Exploring the Reasons Why University Students Prefer Print over Digital Texts: An Australian Perspective

References

• Ben, Y. G., & Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2018). The contribution of text-highlighting to comprehension: Acomparison of print and digital reading. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 27(2), 153–178.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, S. A., Hoffmann, K., & Dawson, D. (2010). Not on the same page: Undergraduates’ information retrieval in electronic and print books. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36(6), 518–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boustany, J. (2015). Print vs. electronic: What do French students prefer in their academic reading material? Paper presented at the Third European Conference on Information Literacy (ECIL) October 19-22, 2015, Tallinn, Estonia.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, G., Cheng, W., Chang, T.-W., Zheng, X., & Huang, R. (2014). A comparison of reading comprehension across paper, computer screens, and tablets: Does tablet familiarity matter? Journal of Computers in Education, 1(2–3), 213–225.
   Google Scholar
• Clowes, R. W. (2018). Screen reading and the creation of new cognitive ecologies. AI & Society(1), 1–16. doi:10.1007/s00146-017-0785-5.
   Google Scholar
• Deakin University. (2019). Collection development. Retrieved from https://www.deakin.edu.au/library/about/collection-guidelines/colldev
   Google Scholar
• Farinosi, M., Lim, C., & Roll, J. (2016). Book or screen, pen or keyboard? A cross-cultural sociological analysis of writing and reading habits basing on Germany, Italy and the UK. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 410–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foasberg, N. M. (2014). Student reading practices in print and electronic media. College & Research Libraries, 75(5), 705–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, S. W., Michaels, S., & Waterman, D. (2014). Print vs. electronic readings in college courses: Cost-efficiency and perceived learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 21, 17–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, N., Salaz, A., & Alsabbagh, L. (2016). Print and digital reading preferences and behaviors of University students in Qatar. In Kurbanoğlu S. et al. (Eds.), Information literacy: key to an inclusive society. ECIL 2016. communications in computer and information science (Vol. 676). Springer, Cham..
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, N., & Salaz, A. M. (2018). Print versus digital preferences of university students in Australia. Paper presented at the VALA conference, Melbourne, Australia.. https://www.vala.org.au/vala2018-proceedings/vala2018-session-13-johnston/
   Google Scholar
• Kortelainen, T. (2015). Reading format preferences of finnish university students. In S. Kurbanoğlu, J. Boustany, S. Špiranec, E. Grassian, D. Mizrachi, & L. Roy (Eds.), Information Literacy: Moving Toward Sustainability: Third European Conference, ECIL 2015, Tallinn, Estonia, October 19- 22,2015, Revised Selected Papers (pp. 446–454). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z. (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of Documentation, 61(6), 700–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizrachi, D. (2015). Undergraduates’ academic reading format preferences and behaviours. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(3), 301–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizrachi, D., Boustany, J., Kurbanoğlu, S., Doğan, G., Todorova, T., & Vilar, P. (2016). The Academic Reading Format International Study (ARFIS): Investigating students around the world.  In: Kurbanoğlu S. et al. (Eds), Information literacy: Key to an inclusive society. ECIL 2016. Communications in computer and information science, (Vol. 676). Springer, Cham.
   Google Scholar
• Mizrachi, D., Salaz, A., Kurbanoglu, S., Boustany, J., & Research Team, A. R. F. I. S. (2018). Academic reading format preferences and behaviors among university students worldwide: A comparative survey analysis. PloS one, 13(5), e0197444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, L. M., & Alexander, P. A. (2017). Reading across mediums: Effects of reading digital and print texts on comprehension and calibration. The Journal of Experimental Education, 85(1), 155–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subrahmanyam, K., Michikyan, M., Clemmons, C., Carrillo, R., Uhls, Y. T., & Greenfield, P. M. (2013). Learning from paper, learning from screens: Impact of screen reading and multitasking conditions on reading and writing among college students. International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning (IJCBPL), 3(4), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Taipale, S. (2014). The affordances of reading/writing on paper and digitally in Finland. Telematics and Informatics, 31(4), 532–542.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• University of Queensland. (2017). Collection management policy Retrieved from https://web.library.uq.edu.au/collections/collection-management/collection-management-policy
   Google Scholar
• Woody, W. D., Daniel, D. B., & Baker, C. A. (2010). E-books or textbooks: Students prefer textbooks. Computers & Education, 55(3), 945–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zabukovec, V., & Vilar, P. (2015). Paper or electronic: preferences of slovenian students. In S. Kurbanoğlu, J. Boustany, S. Špiranec, E. Grassian, D. Mizrachi, & L. Roy (Eds.), Information Literacy: Moving Toward Sustainability: Third European Conference, ECIL 2015, Tallinn, Estonia, October 19- 22,2015, Revised Selected Papers (pp. 427–435). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar