Advanced search
Publication Cover
Statistical Theory and Related Fields Volume 2, 2018 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
357
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Testing hypotheses under covariate-adaptive randomisation and additive models

Ting YeDepartment of Statistics, University of WisconsinMadison, WI, USACorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0001-6009-641XView further author information
ORCID Icon
Pages 96-101 | Received 05 Apr 2018, Accepted 13 May 2018, Published online: 25 May 2018

References

  • Aickin M. (2001). Randomization, balance, and the validity and efficiency of design-adaptive allocation methods. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 94, 97–119. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3758(00)00228-7
  • Aickin M. (2002). Beyond randomization. The Journal of Alternative Medicine, 8, 765–772.
  • Brikett N. J. (1985). Adaptive allocation in randomized controlled trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 6, 146–155. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(85)90120-5
  • Efron B. (1971). Forcing a sequential experiment to be balanced. Biometrika, 58, 403–417. doi: 10.1093/biomet/58.3.403
  • Forsythe A. B. (1987). Validity and power of tests when groups have been balanced for prognostic factors. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 5, 193–200. doi: 10.1016/0167-9473(87)90015-6
  • Hagino A., Hamada C., Yoshimura I., Ohashi Y., Sakamoto J., & Nakazato H. (2004). Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 25, 572–584. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2004.08.004
  • Kalish L. A., & Begg C. B. (1985). Treatment allocation methods in clinical trials: A review. Statistics in Medicine, 4, 129–144. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780040204
  • Ma W., Hu F., & Zhang L. (2015). Testing hypotheses of covariate-adaptive randomized clinical trials. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 110(510), 669–680. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2014.922469
  • Pocock S. J., & Simon R. (1975). Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics, 31, 103–115. doi: 10.2307/2529712
  • Shao J., & Yu X. (2013). Validity of tests under covariate-adaptive biased coin randomization and generalized linear models. Biometrics, 69, 960–969. doi: 10.1111/biom.12062
  • Shao J., Yu X., & Zhong B. (2010). A theory for testing hypotheses under covariate-adaptive randomization. Biometrika, 97, 347–360. doi: 10.1093/biomet/asq014
  • Taves D. R. (1974). Minimization: A new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 15, 443–453. doi: 10.1002/cpt1974155443
  • Weir C. J., & Lees K. R. (2003). Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial. Statistics in Medicine, 22, 705–726. doi: 10.1002/sim.1366

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.