Decoding technological frames: a qualitative inquiry into business analytics perspectives

References

• Allen, J. P., & Kim, J. (2005). IT and the video game industry: Tensions and mutual shaping. Journal of Information Technology, 20(4), 234–244. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrave, D., Charlwood, A., Kirkpatrick, I., Lawrence, M., & Stuart, M. (2016). HR and analytics: Why HR is set to fail the big data challenge. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, F., Breitenmoser, P., Röth, T., & Spieth, P. (2022). How do technological frames feel? Business model innovation in pre-digital companies and the emotional impact of digital technologies. International Journal of Innovation Management, 26(9), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919622400217
   Google Scholar
• Aydiner, A. S., Tatoglu, E., Bayraktar, E., Zaim, S., & Delen, D. (2019). Business analytics and firm performance: The mediating role of business process performance. Journal of Business Research, 96, 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azad, B., & Faraj, S. (2008). Making e-government systems workable: Exploring the evolution of frames. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartis, E. (2007). Two suggested extensions for SCOT: Technological frames and metaphors. Society and Economy, 29(1), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1556/SocEc.29.2007.1.6
   Google Scholar
• Bartunek, J. M., & Moch, M. K. (1987). First-order, second-order, and third-order change and organization development interventions: A cognitive approach. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23(4), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/002188638702300404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bateson, G. (1972). The logical categories of learning and communication: Steps to an ecology of mind. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F.R., & Mahoney, C. (2008). The two faces of framing: Individual-level framing and collective issue-definition in the EU. European Union Politics, 9(3), 435–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116508093492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayraktar, E., Tatoglu, E., Aydiner, A.S., & Delen, D. (2023). Business analytics adoption and technological intensity: An efficiency analysis. Information System Frontiers, in press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-023-10424-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bijker, W.E., & Pinch, T.J. (1987). The social construction of fact and artifacts. Philosophy of technology: the technological condition: an anthology, social studies of science, 14(3), 107–139.
   Google Scholar
• Bougon, M., Weick, K., & Binkhorst, D. (1977). Cognition in organizations: An analysis of the Utrecht Jazz Orchestra. Administrative Science Quarterly, 22(4), 606–639. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson, L. (2023). Strategizing organizational capabilities for industrial digitalization–exploring managers’ technological frames. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 34(9), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-07-2022-0252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, D. Q., Preston, D. S., & Swink, M. (2015). How the use of big data analytics affects value creation in supply chain management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 32(4), 4–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2015.1138364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornelissen, J. P., & Werner, M. D. (2014). Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 181–235. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.875669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criado, J. I., & de Zarate-Alcarazo, L. O. (2022). Technological frames, CIOs, and artificial intelligence in public administration: A socio-cognitive exploratory study in Spanish local governments. Government Information Quarterly, 39(3), 101688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, E. (2006). A technological frames perspective on information technology and organizational change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 42(1), 23–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886305285126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, E. J. (2002). Technology frames and framing: A socio-cognitive investigation of requirements determination. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 329–358. https://doi.org/10.2307/4132312
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delen, D., & Ram, S. (2018). Research challenges and opportunities in business analytics. Journal of Business Analytics, 1(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/2573234X.2018.1507324
   Google Scholar
• De Vreese, C.H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal & Document Design, 13(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre
   Google Scholar
• Diehl, D., & McFarland, D. (2010). Toward a historical sociology of social situations. American Journal of Sociology, 115(6), 1713–1752. https://doi.org/10.1086/651941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, L. E., & Donohue, W. A. (1996). Communicative framing theory in conflict resolution. Communication Research, 23(3), 297–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023003003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eddy, P.L. (2003). Sensemaking on campus: How community college presidents frame change. Community College Journal of Research &practice, 27(6), 453–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/713838185
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furr, N. R., Cavarretta, F., & Garg, S. (2012). Who changes course? The role of domain knowledge and novel framing in making technology changes. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(3), 236–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gal, U., & Berente, N. (2008). A social representations perspective on information systems implementation: Rethinking the concept of “frames”. Information Technology & People, 21(2), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840810881051
   Google Scholar
• Gash, D.C., & Orlikowski, W.J. (1991). Changing frames: Towards an understanding of information technology and organizational change. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 1991, No. 1, pp. 189–193). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, Anthony 1984 The Constitution of Society (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press)
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, C. G. (2006). Change in the presence of residual fit: Can competing frames coexist? Organization Science, 17(1), 150–167. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorgi, S. (2017). The mind and heart of resonance: The role of cognition and emotions in frame effectiveness. Journal of Management Studies, 54(5), 711–738. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, J.S., & Davis, L.L. (1998). Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Research in Nursing & Health, 20(3), 269–274. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199706)20:3<269:AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenduez, A. A., Mettler, T., & Schedler, K. (2020). Technological frames in public administration: What do public managers think of big data? Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), 101406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, D. A., Mykytyn, P. P., Jr., & Riemenschneider, C. K. (1997). Executive decisions about adoption of information technology in small business: Theory and empirical tests. Information Systems Research, 8(2), 171–195. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.2.171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819800100106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppmann, J., Anadon, L. Diaz, & Narayanamurti, V. (2020). Why matter matters: How technology characteristics shape the strategic framing of technologies. Research Policy, 49(1), 103882. 10.1016/j.respol.2019.103882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hymes, Dell. (1974). Foundations in Sociolinguistics. University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janiesch, C., Dinter, B., Mikalef, P., & Tona, O. (2022). Business analytics and big data research in information systems. Journal of Business Analytics, 5(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/2573234X.2022.2069426
   Google Scholar
• Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). An information company in Mexico: Extending the resource-based view of the firm to a developing country context. Information Systems Research, 9(4), 342–361. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.4.342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). On the interpretation of intuitive probability: A reply to Jonathan Cohen. Cognition, 7(4), 409–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(79)90024-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakhki, M.D., & Shrivastava, U. (2023). Data analytics management capability and strategies for interorganisational collaborations: A survey research. Journal of Business Analytics, 6(4), 294–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/2573234X.2023.2204159
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, S., & Tripsas, M. (2008). Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Research Policy, 37(5), 790–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T.S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kulkarni, U., Robles-Flores, J. A., & Popovič, A. (2017). Business intelligence capability: The effect of top management and the mediating roles of user participation and analytical decision making orientation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 18(7), 516–541. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labro, E., Lang, M., & Omartian, J.D. (2023). Predictive analytics and centralization of authority. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 75(1), 101526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2022.101526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lempiälä, T., Apajalahti, E. L., Haukkala, T., & Lovio, R. (2019). Socio-cultural framing during the emergence of a technological field: Creating cultural resonance for solar technology. Research Policy, 48(9), 103830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard-Barton, D., & Deschamps, I. (1988). Managerial influence in the implementation of new technology. Management Science, 34(10), 1252–1265. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.34.10.1252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P.M. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: Affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 147–167. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G. (1986). But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Program Evaluation, 1986(30), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1427
   Google Scholar
• Lin, A., & Silva, L. (2005). The social and political construction of technological frames. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(1), 49–59. 10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLeod, M., & Davidson, E. (2007). Organizational storytelling and technology innovation. 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences Big Island, Hawaii (HICSS’07) (pp. 248c–248c). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Mazmanian, M. (2013). Avoiding the trap of constant connectivity: When congruent frames allow for heterogeneous practices. Academy of Management Journa, 56(5), 1225–1250. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGovern, T., & Hicks, C. (2004). How political processes shaped the IT adopted by a small make-to-order company: A case study in the insulated wire and cable industry. Information & Management, 42(1), 243–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishra, A. N., & Agarwal, R. (2010). Technological frames, organizational capabilities, and IT use: An empirical investigation of electronic procurement. Information Systems Research, 21(2), 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadkarni, S., & Narayanan, V.K. (2007). The evolution of collective strategy frames in high-and low-velocity industries. Organization Science, 18(4), 688–710. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noble, David F. 1986 Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
   Google Scholar
• Olesen, K. (2014). Implications of dominant technological frames over a longitudinal period. Information Systems Journal, 24(3), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, O. E., & Engen, O. A. (2007). Technological change as a trade-off between social construction and technological paradigms. Technology in Society, 29(4), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2007.08.006
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W., & Gash, D. (1992). Changing frames: Understanding technological change in organizations, Mit’s Center for Information Systems Research Working papers 3368-92, MIT Press,
   Google Scholar
• Orlikowski, W.J., & Gash, D.C. (1994). Technological frames: Making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 12(2), 174–207. https://doi.org/10.1145/196734.196745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinch, T.J., & Bijker, W.E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raffaelli, R.L., Glynn, M.A., & Tushman, M.L. (2017). Flexing the frame: TMT framing and the adoption of non-incremental innovations in incumbent firms. Harvard Business School Working Paper Series# 17-091.
   Google Scholar
• Raffaelli, R., Glynn, M. A., & Tushman, M. (2019). Frame flexibility: The role of cognitive and emotional framing in innovation adoption by incumbent firms. Strategic Management Journal, 40(7), 1013–1039. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheibe, K.P., Nilakanta, S., Ragsdale, C.T., & Younie, B. (2019). An evidence-based management framework for business analytics. Journal of Business Analytics, 2(1), 47–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/2573234X.2019.1609341
   Google Scholar
• Seidel, V. P., Hannigan, T. R., & Phillips, N. (2020). Rumor communities, social media, and forthcoming innovations: The shaping of technological frames in product market evolution. Academy of Management Review, 45(2), 304–324. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senge, P.M. (1990). The art and practice of the learning organization. Currency Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, R., Mithas, S., & Kankanhalli, A. (2014). Transforming decision-making processes: A research agenda for understanding the impact of business analytics on organisations. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(4), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.17
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, A. (1980). Organizational paradigms: A theory of organizational change. Organizational Dynamics, 8(3), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(80)90045-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivri, M.S., & Ustundag, A. (2023). An adaptive and enhanced framework for daily stock market prediction using feature selection and ensemble learning algorithms. Journal of Business Analytics, 7(1), 42–62. in press. https://doi.org/10.1080/2573234X.2023.2263522
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B., Larsen, T., & Rosenbloom, B. (2009). Understanding cultural frames in the multicultural sales organization: Prospects and problems for the sales manager. Journal of Transnational Management, 14(4), 277–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475770903325308
   Google Scholar
• Snow, D.A., Benford, R.D. (1988) Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1(1), 197–217.
   Google Scholar
• Spieth, P., Röth, T., Clauss, T., & Klos, C. (2021). Technological frames in the digital age: Theory, measurement instrument, and future research areas. Journal of Management Studies, 58(7), 1962–1993. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoica, M., Liao, J., & Welsch, H. (2004). Organizational culture and patterns of information processing: The case of small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 9(3), 251–266.
   Google Scholar
• Szukits, Á., & Móricz, P. (2023). Towards data-driven decision making: The role of analytical culture and centralization efforts. Review of Managerial Science, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00694-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, F. B., & Hunter, M. G. (2002). The repertory grid technique: A method for the study of cognition in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 26(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/4132340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, D., & Scheufele, D. A. (2019). News framing theory and research, Jennings Bryant and Mary Beth Oliver. In Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 51–68). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tripsas, M. (1997). Surviving radical technological change through dynamic capability: Evidence from the typesetter industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(2), 341–377. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/6.2.341
   Google Scholar
• Vaccaro, A., Brusoni, S., & Veloso, F. M. (2011). Virtual design, problem framing, and innovation: An empirical study in the automotive industry. Journal of Management Studies, 48(1), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00939.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Heuvel, S. & Bondarouk, T. (2017). The rise (and fall?) of HR analytics. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People & Performance, 4(2), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-03-2017-0022
   Google Scholar
• Vuori, T. O., & Huy, Q. N. (2016). Distributed attention and shared emotions in the innovation process: How Nokia lost the smartphone battle. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61(1), 9–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839215606951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S., Yeoh, W., Richards, G., Wong, S. F., & Chang, Y. (2019). Harnessing business analytics value through organizational absorptive capacity. Information & Management, 56(7), 103152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2019.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeoh, W., Richards, G., & Wang, S. (2014). Benefits and barriers to corporate performance management systems. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 55(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2014.11645745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, B, Mathiassen, L, & Davidson, E. (2016). Inconsistent and incongruent frames during IT-enabled change: An action research study into sales process innovation. JAIS, 17(7), 495–520. 10.17705/1jais.00432
   Google Scholar