Differential genetic variability at two mtDNA COI regions does not imply mismatches in Odonata molecular identification performances

References

• Andújar C, Arribas P, Yu DW, Vogler AP, Emerson BC. 2018. Why the COI barcode should be the community DNA metabarcode for the metazoa. Molecular Ecology 27(20):3968–3975. DOI: 10.1111/mec.14844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballare EF, Ware JL. 2011. Dragons fly, biologists classify: An overview of molecular odonate studies, and our evolutionary understanding of dragonfly and damselfly (Insecta: Odonata) behavior. International Journal of Odonatology 14(2):137–147. DOI: 10.1080/13887890.2011.579538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann T, Rach J, Damm S, DeSalle R, Schierwater B, Hadrys H. 2013. The potential of distance-based thresholds and character-based DNA barcoding for defining problematic taxonomic entities by CO1 and ND1. Molecular Ecology Resources 13(6):1069–1081. DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergsten J, Bilton DT, Fujisawa T, Elliott M, Monaghan MT, Balke M, Hendrich L, Geijer J, Herrmann J, Foster GN, Ribera I, Nilsson AN, Barraclough TG, Vogler AP. 2012. The effect of geographical scale of sampling on DNA barcoding. Systematic Biology 61(5):851–869. DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/sys037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bried J, Ries L, Smith B, Patten M, Abbott J, Ball-Damerow J, Cannings R, Cordero-Rivera A, Córdoba-Aguilar A, De Marco Jr P, Dijkstra KD, Dolný A, Van Grunsven R, Halstead D, Harabiš F, Hassall C, Jeanmougin M, Jones C, Juen L, Kalkman V, Kietzka G, Mazzacano CS, Orr A, Perron MA, Rocha-Ortega M, Sahlén G, Samways M, Siepielski A, Simaika J, Suhling F, Underhill L, White E. 2020. Towards global volunteer monitoring of odonate abundance. BioScience 70(10):914–923. DOI: 10.1093/biosci/biaa092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bried JT, D’Amico F, Samways MJ. 2012. A critique of the dragonfly delusion hypothesis: Why sampling exuviae does not avoid bias. Insect Conservation and Diversity 5(5):398–402. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2011.00171.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown SD, Collins RA, Boyer S, Lefort MC, Malumbres-Olarte J, Vink CJ, Cruickshank RH. 2012. Spider: An R package for the analysis of species identity and evolution, with particular reference to DNA barcoding. Molecular Ecology Resources 12(3):562–565. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03108.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee S, Córdoba-Aguilar A, Duryea MC, Futahashi R, Hansson B, Lorenzo-Carballa MO, Schilder R, Stoks R, Suvorov A, Svensson EI, Swaegers J, Takahashi Y, Watts PC, Wellenreuther M. 2016. Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies) as a bridge between ecology and evolutionary genomics. Frontiers in Zoology 13:46. DOI: 10.1186/s12983-016-0176-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bybee SM, Bracken-Grissom H, Haynes BD, Hermansen RA, Byers RL, Clement MJ, Udall JA, Wilcox ER, Crandall KA. 2011. Targeted amplicon sequencing (TAS): A scalable next-gen approach to multilocus, multitaxa phylogenetics. Genome Biology and Evolution 3:1312–1323. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evr106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Córdoba-Aguilar A. 2008. Dragonflies and damselflies: Model organisms for ecological and evolutionary research. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230693.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Cruaud P, Rasplus JY, Rodriguez LJ, Cruaud A. 2017. High-throughput sequencing of multiple amplicons for barcoding and integrative taxonomy. Scientific Reports 7(1):41948. DOI: 10.1038/srep41948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cywinska A, Hannan MA, Kevan PG, Roughley RE, Iranpour M, Hunter FF. 2010. Evaluation of DNA barcoding and identification of new haplomorphs in Canadian deerflies and horseflies. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 24(4):382–410. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2010.00896.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damm S, Schierwater B, Hadrys H. 2010. An integrative approach to species discovery in odonates: From character-based DNA barcoding to ecology. Molecular Ecology 19(18):3881–3893. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04720.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D. 2012. jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9(8):772. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deagle BE, Jarman SN, Coissac E, Pompanon F, Taberlet P. 2014. DNA metabarcoding and the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I marker: Not a perfect match. Biology Letters 9(9):20140562. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeSalle R, Goldstein PZ. 2019. Review and interpretation of trends in DNA barcoding. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 7:302. DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra KDB, Kalkman VJ, Dow RA, Stokvis FR, Van Tol JAN. 2014b. Redefining the damselfly families: A comprehensive molecular phylogeny of Z ygoptera (O donata). Systematic Entomology 39(1):68–96. DOI: 10.1111/syen.12035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra KDB, Monaghan MT, Pauls SU. 2014a. Freshwater biodiversity and aquatic insect diversification. Annual Review of Entomology 59(1):143–163. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ento-011613-161958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorková M, Krištín A, Jarčuška B, Kaňuch P. 2020. The mosaic distribution pattern of two sister bush-cricket species and the possible role of reproductive interference. Ecology and Evolution 10(5):2570–2578. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberle J, Ahrens D, Mayer C, Niehuis O, Misof B. 2020. A plea for standardized nuclear markers in metazoan DNA taxonomy. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 35(4):336–345. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbrecht V, Braukmann TWA, Ivanova NV, Prosser SWJ, Hajibabaei M, Wright M, Zakharov EV, Hebert PDN, Steinke D. 2019. Validation of COI metabarcoding primers for terrestrial arthropods. PeerJ 7:e7745. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.7745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira S, Lorenzo-Carballa MO, Torres-Cambas Y, Cordero-Rivera A, Thompson DJ, Watts PC. 2014b. New EPIC nuclear DNA sequence markers to improve the resolution of phylogeographic studies of coenagrionids and other odonates. International Journal of Odonatology 17(2–3):135–147. DOI: 10.1080/13887890.2014.950698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira S, Velo-Anton G, Brochard C, Vieira C, Alves PC, Thompson DJ, Watts PC, Brito JC. 2014a. A Critically Endangered new dragonfly species from Morocco: Onychogomphus boudoti sp. nov. (Odonata: Gomphidae). Zootaxa 3856(3):349–365. DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3856.3.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galimberti A, Assandri G, Maggioni D, Ramazzotti F, Baroni D, Bazzi G, Chiandetti I, Corso A, Ferri V, Galuppi M, Ilahiane L, La Porta G, Laddaga L, Landi F, Mastropasqua F, Ramellini S, Santinelli R, Soldato G, Surdo S, Casiraghi M. 2021. Italian odonates in the Pandora’s box: A comprehensive DNA barcoding inventory shows taxonomic warnings at the Holarctic scale. Molecular Ecology Resources 21(1):183–200. DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaytán Á, Bergsten J, Canelo T, Pérez‐Izquierdo C, Santoro M, Bonal R. 2020. DNA Barcoding and geographical scale effect: The problems of undersampling genetic diversity hotspots. Ecology and Evolution 10(19):10754–10772. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.6733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gueuning M, Frey JE, Praz C. 2020. Ultraconserved yet informative for species delimitation: Ultraconserved elements resolve long-standing systematic enigma in Central European bees. Molecular Ecology 29(21):4203–4220. DOI: 10.1111/mec.15629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajibabaei M, Porter TM, Wright M, Rudar J. 2019. COI metabarcoding primer choice affects richness and recovery of indicator taxa in freshwater systems. PLoS One 14(9):e0220953. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassall C. 2015. Odonata as candidate macroecological barometers for global climate change. Freshwater Science 34(3):1040–1049. DOI: 10.1086/682210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kajtoch Ł, Montagna M, Wanat M. 2018. Species delimitation within the Bothryorrhynchapion weevils: Multiple evidence from genetics, morphology and ecological associations. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 120:354–363. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2017.12.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: Improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(4):772–780. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mst010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodandaramaiah U, Wahlberg N. 2009. Phylogeny and biogeography of Coenonympha butterflies (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) - Patterns of colonization in the Holarctic. Systematic Entomology 34:315–323. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2008.00453.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koroiva R, Kvist S. 2018. Estimating the barcoding gap in a global dataset of cox1 sequences for Odonata: Close, but no cigar. Mitochondrial DNA Part A 29(5):765–771. DOI: 10.1080/24701394.2017.1357709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühn AL, Haase M. 2020. QUIDDICH: QUick IDentification of DIagnostic CHaracters. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 58(1):22–26. DOI: 10.1111/jzs.12347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. 2018. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35(6):1547–1549. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msy096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecocq T, Biella P, Martinet B, Rasmont P. 2020. Too strict or too loose? Integrative taxonomic assessment of Bombus lapidarius complex (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Zoologica Scripta 49(2):187–196. DOI: 10.1111/zsc.12402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecocq T, Vereecken NJ, Michez D, Dellicour S, Lhomme P, Valterova I, Rasplus JY, Rasmont P. 2013. Patterns of genetic and reproductive traits differentiation in mainland vs. Corsican Populations of Bumblebees. PLoS One 8(6):e65642. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Estrada EK, Fernández JB, Cardo-Maeso N, Montejano ST, Diaz-Martinez C. 2020. Onychogomphus cazuma sp. nov. from Spain: Molecular and morphological evidence supports the discovery of a new European dragonfly species (Odonata: Gomphidae). Odonatologica 49:125–154. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.3823337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May ML. 2019. Odonata: Who they are and what they have done for us lately: Classification and ecosystem services of dragonflies. Insects 10(3):62. DOI: 10.3390/insects10030062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer CP, Paulay G. 2005. DNA barcoding: Error rates based on comprehensive sampling. PLoS Biology 3(12):e422. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paknia O, Bergmann T, Hadrys H. 2015. Some ‘ant’swers: Application of a layered barcode approach to problems in ant taxonomy. Molecular Ecology Resources 15(6):1262–1274. DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce M. 2019. Filling in the gaps: Adopting ultraconserved elements alongside COI to strengthen metabarcoding studies. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 7:469. DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00469.
   Google Scholar
• Platania L, Vodă R, Dincă V, Talavera G, Vila R, Dapporto L. 2020. Integrative analyses on Western Palearctic Lasiommata reveal a mosaic of nascent butterfly species. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 58(4):809–822. DOI: 10.1111/jzs.12356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puillandre N, Brouillet S, Achaz G. 2021. ASAP: Assemble species by automatic partitioning. Molecular Ecology Resources 21(2):609–620. DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available: https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Rach J, Bergmann T, Paknia O, DeSalle R, Schierwater B, Hadrys H. 2017. The marker choice: Unexpected resolving power of an unexplored CO1 region for layered DNA barcoding approaches. PLoS One 12(4):e0174842. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rach J, DeSalle R, Sarkar IN, Schierwater B, Hadrys H. 2008. Character-based DNA barcoding allows discrimination of genera, species and populations in Odonata. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275(1632):237–247. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rambaut A, Suchard MA, Drummond AJ 2014. Tracer v1.6. Available from http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer
   Google Scholar
• Ratnasingham S, Hebert PD. 2007. BOLD: The barcode of life data system. Molecular Ecology Notes 7(3):355–364. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2006.01678.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratnasingham S, Hebert PD. 2013. A DNA-based registry for all animal species: The Barcode Index Number (BIN) system. PLoS One 8(7):e66213. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reemer M, Ståhls G. 2013. Phylogenetic relationships of Microdontinae (Diptera: Syrphidae) based on molecular and morphological characters. Systematic Entomology 38(4):661–688. DOI: 10.1111/syen.12020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribera I, Vogler AP, Balke M. 2008. Phylogeny and diversification of diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Cladistics 24(4):563–590. DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2007.00192.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe AD, Sperling FA. 2007. Patterns of evolution of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase I and II DNA and implications for DNA barcoding. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 44(1):325–345. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2006.12.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Van Der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61(3):539–542. DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozas J, Ferrer-Mata A, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Guirao-Rico S, Librado P, Ramos-Onsins SE, Sánchez-Gracia A. 2017. DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34(12):3299–3302. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msx248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvi D, Berrilli E, D’Alessandro P, Biondi M. 2020. Sharpening the DNA barcoding tool through a posteriori taxonomic validation: The case of Longitarsus flea beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). PLoS One 34(5):e0233573. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schorr M, Paulson D 2021. World Odonata list. Electronic Database. Available: https://www.pugetsound.edu/academics/academic-resources/slater-museum/biodiversity-resources/dragonflies/world-odonata-list2/. Accessed February 2021 1.
   Google Scholar
• Simon C, Frati F, Beckenbach A, Crespi B, Liu H, Flook P. 1994. Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87(6):651–701. DOI: 10.1093/aesa/87.6.651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solano E, Hardersen S, Audisio P, Amorosi V, Senczuk G, Antonini G. 2018. Asymmetric hybridization in Cordulegaster (Odonata: Cordulegastridae): Secondary postglacial contact and the possible role of mechanical constraints. Ecology and Evolution 8(19):9657–9671. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: A tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30(9):1312–1313. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefanni S, Stanković D, Borme D, De Olazabal A, Juretić T, Pallavicini A, Tirelli V. 2018. Multi-marker metabarcoding approach to study mesozooplankton at basin scale. Scientific Reports 8(1):12085. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-30157-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termaat T, Van Strien AJ, Van Grunsven RHA, De Knijf G, Bjelke U, Burbach K, Conze KJ, Goffart P, Hepper D, Kalkman VJ, Motte G, Prins MD, Prunier F, Sparrow D, Van Den Top GG, Vanappelghem C, Winterholler M, WallisDeVries MF. 2019. Distribution trends of European dragonflies under climate change. Diversity & Distributions 25(6):936–950. DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia X. 2000. Data analysis in molecular biology and evolution. Boston, USA: Kluver Academic Publishers. DOI: 10.1007/b113439.
   Google Scholar
• Xia X, Xie Z. 2001. DAMBE: Software package for data analysis in molecular biology and evolution. Journal of Heredity 92(4):371–373. DOI: 10.1093/jhered/92.4.371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Kapli P, Pavlidis P, Stamatakis A. 2013. A general species delimitation method with applications to phylogenetic placements. Bioinformatics 29(22):2869–2876. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar