Defining geologic domains using cluster analysis and indicator correlograms: a phosphate-titanium case study

References

• Ambroise C, Dang M, Govaert G. 1997. Clustering of spatial data by the EM algorithm. Proceedings of GEOEV I – Geostatistivs for Environmental Applications. p. 493–504. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-1675-8_40
   Google Scholar
• Arthur D, Vassilvitskii S. 2007. K-means++: the advantages of careful seeding. Proceedings of the Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms. p. 1027–1035; New Orleans, Louisiana. doi:10.5555/1283383.1283494.
   Google Scholar
• Breiman L. 2001. Random forests. Mach Learn. 45(1):5–32. doi:10.1023/A:1010933404324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calinski T, Harabasz J. 1974. A dendrite method for cluster analysis. Commun Stat – Theor M. 3(1):1–27. doi:10.1080/03610927408827101.
   Google Scholar
• Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. 1977. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc B (Methodol). 39(1):1–22. doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D`Urso P, Vitale V. 2020. A robust hierarchical clustering for georeferenced data. Spat Stat. 35. doi:100407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouedjio F. 2016a. A hierarchical clustering method for multivariate geostatistical data. Spat Stat. 18:333–351. doi:10.1016/j.spasta.2016.07.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fouedjio F. 2016b. Discovering spatially contiguous clusters in multivariate geostatistical data through spectral clustering. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference in Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition. Vol. 10086 LNAI, p. 547–557. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-49586-6_38
   Google Scholar
• Fouedjio F. 2017a. A spectral clustering approach for multivariate geostatistical data. Int J Data Sci Anal. 4(4):301–312. doi:10.1007/s41060-017-0069-7.
   Google Scholar
• Fouedjio F. 2017b. A spectral clustering method for large-scale geostatistical datasets. Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference in Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition. Vol. 10358 LNAI, p. 248–261. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-62416-7_18
   Google Scholar
• Fouedjio F. 2020. Clustering of multivariate geostatistical data. Wiley Interdiscip Rev: Comput Stat. (March):1–13. doi:10.1002/wics.1510.
   Google Scholar
• Fouedjio F., Hill EJ, Laukamp C. 2018. Geostatistical clustering as an aid for ore body domaining: case study at the Rocklea Dome channel iron ore deposit, Western Australia. Appl Earth Sci: Transe Inst Min Metall. 127(1):15–29. doi:10.1080/03717453.2017.1415114.
   Google Scholar
• Getis A, Ord JK. 1992. The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geogr Anal. 24(3):189–206. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Journel AG, Huijbregts C. 1978. Mining geostatistics. London: Academic Press Limited.
   Google Scholar
• MacQueen J. 1967. Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proceedings of the fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Vol. 1, p. 281–296.
   Google Scholar
• Mariz C, Wagner L, Pilger G, Whitehouse P, Bessin C, Laurent D. 2016. Geostatistical clustering, potential modeling and traditional geostatistics: a new coherent workflow. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Innovation in Mine Operations; Santiago, Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Martin R. 2019. Data driven decisions of stationarity for improved numerical modeling in geological environments. Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Martin R, Boisvert J. 2018. Towards justifying unsupervised stationary decisions for geostatistical modeling: ensemble spatial and multivariate clustering with geomodeling specific clustering metrics. Comput Geosci. 120(August):82–96. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2018.08.005.
   Google Scholar
• Modena RCC, Moreira GC, Marques DM, Costa JFCL. 2019. Avaliação de técnicas de agrupamento para definição de domínios estacionários com o auxílio de geoestatística. Proceedings of the twentieth mining symposium at the fifht ABM week; São Paulo. p. 91–100.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira GC. 2020. Análise de agrupamento aplicada à definição de domínios de estimativa para a modelagem de recursos minerais. Porto Alegre, Brazil: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. https://lume.ufrgs.br/handle/10183/212457.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver MA, Webster R. 1989. A geostatistical basis for spatial weighting in multivariate classification. Math Geol. 21(1):15–35. doi:10.1007/BF00897238.
   Google Scholar
• Ord JK, Getis A. 1995. Local spatial autocorrelation statistics: distributional issues and an application. Geogr Anal. 27:286–306. doi:10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00912.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, et al. 2011. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res. 12:2825–2830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prades C. 2017. Geostatistics and clustering for geochemical data analysis. Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta.
   Google Scholar
• Romary T, Ors F, Rivoirard J, Deraisme J. 2015. Unsupervised classification of multivariate geostatistical data: two algorithms. Comput Geosci. 85(December):96–103. doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2015.05.019.
   Google Scholar
• Romary T, Rivoirard J, Deraisme J, Quinones C, Freulon X. 2012. Domaining by clustering multivariate geostatistical data. Geostatistics Oslo. p. 455–466. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-4153-9_37
   Google Scholar
• Rossi ME, Deutsch CV. 2014. Mineral resource estimation. Springer Science & Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5717-5.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseeuw P.J. 1987. Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J Comput Appl Math. 20(C):53–65. doi:10.1016/0377-0427(87)90125-7.
   Google Scholar
• Scrucca L. 2005. Clustering multivariate spatial data based on local measures of spatial autocorrelation. Quaderni del Dipartimento di Economia, Finanza e Statistica. 20(1):1–25. http://www.ec.unipg.it/DEFS/uploads/spatcluster.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Soares A. 2000. Geoestatística para as ciências da terra e do ambiente. Lisbon: Instituto Superior Técnico.
   Google Scholar
• Sokal RR, Sneath PHA. 1965. Principles of numerical taxonomy. J Mammal. 46(1):111. doi:10.2307/1377831.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava RM, Parker HM. 1989. Robust Measures of Spatial Continuity. Geostatistics. Vol. 4. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 295–308. doi:10.1007/978-94-015-6844-9_22.
   Google Scholar
• Strehl A, Ghosh J. 2002. Cluster ensembles – a knowledge reuse framework for combining multiple partitions. J Mach Learn Res. 3:583–617. doi:10.1162/153244303321897735.
   Google Scholar