Co-creative practice reconciling theory and practice in tertiary student documentary production

References

• ATOM. 2022. Best Tertiary Documentary. https://atomawards.org/2022-tertiary-industry-category/best-tertiarydocumentary/.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, D. 2011. “The Primacy of Practice?” KINEMA: A Journal for Film and Audiovisual Media Spring 2011: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.15353/kinema.vi.1244.
   Google Scholar
• Bevan, C., and D. Shillinglaw. 2010. “Bigges Mob Mirlimirli: Teaching Two Way – Codeswitching Cultures and Dialects.” Literacy learning 18 (2): 11–17. https://doi.org/10.3316/aeipt.182984.
   Google Scholar
• Borum Chattoo, Caty. 2020. Story Movements: How Documentaries Empower People and Inspire Social Change. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buckland, W. 2020. “Scholarly Exploration of the Creative Process: Integrating Film Theory and Practice.” In Creative Practice Research in the Age of Neoliberal Hopelessness, edited by A. Piotrowska, 133–149. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, M., and M. Devlin. 2007. Interdisciplinary Higher Education: Implications for Teaching and Learning. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne, Centre for the Study of Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, W. 2006. “From ‘Doing’ to ‘Knowing What You are Doing’: Kolb's Learning Theory in Teaching Documentary Practice.” Journal of Media Practice 7 (2): 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1386/jmpr.7.2.151_3.
   Google Scholar
• Deslauriers, L., L. S. McCarty, K. Miller, K. Callaghan, and G. Kestin. 2019. “Measuring Actual Learning Versus Feeling of Learning in Response to Being Actively Engaged in the Classroom.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116 (39): 19251–19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dooley, K. 2019. “Teaching Screen Arts in Australia: Challenges, Opportunities and Current Trends.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Screen Production, edited by C. Batty, M. Berry, K. Dooley, B. Frankham, and S. Kerrigan, 427–441. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21744-0_33.
   Google Scholar
• Dooley, K., M. McHugh, and M. Berry. 2020. “Diversity On and Of Screen in Australian Film Schools: An ASPERA Report”. Australian Screen Production, Education and Research Association. doi:10.25916/fp9a-te97.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, John. 2021. “How Documentaries Mark themselves Out from Fiction: A Genre-based Approach.” Studies in Documentary Film 15 (2): 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/17503280.2021.1923144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FilmFreeway. 2022. Finding a Voice. https://filmfreeway.com/FindingAVoice688.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, S., S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. K. Smith, N. Okoroafor, H. Jordt, and M. P. Wenderoth. 2014. “Active Learning Increases Student Performance in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 (23): 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. A. 2020. On Critical Pedagogy. London: Bloomsbury. doi:10.5040/9781350145016.
   Google Scholar
• Hamalainen, R., and K. Vahasantanen. 2011. “Theoretical and Pedagogical Perspectives on Orchestrating Creativity and Collaborative Learning.” Educational Research Review 6 (3): 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2011.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, G.-S., and J. Budarick. 2018. “Overcoming the New Kids on the Block Syndrome: The Media “Endorsement” on Discrimination against African-Australians.” Continuum (Mount Lawley, W.A.) 32 (2): 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2017.1409340
   Google Scholar
• Hartley, J., C. Cassell, and G. Symon. 1994. Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research: A Practical Guide. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, Kimberley. 2019. Finding a Voice. Brisbane: QUT.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, L., and D. Chalmers. 2021. University Teaching in Focus: A Learning-centred Approach. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008330.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, N. 2006. Developing Creativity in Higher Education: An Imaginative Curriculum. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschenbaum, Howard, and Valerie Land Henderson, eds. 1989. The Carl Rogers Reader. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Kreber, C. 2004. “An Analysis of Two Models of Reflection and their Implications for Educational Development.” The International Journal for Academic Development 9 (1): 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144042000296044.
   Google Scholar
• Kreber, C., and P. A. Cranton. 2000. “Exploring the Scholarship of Teaching.” The Journal of Higher Education (Columbus) 71 (4): 476–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2000.11778846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakshman, L. 2021. Bustard Head. https://www.lucylakshmanfilms.com/bustard-head-documentary.
   Google Scholar
• Lakshman, Lucy. 2021. Bustard Head. Brisbane: QUT.
   Google Scholar
• Lattuca, L. R. 2005. “The Constructivist Pedagogy We’re Looking For.” Journalism & Mass Communication Educator 60 (4): 354–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769580506000404.
   Google Scholar
• Lyman, F. T. 1981. “The Responsive Classroom Discussion: The Inclusion of All Students.” In Mainstreaming Digest, edited by A. S. Anderson, 109–113. College Park, MD: University of Maryland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. 1991. Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J., E. W. Taylor, & Associates. 2009. Transformative Learning in Practice Insights from Community, Workplace, and Higher Education (Vol. 1). San Francisco: Jossey Bass Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, B. 2019. “‘Is this Degree Practical or Theoretical?’ Screen and Media Education, Studio-Based Teaching and Signature Pedagogies.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Screen Production, edited by C. Batty, M. Berry, K. Dooley, B. Frankham, and S. Kerrigan, 415–425. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21744-0_32.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, Bill. 2017. Introduction to Documentary. 3rd ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petrić, Vlada. 1976. “The Projector and the Camera: Integrating Courses in Cinema Studies and Filmmaking.” Journal of the University Film Association 28 (2): 3–7. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20687316.
   Google Scholar
• Pietsch, J., and V. Marotta. 2009. “Bauman, Strangerhood and Attitudes Towards Immigrants among the Australian Population.” Journal of Sociology (Melbourne, Vic.) 45 (2): 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783309103346.
   Google Scholar
• QUT. 2019. Blueprint 6. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Renov, Michael. 2004. The Subject of Documentary. Edited by Michael Renov, Faye Ginsberg and Jane Gaines. 16 vols. Vol. 16, Visible Evidence. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robson, Jill. 2017. Don’t Call Me Beautiful. Brisbane: QUT.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, M. D. 2017. “Australian Cinema Studies: How the Subject is Taught in Australian Universities.” Journal of Australian Studies 41 (4): 518–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/14443058.2017.1380685.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosey, P. 2006. “Interfering with Interference: An Emergent Perspective on Creativity in Higher Education.” In Developing Creativity in Higher Education: An Imaginative Curriculum, edited by N. Jackson, M. Oliver, M. Shaw, and J. Wisdom, 29–42. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne, M. 2003. “Reflections on Pedagogy.” Journal of Media Practice 4 (1): 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1386/jmpr.4.1.55/0.
   Google Scholar