Maximum frequency of songs reflects body size among male dusky warblers Phylloscopus fuscatus (Passeriformes: Phylloscopidae)

References

• Brumm H. 2009. Song amplitude and body size in birds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 63:1157–1165. DOI:10.1007/s00265-009-0743-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catchpole CK, Slater PJB. 2008. Bird song: biological themes and variations. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forstmeier W, Balsby T. 2002. Why mated dusky warblers sing so much: territory guarding and male quality announcement. Behaviour 139:89–111. DOI:10.1163/15685390252902300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forstmeier W, Kempenaers B, Meyer A, Leisler B. 2002. A novel song parameter correlates with extra-pair paternity and reflects male longevity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences 269:1479–1485. DOI:10.1098/rspb.2002.2039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geberzahn N, Goymann W, Muck C, Cate CT. 2009. Females alter their song when challenged in a sex-role reversed bird species. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 64:193–204. DOI:10.1007/s00265-009-0836-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall ML, Kingma SA, Peters A, Johnson N. 2013. Male songbird indicates body size with low-pitched advertising songs. PLoSOne 8:5671. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0056717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesler N, Mundry R, Sacher T, Coppack T, Bairlein F, Dabelsteen T. 2012. Song repertoire size correlates with measures of body size in Eurasian blackbirds. Behaviour 149:645–665. DOI:10.1163/156853912X649920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanitskii VV, Marova IM, Malykh IM. 2012. Between order and chaos: Contrasting syntax in the advertising song of Dusky (Phylloscopus fuscatus) and Radde’s (Ph. schwarzi) Warblers. Journal of Ornithology 153:337–346. DOI:10.1007/s10336-011-0748-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonart LM, Hill GE, Badyaev AV. 2007. Fighting ability and motivation: Determinants of dominance and contest strategies in females of a passerine bird. Animal Behaviour 74:1675–1681. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.03.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagawa H, Soma M. 2013. Song performance and elaboration as potential indicators of male quality in Java sparrows. Behavioural Processes 99:138–144. DOI:10.1016/j.beproc.2013.07.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempenaers B, Verheyen GR, Broeck MVD, Burke T, Broeckhoven CV, Dhondt A. 1992. Extra-pair paternity results from female preference for high-quality males in the blue tit. Nature 357:494–496. DOI:10.1038/357494a0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koetz AH, Westcott DA, Congdon BC. 2007. Geographical variation in song frequency and structure: The effects of vicariant isolation, habitat type and body size. Animal Behaviour 74:1573–1583. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.03.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivula K, Lahti K, Orell M, Rytkönen S. 1993. Prior residency as a key determinant of social dominance in the willow tit (Parus montanus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 33:283–287. DOI:10.1007/BF02027126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linhart P, Fuchs R. 2015. Song pitch indicates body size and correlates with males’ response to playback in a songbird. Animal Behaviour 103:91–98. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.01.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason NA, Burns KJ. 2015. The effect of habitat and body size on the evolution of vocal displays in Thraupidae (tanagers), the largest family of songbirds. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 114:538–551. DOI:10.1111/bij.12455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael W, Sarah K, Silke K. 2012. Buzzwords in females ears? The use of buzz songs in the communication of Nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos). PLoS One 7:e45057. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0045057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyashita A, Kizaki H, Sekimizu K, Kaito C, Fine ML. 2016. No effect of body size on the frequency of calling and courtship song in the two-spotted Cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus. PLoS One 11:e0146999. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0146999
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Møller AP, Ninni P. 1998. Sperm competition and sexual selection: A meta-analysis of paternity studies of birds. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 43:345–358. DOI:10.1007/s002650050501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podos J. 2001. Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin’s finches. Nature 409:185–188. DOI:10.1038/35051570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poesel A, Kunc HP, Foerster K, Johnsen A, Kempenaers B. 2006. Early birds are sexy: Male age, dawn song and extrapair paternity in blue tits Cyanistes (formerly Parus) caeruleus. Animal Behaviour 72:531–538. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.10.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potvin DA. 2013. Larger body size on islands affects silvereye Zosterops lateralis song and call frequency. Journal of Avian Biology 44:221–225. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-048X.2012.05820.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price JJ, Crawford CL. 2013. Use and characteristics of two singing modes in pine warblers. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology 125:552–561. DOI:10.1676/13-006.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price JJ, Earnshaw SM, Webster MS. 2006. Montezuma oropendolas modify a component of song constrained by body size during vocal contests. Animal Behaviour 71:799–807. DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2005.05.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuchmann M, Siemers BM, Somers M. 2010. Variability in echolocation call intensity in a community of horseshoe bats: A role for resource partitioning or communication? PLoS One 5:e12842. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0012842.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searcy WA. 1979. Morphological correlates of dominance in captive male red winged blackbirds. The Condor 81:417–420. DOI:10.2307/1366971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith M, Harper D. 2004. Animal signals. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soma M, Garamszegi LZ. 2011. Rethinking birdsong evolution: Meta-analysis of the relationship between song complexity and reproductive success. Behavioral Ecology 22:363–371. DOI:10.1093/beheco/arq219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprau P, Roth T, Amrhein V, Naguib M. 2013. The predictive value of trill performance in a large repertoire songbird, the nightingale Luscinia megarhynchos. Journal of Avian Biology 44:567–574. DOI:10.1111/jav.2013.44.issue-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tubaro PL, Mahler B. 1998. Acoustic frequencies and body mass in New World doves. The Condor 100:54–61. DOI:10.2307/1369896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar