Practitioner centred methodological approaches to creative media practice research

References

• Anonymous. 2012. Media Production and Creativity: A Practitioner Based Enquiry From a Systems View of Creativity. University of Newcastle. Unpublished Undergraduate Exegesis.
   Google Scholar
• Art & Design. 2000. “Working Papers in Art and Design.” An International Referred Journal for Research in Art & Design. Accessed 16 September 2017. http://researchprofiles.herts.ac.uk/portal/en/publications/editorial-the-foundations-of-practicebased-research(2ed0281f-ed5c-42af-a685-31e6465867d5)/export.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ashmore, M. 1989. The Reflexive Thesis: Writing the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• ASPERA. 2016. “Papers and Publications.” Australian Screen Production Education & Research Association. Accessed 16 September 2017. http://www.aspera.org.au/research/conference-proceedings/.
   Google Scholar
• Bastick, T. 1982. Intuition, How We Think and Act. Chichester: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Batty, C., and S. Kerrigan. 2017. Screen Production Research: Creative Practice as a Mode of Enquiry. London: Palgrave Macmillian.
   Google Scholar
• Boden, M. 2004. The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, G. 2001. “What is a Learning Journal?” In Reflective Practice: Writing and Professional Development, edited by P. Chapman, 160–164. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brien, D., S. Burr, and J. Webb. 2010. “Creative and Practice-led Research: Current Status, Future Plans.” TEXT [Special Issue No 8]. Accessed 16 September 2017. http://www.textjournal.com.au.
   Google Scholar
• Burton, D., and S. Bartlett. 2005. Practitioner Research for Teachers. London: Paul Chapman.
   Google Scholar
• Coffee, S. 2011. “Exploring Creativity through Freelance Journalism: Testing Out the Systems Model.” ANZCA 2011. Accessed 17 September 2017. http://www.canberra.edu.au/anzca2010/conference-proceedings/table-of-contents.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, S. 1993. “Ethnography and Popular Music Studies.” Popular Music 12 (2): 123–138. doi: 10.1017/S0261143000005511
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, J. 1998. On Becoming an Innovative University Teacher: Reflection in Action. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crotty, M. 1998. The Foundations of Social Research. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1988. “Society, Culture, and Person: A Systems View of Creativity.” In The Nature of Creativity, edited by R. Stenberg, 325–338. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1996. Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi, M. 1999. “Implications of a Systems Perspective for the Study of Creativity.” In Handbook of Creativity, edited by R. Sternberg, 313–335. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuttance, R. 2009. Making a Voice Show Reel – Investigating the Systems Model of Creativity through Practitioner-based Enquiry. University of Newcastle. Unpublished Honours Exegesis.
   Google Scholar
• Fenton-O’Creevy, M. 2005. “ Is Practice-based Learning Only for Professional and Vocational Subjects?” Open University Online. Accessed 17 September 2017. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.483.5977&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, S. 2006. Cooperative Motivation: Investigating the Role of the Producer – Director Within the Collaborative Creative Process of Video Production. University of Newcastle. Unpublished Honours Exegesis.
   Google Scholar
• Grix, J. 2004. The Foundations of Research. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hanney, R. 2013. “Towards a Situated Media Practice: Reflections on the Implementation of Project-led-problem-based Learning.” Journal of Media Practice 14 (1): 43–59. doi: 10.1386/jmpr.14.1.43_1
   Google Scholar
• Horn, A. 2009. Coal and Community: Creating a Radio Documentary Series. University of Newcastle. Unpublished Honours Exegesis.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S., and M. Csikszentmihalyi. 1999. Flow in Sports: The Key to Optimal Experiences and Performances. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, K., and N. Jankowski. 1991. A Handbook of Qualitative Methodologies for Mass Communication Research. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Johns, C. 2006. Engaging Reflection in Practice. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Kerrigan, S. 2010. “Creative Practice Research: Interrogating Creativity Theories Through Documentary Practice.” Edited by D. L. Brien, S. Burr, and J. Webb. TEXT – Creative and Practice-led Research: Current Status, Future Plans [Special Issue No 8]. Accessed 17 September 2017. http://www.textjournal.com.au/speciss/issue8/Burr.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kerrigan, S. 2011. “Creative Documentary Practice: Internalising the Systems Model of Creativity through Documentary Video and Online Practice.” PhD Thesis, University of Newcastle, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Kerrigan, S. 2013. “Accommodating Creative Documentary Practice within a Revised Systems Model of Creativity.” Journal of Media Practice 14 (2): 111–127. doi: 10.1386/jmpr.14.2.111_1
   Google Scholar
• Kerrigan, S., and P. McIntyre. 2010. “The ‘Creative Treatment of Actuality’: Rationalising and Reconceptualising the Notion of Creativity for Documentary Practice.” Journal of Media Practice 11 (2): 111–130. doi: 10.1386/jmpr.11.2.111_1
   Google Scholar
• Lebow, A. 2008. “AVPhD: Supervising in the Dark.” Journal of Media Practice 9 (3): 201–213. doi: 10.1386/jmpr.9.3.201_1
   Google Scholar
• Lee, K. 2011. Investigating the Creative Process Through the Adaptation of Fairy Tales into Modern Stories for the Screen. University of Newcastle. Unpublished Honours Exegesis.
   Google Scholar
• Lull, J. 1990. Inside Family Viewing: Ethnographic Research on Television's Audiences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. 2000. “Against Reflexivity as an Academic Virtue and Source of Privileged Knowledge.” Theory, Culture & Society 17 (3): 26–54. doi: 10.1177/02632760022051202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre, P. 2006a. “Creative Practice as Research: ‘Testing Out’ the Systems Model of Creativity through Practitioner Based Enquiry.” Speculations and Innovations: Applying Practice Led Research in the Creative Industries. Queensland University of Technology. Accessed 16 July 2013. http://www.speculations2005.qut.edu.au/Spin_embedded.HTM.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, E. 2006b. “Facilitating the Script: Creative Research in Practice.” Speculations and Innovations: applying practice led research in the Creative Industries. Queensland University of Technology. Accessed 16 July 2013 http://www.speculations2005.qut.edu.au/Spin_embedded.HTM.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, P. 2010. ”Communication and the Creation of Media Content: A Practitioner-based Enquiry Study of Popular Music Songwriting.” Edited by K. Macallum, ANZCA 2010 Conference: Media, Democracy and Change, University of Canberra, Canberra, 7–9 July.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, P. 2012. Creativity and Cultural Production Issues for Media Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, P. 2017. “Using Practitioner Based Enquiry (PBE) to Examine Screen Production as a Form of Creative Practice.” In Screen Production Research: Creative Practice as a Mode of Enquiry, edited by C. Batty, and S. Kerrigan, 85–102. London: Palgrave Macmillian.
   Google Scholar
• Milech, B., and A. Schilo. 2004. “‘Exit Jesus’: Relating the Exegesis and Creative Production Components of a Research Thesis.” Text 3. Accessed 27 January 2015. http://www.textjournal.com.au/speciss/issue3/milechschilo.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, L. 1992. “What is Practitioner Based Enquiry?” British Journal of In-Service Education 18 (3): 191–196. doi:10.1080/0305763920180309.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, L., and B. Lawrence. 2000. Practitioner-based Enquiry: Principles for Postgraduate Research. London: Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nakamura, J., and M. Csikszentmihalyi. 2002. “The Concept of Flow.” In Handbook of Positive Psychology, edited by C. Snyder, and S. Lopex, 89–106. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paulus, P., and B. Nijstad. 2003. Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration. Online: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. 1962. “Tacit Knowing: Its Bearing on Some Problems of Philosophy.” Reviews of Modern Physics 34 (4): 601–616. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.34.601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rippon, N. 2010. Creative Practices: Understanding the Processes of Csikszentmihalyi’s ‘Systems Model of Creativity’ Relative to the Production of a Comedy Play. University of Newcastle. Unpublished Honours Exegesis.
   Google Scholar
• Ruddock, A. 2001. Understanding Audiences. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, H., and R. Dean. 2009. Practice-led Research and Research-led Practice in the Creative Arts. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SPARC. 2010. “Screen Production and Research Collaboration.” Accessed 17 September 2017. http://nass.murdoch.edu.au/altc/projecttwo/news.html.
   Google Scholar
• SPIN. 2006. Speculations & Innovations: Applying Practice Led Research in the Creative Industries. Brisbane: QUT.
   Google Scholar
• University of Newcastle. 2017a. “CMNS3450 Media Production Project.” Accessed 17 September 2017. http://www.newcastle.edu.au/course/CMNS3450.
   Google Scholar
• University of Newcastle. 2017b. “CMNS4100 Communication Honours 1: Research Methods.” Accessed 17 September 2017. http://www.newcastle.edu.au/course/CMNS4100.
   Google Scholar
• Wallas, G. 1976. “Stages in the Creative Process.” In The Creativity Question, edited by A. Rothenberg, and C. Hausman, 69–73. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar