January 6th on Twitter: measuring social media attitudes towards the Capitol riot through unhealthy online conversation and sentiment analysis

References

• Abilov, A., Hua, Y., Matatov, H., Amir, O., & Naaman, M. (2021). VoterFraud2020: A multi-modal dataset of election fraud claims on Twitter (arXiv:2101.08210). arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.08210
   Google Scholar
• ALDayel, A., & Magdy, W. (2021). Stance detection on social media: State of the art and trends. Information Processing & Management, 58(4), 102597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calma, J. (2023, May 31). Scientists say they can’t rely on twitter anymore. The Verge. https://www.theverge.com/2023/5/31/23739084/twitter-elon-musk-api-policy-chilling-academic-research
   Google Scholar
• Cambria, E., Havasi, C., & Hussain, A. (2012). Senticnet 2: A semantic and affective resource for opinion mining and sentiment analysis. In G. M. Youngblood & P. M. McCarthy (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-fifth international Florida artificial intelligence research society conference, May 23–25, 2012. AAAI Press. http://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/FLAIRS/FLAIRS12/paper/view/4411
   Google Scholar
• Cambria, E., Li, Y., Xing, F. Z., Poria, S., & Kwok, K. (2020). Senticnet 6: Ensemble application of symbolic and subsymbolic AI for sentiment analysis. Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management, 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340531.3412003
   Google Scholar
• Capitol riots timeline: What happened on 6 Jan one year ago? (2022, January 6). BBC News. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-56004916
   Google Scholar
• Cascini, F., Pantovic, A., Al-Ajlouni, Y. A., Failla, G., Puleo, V., Melnyk, A., Lontano, A., & Ricciardi, W. (2022). Social media and attitudes towards a COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review of the literature. EClinicalMedicine, 48, 101454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101454
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, E., Deb, A., & Ferrara, E. (2021). #Election2020: The first public Twitter dataset on the 2020 US presidential election. Journal of Computational Social Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-021-00117-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen, K., Molder, A. L., Duan, Z., Boulianne, S., Eckart, C., Mallari, P., & Yang, D. (2023). How climate movement actors and news media frame climate change and strike: Evidence from analyzing Twitter and news media discourse from 2018 to 2021. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 28(2), 384–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612221106405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., & Wang, L. (2022). Misleading political advertising fuels incivility online: A social network analysis of 2020 U.S. presidential election campaign video comments on YouTube. Computers in Human Behavior, 131, 107202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, D., & LeBlanc, P. (2021). An inauguration like no other: Notable moments of a momentous day. CNN. Retrieved March 15, 2022, from https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/20/politics/biden-inauguration-notable-moments/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Conte, R., Gilbert, N., Bonelli, G., Cioffi-Revilla, C., Deffuant, G., Kertesz, J., Loreto, V., Moat, S., Nadal, J.-P., Sanchez, A., Nowak, A., Flache, A., San Miguel, M., & Helbing, D. (2012). Manifesto of computational social science. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2012-01697-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotfas, L.-A., Delcea, C., Roxin, I., Ioanăş, C., Gherai, D. S., & Tajariol, F. (2021). The longest month: Analyzing COVID-19 vaccination opinions dynamics from tweets in the month following the first vaccine announcement. IEEE Access, 9, 33203–33223. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3059821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristescu, M. P., Nerisanu, R. A., Mara, D. A., & Oprea, S.-V. (2022). Using market news sentiment analysis for stock market prediction. Mathematics, 10(22), 4255. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10224255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT2022), June 2-7, 2019, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), 4171–4186. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423
   Google Scholar
• Dobriţa, G., Bâra, A., Oprea, S.-V., Baroiu, C., & Barbu, D.-C. (2022). Mobility, COVID-19 cases and virus reproduction rate data analysis for Romania using machine learning algorithms. 26th International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC), October 19-21, 2022, 244–251. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSTCC55426.2022.9931806
   Google Scholar
• Giachanou, A., & Crestani, F. (2016). Like it or not: A survey of Twitter sentiment analysis methods. ACM Computing Surveys, 49(28), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/2938640
   Google Scholar
• Gilda, S., Giovanini, L., Silva, M., & Oliveira, D. (2022). Predicting different types of subtle toxicity in unhealthy online conversations. Procedia Computer Science, 198, 360–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.254
   Google Scholar
• Hutto, C., & Gilbert, E. (2014). Vader: A parsimonious rule-based model for sentiment analysis of social media text. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 8(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14550
   Google Scholar
• Keivanlou-Shahrestanaki, Z., Kahani, M., & Zarrinkalam, F. (2022). Interpreting sarcasm on social media using attention-based neural networks. Knowledge-Based Systems, 258, 109977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2022.109977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelleher, J. D., Namee, B. M., & D’Arcy, A. (2020). Fundamentals of machine learning for predictive data analytics. Algorithms, Worked Examples, and Case Studies (2nd ed.). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Khodak, M., Saunshi, N., & Vodrahalli, K. (2018, May). A large self-annotated corpus for sarcasm. Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC 2018), May 7-12, 2018, Miyazaki, Japan. https://aclanthology.org/L18-1102
   Google Scholar
• Lashkarashvili, N., & Tsintsadze, M. (2022). Toxicity detection in online Georgian discussions. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(1), 100062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2022.100062
   Google Scholar
• Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabási, A.-L., Brewer, D., Christakis, N., Contractor, N., Fowler, J., Gutmann, M., Jebara, T., King, G., Macy, M., Roy, D., & Van Alstyne, M. (2009). Computational social science. Science, 323(5915), 721–723. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1167742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees, J., & Cikara, M. (2020). Understanding and combating misperceived polarization. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ncwez
   Google Scholar
• Liebetrau, A. M. (1983). Measures of association. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019). RoBERTa: A robustly optimized BERT pretraining approach. ArXiv:1907.11692 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.11692
   Google Scholar
• Macanovic, A. (2022). Text mining for social science – The state and the future of computational text analysis in sociology. Social Science Research, 108, 102784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102784
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammad, S. M., & Turney, P. D. (2013). Crowdsourcing a word-emotion association lexicon. ArXiv:1308.6297 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1308.6297
   Google Scholar
• Most popular social media apps in U.S. (n.d.). Statista. Retrieved February 26, 2022, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/248074/most-popular-us-social-networking-apps-ranked-by-audience/
   Google Scholar
• Oprea, S.-V., Bâra, A., Puican, F. C., & Radu, I. C. (2021). Anomaly detection with machine learning algorithms and big data in electricity consumption. Sustainability, 13(19), 10963. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouni, S., Fkih, F., & Omri, M. N. (2022). Bots and gender detection on Twitter using stylistic features. In C. Bădică, J. Treur, D. Benslimane, B. Hnatkowska, & M. Krótkiewicz (Eds.), Advances in computational collective intelligence (pp. 650–660). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16210-7_53
   Google Scholar
• Preda, S., Oprea, S.-V., Bâra, A., & Belciu (Velicanu), A. (2018). Pv forecasting using support vector machine learning in a big data analytics context. Symmetry, 10(12), 748. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10120748
   Google Scholar
• Price, I., Gifford-Moore, J., Flemming, J., Musker, S., Roichman, M., Sylvain, G., Thain, N., Dixon, L., & Sorensen, J. (2020). Six attributes of unhealthy conversations. Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Online Abuse and Harms, 114–124. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.alw-1.15
   Google Scholar
• Ruan, T., & Lv, Q. (2023). Public perception of electric vehicles on Reddit and Twitter: A cross-platform analysis. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 21, 100872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2023.100872
   Google Scholar
• Sheth, S. (n.d.). Trump’s 2nd impeachment is the most bipartisan in US history. Business Insider. Retrieved March 15, 2022, from https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-second-impeachment-most-bipartisan-in-us-history-2021-1
   Google Scholar
• Simpson, M., & Sidner, S. (n.d.). Decoding the extremist symbols and groups at the Capitol Hill insurrection. CNN. Retrieved February 26, 2022, from https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/09/us/capitol-hill-insurrection-extremist-flags-soh/index.html
   Google Scholar
• #StopTheSteal: Timeline of Social Media and Extremist Activities Leading to 1/6 Insurrection. (2021, February 10). Just security. https://www.justsecurity.org/74622/stopthesteal-timeline-of-social-media-and-extremist-activities-leading-to-1-6-insurrection/
   Google Scholar
• Toxic Comment Classification Challenge. (n.d.). Retrieved March 15, 2022, from https://kaggle.com/c/jigsaw-toxic-comment-classification-challenge
   Google Scholar
• Tschirky, M., & Makhortykh, M. (2023). #Azovsteel: Comparing qualitative and quantitative approaches for studying framing of the siege of Mariupol on Twitter. Media, War & Conflict, 17506352231184164. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352231184163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vajjala, S., Majumder, B., Gupta, A., & Surana, H. (2020). Practical natural language processing: A comprehensive guide to building real-world NLP systems. O’Reilly Media.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, K., Yang, J., & Wu, H. (2021). A survey of toxic comment classification methods. ArXiv:2112.06412 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.06412
   Google Scholar
• Wang, R., Zhou, D., Jiang, M., Si, J., & Yang, Y. (2019). A survey on opinion mining: From stance to product aspect. IEEE Access, 7, 41101–41124. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2906754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., Dai, Z., Yang, Y., Carbonell, J., Salakhutdinov, R., & Le, Q. V.. (2019). XLNet: generalized autoregressive pretraining for language understanding. Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 19), December 8-14 2019, Vancouver, Canada. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3454287.3454804
   Google Scholar