Territory exclusivity and intergroup encounters in the indris (Mammalia: Primates: Indridae: Indri indri) upon methodological tuning

References

• Altmann J. 1974. Observational study of behavior: Sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–266. doi:10.1163/156853974X00534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asensio N, Schaffner CM, Aureli F. 2011. Variability in core areas of spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi) in a tropical dry forest in Costa Rica. Primates 53:147–156. doi:10.1007/s10329-011-0288-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker-Médard MSA, Baker MC, Logue DM. 2013. Chorus song of the indri (Indri indri: Primates, Lemuridae): Group differences and analysis of within-group vocal interactions. International Journal of Comparative Psychology 26:241–255.
   Google Scholar
• Bartlett TQ. 2003. Intragroup and intergroup social interactions in white-handed gibbons. International Journal of Primatology 24:239–259. doi:10.1023/A:1023088814263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benadi G, Fichtel C, Kappeler P. 2008. Intergroup relations and home range use in Verreaux’s sifaka (Propithecus verreauxi). American Journal of Primatology 70:956–965. doi:10.1002/ajp.v70:10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett EL. 1986. Environmental correlates of ranging behaviour in the Banded Langur, Presbytis melalophos. Folia Primatologica 47:26–38. doi:10.1159/000156261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer HL. 2004. Hawth’s analysis tools for ArcGIS. Available: http://www.spatialecology.com/htools. Accessed Dec 2015 05.
   Google Scholar
• Bonadonna G, Torti V, Randrianarison RM, Martinet N, Gamba M, Giacoma C. 2014. Behavioral correlates of extra-pair copulation in Indri indri. Primates 55:119–123. doi:10.1007/s10329-013-0376-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börger L, Franconi N, De Michele G, Gantz A, Meschi F, Manica A, Lovari S, Coulson T. 2006. Effects of sampling regime on the mean and variance of home range size estimates. Journal of Animal Ecology 75:1393–1405. doi:10.1111/jae.2006.75.issue-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulanger JG, White GC. 1990. A comparison of home-range estimators using Monte Carlo simulation. The Journal of Wildlife Management 54:310–315. doi:10.2307/3809048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briefer E, Rybak F, Aubin T. 2008. When to be a dear enemy: Flexible acoustic relationships of neighbouring skylarks, Alauda arvensis. Animal Behaviour 76:1319–1325. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.06.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt WH. 1943. Territoriality and home range concepts as applied to mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 24:346–352. doi:10.2307/1374834.
   Google Scholar
• Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM. 1987. The influence of intergroup competition on the survival and reproduction of female vervet monkeys. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 21:375–386. doi:10.1007/BF00299932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chivers DJ. 1974. The Siamang in Malaya: A field study of a primate in tropical rain forest. Basel: Karger.
   Google Scholar
• Cowlishaw G. 1992. Song function in gibbons. Behaviour 121:131–153. doi:10.1163/156853992X00471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dallmann R, Geissmann T. 2009. Individual and geographical variability in the songs of wild silvery gibbons (Hylobates moloch) on Java, Indonesia. In: Lappan SM, Whittacker D, editors. The gibbons: New perspectives on small ape socioecology and population biology. New York: Springer. pp. 91–110.
   Google Scholar
• de Silva WP, de Silva CM. 2011. Lab fit curve fitting software. Available: http://www.labfit.net. Accessed Sep 2016 10.
   Google Scholar
• Dolch R. 2003. Andasibe (Périnet): Are current efforts sufficient to protect Madagascar’s biodiversity hot spot? In: Goodman SM, Benstead JP, editors. The natural history of Madagascar. Chicago: Chicago University Press. pp. 1480–1485.
   Google Scholar
• Downs JA, Horner MW. 2008. Effects of point pattern shape on home-range estimates. The Journal of Wildlife Management 72:1813–1818. doi:10.2193/2007-454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dröscher I, Kappeler PM. 2013. Defining the low end of primate social complexity: The social organization of the nocturnal white-footed sportive lemur (Lepilemur leucopus). International Journal of Primatology 34:1225–1243. doi:10.1007/s10764-013-9735-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dröscher I, Kappeler PM. 2014a. Competition for food in a solitarily foraging folivorous primate (Lepilemur leucopus)? American Journal of Primatology 76:842–854. doi:10.1002/ajp.22272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dröscher I, Kappeler PM. 2014b. Maintenance of familiarity and social bonding via communal latrine use in a solitary primate (Lepilemur leucopus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 68:2043–2058. doi:10.1007/s00265-014-1810-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamba M, Favaro L, Torti V, Sorrentino V, Giacoma C. 2011. Vocal tract flexibility and variation in the vocal output in wild indris. Bioacoustics 20:251–265. doi:10.1080/09524622.2011.9753649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamba M, Torti V, Estienne V, Randrianarison RM, Valente D, Rovara P, Bonadonna G, Friard O, Giacoma C. 2016. The Indris have got rhythm! Timing and pitch variation of a primate song examined between sexes and age classes. Frontiers in Neuroscience 10. doi:10.3389/fnins.2016.00249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garbutt N. 1999. Mammals of Madagascar: A complete guide. U.S.A.: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giacoma C, Sorrentino V, Rabarivola C, Gamba M. 2010. Sex differences in the song of Indri indri. International Journal of Primatology 31:539–551. doi:10.1007/s10764-010-9412-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girard I, Ouellet J-P, Courtois R, Dussault C, Breton L. 2002. Effects of sampling effort based on GPS telemetry on home-range size estimations. The Journal of Wildlife Management 66:1290–1300. doi:10.2307/3802962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glessner KDG, Britt A. 2005. Population density and home range size of Indri indri in a protected low altitude rain forest. International Journal of Primatology 26:855–872. doi:10.1007/s10764-005-5326-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldizen AW. 1987. Facultative polyandry and the role of infant-carrying in wild saddle-back tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 20:99–109. doi:10.1007/BF00572631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haimoff E. 1984. Acoustic and organizational features of gibbon song. In: Preuschoft H, Chivers D, Brockelman W, Creel N, editors. The lesser apes: Evolutionary and behavioural biology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. pp. 333–353.
   Google Scholar
• Haines AM, Hernández F, Henke SE, Bingham RL. 2006. A method for determining asymptotes of home-range area curves. In: Cederbaum SB, Faircloth BC, Terhune TM, Thompson JJ, Carroll JP, editors. Gamebird, Quail VI and Perdix XII. Athens: Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources. pp. 489–498.
   Google Scholar
• Jetz W, Carbone C, Fulford J, Brown JH. 2004. The scaling of animal space use. Science 306:266–268. doi:10.1126/science.1102138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan NR, Cherry MI, Manser MB. 2007. Latrine distribution and patterns of use by wild meerkats: Implications for territory and mate defence. Animal Behaviour 73:613–622. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juarez CP, Rotundo MA, Berg W, Fernández-Duque E. 2011. Costs and benefits of radio-collaring on the behavior, demography, and conservation of owl monkeys (Aotus azarai) in Formosa, Argentina. International Journal of Primatology 32:69–82. doi:10.1007/s10764-010-9437-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenward RE, Clarke RT, Hodder KH, Walls SS. 2001. Density and linkage estimators of home range: Nearest-neighbor clustering defines multinuclear cores. Ecology 82:1905–1920. doi:10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1905:DALEOH]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch F, Signer J, Kappeler PM, Fichtel C. 2016. Intergroup encounters in Verreaux’s sifakas (Propithecus verreauxi): Who fights and why? Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 70:797–808. doi:10.1007/s00265-016-2105-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koda H, Oyakawa C, Nurulkamilah S, Sugiura H, Bakar A, Masataka N. 2012. Male replacement and stability of territorial boundary in a group of agile gibbons (Hylobates agilis agilis) in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Primates 53:327–332. doi:10.1007/s10329-012-0313-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Komers PE, Brotherton PNM. 1997. Female space use is the best predictor of monogamy in mammals. Proceedings: Biological Science 264:1261–1270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs JR. 1977. Song and territory in the great tit Parus major. In: Stonehouse B, Perrins C, editors. Evolutionary Ecology. London: MacMillan. pp. 47–62.
   Google Scholar
• Lair H. 1987. Estimating the location of the focal center in red squirrel home ranges. Ecology 68:1092–1101. doi:10.2307/1938381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver PN, Kelly MJ. 2008. A critical review of home range studies. The Journal of Wildlife Management 72:290–298. doi:10.2193/2005-589.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazaro-Perea C. 2001. Intergroup interactions in wild common marmosets, Callithrix jacchus: Territorial defence and assessment of neighbours. Animal Behaviour 62:11–21. doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowen C, Dunbar RIM. 1994. Territory size and defendability in primates. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 35:347–354. doi:10.1007/BF00184423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukas D, Clutton-Brock TH. 2013. The evolution of social monogamy in mammals. Science 341:526–530. doi:10.1126/science.1238677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manson JH, Wrangham RW. 1991. Intergroup aggression in chimpanzees and humans. Current Anthropology 32:369–390. doi:10.1086/203974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maretti G, Sorrentino V, Finomana A, Gamba M, Giacoma C. 2010. Not just a pretty song: An overview of the vocal repertoire of Indri indri. Journal of Anthropological Science 88:151–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell WJ, Sweeney SP. 2005. Challenges of forest governance in Madagascar. The Geographical Journal 171:223–238. doi:10.1111/geoj.2005.171.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald MV. 1989. Function of song in Scott’s seaside sparrow, Ammodramus maritimus peninsulae. Animal Behaviour 38:468–485. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(89)80040-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitani JC, Rodman PS. 1979. Territoriality: The relation of ranging pattern and home range size to defendability, with an analysis of territoriality among primate species. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 5:241–251. doi:10.1007/BF00293673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitani JC, Watts D, Amsler S. 2010. Lethal intergroup aggression leads to territorial expansion in wild chimpanzees. Current Biology 20:R507–R508. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2010.04.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittermeier RA, Louis EE, Richardson M, Schwitzer C, Langrand O, Rylands AB, Hawkins F, Rajaobelina S, Ratsimbazafy J, Rasoloarison R, Roos C, Kappeler PM, MacKinnon J. 2010. Lemurs of Madagascar. 3rd ed. Tropical Field Guide Series. Arlington: Conservation International.
   Google Scholar
• Morton ES. 1986. Predictions from the ranging hypothesis for the evolution of long distance signals in birds. Behaviour 99:65–86. doi:10.1163/156853986X00414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicoll ME, Langrand O. 1989. Madagascar: Revue de la conservation et des Aires Protégées. Gland: WWF.
   Google Scholar
• Nievergelt CM, Mutschler T, Feistner ATC. 1998. Group encounters and territoriality in wild Alaotran gentle lemurs (Hapalemur griseus alaotrensis). American Journal of Primatology 46:251–258. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1998)46:3<251::AID-AJP5>3.0.CO;2-H.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock JI. 1975. Field observations on Indri indri: A preliminary report. In: Tattersall I, Sussman RW, editors. Lemur Biology. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock JI. 1979. Spatial distribution and ranging behavior in lemurs. In: Doyle GA, Martin RD, editors. The study of prosimian behavior. New York: Academic Press. pp. 359–409.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock JI. 1986. The song of the indris (Indri indri; Primates: Lemuroidea): Natural history, form, and function. International Journal of Primatology 7:225–264. doi:10.1007/BF02736391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell RA. 2000. Animal home ranges and territories and home range estimators. In: Boitani L, Fuller T, editors. Research techniques in animal ecology: controversies and consequences. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 65–110.
   Google Scholar
• Powzyk JA. 1997. The socio-ecology of two sympatric indriids: Propithecus diadema diadema and Indri indri, a comparison of feeding strategies and their possible repercussions on species-specific behaviors. PhD dissertation, Duke University.
   Google Scholar
• Powzyk JA, Mowry CB. 2003. Dietary and feeding differences between sympatric Propithecus diadema diadema and Indri indri. International Journal of Primatology 24:1143–1162. doi:10.1023/B:IJOP.0000005984.36518.94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powzyk JA, Mowry CB. 2006. The feeding ecology and related adaptations of Indri indri. In: Gould L, Sauther MS, editors. Lemurs: Ecology and adaptation. New York: Springer. pp. 353–368.
   Google Scholar
• Price EC, Piedade HM. 2001. Ranging behavior and intraspecific relationships of masked titi monkeys (Callicebus personatus personatus). American Journal of Primatology 53:87–92. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratsimbasafy J, Ralison JM, Rabarison H, Randrianarison RM, Manesimana RM, Rasolondraibe LT, Rasoarivelo DS. 2008. Préservation de la biodiversité de Maromizaha. Rapport Technique. Available: http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADS090.pdf. Accessed Sep 2016 15.
   Google Scholar
• Reichard UH, Sommer V. 1997. Group encounters in wild gibbons (Hylobates lar): Agonism, affiliation, and the concept of infanticide. Behaviour 134:1135–1174. doi:10.1163/156853997X00106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Row JR, Blouin-Demers G. 2006. Kernels are not accurate estimators of home-range size for herpetofauna. Copeia 2006:797–802. doi:10.1643/0045-8511(2006)6[797:KANAEO]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seaman DE, Millspaugh JJ, Kernohan BJ, Brundige GC, Raedeke KJ, Gitzen RA. 1999. Effects of sample size on kernel home range estimates. The Journal of Wildlife Management 63:739–747. doi:10.2307/3802664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Signer J, Balkenhol N, Ditmer M, Fieberg J. 2015. Does estimator choice influence our ability to detect changes in home-range size? Animal Biotelemetry 3:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Sorrentino V, Gamba M, Giacoma C. 2013. A quantitative description of the vocal types emitted in the indri’s song. In: Masters JC, Gamba M, Genin F, editors. Leaping ahead: Advances in prosimian biology (Developments in primatology: Progress and prospects). New York: Springer Science + Business Media. pp. 315–322.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer WD. 2012. Home ranges and the value of spatial information. Journal of Mammalogy 93:929–947. doi:10.1644/12-MAMM-S-061.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Struhsaker TT. 1974. Correlates of ranging behavior in a group of red colobus monkeys (Colobus badius tephrosceles). American Zoologist 14:177–184. doi:10.1093/icb/14.1.177.
   Google Scholar
• Swihart RK, Slade NA. 1985. Influence of sampling interval on estimates of home-range size. The Journal of Wildlife Management 49:1019–1025. doi:10.2307/3801388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terleph TA, Malaivijitnond S, Reichard UH. 2015. Lar gibbon (Hylobates lar) great call reveals individual caller identity. American Journal of Primatology 77:811–821. doi:10.1002/ajp.22406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torti V, Gamba M, Rabemananjara Z, Giacoma C. 2013. The songs of the indris (Mammalia: Primates: Indridae): Contextual variation in the long-distance calls of a lemur. Italian Journal of Zoology 80:596–607. doi:10.1080/11250003.2013.845261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torti V, Sorrentino V, Giacoma C, Gamba M. 2010. Acoustic potential for reference-like communication in wild indris. In: Smith ADM, Schouwstra M, de Boer B, Smith K, editors. The evolution of language. Proceedings of the 8th international conference on the evolution of language. Singapore: World Scientific. pp. 505–596.
   Google Scholar
• Watts DP, Mitani JC. 2001. Boundary patrols and intergroup encounters in wild chimpanzees. Behaviour 138:299–327. doi:10.1163/15685390152032488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitten A. 1982. The ecology of singing in Kloss gibbons (Hylobates klossii) on Siberut Island, Indonesia. International Journal of Primatology 3:33–51. doi:10.1007/BF02693489.
   Google Scholar
• Wich SA, Nunn CL. 2002. Do male “long-distance calls“ function in mate defense? A comparative study of long-distance calls in primates. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 52:474–484. doi:10.1007/s00265-002-0541-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems EP, Hellriegel B, Van Schaik CP. 2013. The collective action problem in primate territory economics. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 280:20130081. doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.0081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems EP, Van Schaik CP. 2015. Collective action and the intensity of between-group competition in nonhuman primates. Behavioral Ecology 26:625–631. doi:10.1093/beheco/arv001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worton BJ. 1987. A review of models of home range for animal movement. Ecological Modelling 38:277–298. doi:10.1016/0304-3800(87)90101-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Fei H-L, Yuan S-D, Sun W-M, Ni Q-Y, Cui L-W, Fan P-F. 2014. Ranging behavior of eastern hoolock gibbon (Hoolock leuconedys) in a northern montane forest in Gaoligongshan, Yunnan, China. Primates 55:239–247. doi:10.1007/s10329-013-0394-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao D, Chen Z, Li B, Romero T. 2013. Sex-specific participation in inter-group conflicts within a multilevel society: The first evidence at the individual level. Integrative Zoology 8:441–454. doi:10.1111/inz2.2013.8.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar