587
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Denormalising surveillance through curation in Face Value: Surveillance and Identity in the Age of Digital Face Recognition

Pages 182-198 | Received 01 May 2023, Accepted 02 May 2023, Published online: 16 May 2023

References

  • Alacovska, Ana, Peter Booth, and Christian Fieseler. 2020. “The Role of the Arts in the Digital Transformation.” Artsformation Report Series. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3715612.
  • Amoore, Louise. 2006. “Biometric Borders: Governing Mobilities in the War on Terror.” Political Geography 25 (3): 336–351. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.02.001.
  • Bal, Mieke. 1996. Double Exposures. The Subject of Cultural Analysis. New York: Routledge.
  • Blas, Zach, and Jacob Gaboury. 2016. “Biometrics and Opacity: A Conversation.” Camera Obscura: Feminism, Culture, and Media Studies 31 (2): 155–165. doi:10.1215/02705346-3592510.
  • Brighenti, Andrea Mubi. 2010. “Artveillance: At the Crossroad of Art and Surveillance.” Surveillance and Society 7 (2): 137–148. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2010.12.002.
  • Browne, Simone. 2015. Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Buikema, Rosemarie. 2017. Revoltes in de Cultuurkritiek. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Buzan, B., and O. Wæver. 2003. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cahill, Susan. 2019. “Visual Art, Corporeal Economies, and the “New Normal” of Surveillant Policing in the War on Terror.” Surveillance & Society 17 (3/4): 352–366. doi:10.24908/ss.v17i3/4.8661.
  • Deleuze, Gilles. 1992. “Postscript on the Societies of Control.” October 59: 3–7.
  • Deleuze, Gilles. 1995. “Control and Becoming.” In Negotiations 1972–1990, edited by Martin Joughin, 169–176. New York: Colombia University Press.
  • Dewey-Hagborg, Heather. 2021. “The Politics of Face Recognition.” Utrecht.
  • Ellis, Darren. 2020. “Techno-Securitisation of Everyday Life and Cultures of Surveillance-Apatheia.” Science as Culture 29 (1): 11–29. doi:10.1080/09505431.2018.1561660.
  • Haraway, Donna Jeanne. 2016. Staying with the Trouble. Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Hengel, Louis. 2018. “The Arena of Affect: Marina Abramović and the Politics of Emotion.” In Doing Gender in Media, Art and Culture: A Comprehensive Guide to Gender Studies, edited by Rosemarie Buikema, Liedeke Plate, and Kathrin Thiele, 123–135. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Jones, Chris, Jane Kilpatrick, and Yasha Maccanico. 2022. “Building the Biometric State: Police Powers and Discrimination.” https://www.statewatch.org/media/3143/building-the-biometric-state-police-powers-and-discrimination.pdf.
  • Krause, Michael. 2018. “Artistic Explorations of Securitised Architecture and Urban Space.” In Architecture and Control, edited by Annie Ring, Henriette Steiner, and Kiristin Veel, 128–156. Leiden: Koninklijke Brill NV. doi:10.1163/9789004355620
  • Kruger, E., S. Magnet, and J. Van Loon. 2008. “Biometric Revisions of the ‘Body’ in Airports and US Welfare Reform.” Body & Society 14 (2): 99–121. doi:10.1177/1357034X08090700.
  • Leix Palumbo, Daniel. Forthcoming. “The Weaponisation of Datafied Sound: The Case of Voice Biometrics in German Asylum Procedures.” In Doing Digital Migration Studies, edited by Koen Leurs, and Sandra Ponzanesi. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
  • Lidchi, Henrietta. 1997. “The Poetics and Politics of Exhibiting Other Cultures.” In Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, edited by Stuart Hall, 151–222. London: Sage/Open University.
  • Madianou, Mirca. 2019. “The Biometric Assemblage: Surveillance, Experimentation, Profit, and the Measuring of Refugee Bodies.” Television and New Media 20 (6): 581–599. doi:10.1177/1527476419857682.
  • Magnet, Soshana Amielle. 2011. When Biometrics Fail. Gender, Race, and the Technology of Identity. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Mann, Steve, Jason Nolan, and Barry Wellman. 2003. “Sousveillance: Inventing and Using Wearable Computing Devices for Data Collection in Surveillance Environments.” Surveillance and Society 1 (3): 331–355. doi:10.24908/ss.v1i3.3344.
  • M’charek, Amade, Katharina Schramm, and David Skinner. 2014. “Topologies of Race: Doing Territory, Population and Identity in Europe.” Science, Technology & Human Values 39 (4): 468–487. doi:10.1177/0162243913509493.
  • McKnight, Stéphanie. 2020. “Creative Research Methodologies for Surveillance Studies.” Surveillance and Society 18 (1): 148–156. doi:10.24908/ss.v18i1.13530.
  • Mejias, Ulises A., and Nick Couldry. 2019. “Datafication.” Internet Policy Review 8: 4. doi:10.14763/2019.4.1428.
  • Monahan, Torin. 2022. Crisis Vision. Race and the Cultural Production of Surveillance. Durham: Duke University Press.
  • Moser, Stephanie. 2010. “The Devil is in the Detail: Museum Displays and the Creation of Knowledge.” Museum Anthropology 33 (1): 22–32. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1379.2010.01072.x.
  • O’Neill, Paul. 2007. “The Curatorial Turn: From Practice to Discourse.” In Issues in Curating Contemporary Art and Performance, edited by Judith Rugg, and Michèle Sedgwick, 13–28. Bristol: Intellect.
  • O'Neill, Maggie 2008. “Transnational Refugees: The Transformative Role of Art?” Forum: Qualitative Social Research 9: 2. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0802590.
  • Pasquale, Frank. 2015. The Black Box Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Pisters, Patricia. 2013. “Art as Circuit Breaker: Surveillance Screens and Powers of Affect.” In Carnal Aesthetics, edited by Bettina Papenburg, and Marta Zarzycka, 198–213. London: I.B. Tauris.
  • Ploeg, Irma. 2009. “Machine-Readable Bodies: Biometrics, Informatization and Surveillance.” Identity, Security and Democracy, 85–94. doi:10.3233/978-1-58603-940-0-85.
  • Pugliese, Joseph. 2005. “In Silico Race and the Heteronomy of Biometric Proxies: Biometrics in the Context of Civilian Life, Border Security and Counter-Terrorism Laws.” Australian Feminist Law Journal 23 (1): 1–32. doi:10.1080/13200968.2005.10854342.
  • Quinan, C L, and Mina Hunt. 2022. “Biometric Bordering and Automatic Gender Recognition: Challenging Binary Gender Norms in Everyday Biometric Technologies.” Communication, Culture and Critique 15 (2): 211–226. doi:10.1093/ccc/tcac013.
  • Quinan, Christine, and Kathrin Thiele. 2020. “Biopolitics, Necropolitics, Cosmopolitics–Feminist and Queer Interventions: An Introduction.” Journal of Gender Studies 29 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1080/09589236.2020.1693173.
  • Rancière, Jacques. 2010. Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics. London: Continuum.
  • Selinger, Evan, and Hyo Joo Rhee. 2021. “Normalizing Surveillance.” De Gruyter 22 (1): 49–74. doi:10.1515/sats-2021-0002.
  • Sheikh, Simon. 2013. “Towards the Exhibition as Research.” In Curating Research, edited by Paul O’Neill, and Nick Wilson, 32–46. London: Open Editions/de Appel.
  • Stark, Luke, and Kate Crawford. 2019. “The Work of Art in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: What Artists Can Teach Us About the Ethics of Data Practice.” Surveillance and Society 17 (3–4): 442–455. doi:10.24908/ss.v17i3/4.10821.
  • Wevers, Rosa. 2018. “Unmasking Biometrics ‘Biases: Facing Gender, Race, Class and Ability in Biometric Data Collection.” Tijdschrift Voor Mediageschiedenis 21 (2): 89–105. doi:10.18146/2213-7653.2018.368.
  • Wevers, Rosa. 2023. “Caged by Data: Exposing the Politics of Facial Recognition Through Zach Blas’ Face Cages.” In Situating Data, edited by Karin van Es, and Nanna Verhoeff, 159–172. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. doi:10.5117/9789463722971
  • Wood, David Murakami, and C. W. R. Webster. 2009. “Living in Surveillance Societies: The Normalisation of Surveillance in Europe and the Threat of Britain’s Bad Example.” Journal of Contemporary European Research 5 (2): 259–273. doi:10.3347/kjp.1992.30.2.65.
  • Zilio, Marion. 2020. Faceworld. Translated by Robin MacKay. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. London: Profile Books.