Inter-annual variation in adult demography, but no sex bias in a large lowland population of the threatened Clouded Apollo Parnassius mnemosyne butterfly

References

• Adamski P. 2004. Sex ratio of apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) - facts and artifacts. European Journal of Entomology 101(2):341–344. DOI: 10.14411/eje.2004.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamski P. 2013. Preferencje siedliskowe i biologia rozrodu niepylaka mnemozyny Parnassius mnemosyne oraz ich znaczenie dla ochrony gatunku. Studia Naturae 61:1–65.
   Google Scholar
• Adamski P, Ćmiel AM, Lipińska AM. 2019. Intraseasonal asynchrony as a factor boosting isolation within a metapopulation: The case of the clouded apollo. Insect Science 26(5):911–922. DOI: 10.1111/1744-7917.12589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altermatt F. 2010. Tell me what you eat and I’ll tell you when you fly: Diet can predict phenological changes in response to climate change: Phenological change and diet breadth. Ecology Letters 13(12):1475–1484. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01534.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altermatt F. 2012. Temperature-related shifts in butterfly phenology depend on the habitat. Global Change Biology 18(8):2429–2438. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2012.02727.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnason AN, Schwarz CJ. 1999. Using POPAN-5 to analyse banding data. Bird Study 46(157–168):S157–S168. DOI: 10.1080/00063659909477242.
   Google Scholar
• Bergström A. 2005. Oviposition site preferences of the threatened butterfly Parnassius mnemosyne - implications for conservation. Journal of Insect Conservation 9(1):21–27. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-004-3204-4.
   Google Scholar
• Brommer JE, Fred MS. 1999. Movement of the Apollo butterfly Parnassius apollo related to host plant and nectar plant patches. Ecological Entomology 24(2):125–131. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2311.1999.00190.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks SJ, Self A, Powney GD, Pearse WD, Penn M, Paterson GLJ. 2017. The influence of life history traits on the phenological response of British butterflies to climate variability since the late-19th century. Ecography 40(10):1152–1165. DOI: 10.1111/ecog.02658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bubová T, Kulma M, Vrabec V, Nowicki P. 2016. Adult longevity and its relationship with conservation status in European butterflies. Journal of Insect Conservation 20(6):1021–1032. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-016-9936-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casula P, Nichols JD. 2003. Temporal variability of local abundance, sex ratio and activity in the Sardinian chalk hill blue butterfly. Oecologia 136(3):374–382. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-003-1288-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Čelik T. 2012. Adult demography, spatial distribution and movements of Zerynthia polyxena (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in a dense network of permanent habitats. European Journal of Entomology 109(2):217–227. DOI: 10.14411/eje.2012.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cini A, Barbero F, Bonelli S, Bruschini C, Casacci LP, Piazzini S, Scalercio S, Dapporto L. 2020. The decline of the charismatic Parnassius mnemosyne (L.) (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in a Central Italy National Park: A call for urgent actions. Journal of Insect Biodiversity 16(2):47–54. DOI: 10.12976/jib/2020.16.2.2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormont A, Malinowska AH, Kostenko O, Radchuk V, Hemerik L, WallisDeVries MF, Verboom J. 2011. Effect of local weather on butterfly flight behaviour, movement, and colonization: Significance for dispersal under climate change. Biodiversity and Conservation 20(3):483–503. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-010-9960-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson EA, Hurst GDD. 2004. Persistence of an extreme sex-ratio bias in a natural population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101(17):6520–6523. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.030406810135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrlich PR, Launer AE, Murphy DD. 1984. Can sex ratio be defined or determined? The case of a population of checkerspot butterflies. The American Naturalist 124(4):527–539. DOI: 10.1086/284292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzén M, Nilsson SG, Johansson V, Ranius T. 2013. Population fluctuations and synchrony of grassland butterflies in relation to species traits. PLoS One 8(10):e78233. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey DF, Leong KLH. 1993. Can microhabitat selection or differences in “catchability” explain male-biased sex ratios in overwintering populations of monarch butterflies? Animal Behaviour 45(5):1025–1027. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1993.1120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fric ZF, Rindoš M, Konvička M. 2020. Phenology responses of temperate butterflies to latitude depend on ecological traits. Ecology Letters 23(1):172–180. DOI: 10.1111/ele.13419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gór Á, Fónagy A, Pásztor K, Szigeti V, Lang Z, Kis J. 2023. Facultative male investment in prolonged mate-guarding in a butterfly. Behaviour 160(6):515–557. DOI: 10.1163/1568539X-bja10219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratton P, Konopiński MK, Sbordoni V. 2008. Pleistocene evolutionary history of the Clouded Apollo (Parnassius mnemosyne): Genetic signatures of climate cycles and a ‘time-dependent’ mitochondrial substitution rate. Molecular Ecology 17(19):4248–4262. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03901.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gromek M, Ł S, Sielezniew M, Jaworski T. 2021. Pierwsze stwierdzenie niepylaka mnemozyny Parnassius mnemosyne (Linnaeus, 1758). (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) w środkowej Polsce. Acta entomologica silesiana 29(27):1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez D, Wilson RJ. 2021. Intra‐ and interspecific variation in the responses of insect phenology to climate. Journal of Animal Ecology 90(1):248–259. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.13348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyllenberg M, Hastings A, Hanski I. 1997. Structured metapopulation models. In: Hanski I, Gilpin M, editors. Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, genetics and evolution. London: Academic Press. pp. 93–122.
   Google Scholar
• Habel JC, Angerer V, Gros P, Teucher M, Eberle J. 2022. The relevance of transition habitats for butterfly conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation 31(5–6):1577–1590. DOI: 10.1007/s10531-022-02411-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddad NM, Hudgens B, Damiani C, Gross K, Kuefler D, Pollock K. 2008. Determining Optimal Population Monitoring for Rare Butterflies. Conservation Biology 22(4):929–940. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00932.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton WD. 1967. Extraordinary sex ratios: A sex-ratio theory for sex linkage and inbreeding has new implications in cytogenetics and entomology. Science 156(3774):477–488. DOI: 10.1126/science.156.3774.477.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hanski I. 2005. Metapopulation ecology. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hurvich CM, Tsai C-L. 1989. Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76(2):297–307. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/76.2.297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson V, Knape J, Franzén M. 2017. Population dynamics and future persistence of the clouded Apollo butterfly in southern Scandinavia: The importance of low intensity grazing and creation of habitat patches. Biological Conservation 206:120–131. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.12.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingsolver JG. 1987. Predation, thermoregulation, and wing color in pierid butterflies. Oecologia 73(2):301–306. DOI: 10.1007/BF00377522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konvička M, Kuras T. 1999. Population structure, behaviour and selection of oviposition sites of an endangered butterfly, Parnassius mnemosyne, in Litovelské Pomoravíl. Czech Republic. Journal of Insect Conservation 3(3):211–223. DOI: 10.1023/A:1009641618795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kral K, Harmon J, Limb R, Hovick T. 2018. Improving our science: The evolution of butterfly sampling and surveying methods over time. Journal of Insect Conservation 22(1):1–14. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-018-0046-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kudrna O. 2011. Distribution atlas of butterflies in Europe. Halle, Germany: Gesellschaft für Schmetterlingsschutz.
   Google Scholar
• Kuussaari M, Heikkinen RK, Heliölä J, Luoto M, Mayer M, Rytteri S, von Bagh P. 2015. Successful translocation of the threatened Clouded Apollo butterfly (Parnassius mnemosyne) and metapopulation establishment in southern Finland. Biological Conservation 190:51–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.05.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuussaari M, Rytteri S, Heikkinen RK, Heliölä J, von Bagh P 2016. Weather explains high annual variation in butterfly dispersal. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 283(1835):20160413. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.0413
   Google Scholar
• Liivamägi A, Kuusemets V, Luig J, Kask K. 2013. Changes in the distribution of Clouded Apollo Parnassius mnemosyne (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae) in Estonia. Entomologica Fennica 24(3):186–192. DOI: 10.33338/ef.8985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyytinen A, Alatalo RV, Lindström L, Mappes J. 1999. Are European white butterflies aposematic? Evolutionary Ecology 13(7–8):709. DOI: 10.1023/A:1011081800202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maes D, Verovnik R, Wiemers M, Brosens D, Beshkov S, Bonelli S, Buszko J, Cantú-Salazar L, Cassar L-F, Collins S, Dincă V, Djuric M, Dušej G, Elven H, Franeta F, Garcia-Pereira P, Geryak Y, Goffart P, Á G, Hiermann U, Höttinger H, Huemer P, Jakšić P, John E, Kalivoda H, Kati V, Kirkland P, Komac B, Á K, Kulak A, Kuussaari M, L’Hoste L, Lelo S, Mestdagh X, Micevski N, Mihoci I, Mihut S, Monasterio-León Y, Morgun DV, Munguira ML, Murray T, Nielsen PS, Ólafsson E, Õunap E, Pamperis LN, Pavlíčko A, Pettersson LB, Popov S, Popović M, Pöyry J, Prentice M, Reyserhove L, Ryrholm N, Šašić M, Savenkov N, Settele J, Sielezniew M, Sinev S, Stefanescu C, Švitra G, Tammaru T, Tiitsaar A, Tzirkalli E, Tzortzakaki O, van Swaay CAM, Viborg AL, Wynhoff I, Zografou K, Warren MS. 2019. Integrating national red lists for prioritising conservation actions for European butterflies. Journal of Insect Conservation 23(2):301–330. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-019-00127-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matter SF, Roland J. 2002. An experimental examination of the effects of habitat quality on the dispersal and local abundance of the butterfly Parnassius smintheus: Habitat quality and dispersal. Ecological Entomology 27(3):308–316. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2311.2002.00407.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meglécz E, Nève G, Pecsenye K, Varga Z. 1999. Genetic variations in space and time in Parnassius mnemosyne (L.) (Lepidoptera) populations in north-east Hungary: Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation 89(3):251–259. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00006-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills SC, Oliver TH, Bradbury RB, Gregory RD, Brereton T, Kühn E, Kuussaari M, Musche M, Roy DB, Schmucki R, Stefanescu C, van Swaay C, Evans KL. 2017. European butterfly populations vary in sensitivity to weather across their geographical ranges. Global Ecology and Biogeography 26(12):1374–1385. DOI: 10.1111/geb.12659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols JD. 1992. Capture-Recapture Models. BioScience 42(2):94–102. DOI: 10.2307/1311650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowicki P. 2017. Survey precision moderates the relationship between population size and stability. Biological Conservation 212:310–315. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.06.041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowicki P, Bonelli S, Barbero F, Balletto E. 2009. Relative importance of density-dependent regulation and environmental stochasticity for butterfly population dynamics. Oecologia 161:227–239. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-009-1373-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowicki P, Settele J, Henry P-Y, Woyciechowski M. 2008. Butterfly monitoring methods: The ideal and the real World. Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution 54(1):69–88. DOI: 10.1560/IJEE.54.1.69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowicki P, Vrabec V. 2011. Evidence for positive density-dependent emigration in butterfly metapopulations. Oecologia 167(3):657–665. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2025-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowicki P, Witek M, Skórka P, Settele J, Woyciechowski M. 2005. Population ecology of the endangered butterflies Maculinea teleius and M. nausithous and the implications for conservation. Population Ecology 47(3):193–202. DOI: 10.1007/s10144-005-0222-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osváth-Ferencz M, Bonelli S, Nowicki P, Peregovits L, Rákosy L, Sielezniew M, Kostro-Ambroziak A, Dziekańska I, Á K. 2017. Population demography of the endangered large blue butterfly Maculinea arion in Europe. Journal of Insect Conservation 21(3):411–422. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-016-9944-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ota M, Yuma M, Mitsuo Y, Togo Y. 2014. Beak marks on the wings of butterflies and predation pressure in the field: Beak mark and predation pressure. Entomological Science 17(4):371–375. DOI: 10.1111/ens.12076.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pásztor K, Kőrösi Á, Gór Á, Szigeti V, Vajna F, Kis J. 2022. Phenotypic senescence in a natural insect population. Ecology and Evolution 12(12). DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roland J, Filazzola A, Matter SF. 2021. Spatial variation in early‐winter snow cover determines local dynamics in a network of alpine butterfly populations. Ecography 44(2):334–343. DOI: 10.1111/ecog.05407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakamoto Y, Hirai N, Tanikawa T, Yago M, Ishii M. 2011. Infection by two strains of wolbachia and sex ratio distortion in a population of the endangered butterfly zizina emelina (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) in Northern Osaka Prefecture, Central Japan. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 104(3):483–487. DOI: 10.1603/AN09168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schtickzelle N, Le Boulengé E, Baguette M. 2002. Metapopulation dynamics of the bog fritillary butterfly: Demographic processes in a patchy population. Oikos 97(3):349–360. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.970305.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settele J, Kudrna O, Harpke A, Kühn I, van Swaay C, Verovnik R, Warren M, Wiemers M, Hanspach J, Hickler T, Kühn E, van Halder I, Veling K, Vliegenthart A, Wynhoff I, Schweiger O. 2008. Climatic risk atlas of European butterflies. Biorisk 1:1–712. DOI: 10.3897/biorisk.1.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro AM. 1974. Beak-mark frequency as an index of seasonal predation intensity on common butterflies. The American Naturalist 108(960):229–232. DOI:10.1086/282901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw MR, Stefanescu C, van Nouhuys S. 2009. Parasitoids of European butterflies. In: Settele J, Shreeve T, Konvička M, van Dyck H, editors. Ecology of Butterflies in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 130–156.
   Google Scholar
• Sielezniew M, Kostro‐Ambroziak A, Klimczuk P, Deoniziak K, Pałka K, Nowicki P. 2019. Habitat-related differences in the adult longevity of two ecotypes of a specialized butterfly. Journal of Zoology 307(2):93–103. DOI: 10.1111/jzo.12625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sielezniew M, Nowicki P. 2017. Adult demography of an isolated population of the threatened butterfly scarce heath Coenonympha hero and its conservation implications. Journal of Insect Conservation 21(4):737–742. DOI: 10.1007/s10841-017-0014-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoks R. 2001. Male-biased sex ratios in mature damselfly populations: Real or artefact?: Biased sex ratios: Real or artefact? Ecological Entomology 26(2):181–187. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2311.2001.00301.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szigeti V, Kőrösi Á, Harnos A, Kis J. 2019. Lifelong foraging and individual specialisation are influenced by temporal changes of resource availability. Oikos 128(5):649–658. DOI: 10.1111/oik.05400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szigeti V, Vajna F, Kőrösi Á, Kis J. 2020. Are all butterflies equal? Population-wise proboscis length variation predicts flower choice in a butterfly. Animal Behaviour 163:135–143. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolman T, Lewington R. 2009. Collins butterfly guide. The most complete guide to the butterflies of Britain and Europe. London: Harper Collins Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood DL, Shapiro AM. 1999. A male-biased primary sex ratio and larval mortality in Eucheira socialis (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Evolutionary Ecology Research 1(6):703–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Välimäki P, Itämies J. 2005. Effects of canopy coverage on the immature stages of the Clouded Apollo butterfly [Parnassius mnemosyne (L.)] with observations on larval behaviour. Entomologica Fennica 16(2). DOI: 10.33338/ef.84244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Swaay C, Cuttelod A, Collins S, Maes D, Munguira ML, Šašić M, Settele J, Verovnik R, Verstrael T, Warren M, Wiemers M, Wynhoff. 2010. European red list of Butterflies. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Vlasánek P, Bartonová A, Marec F, Konvička M. 2017. Elusive Parnassius mnemosyne (Linnaeus, 1758. larvae: habitat selection, sex determination and sex ratio (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología 45(180):561–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlasanek P, Hauck D, Konvička M. 2009. Adult sex ratio in the Parnassius mnemosyne butterfly: Effects of survival, migration, and weather. Israel Journal of Ecology & Evolution 55(3):233–252. DOI: 10.1560/IJEE.55.3.233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White GC, Burnham KP. 1999. Program MARK: Survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46(sup1):120–139. DOI: 10.1080/00063659909477239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson RJ, Roy D. 2009. Butterfly population structure and dynamics. In: Settele J, Shreeve M, Konvička H, van Dyck H, editors. Ecology of Butterflies in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 81–96.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmermann K, Blazkova P, Cizek O, Fric Z, Hula V, Kepka P, Novotny D, Slamova I, Konvička M. 2011. Demography of adults of the Marsh fritillary butterfly, Euphydryas aurinia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in the Czech Republic: Patterns across sites and seasons. European Journal of Entomology 108(2):243–254. DOI: 10.14411/eje.2011.033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zografou K, Swartz MT, Adamidis GC, Tilden VP, McKinney EN, Sewall BJ. 2021. Species traits affect phenological responses to climate change in a butterfly community. Scientific Reports 11(1):3283. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82723-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar