The role of nature reserves in preserving saproxylic biodiversity: using longhorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) as bioindicators

References

• Baselga A, Orme D, Villeger S, De Bortoli J, Leprieur F, Logez M. 2020. betapart: Partitioning beta diversity into turnover and nestedness components. R package version 1.5.2. Available: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=betapart. Accessed Nov 2020 5.
   Google Scholar
• Basset Y, Lamarre G. 2019. Toward a world that values insects. Science 364(6447):1230–1231. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaw7071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastrup-Birk A, Neville P, Chirici G, Houston T. 2007. The BioSoil Forest biodiversity field manual. Hamburg, Germany: ICP Forests.
   Google Scholar
• Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1):1–48. Accessed Oct 2019 22. DOI: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhargava VK 2009. Assessing the potential role of Coleoptera (Insecta) as bioindicators in Simbalbara wildlife sanctuary. PhD thesis, Himachal Pradesh: Saurashtra University, Gujarat, India.
   Google Scholar
• Borowski J. 2001. Valorization of the Białowieża primeval forest by zooindication method using tree-fungus beetles (Coleoptera). The attempt of assessment valorization of the forests in the Białowieża primeval forest by zooindication method. Szujecki, A. editors. pp. 287–317. Warsaw, Poland: SGGW Press. (in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Boucher J, Azeria ET, Ibarzabal J, Hébert C. 2012. Saproxylic beetles in disturbed boreal forests: Temporal dynamics, habitat associations, and community structure. Écoscience 19(4):328–343. DOI: 10.2980/19-4-3503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouget C, Brustel H, Brin A, Valladares L. 2009. Evaluation of window flight traps for effectiveness at monitoring dead wood-associated beetles: The effect of ethanol lure under contrasting environmental conditions. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 11(2):143–152. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2008.00400.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouget C, Larrieu L, Nusillard B, Parmian G. 2013. In search of the best habitat drivers for saproxylic beetle diversity in temperate deciduous forests. Biodiversity and Conservation 22(9):2111–2130. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-013-0531-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouget C, Parmain G. 2016. Effects of landscape design of forest reserves on saproxylic beetle diversity. Conservation Biology 30(1):92–102. DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouget C, Parmain G, Gilg O, Noblecourt T, Nusillard B, Paillet Y, Gosselin F. 2014. Does a set-aside conservation strategy help the restoration of old-growth forest attributes and recolonization by saproxylic beetles? Animal Conservation 17(4):342–353. DOI: 10.1111/acv.12101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bujoczek L, Bujoczek M, Zięba S. 2021. How much, why and where? Deadwood in forest ecosystems: The case of Poland. Ecological Indicators 121:107027. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buse J, Entling MH, Ranius T, Assmann T. 2016. Response of saproxylic beetles to small-scale habitat connectivity depends on trophic levels. Landscape Ecology 31(5):939–949. DOI: 10.1007/s10980-015-0309-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byk A. 2001a. Valorization of older tree-stands in Białowieża primeval forest based on the structure of communities of beetles (Coleoptera) associated with decaying wood of standing dead tree trunks and hollows. The attempt of assessment valorization of the forests in the Białowieża primeval forest by zooindication method. Szujecki, A. editors. pp. 333–367. Warsaw, Poland: SGGW Press. (in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Byk A. 2001b. Valorization of older tree-stands in Białowieża Primeval Forest based on the structure of communities of beetles (Coleoptera) associated with decaying wood of lying trunks and stumps. The attempt of assessment valorization of the forests in the Białowieża primeval forest by zooindication method. Szujecki, A. editors. pp. 369–393. Warsaw, Poland: SGGW Press. (in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Cardoso P, Leather SR. 2019. Predicting a global insect apocalypse. Insect Conservation and Diversity 12(4):263–267. DOI: 10.1111/icad.12367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central Register of Forms of Nature Protection. 2020. Available: http://crfop.gdos.gov.pl/CRFOP/search.jsf. Accessed Oct 2020 30.
   Google Scholar
• Czerepko J. 2008. Biodiversity condition of polish forests on the basis of monitoring plots. Synthesis of the results obtained in the framework of the biosoil forest biodiversity project. Sękocin Stary, Poland: Forest Research Institute. (in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• De Zan LR, Bellotti F, D’Amato D, Carpaneto GM. 2014. Saproxylic beetles in three relict beech forests of central Italy: Analysis of environmental parameters and implications for forest management. Forest Ecology and Management 328:229–244. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.05.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Rocca F, Stefanelli S, Pasquaretta C, Campanaro A, Bogliani G. 2014. Effect of deadwood management on saproxylic beetle richness in the floodplain forests of northern Italy: Some measures for deadwood sustainable use. Journal of Insect Conservation 18(1):121–136. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-014-9620-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerfler I, Gossner MM, Müller J, Seibold S, Weisser WW. 2018. Deadwood enrichment combining integrative and segregative conservation elements enhances biodiversity of multiple taxa in managed forests. Biological Conservation 228:70–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.10.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollin PE, Majka CHG, Duinker PN. 2008. Saproxylic beetle (Coleoptera) communities and forest management practices in coniferous stands in southwestern Nova Scotia, Canada. Zookeys 2:291–336. DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.2.15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckelt A, Müller J, Bense U, Brustel H, Bußler H, Chittaro Y, Cizek L, Frei A, Holzer E, Kadej M, Kahlen M, Köhler F, Möller G, Mühle H, Sanchez A, Schaffrath U, Schmidl J, Smolis A, Szallies A, Németh T, Wurst C, Thorn S, Christensen RHB, Seibold S. 2018. “Primeval forest relict beetles” of Central Europe: A set of 168 umbrella species for the protection of primeval forest remnants. Journal of Insect Conservation 22(1):15–28. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-017-0028-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fayt P, Dufrene M, Branquart E, Hastir P, Pontegnie C, Henin JM, Versteirt V. 2006. Contrasting responses of saproxylic insects to focal habitat resources: The example of longhorn beetles and hoverflies in Belgian deciduous forests. Journal of Insect Conservation 10(2):129–150. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-006-6289-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer B, Larson BMH. 2019. Collecting insects to conserve them: A call for ethical caution. Insect Conservation and Diversity 12(3):173–182. DOI: 10.1111/icad.12344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forest Data Bank. 2017. Available: www.bdl.lasy.gov.pl/portal/mapy-en. Accessed May 2017 12.
   Google Scholar
• Głowaciński Z, Nowacki J. 2004. Polish red data book of animals. Invertebrates. Kraków, Poland: IOP PAN.
   Google Scholar
• Gossner MM, Floren A, Weisser WW, Linsenmair KE. 2013. Effect of dead wood enrichment in the canopy and on the forest floor on beetle guild composition. Forest Ecology and Management 302:404–413. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.03.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gossner MM, Wende B, Levick S, Schall P, Floren A, Linsenmair KE, Steffan-Dewenter I, Schulze ED, Weisser WW. 2016. Deadwood enrichment in European forests – Which tree species should be used to promote saproxylic beetle diversity? Biological Conservation 201:92–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.06.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greń C, Królik R, Szołtys H. 2012. The red list of beetles (Coleoptera) of the Silesian Voivodship. reports opinions 6. Conservation strategy of nature of the Silesian Voivodship by 2030. Report on the state of nature of the Silesian Voivodship 4. Parusel, J.B. editors. pp. 37–70. Katowice, Poland: Upper Silesian Nature Heritage Center. (in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Grove SJ. 2002. Saproxylic insect ecology and the sustainable management of forests. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 33(1):1–23. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.010802.150507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutowski JM, Buchholz L, Kubisz D, Ossowska M, Sućko K. 2006. Saproxylic beetles as indicator of deformation of pine forest ecosystems. Leśne Prace Badawcze 4:101–144. (in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Gutowski JM, Kubisz D, Sućko K, Zub K. 2010. The succession of saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) on windthrow areas in the Scots pine stands of the Piska Forest. Leśne Prace Badawcze 71(3):279–298. (in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Heikkala O, Seibold S, Koivula M, Martikainen P, Müller J, Thorn S, Kouki J. 2016. Retention forestry and prescribed burning result in functionally different saproxylic beetle assemblages than clear-cutting. Forest Ecology and Management 359:51–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2015.09.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilszczański J, Gibb H, Bystrowski C. 2007. Insect natural enemies of Ips typographus (L.) (Coleoptera, Scolytinae) in managed and unmanaged stands of mixed lowland forest in Poland. Journal of Pest Science 80(2):99–107. DOI: 10.1007/s10340-006-0160-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjältén J, Stenbacka F, Pettersson RB, Gibb H, Johansson T, Danell K, Ball JP, Hilszczański J. 2012. Micro and macro-habitat associations in saproxylic beetles: Implications for biodiversity management. PloS One 7(7):e41100. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland JD. 2007. Sensitivity of Cerambycid biodiversity indicators to definition of high diversity. Biodiversity and Conservation 16(9):2599–2609. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-006-9066-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horák J, Chumanová E, Hilszczański J. 2011. Saproxylic beetle thrives on the openness in management: A case study on the ecological requirements of Cucujus cinnaberinus from Central Europe. Insect Conservation and Diversity 5(6):403–413. DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2011.00173.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Interactive map of RDST in Katowice. 2017. Available: http://mapa.katowice.lasy.gov.pl/. Accessed Apr 2017 5.
   Google Scholar
• Invertebrate Link (JCCBI). 2002. A code of conduct for collecting insects and other invertebrates. British Journal of Entomology and Natural History 15(1):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Jaworski T, Plewa R, Tarwacki G, Sućko K, Hilszczański J, Horák J. 2019. Ecologically similar saproxylic beetles depend on diversified deadwood resources: From habitat requirements to management implications. Forest Ecology and Management 449:117462. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsell M, Nitterus K, Stighäll K. 2004. Saproxylic beetles in natural and man-made deciduous high stumps retained for conservation. Biological Conservation 118(2):163–173. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2003.08.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpiński L, Rutkowski T, Szczepański WT. 2017. First record of phoresy of Dendrochernes cyrneus (L. Koch, 1873) (Pseudoscorpiones, Chernetidae) on Cerambyx cerdo Linnaeus, 1758 (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae) and their potential value as bioindicators. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 40(2):187–192. DOI: 10.32800/abc.2017.40.0187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpiński L, Szczepański WT, Kruszelnicki L. 2020. Revision of the Ropalopus ungaricus/insubricus group (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae: Callidiini) from the western Palaearctic region. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 189(4):1176–1216. DOI: 10.1093/zoolinnean/zlz154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachat T, Chumak M, Chumak V, Jakoby O, Müller J, Tanadini M, Wermelinger B. 2016. Influence of canopy gaps on saproxylic beetles in primeval beech forests: A case study from the Uholka-Shyrokyi Luh forest, Ukraine. Insect Conservation and Diversity 9(6):559–573. DOI: 10.1111/icad.12188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachat T, Peveling R, Atignon S, Goergen G, Sinsin B, Nagel P. 2007. Saproxylic beetle assemblages on native and exotic snags in a West African tropical forest. African Entomology 15(1):13–24. DOI: 10.4001/1021-3589-15.1.13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachat T, Wermelinger B, Gossner MM, Bussler H, Isacsson G, Müller J. 2012. Saproxylic beetles as indicator species for dead-wood amount and temperature in European beech forests. Ecological Indicators 23:323–331. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.04.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassauce A, Paillet Y, Jactel H, Bouget C. 2011. Deadwood as a surrogate for forest biodiversity: Meta-analysis of correlations between deadwood volume and species richness of saproxylic organisms. Ecological Indicators 11(5):1027–1039. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maeto K, Sato S, Miyata H. 2002. Species diversity of longicorn beetles in humid warm-temperate forests: The impact of forest management practices on old-growth forest species in south-western Japan. Biodiversity and Conservation 11(11):1919–1937. DOI: 10.1023/A:1020849012649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makino S, Goto H, Hasegawa M, Okabe K, Tanaka H, Inoue T, Okochi I. 2007. Degradation of longicorn beetle (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae, Disteniidae) fauna caused by conversion from broad-leaved to man-made conifer stands of Cryptomeria japonica (Taxodiaceae) in central Japan. Ecological Research 22(3):372–381. DOI: 10.1007/s11284-007-0359-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makino S, Goto H, Inoue T, Sueyoshi M, Okabe K, Hasegawa M, Hamaguchi K, Tanaka H, Okochi I. 2006. The monitoring of insects to maintain biodiversity in Ogawa forest reserve. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 120(1–3):477–485. DOI: 10.1007/s10661-005-9074-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margalef R. 1958. Information theory in ecology. International Journal of General Systems 3:36–71.
   Google Scholar
• Martikainen P, Siitonen J, Punttila P, Kaila L, Rauh J. 2000. Species richness of Coleoptera in mature managed and old-growth boreal forests in southern Finland. Biological Conservation 94(2):199–209. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00175-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokrzycki T. 2001. Valorization of older tree-stands in Białowieża primeval forest by zooindication method based on saproxylic beetle assemblages of trunks surface. The attempt of assessment valorization of the forests in the Białowieża primeval forest by zooindication method. Szujecki, A. editors. pp. 267–285. Warsaw, Poland: SGGW Press. (in Polish).
   Google Scholar
• Müller J, Brustel H, Brin A, Bussler H, Bouget C, Obermaier E, Heidinger IMM, Lachat T, Förster B, Horak J, Procházka J, Köhler F, Larrieu L, Bense U, Isacsson G, Zapponi L, Gossner MM. 2014. Increasing temperature may compensate for lower amounts of dead wood in driving richness of saproxylic beetles. Ecography 38(5):499–509. DOI: 10.1111/ecog.00908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller J, Bußler H, Bense U, Brustel H, Flechtner G, Fowles A, Kahlen M, Möller G, Mühle H, Schmidl J, Zabransky P. 2005. Urwald relict species – Saproxylic beetles indicating structural qualities and habitat tradition. Waldoekologie Onlinae 2:106–116.
   Google Scholar
• Müller J, Bütler R. 2010. A review of habitat thresholds for dead wood: A baseline for management recommendations in European forests. European Journal of Forest Research 129(6):981–992. DOI: 10.1007/s10342-010-0400-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller J, Wende B, Strobl C, Eugster M, Gallenberger I, Floren A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Linsenmair KE, Weer WW, Gossner MM. 2015. Forest management and regional tree composition drive the host preference of saproxylic beetle communities. Journal of Applied Ecology 52(3):753–762. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieto A, Alexander KNA. 2010. European red list of saproxylic beetles. Luxembourg City, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Ohsawa M. 2010. Beetle families as indicators of Coleopteran diversity in forests: A study using Malaise traps in the central mountainous region of Japan. Journal of Insect Conservation 14(5):479–484. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-010-9276-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okland B, Bakke A, Hagvar S, Kvamme T. 1996. What factors influence the diversity of saproxylic beetles? A multiscaled study from a spruce forest in southern Norway. Biodiversity and Conservation 5(1):75–100. DOI: 10.1007/BF00056293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H. 2019. Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.5-6. Available: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. Accessed May 2020 22.
   Google Scholar
• Pawłowski J, Kubisz D, Mazur SM. 2002. Coleoptera – beetles. Red list of threatened animals in Poland. Głowaciński, Z. editors. Cracow, Poland: IOP PAN. pp. 88–110.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. Available: https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Ramanathan V, Feng Y. 2009. Air pollution, greenhouse gases and climate change: Global and regional perspectives. Atmospheric Environment 43(1):37–50. DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassati D, Marini L, Marchioro M, Rapuzzi P, Magnani G, Poloni R, Di Giovanni F, Mayo P, Sweeney JD. 2019. Developing trapping protocols for wood boring beetles associated with broadleaf trees. Journal of Pest Science 92(1):267–279. DOI: 10.1007/s10340-018-0984-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell L. 2019. Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, Aka LEAST-squares means. 2019 R Package Version 1.4.2. Available: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans. Accessed Oct 2019 22.
   Google Scholar
• RWMŚ GIOŚ. 2019. An annual assessment of air quality in the Silesian Voivodeship. Available: http://powietrze.gios.gov.pl/pjp/documents/download/103141. Accessed Oct 28 2020. in Polish.
   Google Scholar
• Sebek P, Barnouin T, Brin A, Brustel H, Dufrêne M, Gosselin F, Meriguet B, Micas L, Noblecourt T, Rose O, Velle L, Bouget C. 2012. A test for assessment of saproxylic beetle biodiversity using subsets of “monitoring species”. Ecological Indicators 20:304–3015. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibold S, Bässler C, Brandl R, Büche B, Szallies A, Thorn S, Ulyshen MD, Müller J. 2016. Microclimate and habitat heterogeneity as the major drivers of beetle diversity in dead wood. Journal of Applied Ecology 53(3):934–943. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12607.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seibold S, Bässler C, Brandl R, Gossner MM, Thorn S, Ulyshen MD, Müller J. 2015. Experimental studies of dead-wood biodiversity – A review identifying global gaps in knowledge. Biological Conservation 191:139–149. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speight MCD. 1989. Saproxylic invertrebrates and their conservation. Nature and environment. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Stokland JN, Siitonen J, Jonsson BG. 2012. Biodiversity in dead wood. New York City, US: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sugiura S, Tsuru T, Yamaura Y, Makihara H. 2009. Small off-shore islands can serve as important refuges for endemic beetle conservation. Journal of Insect Conservation 13(4):377–385. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-008-9185-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Švácha P, Danilevsky ML. 1987. Cerambycoid larvae of Europe and Soviet Union (Coleoptera, Cerambycoidea). Part 1. Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Biologica 30:1–186.
   Google Scholar
• Švácha P, Danilevsky ML. 1988. Cerambycoid larvae of Europe and Soviet Union (Coleoptera, Cerambycoidea). Part II. Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Biologica 31(3–4):121–284.
   Google Scholar
• Švácha P, Danilevsky ML. 1989. Cerambycoid larvae of Europe and Soviet Union (Coleoptera, Cerambycoidea). Part III. Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Biologica 32(1–2):1–205.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney J, De Groot P, MacDonald L, Smith S, Cocquempot C, Kenis M, Gutowski JM. 2004. Host volatile attractants and traps for detection of Tetropium fuscum (F.), Tetropium castaneum L., and other longhorned beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Environmental Entomology 33(4):844–854. DOI: 10.1603/0046-225X-33.4.844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward Jr. JH. 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58(301):236–244. DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weslien J, Schroeder LM. 1999. Population levels of bark beetles and associated insects in managed and unmanaged spruce stands. Forest Ecology and Management 115(2–3):267–275. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00405-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong JC, Hanks LM. 2016. Influence of fermenting bait and vertical position of traps on attraction of cerambycid beetles to pheromone lures. Journal of Economic Entomology 109(5):2145–2150. DOI: 10.1093/jee/tow197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Pan H, Yang SZ, Niu X. 2013. Tree species and elevation influence the assemblage composition of saproxylic beetles in subtropical forest of east China. Forest Ecology and Management 292:29–38. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Pan H, Zhang J, Yang SZ, Zhao MS. 2015. Effect of sun exposure on saproxylic beetle assemblages may change with topoclimate in a subtropical forest of east China. Journal of Insect Conservation 19(5):877–889. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-015-9805-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar