https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6567-5717
References
- Bal-Blanc, P., and K. Rhomberg, edited by. 2020. The Canaletto View. Wien: Walther König.
- Brückweh, K., C. Villinger, and K. Zöller, edited by. 2020. Die lange Geschichte der “Wende”: Geschichtswissenschaft im Dialog. Berlin: Christoph Links Verlag.
- Buden, B. 2018. “Is There Still East After the Collapse of Post-Communism?” Keynote lecture at the conference Lost and Found Spaces: Displacements in Eastern European Art and Society in the 1990s. Tallinn, 1-3 November.
- Esanu, O. 2008. The Transition of Soros Centers to Contemporary Art: The Managed Avantgarde. Accessed 3 November 2022. https://monoskop.org/images/d/dc/Esanu_Octavian_The_Transition_of_The_Soros_Centers_to_Contemporary_Art_The_Managed_Avant-Garde_2008.pdf
- Esanu, O. 2021. The Postsocialist Contemporary: The Institutionalization of Artistic Practice in Eastern Europe After 1989. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
- Fukuyama, F. 1989. “The End of History?” The National Interest 16: 3–18.
- Fukuyama, F. 2019. “Identity Politics – the Demand for Dignity and the Nation State’s Future.” Tipping Point Talks, April 2. Accessed 3 November 2022. http://www.erstestiftung.org/en/francis-fukuyama-identity-politics/.
- Gardner, A. 2015. Politically Unbecoming: Postsocialist Art Against Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Hall, P. D. 2013. “Philanthropy, the Nonprofit Sector & the Democratic Dilemma.” Daedalus 142 (2): 139–158. doi:10.1162/DAED_a_00209.
- Hennig, N. 2011. „Finanzmarkt, Geopolitik und Kulturförderung – eine Illustration der Soros Open Society Foundation. ”Master Thesis, Universität der Künste Berlin.
- Hlavajová, M. 2006. “Towards the Normal: Negotiating the ‘Former East.” In The Manifesta Decade: Debates on Contemporary Art Exhibitions and Biennials in Post-Wall Europe, edited by B. Vanderlinden and E. Filipovic, 153–164. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Hock, B. 2018. “Die Domestizierung der feministischen Kulturtheorie als Mittel zur Aussöhnung mit der sozialistischen Vergangenheit.” In Geschlecht und Wissen(schaft) in Ostmitteleuropa, edited by I. Alber and C. Kraft, 49–69. Marburg: Herder-Institut.
- Hock, B. 2022. Filantrópia vagy plutokrácia? ASoros-realizmustól aSoros-tervig.Fordulat, 30: 151–180.
- Moulton, A., and G. Lovink. 2019. “’the Soros Center Was a Perfect Machine’: An Exchange Between Aaron Moulton and Geert Lovink.” Artmargins, Juli, 15. Accessed 3 November 2022. https://artmargins.com/the-soros-center-was-a-perfect-machine-a-dialogue-between-aaron-moulton-and-geertlovink/?fbclid=IwAR1fUoW4wvHV_1gDkWLhKwCzFd3mQ3ecf_41soxjbOnOBcSTcU_haStYU68
- Nagy, K. 2018. “From Fringe Interest to Hegemony: The Emergence of the Soros Network in Eastern Europe.” In Chap. 3 in Globalizing East European Art Histories: Past and Present, edited by H. Beáta and A. Allas, 53–63. New York: Routledge.
- Nóvé, B. 1999. Tény/Soros: A magyar Soros Alapítvány első tíz éve, 1984–1994. Budapest: Balassi.
- Ostrower, F. 1995. Why the Wealthy Give: The Culture of Elite Philanthropy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Ratiu, M. 2011. “Romanian Contemporary Visual Arts World After 1989: Tension and Fragmentation.” Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai – Philosophia 56 (3): 107–126.