639
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Without the filmmaking there is no research: establishing the Sound/Image Cinema Lab via a REF2021 impact case study and exploring the impact of its engagement with UK film production

Pages 161-173 | Received 04 Oct 2021, Accepted 29 Jan 2022, Published online: 11 May 2022

References

  • Barnard, Clio. 2010. The Arbor [Film].
  • Batty, Craig, and Susan Kerrigan. 2018. “Introduction.” In Screen Production Research: Creative Practice as a Mode of Enquiry, edited by Craig Batty and Susan Kerrigan, 1–10. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Caldwell, John Thornton. 2008. Production Culture: Industrial Reflexivity and Critical Practice in Film and Television. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Dickson Leach, Hope. 2016. The Levelling [Film].
  • Eggers, Robert. 2015. The VVitch [Film].
  • Fox, Neil. 2018. “'Filmmaking is a Hard Thing to Do': Reflections on Student and Lecturer Experience of Falmouth University's Filmmaker in Residence Initiative.” Media Practice and Education 19 (2): 205–221.
  • Gibson, Ross. 2018. “Foreword: Cognitive Two-Steps.” In Screen Production Research: Creative Practice as a Mode of Enquiry, edited by Craig Batty and Susan Kerrigan, v–xiii. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Hall, Gary. 2016. The Uberfication of the University. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Hardy, Robin. 1973. The Wicker Man [Film].
  • Jenkin, Mark. 2019a. Bait [Film].
  • Jenkin, Mark. 2019b. Hard, Cracked The Wind [Film].
  • Jenkin, Mark. 2022. Enys Men [Film].
  • John Doherty, Justin. 2017. Wilderness [Film].
  • Kermode, Mark. 2019. “Bait Review – One of the Defining British Films of the Decade.” The Guardian 1 September [online]. Accessed 2 October 2021. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2019/sep/01/bait-review-mark-jenkin-cornish-fishing-village.
  • Kerrigan, Susan, and Joanna Callaghan. 2018. “The Impact of Filmmaking Research.” Media Practice and Education 19 (3): 229–242.
  • Knudsen, Erik. 2018. “Method in Madness: A Case Study in Practice Research Methods.” In Screen Production Research: Creative Practice as a Mode of Enquiry, edited by Craig Batty and Susan Kerrigan, 121–142. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • La-Janisse, Kier. 2021. Woodlands Dark and Days Bewitched [Film].
  • Mackfall, Ryan. 2019. Backwoods [Film].
  • Mateer, John. 2018. “A Fistful of Dollars or the Sting? Considering Academic-Industry Collaborations in the Production of Feature Films.” Media Practice and Education 19 (2): 139–158.
  • Mateer, John, and Samm Haillay. 2019. “Digital Disruption and Its Implications in Generating ‘Impact’ Through Film and Television Practice-as-Research.” Media Practice and Education 20 (2): 165–178.
  • Murray, Tom, Iqbal Barkat, and Karen Pearlman. 2020. “Intensive Mode Screen Production: An Australian Case Study in Designing University Learning and Teaching to Mirror ‘Real-World’ Creative Production Processes.” Media Practice and Education 21 (1): 18–31.
  • Myer, Clive, ed. 2011. Critical Cinema: Beyond the Theory of Practice. London: Wallflower Press.
  • Nelson, Robin. 2013. Practice as Research in the Arts: Principles, Protocols, Pedagogies, Resistances. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Nichols, Bill. 2011. “Foreword.” In Critical Cinema: Beyond the Theory of Practice, edited by Clive Myer, xiii–xxvi. London: Wallflower Press.
  • Oakley, Claire. 2019. Make Up [Film].
  • Oppenheimer, Joshua. 2012. The Act of Killing [Film].
  • Petrie, Duncan, and Rod Stoneman. 2014. Educating Film-Makers: Past, Present and Future. Bristol: Intellect.
  • REF2021. 2019. Guidance. REF2021 2019. Accessed 2 October 2021. https://www.ref.ac.uk/guidance/.
  • Sharma, Aparna. 2011. “The Theory-Practice Interface in Film Education: Observational Documentary in India.” In Critical Cinema: Beyond the Theory of Practice, edited by Clive Myer, 141–168. London: Wallflower Press.
  • Sullivan, Steve. 2018. Being Frank: The Chris Sievey Story [Film].
  • Webb, Dominique. 2018. “Screen Industry Collaboration: The Knock – Producing Fiction with Creative England/BFI.” Media Practice and Education 19 (2): 173–187.