cambrian felsic magmatism along transcrustal shear zones in southern India: U-Pb electron microprobe ages and implications for the amalgamation of the Gondwana supercontinent. Gondwana Research, 8, 31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sener, E., Davraz, A., & Ozcelik, M. (2005). An integration of GIS and remote sensing in groundwater investigations: A case study in Burdur, Turkey. Hydrogeology Journal 13: 826–834.10.1007/s10040-004-0378-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shazia, J. R., Harlov, D. E., Suzuki, K., Kim, S. W., Girish-Kumar, M.,Hayasaka, Y., Ishwar-Kumar, C., Windley, B. F., & Sajeev, K. (2015). Linking monazite geochronology with fluid infiltration and metamorphic histories: Nature and experiment. Lithos, 236–237, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2015.08.008
   Google Scholar
• Singh, A. P., Kumar, N., , & Singh, B. (2006). Nature of the crust along Kuppam–Palani geotransect (South India) from gravity studies: Implications for Precambrian continental collision and delamination. Gondwana Research, 10, 41–47.10.1016/j.gr.2005.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thanavelu, C. (2012). Landslide hazard zonation on macroscale of Kodaikanal hills, Dindigul district, Tamil Nadu. Records of the Geological Survey of India, 144 (5), 233.
   Google Scholar
• Unnikrishnan-Warrier, C., Santosh, M., & Yoshida, M. (1995). First report of Pan-African Sm—Nd and Rb—Sr mineral isochron ages from regional charnockites of southern India. Geological Magazine, 132(3), 253–260.10.1017/S0016756800013583
   Google Scholar
• Valdiya, K. S. (2016). The making of India: Geodynamic evolution (2nd ed., 924p). Switzerland: Springer. 10.1007/978-3-319-25029-8
   Google Scholar
• Wang, P. J., & Howarth, P. J. (1990). Use of the Hough transform in automated lineament detection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 28(4), 561–567.10.1109/TGRS.1990.572949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zlatopolsky, A. A. (1992). Program LESSA (lineament extraction and stripe statistical analysis) automated linear image features analysis – Experimental results. Computers and Geosciences, 18(9), 1121–1126.10.1016/0098-3004(92)90036-Q
   Google Scholar