Geomorphic evolution of the Dongar River Basin, Son Valley, Central India

References

• Band, L. E. (1986). Topographic partition of watersheds with digital elevation models. Water Resource Research, 22, 15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, P., Hoey, T. B., Jansen, J. D., & Lexartza Artza, I. (2005). Knick-point recession rateand catchment area: The case of uplifted rivers in eastern Scotland. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 30, 767–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brocard, G. Y., van der Beek, P. A., Bourlès, D. L., Siame, L. L., & Mugnier, J. L. (2003). Long-termfluvial incision rates and postglacial river relaxation time in the French westernAlps from10Be dating of alluvial terraces with assessment of inheritance, soil development and wind ablation effects. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 209, 197–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burrough, P. A. (1986). Principles of geographical information systems for land resources assessment (pp. 50). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chorley, R. J., Malm, D. E. G., & Pogorzelski, H. A. (1957). A new standard for estimating drainage basin shape. American Journal of Science, 255, 138–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, J. I. (1996). Morphometry from maps. Essays in geomorphology (pp. 235–274). New York, NY: Elsevierpublication Co.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, R. T. (1994). Analysis of drainage-basins symmetry as rapid technique to identify areas of possible quaternary tilt-block tectonics: An example from Mississippi Embayment. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 106, 571–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuong, N. Q., & Zuchiewicz, W. A. (2001). Morphotectonic properties of the Lo River fault near Tam Dao in North Vietnam. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 1, 15–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duvall, A., Kirby, E., & Burbank, D. (2004). Tectonic and lithologic controls on bedrock channelprofiles and processes in coastal California. Journal of Geophysical Research, 109, F03002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayen, S., Bhunia, G. S., & Shi, P. K. (2013). Morphometric analysis of Kangshabati-Darkeswar interfluves area in West Bengal, India using ASTER DEM and GIS techniques. Geology and Geoscience, 2(4), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Gelabert, B., Fornos, J. J., Pardo, J. E., Rosello, V. M., & Segura, F. (2005). Structurally controlleddrainage basin development in the south of Menorca (western Mediterranean, Spain). Geomorphology, 65, 147–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottschalk, L. C. (1964). Reservoir sedimentation. In V. T. Chow (Ed.), Handbook of Applied Hydrology (pp. 1–33). New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gurnell, A. M., & Montgomery, A. R. (1999). Hydrological application of GIS (pp. 176). Chichester: F, Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, P. W., & Gardner, T. W. (1985). Geomorphic indicators of vertical neotectonism along converging plate margins, Nicoya Peninsula, Costa Rica. In M. Morisawa & J. T. Hack (Eds.), Tectonic Geomorphology: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Binghamton Geomorphology symposium (pp. 90–104). Boston: Allen @ Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, R. E. (1932). Drainage basin characteristics. Transactions American Geophysical Union, 13, 350–361.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, R. E. (1945). Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: Hydrophysicalapproach to quantitative morphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 56, 275–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John Wilson, J. S., Chandrasekar, N., & Magesh, N. S. (2012). Morphometric analysis of majorsub-watersheds in Aiyar and Karai Pottanar Basin, central Tamil Nadu, India usingremote sensing and GIS techniques. Bonfring International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Science, 2(1), 8–15.
   Google Scholar
• Kanhaiya, S., Singh, B. P., Singh, S., Mittal, P., & Srivastava, V. K. (2018). Morphometric analysis, bed-load sediments, and weathering intensity in the Khurar River Basin, central India. Geological Journal, 1–16. doi:10.1002/gj.3194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushik, P., & Ghosh, P. (2015a). 3D DEM delineation of Chambal river basin from SRTM data using remote sensing and GIS technology. International Journal of Remote Sensing & Geoscience, 4(4), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kaushik, P., & Ghosh, P. (2015b). Geomorphic Evolution of Chambal River Origin in Madhya Pradesh using Remote Sensing and GIS. International Journal of Advanced Remote Sensing and GIS, 4(1), 1130–1141.
   Google Scholar
• Kaushik, P., & Ghosh, P. (2018a). Morphometric Analysis of Mej Sub-Basin, Rajasthan, India, using Remote Sensing & GIS Applications. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 6(1), 1379–1392.
   Google Scholar
• Kaushik, P., & Ghosh, P. (2018b). Morphometric Analysis of Shipra River Sub-Basin, India, Remote Sensing and GIS Approach. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, 6(1), 1536–1546.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, E. A., & Pinter, N. (2002). Active tectonics. Earthquakes, uplift, and landscape (pp. 362). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Macka, Z. (2001). Determination of texture of topography from large scale contour maps. Geografski Vestnik, 73(2), 53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Magesh, N. S., & Chandrasekar, N. (2014). GIS model-based morphometric evaluation of Tamiraparani sub-basin, Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu, India. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 7, 131–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magesh, N. S., Chandrasekar, N., & Soundranayagam, J. P. (2011). Morphometric evaluation of Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds, parts of Western Ghats, Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu, India: A GIS approach. Environmental Earth Science, 64, 373–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maidment, D. R. (2002). Arc hydro GIS for water resources. California: ESRI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manu, M. S., & Anirudhan, S. (2008). Drainage characteristics of Achankovil River basin, Kerala. Journal of Geological Society of India, 71, 841–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchi, L., & Fontana, G. D. (2005). GIS morphometric indicators for the analysis of sediment dynamics in mountain basins. Environmental Geology, 48, 218–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melton, M. A. (1957). An analysis of the relations among the elements of climate, surface properties and geomorphology (Technical Report 11). New York: Department of Geology, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Melton, M. A. (1965). The geomorphic and paleoclimatic significance of alluvial deposits in southern Arizona. Journal of Geology, 73, 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Mesa, L. M. (2006). Morphometric analysis of a subtropical Andean basin (Tucuman, Argentina). Environmental Geology, 50, 1235–1242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, V. C. (1953). A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch mountain area, Virginia and Teimessee, Proi NR 389-402 (Technical Report 3). New York: Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Molin, P., Pazzaglia, F. J., & Dramis, F. (2004). Geomorphic expression of the active tectonics in a rapidly-deforming forearc, sila Massif, Calabria, Southern Italy. American Journal of Science, 304, 559–589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, D. S., & Heerdegen, R. G. (1988). Automatically derived catchment boundaries and channel networks and their hydrological applications. Geomorphology, 1, 131–141.
   Google Scholar
• Nag, S. K. (1998). Morphometric analysis using remote sensing techniques in the Chaka sub-basin, Purulia district, West Bengal. Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 26(1–2), 69–76.
   Google Scholar
• Nag, S. K., & Chakraborty, S. (2003). Influence of rock type and structure in the development of drainage network in hard rock area. Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 31(1), 625–635.
   Google Scholar
• Ozdemir, H., & Brid, D. (2009). Evaluation of morphometric parameters of drainage networks derived from topographic maps and DEM in point of flood. Environmental Geology, 56, 1405–1415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pareta, K., & Pareta, U. (2011). Quantitative morphometric analysis of a watershed of Yamuna Basin, India using ASTER (dem) data and GIS. International Journal of Geomatics Geosciences, 2(1), 248–269.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, P. C. (1988). Drainage basin morphometry and flood. In V. R. Baker, R. C. Kochel, & P. C. Patton (Eds.), Flood geomorphology (pp. 51–65). USA: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Powar, K. B., & Patil, D. M. (1983). Lineaments, their mapping and analysis. NAGI annuals, 2, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash, K., Chaubey, K., Singh, S., Mohanty, T., & Singh, C. K. (2017a). Morphometric analysis of the Satna River Basin, Central India. Indian Journal of Geomorphology, 22, 41–60.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash, K., Mohanty, T., Pati, J. K., Singh, S., & Chaubey, K. (2017b). Morphotectonics of the Jamuna River basin, Bundelkhand Craton, Central India; using remote sensing and GIS technique. Applied Water Science, 7, 3767–3782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash, K., Mohanty, T., Singh, S., Chaubey, K., & Prakash, P. (2016b). Drainage morphometry of the Dhasan river basin, Bundelkhand craton, central India using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Journal of Geomatics, 10, 21–132.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash, K., Singh, S., Mohanty, T., Chaubey, K., & Singh, C. K. (2017c). Morphometric assessment of Gomati river basin, middle Ganga plain, Uttar Pradesh, North India. Spatial Information Research, 25, 449–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prakash, K., Singh, S., & Shukla, U. K. (2016a). Morphometric changes of the Varuna river basin, Varanasi district, Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Geomatics, 10(1), 48–54.
   Google Scholar
• Rai, P. K., Chandel, R. S., Mishra, V. N., & Singh, P. (2018). Hydrological inferences through morphometric analysis of lower Kosi river basin of India for water resource management based on remote sensing data. Applied Water Science, 8, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai, P. K., Mishra, V. N., & Mohan, K. (2017). A study of morphometric evolution of the Son basin, India using geospatial approach. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 7, 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Reddy, G. P. O., Maji, A. K., & Gajbhiye, K. S. (2004). Drainage morphometry and its influence on landforms characteristics in basaltic terrain, central India: A remote sensing and GIS approach. International Journal ofApplied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 6, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, D. F., Kochel, R. C., & Miller, J. R. (1995). In process geomorphology. Dubuque: William C. Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter, D. F., Kochel, R. C., & Miller, J. R. (2002). Process geomorphology. Long Grove, IL: Wavel and Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rudraiah, M., Govindaiah, S., & Srinivas, V. S. (2008). Morphometry using remote sensing and GIS techniques in the sub-basins of Kagna river basin, Gulburga district, Karnataka, India. Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 36, 351–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schidggar, A. E. (1970). Theoretical geomorphology (2nd ed.). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schumm, S. A. (1956). Evolution of drainage system and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, NEW Jessey. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 67, 597–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senadeera, K. P. G. W., Piyasiri, S., & Nandalal, K. D. W. (2001). The evolution of morphometric characteristics of Kotmale Reservoir catchment using GIS as a tool, Sri Lanka. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 34(3), 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, C. K. (2014). Active deformations extracted from drainage geomorphology: A case study from Southern Sonbhadra District, Central India. Journal Geological Society of India, 84, 569–578.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S., & Kanhaiya, S. (2015). Morphometry of the Barakar River Basin, India: A remote sensing and GIS approach. International Journal of Current Research, 7(7), 17948–17955.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S., Kanhaiya, S., Singh, A., & Chaubey, K. (2018a). Drainage network characteristics of the Ghaghghar River Basin (GRB), Son Valley, India. Geology, Ecology & Landscapes, 1–9. doi:10.1080/24749508.2018.1525670
   Google Scholar
• Singh, S., Kumar, S., Mittal, P., Kanhaiya, S., Prakash, P., & Kumar, R. (2018b). Drainage basin parameters of Bagh River, a sub-basin of Narmada River, Central India: Analysis and implications. Journal of Applied Geochemistry, 20(1), 91–102.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, N. P., Whipple, K. X., Tucker, G. E., & Merritts, D. J. (2000). Landscape response to tectonicforcing: DEM analysis of stream profiles in the Mendocino triple junction, Northern California. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 112, 1250–1263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sreedevi, P. D., Subrahmanyam, K., & Ahmed, S. (2004). The significance of morphometry analysis for obtaining groundwater potential zones in a structurally controlled terrain. Environmental Geology, 47, 417–420.
   Google Scholar
• Sreedevi, P. D., Subrahmanyam, K., & Ahmed, S. (2005). Integrated approach for delineating potential zones to explore for groundwater in the Pageru River basin, Kuddapah District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Hydrogeology Journal, 13, 534–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stock, J. D., & Montgomery, D. R. (1999). Geologic constraints on bedrock river incision using the stream power law. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 104(B3), 4983–4993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahler, A. (1957). Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transactions, American Geophysical Union, 38, 913–920.
   Google Scholar
• Strahler, A. N. (1952). Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. Bulletin of Geological Society of America, 63, 1117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahler, A. N. (1958). Dimensional analysis applied to fluvially eroded landforms. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 69, 279–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahler, A. N. (1964). Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basin and channel networks. In V. T. Chow (Ed.), Handbook of applied hydrology (pp. 4–76). New York: McGraw Hill Book Company.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, J., Joseph, S., & Thrivikramaji, K. P. (2010). Morphometric aspects of the small tropical mountain river system, the southern Western Ghats, India. International Journal of Digital Earth, 3(2), 135–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, G. E., & Bras, R. L. (1998). Hill slope processes, drainage density and landscape morphology. Water Resources Research, 34(10), 2751–2764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verstappen, H. T. (1983). Applied geomorphology‐geomorphological surveys for environmental development (pp. 57–83). New York: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Vijith, H., & Satheesh, R. (2006). GIS based morphometric analysis of two major upland sub-watersheds of Meenachil River Kerala. Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 34(2), 181–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vittala, S. S., Govindaiah, S., & Honne, G. H. (2004). Morphometric analysis of sub-watersheds in the Pawagada area of Tumkur district South India using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 32, 351–362.
   Google Scholar
• Vittala, S. S., Govindaiah, S., & Honne, G. H. (2006). Digital Elevation Model (DEM) for identification of ground water prospective zones. Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 34, 305–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, R. C., & Robinson, M. (2000). Principles of hydrology (4th ed.). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar