Reanimating Shelley’s Heart: breathing new life into locative learning with dual process design

References

• Abba, T. 2017. “Introducing the Manifesto for Ambient Literature.” Paper presented at the Ambient Literature Symposium, Bristol, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Anthony, T., Z. Tian, and D. Barber. 2017. “Thinking Fast and Slow with Deep Learning and Tree Search.” Paper presented at 31st Conference on Neural information processing Systems, Long Beach, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Appel, M., and T. Richter. 2007. “Persuasive Effects of Fictional Narratives Increase Over Time.” Media Psychology 10 (1): 113–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristotle. 2018. The Art of Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Batterink, L., and H. Neville. 2011. “Implicit and Explicit Mechanisms of Word Learning in a Narrative Context: An Event-Related Potential Study.” Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23 (11): 3181–3196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, D. G. 2010. “Ambiguity, the Literary, and Close Reading.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 12: 4. http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byron, G. G. 2004. Don Juan. London: Penguin Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Cercas, J. 2018. The Blind Spot: An Essay on the Novel. London: MacLehose Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ciavarr, C., M. Dobson, and D. Goodman. 2008. “Implicit Learning as a Design Strategy for Learning Games: Alert Hockey.” Computers in Human Behavior 24 (6): 2862–2872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conole, G. 2010. “Learning Design – Making Practice Explicit.” Presented at Connected 2010: 2nd International Conference on Design Education, Sydney, Australia, 28 June–1 July 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Dettori, G., and F. Morselli. 2008. “Accessing Knowledge Through Narrative Context.” In Learning to Live in the Knowledge Society, edited by M. Kendall, and B. Samways, 253–260. Basel: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Devine, P. 1989. “Stereotypes and Prejudice: Their Automatic and Controlled Components.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 (1): 5–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonds, R., and S. Smith. 2017. “From Playing to Designing: Enhancing Educational Experiences with Location-Based Mobile Learning Games.” Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 33 (6): 41–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. K., D. W. Denton, and J. B. Bond. 2014. “An Analysis of Research on Metacognitive Teaching Strategies.” Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 116: 4015–4024.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, R., S. Loewen, C. Elder, H. Reinders, R. Erlam, and J. Philp. 2009. Implicit and Explicit Knowledge in Second Language Learning, Testing and Teaching. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. 1984. “Heuristic and Analytic Processes in Reasoning.” British Journal of Psychology 75 (4): 451–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J., and K. E. Stanovich. 2013. “Dual-process Theories of Higher Cognition: Advancing the Debate.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 8 (3): 223–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, R. 1998. “Expert Knowledge and Processes of Thinking.” In Learning and Knowledge, edited by R. McCormick and C. Paetcher, 88–102. New York: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Gyori, B. 2018. “ Shelley’s Heart [Locative Education Tool].” https://www.shelleysheart.com /.
   Google Scholar
• Hadar, I. 2013. “When Intuition and Logic Clash: The Case of the Object-Oriented Paradigm.” Science of Computer Programming 78 (9): 1407–1426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. 2006. The Happiness Hypothesis. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hartzmark, S. M., and K. Shue. 2018. “A Tough Act to Follow: Contrast Effects in Financial Markets.” The Journal of Finance 73 (4): 1567–1613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haven, K. 2007. Story Proof: The Science Behind the Startling Power of Story. Westport: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Islam, M. N., and H. Bouwman. 2016. “Towards User-Intuitive Web Interface Sign Design and Evaluation: A Semiotic Framework.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 86 (C): 121–137.
   Google Scholar
• Jingo, A. (Producer & Kurosawa, A. (Director)). 1950. Rashomon [Motion Picture]. Japan: Daiei Film.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A., B. Gyori, C. Hargood, D. Green, and F. Charles. 2018. “Shelley’s Heart: Experiences in Designing a Multi-Reader Locative Narrative.” Proceedings from the NHT’18, Baltimore, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
   Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W., and G. Gigerenzer. 2011. “Intuitive and Deliberative Judgements Are Based on Common Principles.” Psychological Review 118 (1): 97–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ley, T., S. Schweiger, and P. Seitlinger. 2011. “Implicit and Explicit Memory in Learning From Social Software: A Dual-Process Account.” In Towards Ubiquitous Learning, edited by C. D. Kloos, D. Gillet, R. M. Crespo García, F. Wild, and M. Wolpers, 449–454. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Li, F., X. Guo, L. Zhu, Z. Yang, and Z. Dienes. 2013. “Implicit Learning of Mappings Between Forms and Metaphorical Meanings.” Consciousness and Cognition 22 (1): 174–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mar, R. A., K. Oatley, M. Djikic, and J. Mullin. 2011. “Emotion and Narrative Fiction: Interactive Influences Before, During, and After Reading.” Cognition & Emotion 25 (5): 818–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, E. J., M. L. Meade, and H. L. Roediger III. 2003. “Learning Facts From Fiction.” Journal of Memory and Language 49 (4): 519–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, D. E., and R. W. Schvaneveldt. 1971. “Facilitation in Recognizing Pairs of Words: Evidence of a Dependence Between Retrieval Operations.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 90 (2): 227–234.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Millard, D. E., and C. Hargood. 2017. “Tiree Tales: A Co-Operative Inquiry Into the Poetics of Location-Based Narrative.” Presented at the 28th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Prague, Czech Republic, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Moshman, D. 2000. “Diversity in Reasoning and Rationality: Metacognitive and Developmental Considerations.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5): 689–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, D. 2013. The Design of Everyday Things. Boston: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oatley, K. 2011. “In the Minds of Others.” Scientific American Mind 22 (5): 62–67.
   Google Scholar
• Packer, H. S., C. Hargood, Y. Howard, and P. Papadopoulos. 2017. “Developing a Writer’s Toolkit for Interactive Locative Storytelling.” Presented at International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling, Dublin, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Pemberley Digital. 2012. The Lizzy Bennett Diaries [Web Series]. http://www.pemberleydigital.com/the-lizzie-bennet-diaries/.
   Google Scholar
• Reber, A. S. 1989. “Implicit Learning and Tacit Knowledge.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 118 (3): 219–235.
   Google Scholar
• Rieser, M., and S. Clark. 2013. “Locative Media and Situated Learning.” Digital Creativity 24 (3): 208–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. L., K. Foote, and M. Azaryahu. 2016. Narrating Space / Spatializing Narrative: Where Narrative Theory and Geography Meet (Theory Interpretation Narrative). Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schuwirth, L. 2017. “When I Say … Dual-Processing Theory.” Medical Education 51: 888–889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schvaneveldt, R. W., and D. E. Meyer. 1971. “Retrieval and Comparison Process in Semantic Memory.” In Attention and Performance IV, edited by S. Kornblum, 395–409. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shelley, M. 2003. Frankenstein: Or, the Modern Prometheus. New York: Penguin Classics.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, R. 2011. “Critical Reading, Metacognition and Relevance in the Humanities.” The International Journal of Learning 18 (2): 159–165.
   Google Scholar
• Skulmowski, A., and G. D. Rey. 2017. “Bodily Effort Enhances Learning and Metacognition: Investigating the Relation Between Physical Effort and Cognition Using Dual-Process Models of Embodiment.” Advances in Cognitive Psychology 13 (1): 3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D., and D. Rouner. 2002. “Entertainment-Education and Elaboration Likelihood: Understanding the Processing of Narrative Persuasion Communication Theory.” Communication Theory 12 (2): 173–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, R., P. Slusarz, and C. Terry. 2005. “The Interaction of the Explicit and the Implicit in Skill Learning: A Dual-Process Approach.” Psychological Review 112 (1): 159–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A. 2009. “Dual-process Theories: A Metacognitive Perspective.” In In Two Minds: Dual Processes and Beyond, edited by J. S. B. T. Evans and K. Frankish, 171–195. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, V. A., J. B. T. Evans, and J. I. D. Campbell. 2013. Matching Bias on the Selection Task: It’s Fast and Feels Good.” Thinking & Reasoning 19 (3): 431–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. “Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.” Science 185 (4157): 1124–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaisey, S. 2009. “Motivation and Justification: A Dual-Process Model of Culture in Action.” American Journal of Sociology 114 (6): 1675–1715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, J. 2010. “A Case Study: Developing Learning Objects with an Explicit Learning Design.” Electronic Journal of e-Learning 8 (1): 41–50.
   Google Scholar
• White, H. 1985. Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., R. B. Zajonc, and N. Schwarz. 1997. “Subliminal Affective Priming Effects Resists Attributional Interventions.” Cognition and Emotion 11 (4): 433–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M. B. W., and J. A. Mienko. 2007. “Learning and Memory of Factual Content from Narrative and Expository Text.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 77 (3): 541–564.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. 1968. “Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9 (2), Pt. 2: 1–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. 1980. “Feeling and Thinking: Preferences Need No Inferences.” American Psychologist 35 (2): 151–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. 2001. “Mere Exposure: A Gateway to the Subliminal.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 10 (6): 224–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaltman, G. 2003. How Customers Think: Essential Insights Into the Mind of the Market. Cambridge: Harvard Business.
   Google Scholar