488
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Scalar dissonances, knowledge-making, sense of urgency, and social narratives about the future. Contours of the climate change debate in Latin America

Dissonâncias escalares, produção de conhecimento, senso de urgência e narrativas sociais sobre o futuro. Contornos do debate sobre mudanças climáticas na América Latina

Disonancias escalares, producción de conocimiento, sentido de urgencia y narrativas sociales sobre el futuro. Los contornos del debate sobre el cambio climático en América Latina

ORCID Icon
Article: 2278839 | Received 06 Jun 2023, Accepted 30 Oct 2023, Published online: 07 Dec 2023

References

  • Ahmad, S. 2020. “The Lithium Triangle: Where Chile, Argentina, and Bolivia Meet.” Harvard International Review 41 (1): 51–53. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26917284.
  • Anderson, B., K. Grove, L. Rickards, and M. Kearnes. 2020. “Slow Emergencies: Temporality and the Racialized Biopolitics of Emergency Governance.” Progress in Human Geography 44 (4): 621–639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519849263.
  • Ariztia, T., A. Bravo, and I. Nuñez. 2023. “Baroque Tools for Climate Action. What Do We Learn from a Catalogue of Local Technologies?” Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society 6 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2022.2141015.
  • Barra, M. P. 2021. “Good Sediment: Race and Restoration in Coastal Louisiana.” Annals of the American Association of Geographers 111 (1): 266–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1766411.
  • Bayón, M. C.2019. Las grietas del neoliberalismo: Dimensiones de la desigualdad contemporánea en México. Mexico City: UNAM.
  • Beck, S., and M. Mahony. 2017. “The IPCC and the Politics of Anticipation.” Nature Climate Change 7 (5): 311–313. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3264.
  • Blicharska, M., R. J. Smithers, M. Kuchler, et al. 2017. “Steps to Overcome the North– South Divide in Research Relevant to Climate Change Policy and Practice.” Nature Climate Change 7 (1): 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3163.
  • Bridel, A. 2023. “Democracy in a Deluge: Epistemic Agency of Marginalized Voices in Oaxaca’s Storm Governance.” Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space 6 (3): 1705–1724. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486221132219.
  • Brown, B. M. 2014. “Climate Science, Populism and the Democracy of Rejection.” In Culture, Politics and Climate Change: How Information Shapes our Collective Futures, edited by D. A. Crow, and M. T. Boykoff, 129–145. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Buis, A. 2019. “The Atmosphere: Getting a Handle on Carbon Dioxide.” NASA. 9 October. https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2915/the-atmosphere-getting-a-handle-on-carbon-dioxide/#:~:text=Once%20it's%20added%20to%20the,timescale%20of%20many%20humn%20lives.
  • Bumpus, A. G., and D. M. Liverman. 2008. "Accumulation by Decarbonization and the Governance of Carbon Offsets.” Economic Geography 84 (2): 127–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.tb00401.x.
  • Cappelli, F., V. Costantini, and D. Consoli. 2021. “The Trap of Climate Change-Induced “Natural” Disasters and Inequality.” Global Environmental Change 70: 102329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102329.
  • Casas, R., and T. Pérez-Bustos. 2019. (Comp.) Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad en América Latina. La mirada de las nuevas generaciones. Buenos Aires: CLACSO-ESOCITE.
  • Castree, N., M. A. William, J. Barry, D. Brockington, et al. 2014. “Changing the Intellectual Climate.” Nature Climate Change 4 (9): 763–768. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2339.
  • Clavellina-Miller, J. L. 2014. “Reforma energética, ¿era realmente necesaria?” Economía informa 385: 3–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0185-0849(14)70417-7.
  • Climate Action Tracker (CAT). 2021. “Global Update: Climate Target Updates Slow as Science Demands Action.” September. https://climateactiontracker.org/publications/global-update-september-2021/.
  • ClimateClock.world. 2020. https://climateclock.world/.
  • Conde, A., F. Estrada, B. Martínez, O. Sánchez, and C. Gay-García. 2011. “Regional Climate Scenarios for Mexico.” Atmósfera 24 (1): 125–140.
  • Cornell, S. E., and A. Gupta. 2019. “Is Climate Change the Most Important Challenge of Our Times?” In Contemporary Climate Change Debates, edited by M. Hulme, 6–20. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 6 (CMIP6). https://pcmdi.llnl.gov/CMIP6/.
  • Demeritt, D. 2001. “The Construction of Global Warming and the Politics of Science.” Association of American Geographers 91 (2): 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00245.
  • Dunlap, A. 2021. “More Wind Energy Colonialism(s) in Oaxaca? Reasonable Findings, Unacceptable Development.” Energy Research & Social Science 82: 102304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102304.
  • Edwards, P. N. 2010. A Vast Machine. Computer Models, Climate Date and the Politics of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Eljuri, E. and D. Johnston. 2014. "Mexico’s Energy Sector Reform." The Journal of World Energy Law & Business 7 (2): 168–170. https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwu001.
  • Escobar, H. 2013. “Brasil prepara seu 1o modelo climático para o IPCC. Portal de Notícias Estadão Cie^ncia.” Estadão. 20 February. https://www.estadao.com.br/ciencia/herton-escobar/brasil-prepara-seu-1o-modelo-climatico-para-o-ipcc/.
  • Estrada, F., B. Martínez-López, C. Conde, and C. Gay-García. 2012. “The New National Climate Change Documents of Mexico: What Do the Regional Climate Change Scenarios Represent?” Climatic Change 110 (3-4): 1029–1046. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0100-2.
  • Estrada, F., A. Mendoza-Ponce, G. Murray, et al. 2023. “Model Emulators for the Assessment of Regional Impacts and Risks of Climate.” Frontiers Environmental Science 11: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1027545.
  • Fang, D., and G. Zou. 2023. “The Role of Police Enforcement in Public Health Emergencies.” The Lancet 401 (10382): 1077–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00218-0.
  • Findlater, K., S. Webber, M. Kandlikar, and S. Donner. 2021. “Climate Services Promise Better Decisions but Mainly Focus on Better Data.” Nature Climate Change 11 (9): 731–737. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01125-3.
  • Finnegan, D. A. 2008. “The Spatial Turn: Geographical Approaches in the History of Science.” Journal of the History of Biology 41 (2): 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-007-9136-6. https://www.jstor.org/stable/29737551.
  • Ford, J. D., L. Cameron, J. Rubis, et al. 2016. “Including Indigenous Knowledge and Experience in IPCC Assessment Reports.” Nature Climate Change 6 (4): 349–353. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2954.
  • Fröhlich, C., and T. Ide. 2019. “Other Social, Economic and Political Factors are Nearly Always more Important.” In Contemporary Climate Change Debates, edited by M. Hulme, 57–65. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Garlati, A. 2013. “Climate Change and Extreme Weather Events in Latin America: An Exposure Index.” SSRN. IDB Working Paper No. IDB-TN-490. 21 April. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2254450.
  • Gasparini, L., M. Cicowiez, and W. Sosa-Escudero. 2012. Pobreza y desigualdad en América Latina. Conceptos, herramientas y aplicaciones. La Plata: CEDLAS.
  • Godínez-Zamora, G., L. Victor-Gallardo, J. Angulo-Paniagua, et al. 2020. “Decarbonising the Transport and Energy Sectors: Technical Feasibility and Socioeconomic Impacts in Costa Rica.” Energy Strategy Reviews 32: 100573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100573.
  • Grundmann, R., and N. Stehr. 2010. “Climate Change: What Role for Sociology?: A Response to Constance Lever-Tracy.” Current Sociology 58 (6): 897–910. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392110376031.
  • Hackmann, H., S. C. Moser, and A. L. St. Clair. 2014. “The Social Heart of Global Environmental Change.” Nature Climate Change 4 (8): 653–655. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2320.
  • Harvey, F. 2023. “Scientists Deliver ‘Final Warning’ on Climate Crisis: Act Now or it’s Too Late.” The Guardian, 20 March, https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/mar/20/ipcc-climate-crisis-report-delivers-final-warning-on-15c.
  • Hausfather, Z. 2018. “Explainer: How ‘Shared Socioeconomic Pathways’ Explore Future Climate Change.” Carbon Brief, 4 April. https://www.carbonbrief.org/explainer-how-shared-socioeconomic-pathways-explore-future-climate-change/.
  • Hausfather, Z. 2019. “CMIP6: The Next Generation of Climate Models Explained.” Carbon Brief, 12 February. https://www.carbonbrief.org/cmip6-the-next-generation-of-climate-models-explained/.
  • Heymann, M. 2010. “The Evolution of Climate Ideas and Knowledge.” WIRES Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews 1 (4): 581–597. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.61.
  • Heymann, M. 2012. “Constructing Evidence and Trust. How Did Climate Scientists’Confidence in Their Models and Simulations Emerge?” In The Social Life of Climate Change Models: Anticipating Nature, edited by K. Hastrup, and M. Skrydstrup, 203–224. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Heymann, M. 2019. “The Climate Change Dilemma: Big Science, the Globalizing of Climate and the Loss of the Human Scale.” Regional Environmental Change 19 (6): 1549–1560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1373-z.
  • Heymann, M., and D. A. Dahan. 2019. “Epistemology and Politics in Earth System Modeling: Historical Perspectives.” Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018MS001526.
  • Hochsprung-Miguel, J. C. 2017. “The Technopolitics of Climate Change: Climate Models, Geopolitics, and Governmentality.” História, Cie^ncias, Saúde – Manguinhos 24 (4): 1–19.
  • Hochsprung-Miguel, J. C., M. Mahony, and M. S. Monteiro-Alves. 2019. “‘Infrastructural Geopolitics’ of Knowledge: The Brazilian Earth System Model and the North-South Knowledge Divide.” Sociologia (lisbon, Portugal) 21 (5): 44–74. https://doi.org/10.1590/15174522-0215102.
  • Hulme, M. 2009. Why We Disagree About Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hulme, M. 2010. “Problems with Making and Governing Global Kinds of Knowledge.” Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 20 (4): 558–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.005.
  • Hulme, M. 2011. “Reducing the Future to Climate: A Story of Climate Determinism and Reductionism.” Osiris 26 (1): 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1086/661274.
  • Hulme, M. 2012. “How Climate Models Gain and Exercise Authority.” In The Social Life of Climate Change Models: Anticipating Nature, edited by K. Hastrup, and M. Skrydstrup, 30–44. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Hulme, M. 2014. Can Science Fix Climate Change? A Case Against Climate Engineering. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Hulme, M. 2016. Weathered Cultures of Climate. New York, NY: Sage.
  • Hulme, M. 2017. Weathered: Cultures of Climate. New York, NY: Sage.
  • Hulme, M. 2019. “The First Climate Scenario: A Drama in Three Acts.” In Culture and Climate Change: Scenarios, edited by R. Tyszczuk, J. Smith, and R. Butler, 73–76. Shed.
  • Hulme, M. 2023. Climate Change isn’t Everything. Cambridge: Polity.
  • Hulme, M., and S. Dessai. 2008. “Negotiating Future Climates for Public Policy: A Critical Assessment of the Development of Climate Scenarios for the UK.” Environment, Science and Policy 11 (1): 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2007.09.003.
  • INECC. 2014a. “Actualización y divulgación de los nuevos escenarios de cambio climático aplicados a México para fortalecer las capacidades nacionales.” Estudio desarrollado por el IMTA con la colaboración de: José Antonio Salinas, Gabriela Colorado, Martín José Montero Martínez, María Eugenia Maya Magaña, Maura González Robles.
  • INECC. 2014b. “Identificación y análisis de los flujos financieros internacionales para acciones de cambio climático en México.” Informe final de actividades. México. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/503393/INECC2014IdentificacionAnalisisFlujosFinancierosInternacionalesAccionesCCMexico.pdf.
  • INECC. 2018b. “Oportunidades y barreras para aprovechar las fuentes de financiamiento internacional que favorezcan el alcance de los objetivos climáticos sectoriales de México.” México. https://www.gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/422301/Barreras_Oportunidades_Financiamiento_CGCV.pdf.
  • IPCC. 2018. “Summary for Policymakers.” In: Global Warming of 1.5°C. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/spm/.
  • IPCC. 2021. “Climate Change 2021 The Physical Science Basis. Summary for Policymakers.” 7 Agust. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/chapter/summary-for-policymakers/.
  • Jalota, S. K., B. B. Vashisht, S. Sharma, and S. Kaur. 2018. “Climate Change Projections.” In Understanding Climate Change Impacts on Crop Productivity and Water Balance, edited by S. K. Jalota, B. B. Vashisht, S. Sharma, and S. Kaur, 55–86. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809520-1.00002-1.
  • Janssens, C., P. Havlík, T. Krisztin, et al. 2020. “Global Hunger and Climate Change Adaptation Through International Trade.” Nature Climate Change 10 (9): 829–835. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0847-4.
  • Jasanoff, S. 2004. “Ordering Knowledge, Ordering Society.” In States of Knowledge: The Co- Production of Science and Social Order, edited by S. Jasanoff, 13–45. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Jasanoff, S. 2010. “A New Climate for Society.” Theory, Culture & Society 27 (2-3): 233–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409361497.
  • Jasanoff, S., and L. M. Martello. 2004. “Knowledge and Governance.” In Earthly Politics. Local and Global Environmental Governance, edited by S. Jasanoff, S. & L, and M. Martello, 335–350. USA: The MIP Press.
  • Johnston, R. J., D. Gregory, and M. Watts. 2001. Human Geography Dictionary, 458–459, 582–584. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Kaiho, K. 2022. “Extinction Magnitude of Animals in the Near Future.” Scientific Reports 12: 19593. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-23369-5.
  • Karlsson, S., T. Srebotnjak, and P. Gonzales. 2007. “Understanding the North–South Knowledge Divide and Its Implications for Policy: A Quantitative Analysis of the Generation of Scientific Knowledge in the Environmental Sciences.” Environmental Science and Policy 10 (7-8): 668–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2007.04.001.
  • Karnieli, A., A. Shtein, N. Panov, N. Weisbrod, et al. 2019. “Was Drought Really the Trigger Behind the Syrian Civil War in 2011?” Water 11 (8): 1564. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11081564.
  • Kingsbury, D. 2021. “‘Green’ Extractivism and the Limits of Energy Transitions: Lithium, Sacrifice, and Maldevelopment in the Americas.” SFS Georgetown Journal of International Affairs. 20 July. https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2021/07/20/green-extractivism-and-the-limits-of-energy-transitions-lithium-sacrifice-and-maldevelopment-in-the-americas/.
  • Knutti, R. 2018. “A Wider Role for Climate Scenarios.” Nature Sustainability 1 (5): 214–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0067-3.
  • Knutti, R. 2019. “Closing the Knowledge-Action Gap in Climate Change.” One Earth 1 (1): 21–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.09.001.
  • Koehrsen, J., S. Dickel, T. Pfister, et al. 2020. “Climate Change in Sociology: Still Silent or Resonating?” Current Sociology 68 (6): 738–760. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392120902223.
  • Lahsen, M., and J. Ribot. 2022. “Politics of attributing extreme events and disasters to climate change.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Review Climate Change 13 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.750.
  • Lahsen, M. 2004. “Transnational Locals: Brazilian Experiences of the Climate Regime.” In Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance, edited by S. Jasanoff, and M. L. Martello, 151–172. The MIT Press.
  • Lahsen, M., G. de Azevedo Couto, and I. Lorenzoni. 2020. “When Climate Change is Not Blamed: The Politics of Disaster Attribution in International Perspective.” Climatic Change 158 (2): 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02642-z.
  • Latour, B. 1986. “Visualisation and Cognition: Drawing Things Together.” Avant: Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies 3: 207–260.
  • Lemos, M. C., C. J. Kirchhoff, and V. Ramprasad. 2012. “Narrowing the Climate Information Usability gap.” Nature Climate Change 2 (11): 789–794. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1614.
  • Lezama, J. L. 2004. La Construcción Social y Política del Medio Ambiente. Mexico City: Colegio de México.
  • Livingstone, D. N. 2003. Putting Science in Its Place: Geographies of Scientific Knowledge. University of Chicago Press.
  • Livingstone, D. N. 2005. “Science, Text and Space: Thoughts on the Geography of Reading.” Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30 (4): 391–401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00179.x.
  • Logroño, S. I., and A. Muñoz. 2019. “Percepción social del cambio climático en un valle interandino en la sierra del Ecuador.” Espacio y Desarrollo 36: 101–134. https://doi.org/10.18800/espacioydesarrollo.202002.005.
  • López Cerezo, J. A., and J. L. Lujan López. 2000. Ciencia y política del riesgo. Madrid: Alianza.
  • Lustgarten, A. 2020. “The Great Climate Migration.” New York Times, 23 July. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/07/23/magazine/climate-migration.html.
  • Lyon, C., E. Saupe, C. J. Smith, et al. 2021. “Climate Change Research and Action Must Look Beyond 2100.” Global Change Biology 28 (2): 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15871.
  • Mahony, M. 2014. “The Predictive State: Science, Territory and the Future of the Indian Climate.” Social Studies of Science 44 (1): 109–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713501407.
  • Mahony, M. 2017. “The (re)Emergence of Regional Climate: Mobile Models, Regional Visions and the Government of Climate Change.” In Cultures of Prediction in Atmospheric and Climate Science: Epistemic and Cultural Shifts in Computer-Based Modelling and Simulation, edited by M. Heymann, G. Gramelsberger, and M. Mahony, 139–159. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Mahony, M. 2021. “Geographies of Science and Technology 1: Boundaries and Crossings.” Progress in Human Geography 45 (3): 586–595. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520969824.
  • Mahony, M. 2023. “Geographies of Science and Technology III: Careful Entanglements, Responsible Futures.” Progress in Human Geography 0 (0): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/03091325231165965.
  • Mahony, M., and M. Hulme. 2018. “Epistemic Geographies of Climate Change: Science, Space and Politics.” Progress in Human Geography 42 (3): 395–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132516681485.
  • Martínez-Mendoza, E., L. A. Rivas-Tovar, E. Fernández-Echeverría, et al. 2020. “Social Impact of Wind Energy in the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, Mexico, Using Likert-Fuzzy.” Energy Strategy Reviews 32: 100567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100567.
  • Mejía-Carrasco, E. 2017. “Sociedad civil y violencia: el conflicto por el parque eólico en territorio Ikojt de San Dionisio del Mar.” Acta Sociológica 74: 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acso.2017.11.005.
  • O’Neill, B. C., T. R. Carter, K. Ebi, et al. 2020. “Achievements and Needs for the Climate Change Scenario Framework.” Nature Climate Change 10 (12): 1074–1084. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-00952-0.
  • Oreskes, N. 2015. “How Earth Science has Become Social Science.” Historical Social Research 40 (2): 246–270. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.263.5147.64.
  • Oreskes, N., K. Shrader-Frechette, and K. Belitz. 1994. “Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences.” Science 263 (5147): 641–646. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.263.5147.641.
  • Oswald, S. U., et al. 2014. “Un futuro sustentable con calidad de vida: ¿una utopía, una realidad o una necesidad en Morelos?” In Vulnerabilidad social y de género entre migrantes ambientales, edited by U. Oswald, S. E. Serrano, and A. Estrada, 151–166. Mexico: CRIM-UNAM.
  • Otto, F. E., K. Haustein, P. Uhe, C. A. Coelho, J. A. Aravequia, W. Almeida, A. King, E. Coughlan De Perez, Y. Wada, and G. Jan Van Oldenborgh. 2015. “Factors Other than Climate Change, Main Drivers of 2014/15 Water Shortage in Southeast Brazil.” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 96: S35–S40. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-15-00120.1.
  • Overland, I., and B. K. Sovacool. 2020. “The Misallocation of Climate Research Funding.” Energy Research & Social Science 62 (101349): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101349.
  • Pasgaard, M., B. Dalsgaard, P. Maruyama, et al. 2015. “Geographical Imbalances and Divides in the Scientific Production of Climate Change Knowledge.” Global Environmental Change 35: 279–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.018.
  • Pedee, S., P. A. Harrison, I. Holman, et al. 2021. “Enriching the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways to Co-Create Consistent Multisector Scenarios for the UK.” Science of the Total Environment 756: 143–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143172.
  • Pielke, R. J. 2022. “Why Investors Need Not Worry About Climate Risk?” The Honest Broker, 23 May. https://rogerpielkejr.substack.com/p/why-investors-need-not-worry-about.
  • Porter, J. J., and S. Dessai. 2017. “Mini-Me: Climate Scientists’ (mis)Perceptions of Users and Their Needs.” Environmental, Science and Policy 77: 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.004.
  • Powell, R. C. 2007. “Geographies of Science: Histories, Localities, Practices, Futures.” Progress in Human Geography 31 (3): 309–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132507077081.
  • Presidencia de la República. 2014. “Comunicado de la Presidencia.” 23 September https://www.gob.mx/epn/prensa/para-mexico-enfrentar-el-cambio-climatico-es-un-compromiso-de-estado-presidente-enrique-pena-nieto?tab = .
  • Ramos, E. T., and J. E. Yanes. 2018. Migración y cambio climático. San Salvador: Universidad Tecnológica de El Salvador. http://repositorio.utec.edu.sv:8080/jspui/handle/11298/990.
  • Romero-Lankao, P. 2007. “Are We Missing the Point? Particularities of Urbanization, Sustainability and Carbon Emissions in Latin American Cities.” Environment and Urbanization 19 (1): 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247807076915.
  • Sarewitz, D. 2004. “How Science Makes Environmental Controversies Worse.” Environment Science & Policy 7 (5): 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001.
  • Schipper, L. F. 2020. “Maladaptation: When Adaptation to Climate Change Goes Very Wrong.” One Earth 3 (4): 409–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.09.014.
  • Schneider, S. H. 1983. “CO2, Climate and Society: A Brief Overview.” In Social Science Research and Climate Change: An Interdisciplinary Appraisal, edited by R. S. Chen, E. Boulding, and S. H. Schneider, 9–15. Netherlands: Springer.
  • Seager, J. 2009. “Death By Degrees: Taking a Feminist Hard Look at the 2° Climate Policy.” Kvinder, Køn & Forskning 34: 11–21. https://doi.org/10.7146/kkf.v0i3-4.27968.
  • Selby, J., O. S. Dahi, C. Fröhlich, et al. 2017. “Climate Change and the Syrian Civil War Revisited.” Political Geography 60: 232–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.05.007.
  • SEMARNAT-INE. 1997. México. Primera Comunicación Nacional ante la Convención Marco de las Naciones Unidas. México. 150 pp.
  • SEMARNAT-INE. 2001. México. Segunda Comunicación Nacional ante la Convención Marco de las Naciones Unidas sobre el Cambio Climático. 379 pp.
  • SEMARNAT-INE. 2006. México. Tercera Comunicación ante la Convención Marco de las Naciones Unidas sobre Cambio Climático. México, 208 pp.
  • SEMARNAT-INE. 2009. México. Cuarta Comunicación ante la Convención Marco de las Naciones Unidas sobre Cambio Climático. México, 274 pp.
  • SEMARNAT-INECC. 2012. México. Quinta Comunicación ante la Convención Marco de las Naciones Unidas sobre Cambio Climático. México, 399 pp.
  • SEMARNAT-INECC. 2018. México. Sexta Comunicación ante la Convención Marco de las Naciones Unidas sobre Cambio Climático. México, 757 pp.
  • Shackely, S., and B. Wynne. 1995. “Global Climate Change: The Mutual Construction of an Emergent Science-Policy Domain.” Science and Public Policy 22 (4): 218–230. https://doi.org/10.1093/spp/22.4.218.
  • Shackley, S. 2001. “Epistemic Lifestyles in Climate Change Modeling.” In Changing the Atmosphere: Expert Knowledge and Environmental Governance, edited by C. A. Miller, and P. N. Edwards, 107–133. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Shapin, S. 1988. “The House of Experiment in Seventeenth Century England.” Isis 79 (3): 373. https://doi.org/10.1086/354773.
  • Shimoda, Y., Y. Yamaguchi, Y. Iwafune, et al. 2020. “Energy Demand Science for a Decarbonized Society in the Context of the Residential Sector.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 132: 11–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110051.
  • Skelton, M., J. J. Porter, S. Dessai, et al. 2017. “The Social and Scientific Values That Shape National Climate Scenarios: A Comparison of the Netherlands, Switzerland and the UK.” Regional Environmental Change 17 (8): 2325–2338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-017-1155-z.
  • Skelton, M., J. J. Porter, S. Dessai, et al. 2019. “Customising Global Climate Science for National Adaptation: A Case Study of T Climate Projections in UNFCCC’s National Communications.” Environmental Science and Policy 101: 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.07.015.
  • Sovacool, B. K. 2020. “Sustainable Minerals and Metals for a Low-Carbon Future.” Science 367 (6473): 30–33. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz6003.
  • Sovacool, B. K., M. Martiskainen, A. Hook, and L. Bake. 2019. “Decarbonization and its Discontents: A Critical Energy Justice Perspective on Four Low-Carbon Transitions.” Climate Change 155 (4): 581–619. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02521-7.
  • Suldovsky, B. 2017. “The Information Deficit Model and Climate Change Communication.” Oxford Research Encyclopaedia of Climate Science, https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.301.
  • Svampa, M. 2018. “Imágenes del fin. Narrativas de la crisis socioecológica en el Antropoceno.” Nueva Sociedad 278: 151–164.
  • Tang, S., and S. Dessai. 2012. “Usable Science? The U.K. Climate Projections 2009 and Decision Support for Adaptation Planning.” Weather Climate Society 4 (4): 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-12-00028.1.
  • Turnbull, D. 2000. Masons, Tricksters and Cartographers: Comparative Studies in the Sociology of Scientific and Indigenous Knowledge. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). 2022. “Adaptation Gap Report 2022.” 1 November. https://www.unep.org/resources/adaptation-gap-report-2022.
  • Valdes, P. 2011. “Built for Stability.” Nature Geoscience 4 (7): 414–416. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1200.
  • Van der Sluijs, J., J. Van Eijndhoven, S. Shackley, and B. Wynne. 1998. “Anchoring Devices in Science and Policy: The Case of Consensus Around Climate Sensitivity.” Social Studies of Science 28 (2): 291–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631298028002004.
  • Vega-López, E. 2020. “La erosión presupuestal de la política ambiental mexicana: Evidencias, argumentos y riesgos.” Economía-UNAM 17 (51): 296–305.
  • Vessuri, H., and R. Cancino. 2018. “Science and Technology in Development.” The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea2180.
  • Viguera, B., F. Alpízar, C. A. Harvey, M. R. Martínez-Rodríguez, M. Saborío-Rodríguez, and L. Contreras. 2019. “Percepciones de cambio climático y respuestas adaptativas de pequeños agricultores en dos paisajes guatemaltecos.” Agronomía Mesoamericana 30 (2): 313–331. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v30i2.33938.
  • Villavicencio-Calzadillo, P., and M. Mauger. 2021. “Bolivia’s Energy Transition in Harmony with Nature. Reality or Delusion?” In Dilemmas of Energy Transition in the Global South. Balancing Urgency and Justice, edited by A. Kumar, J. I. Höffken, and A. Pols. Abingdon: Routledge.
  • Walsh, A. 2022. “What to Expect from the World's Sixth Mass Extinction.” Deustche Welle, 1 November. https://www.dw.com/en/what-to-expect-from-the-worlds-sixth-mass-extinction/a-60360245.
  • Whyte, K. 2019. “Too Late for Indigenous Climate Justice: Ecological and Relational Tipping Points.” WIRES Climate Change, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.603.
  • Yearley, S. 2010. “Sociology and Climate Change After Kyoto: What Roles for Social Science in Understanding Climate Change?” Current Sociology 57 (3): 389–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392108101589.
  • Zadra, A., K. Williams, A. Frassoni, M. Rixen, A. Adames, J. Berner, F. Bouyssel, and B. Cassati. 2018. “Systematic Errors in Weather and Climate Models: Nature, Origins, and Ways Forward.” Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, ES67–ES70. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0287.1.
  • Zárate-Toledo, E., and F. Fraga. 2016. “La política eólica mexicana: Controversias sociales y ambientales debido a su implantación territorial. Estudios de caso en Oaxaca y Yucatán.” Trace 69: 65–95. https://doi.org/10.22134/trace.v0i69.10.