The use of drones to study the breeding productivity of Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus

References

• Bałdyga T, Wieloch M, Czyż S 2003. Second mixed brood of Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus and Mute Swan C. olor in Poland. Not. Orn. 44: 270–273. (Polish with English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Barnas AF, Chabot D, Hodgson AJ, David W, Johnston DW, Bird DM, Ellis-Felege SN. 2020. A standardized protocol for reporting methods when using drones for wildlife research. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems 8:89–98. DOI: 10.1139/juvs-2019-0011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bibby CJ, Burgess ND, Hill DA, Mustoe S. 2000. Bird census techniques. London, San Diego, New York, Boston, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto: Academia Press.
   Google Scholar
• BirdLife International. 2015. European red list of birds. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Boiko D, Kampe-Persson H, Morkunas J. 2014. Breeding Whooper Swans Cygnus cygnus in the Baltic states, 1973–2013: A result of re-colonisation. Wildfowl 64:207–216.
   Google Scholar
• Butkauskas D, Švažas S, Tubelytė V, Morkūnas J, Sruoga A, Boiko D, Paulauskas A, Stanevičius V, Baublys V. 2012. Coexistence and population genetic structure of the whooper swan Cygnus cygnus and mute swan Cygnus olor in Lithuania and Latvia. Open Life Sciences 7(5):886–894. DOI: 10.2478/s11535-012-0065-9.
   Google Scholar
• Carboneras C, Kirwan GM. 2020. Whooper Swan (Cygnus cygnus), version 1.0. In: Del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J, Christie DA, de Juana E, editors. In birds of the world. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell Lab of Ornithology. DOI: 10.2173/bow.whoswa.01.
   Google Scholar
• Chabot D, Craik SR, Bird DM. 2015. Population census of a large common tern colony with a small, unmanned aircraft. PLoS ONE 10(4):e0122588. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chylarecki P, Sikora A, Cenian Z, Chodkiewicz T (eds.) 2015. Monitoring ptaków lęgowych. Poradnik metodyczny. [Monitoring breeding birds – a methodological handbook] Wydanie 2. GIOŚ, Warszawa.
   Google Scholar
• Clausen KK, Holm TE, Pedersen CL, Jacobsen EM, Bregnballe T. 2020. Sharing waters: The impact of recreational kayaking on moulting mute swans Cygnus olor. Journal of Ornithology 161:469–479. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-020-01746-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corregidor-Castro A, Holm TE, Bregnballe T. 2021. Counting breeding gulls with unmanned aerial vehicles: Camera quality and flying height affects precision of a semi-automatic counting method. Ornis Fennica 98:33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geldart EA, Barnas AF, Semeniuk CAD, Gilchrist HG, Harris CM, Love OP. 2022. A colonial-nesting seabird shows no heart-rate response to drone-based population surveys. Scientific Reports 12:18804. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-22492-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson JC, Mott R, Baylis SM, Pham TT, Wotherspoon S, Kilpatrick AD, Segaran RR, Reid I, Terauds A, Koh LP. 2018. Drones count wildlife more accurately and precisely than humans. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9:1160–1167. DOI: 10.1111/2041-210X.12974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaramillo E, Lagos NA, Labra FA, Paredes E, Acuña E, Daniel Melnick D, Manzano M, Velásquez C, Duarte C. 2018. Recovery of black-necked swans, macrophytes and water quality in a Ramsar wetland of southern Chile: Assessing resilience following sudden anthropogenic disturbances. Science of the Total Environment 628/629:291–301. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarrett D, Calladine J, Cotton A, Wilson MW, Humphreys E 2020. Behavioural responses of non-breeding waterbirds to drone approach are associated with flock size and habitat, Bird Study, DOI: 10.1080/00063657.2020.1808587.
   Google Scholar
• Junda J, Greene E, Bird DM. 2015. Proper flight technique for using a small rotary-winged drone aircraft to safely, quickly, and accurately survey raptor nests. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems 3:222–236. DOI: 10.1139/juvs-2015-0003.
   Google Scholar
• Kampe-Persson H, Boiko D. 2011. Occurrence of swan hybrids around the Baltic Sea – An outcome of range expansions? Ornis Svecica 21:45–54. DOI: 10.34080/os.v21.22609.
   Google Scholar
• Keller V, Herrando S, Voříšek P, Franch M, Kipson M, Milanesi P, Martí D, Anton M, Klvaňová A, Kalyakin MV, Bauer H-G, Foppen RPB. 2020. European breeding bird Atlas 2: Distribution, abundance and change. Barcelona: European Bird Census Council & Lynx Edicions.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen K, Frikke J, Kahlert J. 2008. Accuracy of ‘total counts’ of waterbirds from aircraft in coastal waters. Wildlife Biology 14(2):165–175. DOI: 10.2981/0909-6396(2008)14[165:AOTCOW]2.0.CO;2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehikoinen A et al. 2020. Cygnus cygnus Whooper Swan.In: Keller V, Herrando S, Vorisek P, editors. European breeding bird Atlas 2: Distribution, abundance and change Barcelona: European Bird Census Council & Lynx Edicions. pp. 102–103.
   Google Scholar
• Marchowski D. 2021. Drones, automatic counting tools, and artificial neural networks in wildlife population censusing. Ecology and Evolution 11:16214–16227. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchowski D, Mohr A, Ławicki Ł, Jankowiak Ł. 2022. Warmer winters increase the breeding success of the Goosander in the Pomeranian Lake District in Poland. Ardea 110:1–15. DOI: 10.5253/arde.v110i1.a3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald KW, McClure CJW, Rolek BW, Hill GE. 2012. Diversity of birds in eastern North America shifts north with global warming. Ecology and Evolution 2(12):3052–3060. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pöysä H, Kotilainen J, Väänänen VM, Kunnasranta M. 2018. Estimating production in ducks: A comparison between ground surveys and unmanned aircraft surveys. European Journal of Wildlife Research 64:74. DOI: 10.1007/s10344-018-1238-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratcliffe N, Guihen D, Robst J, Crofts S, Stanworth A, Enderlein P. 2015. A protocol for the aerial survey of penguin colonies using UAVs. Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems 3(3):95–101. DOI: 10.1139/juvs-2015-0006.
   Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2021. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.” Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.r-project.org/. Accessed Jan 2023 10.
   Google Scholar
• Rush GP, Clarke LE, Stone M, Wood MJ. 2018. Can drones count gulls? Minimal disturbance and semiautomated image processing with an unmanned aerial vehicle for colony-nesting seabirds. Ecology and Evolution 8(24):12322–12334. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sardà-Palomera F, Bota G, Padilla N, Brotons L, Sardà F. 2017. Unmanned aircraft systems to unravel spatial and temporal factors affecting dynamics of colony formation and nesting success in birds. Journal of Avian Biology 48:1273–1280. DOI: 10.1111/jav.01535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarton F, Valle RG. 2020. Could we assess the hatching success of Pied Avocets (Recurvirostra avosetta) by drone monitoring? A pilot study. Lavori Soc Ven Sci Nat 45:135–138.
   Google Scholar
• Sikora A, Marchowski D, Półtorak W. 2022. Use of beaver ponds by breeding Whooper Swans Cygnus cygnus and Mute Swans C. olor at Górowo Heights (north-eastern Poland). Ornis Polonica 63:199–214. (Polish with English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Sikora A, Wieloch M 2022. Whooper swan monitoring. Chief Inspectorate of Environmental Protection. http://monitoringptakow.gios.gov.pl/PM-GIS/.
   Google Scholar
• Sikora A, Wieloch M, Chylarecki P. 2012. Breeding population of the Whooper Swan Cygnus cygnus in Poland. Ornis Polonica 53:69–85. (Polish with English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Valiela I, Bowen JB. 2003. Shifts in winter distribution in birds: Effects of global warming and local habitat change. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment 32(7):476–480. DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447-32.7.476.
   Google Scholar
• Valle RG, Scarton F. 2021. Drone-conducted counts as a tool for the rapid assessment of productivity of Sandwich Tern (Thalasseus sandvicensis). Journal of Ornithology 126:621–628. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-020-01854-w.
   Google Scholar
• Weissensteiner MH, Poelstra JW, Wolf JBW. 2015. Low-budget ready-to-fly unmanned aerial vehicles: An effective tool for evaluating the nesting status of canopy-breeding bird species. Journal of Avian Biology 46:425–430. DOI: 10.1111/jav.00619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieloch M, Sikora A, Rohde Z, Neubauer G 2014. Expansion of breeding population of the Whooper Swan in Poland. 5th International Swan Symposium, Easton, Maryland, USA, 2-6 February 2014. Poster.
   Google Scholar
• Zbyryt A. 2018. The impact of drones on birds and their application in ornithological research and conservation. Ornis Polonica 59:56–70.
   Google Scholar