Changing Research Behaviours of University Students with Progression throughout a Course

References

• Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6ulJIOqe6.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: How the internet is changing the way we think, read and remember. London, UK: Atlantic Books Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Coiro, J. (2011). Talking about reading as thinking: Modeling the hidden complexities of online reading comprehension. Theory Into Practice, 50(2), 107–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cothran, T. (2011). Google Scholar acceptance and use among graduate students: A quantitative study. Library & Information Science Research, 33(4), 293–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cull, B. W. (2011). Reading revolutions: Online digital text and implications for reading in academe. First Monday, 16(6), Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3340/2985
   Google Scholar
• Dabbagh, N., & Kitsantas, A. (2012). Personal learning environments, social media, and selfregulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 15(1), 3–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Rosa, C., Cantrell, J., Hawk, J., & Wilson, A. (2006). College students’ perceptions of libraries and information resources: A report to the OCLC membership. Dublin, OH: OCLC Online Computer Library Center. Retrieved from http://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/reports/pdfs/studentperceptions.pdf Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6ulJ9YpUf.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, P. (2007). Engaging the YouTube Google‐eyed generation: Strategies for using Web 2.0 in teaching and learning. Paper presented at the European Conference on ELearning, ECEL 2007 (pp. 173–182), Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, G. B., & Payne, S. J. (2011). Skim reading by satisficing: Evidence from eye tracking. Paper presented at the CHI ‘11 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1141–1150), New York: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Eden, S., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2013). The effect of format on performance: Editing text in print versus digital formats. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(5), 846–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambrell, L. B. (2011). Seven rules of engagement: What’s most important to know about motivation to read. The Reading Teacher, 65(3), 172–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87105.
   Google Scholar
• Georgas, H. (2014). Google vs. the library (part II): Student search patterns and behaviors when using google and a federated search tool. Libraries and the Academy, 14(4), 503–532.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2008). University students’ approaches to learning: Rethinking the place of technology. Distance Education, 29(2), 141–152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., Seung, B. Y., & Copeland, D. Z. (2014). Measuring critical components of digital literacy and their relationships with learning. Computers & Education, 76, 55–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R. (2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the first ACM Conference on Learning @ scale conference, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Head, A. J. (2007). Beyond Google: How do students conduct academic research? First Monday, 12(8), Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1998/1873
   Google Scholar
• Hembrooke, H. A., Granka, L. A., Gay, G. K., & Liddy, E. D. (2005). The effects of expertise and feedback on search term selection and subsequent learning. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(8), 861–871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holman, L. (2011). Millennial students’ mental models of search: Implications for academic librarians and database developers. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(1), 19–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrastinski, S., & Aghaee, N. (2012). How are campus students using social media to support their studies? An explorative interview study. Education and Information Technologies, 17(4), 451464.
   Google Scholar
• Ji, S. W., Michaels, S., & Waterman, D. (2014). Print vs. electronic readings in college courses: Costefficiency and perceived learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 17–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, J., He, D., & Allan, J. (2014). Searching, browsing, and clicking in a search session: Changes in user behavior by task and over time. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 37th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C., Ramanau, R., Cross, S., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation or digital natives: Is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers & Education, 54(3), 722–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judd, T., & Kennedy, G. (2010). A five-year study of on-campus internet use by undergraduate biomedical students. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1564–1571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, G. E., Judd, T. S., Churchward, A., Gray, K., & Krause, K.-L. (2008). First year students’ experiences with technology: Are they really digital natives. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 108–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konnikova, M. (2014). Being a better online reader. The New Yorker, July 16. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/science/maria-konnikova/being-a-better-online-reader
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlthau, C. C. (1993). A principle of uncertainity for information seeking. Journal of Documentation, 49(4), 339–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai, C., Wang, Q., & Lei, J. (2012). What factors predict undergraduate students’ use of technology for learning? A case from Hong Kong. Computers & Education, 59(2), 569–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, E. P., & Goh, D. H. L. (2006). In search of query patterns: A case study of a university OPAC. Information Processing & Management, 42(5), 1316–1329.
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y. (2012). Undergraduate students searching and reading web sources for writing. Educational Media International, 49(3), 201–215.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z. (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment. Journal of Documentation, 61(6), 700–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z. (2012). Digital reading: An overview. Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science, 5(1), 85–94.
   Google Scholar
• Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56(2), 429–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. Paper presented at the ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Moyer, J. E. (2011). Teens today don’t read book anymore: A study of differences in comprehension and interest across formats. (Ph.D. Dissertation Ph.D. Dissertation), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Retrieved from http://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/116037/1/Moyer_umn_0130E_12132.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, P. A., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2014). The pen is mightier than the keyboard: Advantages of longhand over laptop note taking. Psychological Science, 25(6), 1159–1168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 10651078.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. (2013). Website reading: It (sometimes) does happen. Retrieved from https://www.nngroup.com/articles/website-reading/
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, R., Harper, B., Wills, S., Agostinho, S., & Hedberg, J. (2007). Describing ICT-based learning designs that promote quality learning outcomes. In H. Beetham & R. Sharpe (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age. Designing and delivering e-learning (pp. 64–80). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Prabha, C., Connaway, L. S., Olszewski, L., & Jenkins, L. R. (2007). What is enough? Satisficing information needs. Journal of Documentation, 63(1), 53–74.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash, S. S., Muthuraman, N., & Anand, R. (2017). Short-duration podcasts as a supplementary learning tool: Perceptions of medical students and impact on assessment performance. BMC Medical Education, 17, 167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Qayyum, M. A., & Smith, D. (2015). Learning from student experiences for online assessment tasks. Information Research, 20(2), 674.
   Google Scholar
• Qayyum, M. A., & Smith, D. (2017). Improving university students’ assessment-related online work. Information Research, 22, 4.
   Google Scholar
• Qayyum, M. A., & Williamson, K. (2014). The online information experiences of news-seeking young adults. Information Research, 19, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Roman, D., Thompson, K., Ernst, L., & Hakuta, K. (2016). WordSift: A free web-based vocabulary tool designed to help science teachers in integrating interactive literacy activities. Science Activities: Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 53(1), 13–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Williams, P., Huntington, P., Fieldhouse, M., Gunter, B., … Tenopir, C. (2008). The Google generation: The information behaviour of the researcher of the future. Aslib Proceedings, 60(4), 290–310..doi:10.1108/00012530810887953
   Google Scholar
• Schade, A. (2014). Video usability. Retrieved from http://www.nngroup.com/articles/videousability/
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. J., & Qayyum, M. A. (2015). Using technology to enhance the student assessment experience. International Journal of Social, Education, Economics and Management Engineering, 9, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Stoop, J., Kreutzer, P., & Kircz, J. G. (2013). Reading and learning from screens versus print: A study in changing habits. New Library World, 114(9/10), 371–383.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Subrahmanyam, K., Michikyan, M., Clemmons, C., Carrillo, R., Uhls, Y. T., & Greenfield, P. M. (2013). Learning from paper, learning from screens: Impact of screen reading and multitasking conditions on reading and writing among college students. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning (IJCBPL), 3(4), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, P. (2013). The digital natives as learners: Technology use patterns and approaches to learning. Computers & Education, 65, 12–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinreich, H., Obendorf, H., Herder, E., & Mayer, M. (2008). Not quite the average: An empirical study of web use. ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB), 2(1), 5.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. (1999). The net generation: The experiences, attitudes and behaviour of children using the Internet for their own purposes. Aslib Proceedings, 51(9), 315–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yancey, P. (2017, July 21). The death of reading is threatening the soul. Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2017/07/21/the-death-ofreading-is-threatening-the-soul/
   Google Scholar