China and Japan in CEEC: competition, cooperation and co-existence?

Bibliography

• Akon, M. S., and M. Rahman. “Reshaping the Global Order in the Post COVID-19 Era: A Critical Analysis.” Chinese Journal of International Review 2, no. 1 (2020). doi:10.1142/S2630531320500067.
   Google Scholar
• Alfred, G. “Governance along the New Silk Road in Southeast Asia and Central and Eastern Europe: A Comparison of ASEAN, the EU and 17+1.” Jebat- Malaysian Journal of History, Politics & Strategic Studies 47, no. 1 (2020): 121–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asian Development Bank (ADB). Meeting Asia’s Infrastructure Needs. Manila: Asian Development Bank, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Beeson, M., and F. Li. “China’s Place in Regional and Global Governance: A New World Comes into View.” Global Policy 7, no. 4 (2016): 491–499. doi:10.1111/1758-5899.12348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkofsky, A. “EU-Japan Relations from 2001 to Today: Achievements, Failures and Prospects.” Japan Forum 24, no. 3 (2012): 265–288. doi:10.1080/09555803.2012.699453.
   Google Scholar
• Bertalanic, B. “V4+ Japan: Evolution of Japan’s Transregional Dialogue with Central Europe.” Japanese Slavic and East European Studies (JSEES), no. 40 (2020): 92–105.
   Google Scholar
• Bromund, T., and D. Kochis. “The Top Five U.S. Priorities for European Policy in 2021.” The Heritage Foundation Issue Brief, no. 6037 (2021): 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. M., and R. Doshi “The Coronavirus Could Reshape Global Order: China Is Maneuvering for International Leadership as the United States Falters.” Foreign Affairs (March 18, 2020). https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2020-03-18/coronavirus-could-reshape-global-order
   Google Scholar
• “China Global Investment Tracker (CGIT).” The American Enterprise Institute and the Heritage Foundation. Accessed September 15, 2021. https://www.aei.org/China-global-investment-tracker
   Google Scholar
• “China’s Engagement in Central and Easter European Countries.” Austrian Institute for European and Security Policy (AIES), policy paper, (2021).
   Google Scholar
• Cieslik, A., and M. Ryan. “Characterizing Japanese Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe: A Firm Level Investigation of Stylized Facts and Investment Characteristics.” Post-Communist Economies 14, no. 4 (2002). doi:10.1080/1463137022000032718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte Insights. “Embracing the BRI Ecosystem in 2018. Navigating Pitfalls And. Seizing Opportunities.” February 12, 2018. Accessed February 12, 2021.https://www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en/economy/asia-pacific/china-belt-and-road-initiative.html
   Google Scholar
• Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA). “History of CADP.” ERIA, 2012. Accessed August 30, 2021.http://www.eria.org/database-and-programmes/history-of-cadp/
   Google Scholar
• Economy, E. C. The Third Revolution: Xi Jinping and the New Chinese State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• EU-Japan Summit 2021 Joint Statement. Accessed on August 23, 2021.https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2021/05/27/joint-statement-eu-japan-summit-27-may-2021/
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. “Joint Communication to the European Parliament and the Council: Elements for a New EU Strategy on China.” June 22, 2016. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/c3aa6b64-3919-11e6-a825-01aa75ed71a1
   Google Scholar
• European Commission and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy ( EC-HR). “Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the European Council and the Council: EU–China Strategic Outlook.” March 12, 2019. Accessed on March 12, 2022.https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/3a5bf913-45af-11e9-a8ed-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/
   Google Scholar
• Forgács, A., and P. Csillik “China - A Robotizing East-Asian Developmental State, Its Relation to the USA, EU and CEE - or Will China Become Chin-AI?” In Digitalization in International Trade and E-Commerce: Conference proceeding, Budapest, Hungary, edited by K. Natsuda and A. Bata-Balog, 42–62. Budapest Business School, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, X. “Navigating around the Chinese Hegemon.” East Asia Forum (July 2019). Accessed October 2, 2021. https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2019/07/06/navigating-around-the-chinese-hegemon-on-the-horizon
   Google Scholar
• Global Infrastructure Connectivity Alliance (GICA). “Why Connectivity Matters.” Discussion Paper. Draft Updated 10 May 2018 Singapore GICA Secretariat https://www.gica.global/sites/gica/files/Discussion-Paper-Why-Connectivity-Matters-May-10-2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Grissler, J., R, and L. Vargö“The BRI Vs FOIP: Japan’s Countering of China’s Global Ambitions.” Issue & Policy Briefs (February 2021). Institute for Security and Development Policy. Accessed November 9, 2021. https://isdp.eu/publication/the-bri-vs-foip-japans-countering-of-chinas-global-ambitions
   Google Scholar
• Horváth, L. “The Geopolitical Role of China in the CEE Region.” Contemporary Chinese Political Economy and Strategic Relations 6, no. 2 (2020): 617–651. Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Japan. Diplomatic Bluebook 2020: Japanese Diplomacy and International Situation in 2019. Accessed November 10, 2021. https://www.mofa.go.jp/fp/pp/page22e_000932.html
   Google Scholar
• Iida, M. “Japan’s Reluctant Embrace of BRI?” SWP Working Paper. German Institute for International and Security Affairs, October 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Japan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs. “Free and Open Indo-Pacific.” Accessed November 10, 2020, https://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/page25e_000278.html
   Google Scholar
• Kavalski, E. “The Struggle for Recognition of Normative Powers: Normative Power Europe and Normative Power China in Context.” Cooperation and Conflict 48, no. 2 (2013): 247–267, 258. doi:10.1177/0010836713485386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavalski, E. “Quo Vadis Cooperation between China and Eastern Euroope in the Era of Covid-19?” World Affairs 184, no. 1 (2021): 33–56. doi:10.1177/0043820021991116.
   Google Scholar
• Kawashima, S. “China and Eastern Europe in the COVID-19 Era.” The Diplomat. (April 2, 2020). https://thediplomat.com/2020/04/china-and-eastern-europe-in-the-covid-19-era/?fbclid=IwAR3ZBPeTFKoemvjdNEHRMMJWPVGyHN2TVVgF7U39nt0jaV-BWwi8PV-cUZ4
   Google Scholar
• Kitade, D. “The Butterfly Effect: Why Does Eastern Europe Matter to Japan?” In Brief, 12. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies, 2020. Accessed November 11, 2021. https://www.iss.europa.eu/content/butterfly-effect-why-does-eastern-europe-matter-japan
   Google Scholar
• Kochis, D. “U.S. Contributions to 3 Seas Investment Fund are Smart, Strategic.” The Daily Signal, January 5 (2021). Accessed October 22, 2021. https://www.heritage.org/global-politics/commentary/us-contributions-3-seas-investment-fund-are-smart-strategic/
   Google Scholar
• Li, Q. “R.“Japan’s Strengthening Economic and Trade Ties with Central and Eastern Europe: Motivation, Layout and Influence.” (In Chinese) Journal of Japanese Studies 1 (2021): 88–114.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z. “Japan’s Policy Towards CEEC and Its Impact on China’s 16+1 Initiative.” Journal of Russian Studies 2, (2019): 180–201. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, Z. “Cooperation between China and the Central and Eastern European Countries in Times of Major Changes.” China International Studies 85 (2020): 24–43.
   Google Scholar
• Macikenaite, V. “China’s Economic Statecraft: The Use of Economic Power in an Interdependent World.” Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies 9, no. 2 (2020). doi:10.1080/24761028.2020.1848381.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, M. “China’s Rise as Eurasian Power: The Revival of the Silk Road and Its Consequences.” In Rethinking the Silk Road, edited by M. Mayer, 1–42. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, M., and E. Kavalski 2019. “How to Make the Most of China’s Accidental Rise.” South China Morning Post, April 4. Accessed September 6, 2021.https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/3004542/how-make-most-chinas-accidental-rise-european-power
   Google Scholar
• McKinsey Global Institute. “Bridging Infrastructure Gaps: Has the World Made Progress?” Executive Briefing (October 2017). Accessed 21 November 2019.https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/capital-projects-and-infrastructure/our-insights/bridging-infrastructure-gaps-has-the-world-made-progress
   Google Scholar
• Noesselt, N. “Revisiting the Debate on Constructing a Theory of International Relations with Chinese Characteristics.” China Quarterly 222 (2015): 430–448. doi:10.1017/S0305741015000387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. Enhancing Connectivity through Transport Infrastructure: The Role of Official Development Finance and Private Investment. Paris: OECD, 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Parepa, L., and A. “The Belt and Road Initiative as Continuity in Chinese Foreign Policy.” Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies 9, no. 2 (2020). doi:10.1080/24761028.2020.1848370.
   Google Scholar
• Pascha, W. “The Quest for Infrastructure Development from a ‘Market Creation’ Perspective: China’s ‘Belt and Road,’ Japan’s ‘Quality Infrastructure’ and the EU’s ‘Connecting Europe and Asia.’” International Economics and Economic Policy 17 (2020a): 687–704. doi:10.1007/s10368-020-00468-0.
   Google Scholar
• Pascha, W. “Belts, Roads and Regions: The Dynamics of Chinese and Japanese Infrastructure Connectivity Initiatives and Europe’s Responses.” ADBI Working Paper Series, no. 1114 (2020b): 1–17. http://politics.people.com.cn/n1/2021/0205/c1001-32023832.html
   Google Scholar
• Pepe, J. M. “China’s Inroads into Central, Eastern, and South-Eastern Europe: Implications for Germany and the EU.” DGAP Analysis no. 3 March (2017). Accessed November 22, 2021. https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/56045/ssoar-2017-pepe-Chinas_Inroads_into_Central_Eastern_pdf
   Google Scholar
• Seibt, S. “With Its ‘Global Gateway,’ EU Tries to Compete with China’s Belt and Road. Initiative.“ Accessed October 29, 2021. Available at https://www.france24.com/en/europe/20211203-with-its-global-gateway-eu-tries-to-compete-with-the-china-s-belt-and-road
   Google Scholar
• Song, W. Q., and Q. C. Wang. “Conclusion: Toward a More Promising Partnership.“ In China’s Relations with Central and Eastern Europe, edited by W. Q. Song, 216–224. London: Routledge, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Taniguchi, T. “Beyond ‘The Arc of Freedom and Prosperity’: Debating Universal Values in Japanese, Grand Strategy. The German Marshall Fund of the United States.” The German Marshall Fund of the United States, October 26, 2010. https://www.gmfus.org/publications/beyond-arc-freedom-and-prosperity-debating-universal-values-japanese-grand-strategy
   Google Scholar
• Venne F., “China in Hungary: Real Threat or False Alarm?“ Accessed November 20, 2021. https://cepa.org/china-in-hungary-real-threat-or-false-alarm/
   Google Scholar
• Xing, L. Mapping China’s One Belt, One Road Initiative. Kindle ed. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.
   Google Scholar