Americanity as a concept, Asia as method: on historicizing Cold War technopolitics

References

• Anderson, Warwick. 2002. “Introduction: Postcolonial Technoscience.” Social Studies of Science 32 (5/6): 643–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Warwick. 2008. The Collectors of Lost Souls: Turning Kuru Scientists Into Whitemen. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Warwick. 2012. “Asia as Method in Science and Technology Studies.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society 6: 445–451. doi: 10.1215/18752160-1572849
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Warwick. 2017. “Postcolonial Specters of STS.” East Asian Science, Technology and Society 11: 229–233. doi: 10.1215/18752160-3828937
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracarense, Natália. 2016. “Core and Periphery in the Early Cold War: A Historical Analysis of Development Theory.” In Peripheral Visions of Economic Development: New Frontiers in Development Economics and the History of Economic Thought, edited by Mario Garcia-Molina, and Hans-Michael Trautwein, 15–46. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Kuan-Hsing. 2010. Asia as Method: Toward Deimperialization. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coronil, Fernando. 1998. “Foreword.” In Close Encounters of Empire: Writing the Cultural History of U.S.–Latin American Relations, edited by Gilbert Joseph, Catherine LeGrand, and Ricardo Salvatore, ix–xii. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dumoulin, David, Mina Kleiche-Dray, and Mathieu Quet. 2018. “Going South. How STS Could Think Science in and with the South?” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 1 (1): 280–305.
   Google Scholar
• Ferry, Emma. 2013. Minerals, Collecting, and Value Across the US–Mexico Border. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gonzalez-Vicente, Ruben. 2012. “The Political Economy of Sino-Peruvian Relations: A New Dependency?” Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 41 (1): 97–131. doi: 10.1177/186810261204100104
   Google Scholar
• Grosfoguel, Ramón. 2002. “Colonial Difference, Geopolitics of Knowledge, and Global Coloniality in the Modern/Colonial Capitalist World-System.” Review (Fernand Braudel Center) 25 (3): 203–224.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Junyoung. 2017. “Asia-Latin America as Method: The Global South Project and the Dislocation of the West.” Verge: Studies in Global Asias 3 (2): 97–117.
   Google Scholar
• Kreimer, Pablo, and Hebe Vessuri. 2017. “Latin American Science, Technology, and Society: A Historical and Reflexive Approach.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 1 (1): 17–37.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, Noortje. 2012. “On Some Uses and Abuses of Topology in the Social Analysis of Technology (Or the Problem with Smart Meters).” Theory, Culture & Society 29 (4/5): 288–310. doi: 10.1177/0263276412454460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medina, Eden, Ivan da Costa, and Christina Holmes. 2014. Beyond Imported Magic: Essays on Science, Technology, and Society in Latin America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehos, Donna, and Suzanne Moon. 2011. “The Uses of Portability: Circulating Experts in the Technopolitics of Cold War and Decolonization.” In Entangled Geographies: Empire and Technopolitics in the Global Cold War, edited by Gabrielle Hecht, 43–74. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quijano, Anibal, and Immanuel Wallerstein. 1992. “Americanity as a Concept, or the Americas in the Modern World-System.” International Journal of Social Sciences 134: 549–557.
   Google Scholar
• Sheinin, David, ed. 2000. Beyond the ideal: Pan Americanism in Inter-American affairs. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Velho, Raquel, and Sebastián Ureta. 2019. “Frail Modernities: Latin American Infrastructures between Repair and Ruination.” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 2 (1): 428–441.
   Google Scholar