Intra-guild spatial niche overlap among three small falcon species in an area of recent sympatry

References

• Arpa - Agenzia Regionale Prevenzione e Ambiente dell’Emilia-Romagna. 2004. Cambiamento climatico. Relazione sullo Stato dell’Ambiente della Regione Emilia-Romagna.
   Google Scholar
• Arpae, Agenzia Prevenzione Ambiente Energia Emilia-Romagna, www.arpae.it, consulted in February 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Assandri G, Cecere JG, Sarà M, Catoni C, De Pascalis F, Morinay J, Berlusconi A, Cioccarelli S, Mercogliano A, Pazhera A, Terras A, Imperio S, Morganti M, Rubolini D. 2022. Context-dependent foraging habitat selection in a farmland raptor along an agricultural intensification gradient. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 326:107782. DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2021.107782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabás G, Michalska-Smith JM, Allesina S. 2016. The Effect of Intra- and Interspecific Competition on Coexistence in Multispecies Communities. The American Naturalist 188(1):E1–E12. DOI:10.1086/686901.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbet-Massin M, Jiguet F, Albert CH, Thuiller W. 2012. Selecting pseudo-absences for species distribution models: How, where and how many?: How to use pseudo-absences in niche modelling? Methods in Ecology and Evolution 3(2):327–338. DOI:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2011.00172.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnagaud J-Y, Devictor V, Jiguet F, Barbet-Massin M, Le Viol I, Archaux F. 2012. Relating Habitat and Climatic Niches in Birds. PLoS ONE 7(3):e32819. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0032819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beddall BG. 1963. RANGE EXPANSION OF the cardinal and other birds in the northeastern states. The Wilson Bulletin 75:19.
   Google Scholar
• Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Leadley P, Thuiller W, Courchamp F. 2012. Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity: Biodiversity and climate change. Ecology Letters 15(4):365–377. DOI:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01736.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlusconi A, Michelangelo M, Giannella C, Mercogliano A, Cioccarelli S, Terras A, Rubolini D, Grattini N. 2019. Population status and distribution of the red-footed falcon (Falco vespertinus) in central Po Plain. Scientific poster (XX CIO), Naples, IT.
   Google Scholar
• BirdLife International. 2017. Birds in Europe: Population estimates, trends and conservation status. Cambridge, UK: BirdLife International.
   Google Scholar
• Boatman ND, Brickle NW, Hart JD, Milsom TP, Morris AJ, Murray AWA, Murray KA, Robertson PA. 2004. Evidence for the indirect effects of pesticides on farmland birds: Indirect effects of pesticides. Ibis 146:131–143. DOI:10.1111/j.1474-919X.2004.00347.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bounas A, Rubolini D. 2020. Identification of the proper source population for hacking actions in Northern Italy. Technical report under action A3 of the LIFE project “LIFE FALKON” ( LIFE17 NAT/IT/000586). www.lifefalkon.eu. Accessed Apr 2021 20.
   Google Scholar
• Brambilla M. 2019. Six (or nearly so) big challenges for farmland bird conservation in Italy. Avocetta 2. DOI:10.30456/AVO.2019201.
   Google Scholar
• Brambilla M, Gustin M, Cento M, Ilahiane L, Celada C. 2019. Predicted effects of climate factors on mountain species are not uniform over different spatial scales. J Avian Biol 50:jav.02162. DOI:10.1111/jav.02162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambilla M, Scridel D, Bazzi G, Ilahiane L, Iemma A, Pedrini P, Bassi E, Bionda R, Marchesi L, Genero F, Teufelbauer N, Probst R, Vrezec A, Kmecl P, Mihelič T, Bogliani G, Schmid H, Assandri G, Pontarini R, Braunisch V, Arlettaz R, Chamberlain D. 2020. Species interactions and climate change: How the disruption of species co‐occurrence will impact on an avian forest guild. Glob Change Biol 26:1212–1224. DOI:10.1111/gcb.14953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brichetti P, Fracasso G. 2020. The Birds of Italy – 2. Pteroclidae - Locustellidae. Edizioni Belvedere, Latina, IT.
   Google Scholar
• Capula M, Luiselli L, Rugiero L. 1993. Comparative ecology in sympatric Podarcis muralis and P. sicula (Reptilia: Lacertidae) from the historical centre of Rome: What about competition and niche segregation in an urban habitat? Boll. Zool 60:287–291. DOI:10.1080/11250009309355825.
   Google Scholar
• Carrillo J, González-Dávila E. 2009. Latitudinal variation in breeding parameters of the common kestrel Falco tinnunculus. Ardeola 56:215–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casagrande S, Nieder L, Di Minin E, La Fata I, Csermely D. 2008. Habitat utilization and prey selection of the kestrel Falco tinnunculus in relation to small mammal abundance. Italian Journal of Zoology 75(4):401–409. DOI:10.1080/11250000802085526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catry I, Amano T, Franco AMA, Sutherland WJ. 2012. Influence of spatial and temporal dynamics of agricultural practices on the lesser kestrel: Farmland management and lesser kestrel breeding success. Journal of Applied Ecology 49(1):99–108. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02071.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecere JG, Bondì S, Podofillini S, Imperio S, Griggio M, Fulco E, Curcio A, Ménard D, Mellone U, Saino N, Serra L, Sarà M, Rubolini D. 2018. Spatial segregation of home ranges between neighbouring colonies in a diurnal raptor. Scientific Reports 8:11762. DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-29933-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesson P. 2000. Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst 31:343–366. DOI:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343.
   Google Scholar
• Chiffard J, Marciau C, Yoccoz NG, Mouillot F, Duchateau S, Nadeau I, Fontanilles P, Besnard A. 2020. Adaptive niche‐based sampling to improve ability to find rare and elusive species: Simulations and field tests. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 11(8): 899–909. DOI:10.1111/2041-210X.13399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cioccarelli S. 2020. Multi-scale habitat selection of lesser kestrel at the northern edge of its distribution. Master thesis. Università di Milano.
   Google Scholar
• Clavero M, Villero D, Brotons L. 2011. Climate Change or Land Use Dynamics: Do We Know What Climate Change Indicators Indicate? PLoS ONE 6(4):e18581. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0018581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corine Land Cover (CLC), European Union, Copernicus Land Monitoring Service. 2018. European Environment Agency (EEA). Available online: https://land.copernicus.eu/pan-european/corine-land-cover/clc2018. Accessed Jan 2021 18.
   Google Scholar
• Costantini D, Dell’Omo G. 2020. The kestrel: Ecology, behaviour and conservation of an open-land predator. Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damas-Moreira I, Riley JL, Carretero MA, Harris DJ, Whiting MJ. 2020. Getting ahead: Exploitative competition by an invasive lizard. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 74(10): 117. DOI:10.1007/s00265-020-02893-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demaya GS, Benansio JS, Petrozzi F, Di Vittorio M, Dendi D, Fa JE, Luiselli L. 2020. Habitat use and spatial niche overlap of sympatric Savannah tortoises at multiple spatial scales in South Sudan. Journal of Arid Environments 183:104287. DOI:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2020.104287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Maggio R, Campobello D, Sarà M. 2018. Lesser kestrel diet and agricultural intensification in the Mediterranean: An unexpected win-win solution? Journal for Nature Conservation 45:122–130. DOI:10.1016/j.jnc.2018.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donald PF, Green RE, Heath MF. 2001. Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268:25–29. DOI:10.1098/rspb.2000.1325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donazar JA, Negro JJ, Hiraldo F, Hiraldo F. 1993. Foraging Habitat Selection, Land-Use Changes and Population Decline in the Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni. The Journal of Applied Ecology 30(3):515. DOI:10.2307/2404191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elith J, Graham H, Anderson CP, Dudík R, Ferrier M, Guisan S, Hijmans AJ, Huettmann R, Leathwick FR, Lehmann J, Li A, Lohmann JG, Loiselle LA, Manion B, Moritz G, Nakamura C, Nakazawa M, McC Y, Overton M, Townsend Peterson J, Phillips AJ, Richardson S, Scachetti-Pereira K, Schapire RE, Soberón R, Williams J, Wisz SSM, Zimmermann EN. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29:129–151. DOI:10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emilia-Romagna R. 2009. Relazione sullo stato dell’Ambiente della Regione Emilia-Romagna. Bologna, IT: ARPA, Regione Emilia-Romagna.
   Google Scholar
• Fehérvári P, Harnos A, Neidert D, Solt S, Palatitz P. 2009. Modeling habitat selection of the red-footed falcon (Falco vespertinus): A possible explanation of recent changes in breeding range within Hungary. Appl. Ecol. Environ 7:59–69. DOI:10.15666/aeer/0701_059069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fick SE, Hijmans RJ. 2017. WorldClim 2: New 1-km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 37(12):4302–4315. DOI:10.1002/joc.5086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourcade Y, Engler JO, Rödder D, Secondi J. 2014. Mapping species distributions with MAXENT using a geographically biased sample of presence data: A performance assessment of methods for correcting sampling bias. PloS One 9(5):e97122. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0097122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraissinet M, Fuglione D. 2008. Comparative analysis of the breeding avifauna of Italian cities. Avocetta 32:21–30.
   Google Scholar
• Geldmann J, Heilmann-Clausen J, Holm TE, Levinsky I, Markussen B, Olsen K, Rahbek C, Tøttrup AP. 2016. What determines spatial bias in citizen science? Exploring four recording schemes with different proficiency requirements. Diversity Distrib 22:1139–1149. DOI:10.1111/ddi.12477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham LP, Andréasson J, Carlsson B. 2007. Assessing climate change impacts on hydrology from an ensemble of regional climate models, model scales and linking methods – A case study on the Lule River basin. Climatic Change 81(S1):293–307. DOI:10.1007/s10584-006-9215-2.
   Google Scholar
• Grattini N. 2009. Distribuzione, consistenza ed espansione territoriale del gheppio Falco tinnunculus nidificante in provincia di Mantova. Alula 15(1–2):189–194.
   Google Scholar
• Green RE. 2005. Farming and the Fate of Wild Nature. Science 307(5709):550–555. DOI:10.1126/science.1106049.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guisan A, Thuiller W. 2005. Predicting species distribution: Offering more than simple habitat models 17. Ecology Letters 8(9):993–1009. DOI:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guisan A, Zimmermann NE. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135:147–186. DOI:10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurnell J, Wauters LA, Lurz PWW, Tosi G. 2004. Alien species and interspecific competition: Effects of introduced eastern grey squirrels on red squirrel population dynamics. Journal of Animal Ecology 73(1):26–35. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2004.00791.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hao T, Elith J, Guillera‐Arroita G, Lahoz‐Monfort JJ. 2019. A review of evidence about use and performance of species distribution modelling ensembles like BIOMOD. Divers Distrib 25:839–852. DOI:10.1111/ddi.12892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hijmans RJ. 2020. raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling. R Package Version 3.3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Hijmans ARJ, Phillips S, Leathwick J, Elith J, Hijmans MRJ. 2016. Dismo: Species Distribution Modeling. R Package Version 3.3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Holtmeier F-K. 2015. Animals’ Influence on the Landscape and Ecological Importance. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Johst K, Brandl R, Pfeifer R. 2001. Foraging in a patchy and dynamic landscape: Human land use and the white stork. Ecological Applications 11(1):10. DOI:10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0060:FIAPAD]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller V, Hernando S, Voříšek P, Franch M, Kipson M, Milanesi P, Martí D, Anton M, Klvaňová A, Kalyakin MV, Bauer H-G, Foppen RPB. 2020. European Breeding Bird Atlas 2. Distribution, Abundance and Change. –. Barcelona: European Bird Census Council & Lynx Edicions.
   Google Scholar
• Kosztra B, Büttner G, Hazeu G, Arnold S. 2017. Updated CLC Illustrated Nomenclature Guidelines. Final Report by European Environmental Agency. Available online: https://land.copernicus.eu/. Accessed Jan 2021 18.
   Google Scholar
• Kozak KH, Wiens J. 2006. Does niche conservatism promote speciation? A case study in North American salamanders. Evolution 60(12):2604–2621. DOI:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2006.tb01893.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer-Schadt S, Niedballa J, Pilgrim JD, Schröder B, Lindenborn J, Reinfelder V, Stillfried M, Heckmann I, Scharf AK, Augeri DM, Cheyne SM, Hearn AJ, Ross J, Macdonald DW, Mathai J, Eaton J, Marshall AJ, Semiadi G, Rustam R, Bernard H, Alfred R, Samejima H, Duckworth JW, Breitenmoser-Wuersten C, Belant JL, Hofer H, Wilting A. 2013. The importance of correcting for sampling bias in MaxEnt species distribution models. Diversity Distrib 19:1366–1379. DOI:10.1111/ddi.12096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Gioia G, Melega L, Fornasari L. 2017. Piano d’Azione Nazionale per il grillaio (Falco naumanni). In: Quad. Cons. Natura. Roma: MATTM - ISPRA. p. 128.
   Google Scholar
• Lovette IJ, Hochachka WM. 2006. Simultaneous effects of phylogenetic niche conservatism and competition on avian community structure. Ecology 87(sp7):S14–S28. DOI:10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[14:SEOPNC]2.0.CO;2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Malanson GP, Westman WE, Yan Y-L. 1992. Realized versus fundamental niche functions in a model of chaparral response to climatic change. Ecological Modelling 64(4):261–277. DOI:10.1016/0304-3800(92)90026-B.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin TE. 1998. Are Microhabitat Preferences of Coexisting Species under Selection and Adaptive? Ecology 79(2):656–670. DOI:10.1890/0012-9658(1998)079[0656:AMPOCS]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morganti M, Cecere JG, Quilici S, Tarantino C, Blonda PN, Griggio M, Ambrosini R, Rubolini D. 2021. Assessing the relative importance of managed crops and semi-natural grasslands as foraging habitats for breeding lesser kestrels Falco naumanni in southeastern Italy. Wildlife Biology 2021(1). DOI:10.2981/wlb.00800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morganti M, Preatoni D, Sarà M. 2017. Climate determinants of breeding and wintering ranges of lesser kestrels in Italy and predicted impacts of climate change. J Avian Biol 48:1595–1607. DOI:10.1111/jav.01179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morganti M, Tsiopelas N, Rubolini D, Cecere JG. 2020. Report on the conservation status of surveyed lesser kestrel populations and on the identification of the most suitable sites where Action C.1 and C.2 will be realised. Technical report under action A.1 of the LIFE project “LIFE FALKON” ( LIFE17 NAT/IT/000586). www.lifefalkon.eu. Accessed Sep 2021 20.
   Google Scholar
• Naimi B, Hamm N, Groen TA, Skidmore AK, Toxopeus AG. 2014. Where is positional uncertainty a problem for species distribution modelling? Ecography 37(2):191–203. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00205.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver TH, Gillings S, Pearce-Higgins JW, Brereton T, Crick HQP, Duffield SJ, Morecroft MD, Roy DB. 2017. Large extents of intensive land use limit community reorganization during climate warming. Glob Change Biol 23:2272–2283. DOI:10.1111/gcb.13587.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palatitz P, Fehérvári P, Solt S, Neidert, Harnos A. 2011. Exploratory analyses of foraging habitat selection of the red-footed falcon (Falco vespertinus). Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 57:255–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palatitz P, Solt S, Fehérvári P. 2018. The Blue Vesper - Ecology and Conservation of the Red-footed Falcon. MME BirdLife Hungary, H.
   Google Scholar
• Pande S, Yosef R, Morelli F, Pawar R, Mone R. 2018. Diet and habitat affinities in six raptor species in India. Avian Res 9(36). DOI:10.1186/s40657-018-0129-2.
   Google Scholar
• Pigot AL, Jetz W, Sheard C, Tobias JA. 2018. The macroecological dynamics of species coexistence in birds. Nat Ecol Evol 2:1112–1119. DOI:10.1038/s41559-018-0572-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pineda E, Lobo JM. 2009. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models to predict amphibian species richness patterns. Journal of Animal Ecology 78(1):182–190. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01471.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintor LM, Sih A. 2009. Differences in growth and foraging behavior of native and introduced populations of an invasive crayfish. Biological Invasions 11:1895–1902. DOI:10.1007/s10530-008-9367-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell LL, Ames EM, Wright JR, Matthiopoulos J, Marra PP. 2021. Interspecific competition between resident and wintering birds: Experimental evidence and consequences of coexistence. Ecology 102(2). DOI:10.1002/ecy.3208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quillfeldt P, Engler JO, Silk JRD, Phillips RA. 2017. Influence of device accuracy and choice of algorithm for species distribution modelling of seabirds: A case study using black-browed albatrosses. J Avian Biol 48:1549–1555. DOI:10.1111/jav.01238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2020. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. URL https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed Sep 2021 15.
   Google Scholar
• Radosavljevic A, Anderson RP. 2014. Making better MAXENT models of species distributions: Complexity, overfitting and evaluation. J. Biogeogr 41:629–643. DOI:10.1111/jbi.12227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravasini M. 1995. L’avifauna nidificante nella Provincia di Parma (1980-1995). Editoria Tipolitotecnica. Sala Baganza. pp. 114–117.
   Google Scholar
• Remington CL. 1985. Genetical differences in solutions to the crises of hybridization and competition in early sympatry. Boll. Zool 52:21–43. DOI:10.1080/11250008509440342.
   Google Scholar
• Rete Rurale Nazionale & Lipu. 2021. Emilia-Romagna – Farmland Bird Index e andamenti di popolazione delle specie 2000-2020. Lipu, Parma, IT.
   Google Scholar
• Rolando A, Giachello P. 1992. Interspecific coexistence in corvids in an alpine valley of northwestern Italy. Boll. Zool 59:281–288. DOI:10.1080/11250009209386683.
   Google Scholar
• Root RB. 1967. The Niche Exploitation Pattern of the Blue‐Gray Gnatcatcher. Ecological Monographs 37:317–350. DOI:10.2307/1942327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roscelli F, Ravasini M. 2009. Biologia riproduttiva del Grillaio Falco naumanni in Provincia di Parma. Alula 16(1–2):130–132.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg KV, Dokter AM, Blancher PJ, Sauer JR, Smith AC, Smith PA, Stanton JC, Panjabi A, Helft L, Parr M, Marra PP. 2019. Decline of the North American avifauna. Science 366(6461):120–124. DOI:10.1126/science.aaw1313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarà M, Bondì S, Bermejo A, Bourgeois M, Bouzin M, Bustamante J, Puente J, Evangelidis A, Frassanito A, Fulco E, Giglio G, Gradev G, Griggio M, López‐Ricaurte L, Kordopatis P, Marin S, Martínez J, Mascara R, Mellone U, Pellegrino SC, Pilard P, Podofillini S, Romero M, Gustin M, Saulnier N, Serra L, Sfougaris A, Urios V, Visceglia M, Vlachopoulos K, Zanca L, Cecere JG, Rubolini D. 2019. Broad‐front migration leads to strong migratory connectivity in the lesser kestrel (Falco naumanni). Journal of Biogeography 46:2663–2677. DOI:10.1111/jbi.13713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarà M, Milazzo A, Falletta W, Bellia E. 2005. Exploitation competition between hole-nesters (Muscardinus avellanarius, Mammalia and Parus caeruleus, Aves) in Mediterranean woodlands. Journal of Zoology 265(4):347–357. DOI:10.1017/S095283690500645X.
   Google Scholar
• Scaravelli D, Gustin M. 2020. Primi dati sull’alimentazione del falco cuculo Falco vespertinus in Italia. Alula 27(1–2):71–75.
   Google Scholar
• Schoener TW. 1974. Resource Partitioning in Ecological Communities. Science, New Series 185:27–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soberon J, Peterson AT. 2005. Interpretation of Models of Fundamental Ecological Niches and Species’ Distributional Areas. Biodiversity Informatics 2(0). DOI:10.17161/bi.v2i0.4.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton LJ. 2020. Climatic Constraints on Laggar Falcon (Falco jugger) Distribution Predicts Multidirectional Range Movements under Future Climate Change Scenarios. Journal of Raptor Research 54(1):1. DOI:10.3356/0892-1016-54.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton LJ, Puschendorf R. 2020. Climatic niche of the Saker Falcon Falco cherrug: Predicted new areas to direct population surveys in Central Asia. Ibis 162(1):27–41. DOI:10.1111/ibi.12700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuiller W, Georges D, Engler R. 2013. Biomod2: Ensemble Platform for Species Distribution Modeling. R Package Version 3.3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Thuiller W, Guéguen M, Renaud J, Karge, DN, Zimmermann NE. 2019. Uncertainty in ensembles of global biodiversity scenarios. Nature Communications, 10(1), 1446. DOI:10.1038/s41467-019-09519-w.
   Google Scholar
• Thuiller W, Lavorel S, Araújo MB. 2005. Niche properties and geographical extent as predictors of species sensitivity to climate change: Predicting species sensitivity to climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography 14(4):347–357. DOI:10.1111/j.1466-822X.2005.00162.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ursúa Sesma E. 2006. Evaluación de métodos de seguimiento y de manejo de poblaciones de cernícalo primilla aplicados a su conservación. PhD thesis. Universitat de Barcelona.
   Google Scholar
• Wegmann M, Leutner B, Dech S. 2016. Remote sensing and GIS for ecologists: Using open source software. Exeter: Pelagic Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Ye Y, Hu C, Jiang Y, Davison GWH, Ding C. 2021. Three-dimensional niche partitioning between two colonially nesting ardeid species in central China. Avian Res 12:33. DOI:10.1186/s40657-021-00264-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Elphick CS. 2010. A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 1(1):3–14. DOI:10.1111/j.2041-210X.2009.00001.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar