Using efficiency frontiers to visualise suppliers’ performance capabilities: moving beyond supplier rationalisation

References

• Andersson, U., Forsgren, M., & Holm, U. (2002). The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11), 979–996. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badiezadeh, T., Saen, R. F., & Samavati, T. (2018). Assessing sustainability of supply chains by double frontier network dea: A big data approach. Computers & Operations Research, 98(10), 284–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2017.06.003.
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A., Roychoudhury, B., & Gogoi, B. J. (2020). Determining rank in the market using a neutrosophic decision support system. Journal of Business Analytics, 3(2), 138–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/2573234X.2020.1834883
   Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, J. M., Dion, P., & Johnson, W. (2008). A cross-cultural examination of relationship strength in b2b services. Journal of Services Marketing, 22(2), 114–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040810862868
   Google Scholar
• Braglia, M., & Petroni, A. (2000). A quality assurance-oriented methodology for handling trade-offs in supplier selection. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 30(2), 96–112. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600030010318829
   Google Scholar
• Buffa, F. P., & Ross, A. D. (2011). Measuring the consequences of using diverse supplier evaluation teams: A performance frontier perspective. Journal of Business Logistics, 32(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2158-1592.2011.01005.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, A. S., Kaynak, H., Hartley, J. L., & Ross, A. (2008). Supplier dependence: Impact on supplier’s participation and performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28(9), 899–916. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570810895302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, V., Aparicio, J., & Zhu, J. (2021). Data science for better productivity. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72(5), 971–974. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1892466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charles, V., Färe, R., & Grosskopf, S (2016). A translation invariant pure dea model. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(1), 390–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W., Lewin, A. Y., & Seiford, L. M (1997). Data envelopment analysis theory, methodology and applications. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48(3), 332–333. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, C., & Yan, H. (2011). Network dea model for supply chain performance evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 213(1), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Cook, W. D., & Lim, S. (2019). Preface: Dea and its applications in operations and data analytics. Annals of Operations Research, 278(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03243-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, W. D., Tone, K., & Zhu, J. (2014). Data envelopment analysis: Prior to choosing a model. Omega, 44(4), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2013.09.004
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2006). Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses: With dea-solver software and references. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Day, G. S. (2000). Managing market relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300281003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickson, G. W. (1966). An analysis of vendor selection systems and decisions. Journal of Purchasing, 2(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.1966.tb00818.x
   Google Scholar
• Dutta, P., Jaikumar, B., & Arora, M. S. (2021). Applications of data envelopment analysis in supplier selection between 2000 and 2020: A literature review. Annals of Operations Research, 2021:2 , 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-03931-6
   Google Scholar
• Fugate, B. S., Mentzer, J. T., & Stank, T. P. (2010). Logistics performance: Efficiency, effectiveness, and differentiation. Journal of Business Logistics, 31(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2010.tb00127.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galagedera, D. U. A., & Silvapulle, P. (2003). Experimental evidence on robustness of data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(6), 654–660. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gattorna, J., & Jones, T. (1998). Strategic supply chain alignment: Best practice in supply chain management. Gower Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Golicic, S. L., & Mentzer, J. T. (2006). An empirical examination of relationship magnitude. Journal of Business Logistics, 27(1), 81–108. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2158-1592.2006.tb00242.x
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, D. A., Hoppner, J. J., Lee, H. S., & Schoenherr, T. (2017). The influence of the structure of interdependence on the response to inequity in buyer–supplier relationships. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(1), 124–137. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitt, M. A., Dacin, M. T., Levitas, E., Arregle, J.-L., & Borza, A. (2000). Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: Resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 449–467. https://doi.org/10.5465/1556404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, W., Xu, X., & Dey, P. K. (2010). Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(1), 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ireland, R. D., Hitt, M. A., & Vaidyanath, D. (2002). Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 28(3), 413–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630202800308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaynak, H. (2002). The relationship between just-in-time purchasing techniques and firm performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(3), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2002.803385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotabe, M., Martin, X., & Domoto, H. (2003). Gaining from vertical partnerships: Knowledge transfer, relationship duration, and supplier performance improvement in the US and Japanese automotive industries. Strategic Management Journal, 24(4), 293–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koufteros, X., Vickery, S. K., & Dröge, C. (2012). The effects of strategic supplier selection on buyer competitive performance in matched domains: Does supplier integration mediate the relationships? Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48(2), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2012.03263.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, D. R. (1997). Supplier development: Current practices and outcomes. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management, 33(1), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.1997.tb00287.x
   Google Scholar
• Krause, D. R., Handfield, R. B., & Scannell, T. V. (1998). An empirical investigation of supplier development: Reactive and strategic processes. Journal of Operations Management, 17(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00030-8
   Google Scholar
• Liker, J. K., & Choi, T. Y. (2004). Building deep supplier relationships. Harvard Business Review, 82 (12), 104–113. https://hbr.org/2004/12/building-deep-supplier-relationships
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell, C. K., & Pastor, J. T. (1997). Target setting: An application to a bank branch network. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(2), 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00348-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell, C. K., & Pastor, J. T. (1999). Radial dea models without inputs or without outputs. European Journal of Operational Research, 118(1), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00338-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackelprang, A. W., Bernardes, E., Burke, G. J., & Welter, C. (2018). Supplier innovation strategy and performance: A matter of supply chain market positioning. Decision Sciences, 49(4), 660–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarter, M. W., & Northcraft, G. B. (2007). Happy together?: Insights and implications of viewing managed supply chains as a social dilemma. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 498–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modi, S. B., & Mabert, V. A. (2007). Supplier development: Improving supplier performance through knowledge transfer. Journal of Operations Management, 25(1), 42–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, P. (2005). Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(12), 1129–1151. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narasimhan, R., Talluri, S., & Mendez, D. (2001). Supplier evaluation and rationalization via data envelopment analysis: An empirical examination. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 37(3), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2001.tb00103.x
   Google Scholar
• Paradi, J. C., Asmild, M., & Simak, P. C. (2004). Using dea and worst practice dea in credit risk evaluation. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21(2), 153–165. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.297
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prahinski, C., & Benton, W. (2004). Supplier evaluations: Communication strategies to improve supplier performance. Journal of Operations Management, 22(1), 39–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2003.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdy, L., & Safayeni, F. (2000). Strategies for supplier evaluation: A framework for potential advantages and limitations. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 47(4), 435–443. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.895339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. (1993). Parallel sourcing and supplier performance in the japanese automobile industry. Strategic Management Journal, 14(5), 339–350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, K. W., Purdy, L., Safayeni, F., & Duimering, P. R. (2007). A supplier development program: Rational process or institutional image construction? Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 556–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, A. D., & Buffa, F. P. (2009). Supplier post performance evaluation: The effects of buyer preference weight variance. International Journal of Production Research, 47(16), 4351–4371. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540801968633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, A. D., Buffa, F. P., Droge, C., & Carrington, D. (2009). Using buyer-supplier performance frontiers to manage relationship performance. Decision Sciences, 40(1), 37–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00219.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, A. D., Kuzu, K., & Li, W. (2016). Exploring supplier performance risk and the buyer’s role using chance-constrained data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 250(3), 966–978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.09.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saen, R. F. (2007). Suppliers selection in the presence of both cardinal and ordinal data. European Journal of Operational Research, 183(2), 741–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd [thoroughly rev. and expanded] ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Y., Zhu, J., Charles, V., & Richardson, J. (2020). Data science and productivity: A bibliometric review of data science applications and approaches in productivity evaluations. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 72(5), 975–988. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1860661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talluri, S., DeCampos, H. A., & Hult, G. T. M. (2013). Supplier rationalization: A sourcing decision model. Decision Sciences, 44(1), 57–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2012.00390.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talluri, S., Narasimhan, R., & Nair, A. (2006). Vendor performance with supply risk: A chance-constrained dea approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 100(2), 212–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talluri, S., & Narasimhan, R. (2005). A note on “a methodology for supply base optimization”. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52(1), 130–139. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2004.839960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toloo, M., & Nalchigar, S. (2009). A new integrated dea model for finding most bcc-efficient dmu. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 33(1), 597–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2008.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wathne, K. H., & Heide, J. B. (2004). Relationship governance in a supply chain network. Journal of Marketing, 68(1), 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.68.1.73.24037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, C. A., & Desai, A. (1996). Determination of paths to vendor market efficiency using parallel coordinates representation: A negotiation tool for buyers. European Journal of Operational Research, 90(1), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)00336-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitelock, V. (2018). Business analytics and firm performance: Role of structured financial statement data. Journal of Business Analytics, 1(2), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/2573234X.2018.1557020
   Google Scholar
• Wu, T., & Blackhurst, J. (2009). Supplier evaluation and selection: An augmented dea approach. International Journal of Production Research, 47(16), 4593–4608. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540802054227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, J. (2020). Dea under big data: Data enabled analytics and network data envelopment analysis. Annals of Operations Research. 2020(6) , 1–23 . doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03668-8.
   Google Scholar