Data Speaks Volumes: Evidence-Based Delivery of Library Services in a User-Centred Library

References

• Arnason, H., & Reimer, L. (2012). Analyzing public library service interactions to improve public library customer service and technology systems. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 7(1), 22–40.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, S. L. (1991). The measurement and evaluation of library services (2nd ed.). Arlington, Va.: Information Resources Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, B. W., & Bartlett, J. A. (2013). Where do we go from here? Informing academic library staffing through reference transaction analysis. College & Research Libraries, 74(5), 489–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowron, C. R., & Weber, J. E. (2017). Implementing the READ scale at the Austin Peay State university library. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(6), 518–525.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabretta, N., & Ross, R. (1984). Analysis of reference transactions using packaged computer programs. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 3(3), 23–47.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, E. (1848). A statistical view of the principal public libraries in Europe and the United States of North America. Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 11(3), 250–281.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, S. C., & Welch, J. M. (2016). Content analysis of virtual reference data: Reshaping library website design. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 35(3), 294–304.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerlich, B. K., & Berard, G. L. (2007). Introducing the READ scale: Qualitative statistics for academic reference services. Georgia Library Quarterly, 43(4), 7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlich, B. K., & Berard, G. L. (2010). Testing the viability of the READ scale [Reference effort assessment data]©: Qualitative statistics for academic reference services. College & Research Libraries, 71(2), 116–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlich, B. K., & Whatley, E. (2009). Using the READ scale for staffing strategies: The Georgia college and state university experience. Library Leadership & Management, 23(1), 26–30.
   Google Scholar
• Hudock, S., & Sullivan, D. (2011). Hit the reference transaction mark: Incorporating READ into DART. Colorado Libraries, 36(1), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, A. M. (2014). Content analysis of reference transactions provides guidance regarding staffing of library service points. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 9(2), 31–33.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, W. A. (2002). Introduction to reference work (8th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Luo, L. (2008). Chat reference evaluation: A framework of perspectives and measures. Reference Services Review, 36(1), 71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, J. R. (2018). The evaluation and measurement of library services (Second ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Maximiek, S., Rushton, E., & Brown, E. (2010). Coding into the great unknown: Analyzing instant messaging session transcripts to identify user behaviors and measure quality of service. College & Research Libraries, 71(4), 361–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neville, T. M., & Henry, D. B. (2009). Reference classification - is it time to make some changes? Reference & User Services Quarterly, 48(4), 372–383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawson, J., Davis, M. A., Harding, J., & Miller, C. (2013). Virtual reference at a global university: An analysis of patron and question type. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 7(1–2), 93–97.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, S. (1990). The measurement and evaluation of reference service. The Reference Librarian, 11(25–26), 173–190.
   Google Scholar
• Rourke, L., & Lupien, P. (2010). Learning from chatting: How our virtual reference questions are giving us answers. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 5(2), 63–74.
   Google Scholar
• Scales, B. J., Turner-Rahman, L., & Hao, F. (2015). A holistic look at reference statistics: Whither librarians? Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 10(4), 173–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan, W., Schoppmann, L. A., & Redman, P. M. (1994). Analysis of the use of reference services in an academic health sciences library. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 13(1), 35–55.
   Google Scholar
• Tenopir, C. (1998). Reference use statistics. Library Journal, 123(8), 32–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. S. (1951). History of the measurement of library service. The Library Quarterly: Information, Community, Policy, 21(2), 94–106.
   Google Scholar
• Tobias, C., & Blair, A. (2015). Listen to what you cannot hear, observe what you cannot see: An introduction to evidence-based methods for evaluating and enhancing the user experience in distance library services. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, 9(1–2), 148–156.
   Google Scholar
• Vassady, L., Archer, A., & Ackermann, E. (2015). READ-ing our way to success: Using the READ scale to successfully train reference student assistants in the referral model. Journal of Library Administration, 55(7), 535–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, D. G. (2001). A new classification for reference statistics. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 41(1), 51–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witucke, V., & Schumaker, C. J. (1991). Analyzing reference activities: The affordable solution. RQ, 31(1), 58–69.
   Google Scholar