Quasi-market shaping, stewarding and steering in personalization: the need for practice-orientated empirical evidence

References

• Adnett, N., and P. Davies. 2003. “Schooling Reforms in England: From Quasi-Markets to Co-opetition?” Journal of Education Policy 18 (4): 393–406. doi:10.1080/0268093032000106848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, P., and C. Petsoulas. 2016. “Pricing in the English NHS Quasi Market: A National Study of the Allocation of Financial Risk through Contracts.” Public Money & Management 36 (5): 341–348. doi:10.1080/09540962.2016.1194080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., B. D. Jones, and P. B. Mortensen. 2014. “Punctuated Equilibrium Theory: Explaining Stability and Change in Public Policymaking.” In Theories of the Policy Process. 3rd ed, edited by P. A. Sabatier and C. M. Weible, 59–103. New York: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter, K., P. Rabiee, and C. Glendinning. 2013. “Managed Personal Budgets for Older People: What Are English Local Authorities Doing to Facilitate Personalized and Flexible Care?” Public Money & Management 33 (6): 399–406. doi:10.1080/09540962.2013.835998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J., T. Makkai, and V. Braithwaite. 2007. Regulating Aged Care: Ritualism and the New Pyramid. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Broadhurst, S., and K. Landau. 2017. “Learning Disability Market Position Statements, Are They Fit for Purpose?” Tizard Learning Disability Review 22 (4): 198–205. doi:10.1108/TLDR-03-2017-0011.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., M. Potoski, and D. M. Van Slyke. 2006. “Managing Public Service Contracts: Aligning Values, Institutions, and Markets.” Public Administration Review 66 (3): 323–331. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00590.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. 2016a. The Politics of Evidence Based Policy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Pivot.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. 2016b. The Politics of Evidence-Based Policy Making. 1st ed. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Pivot.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P., and K. Oliver. 2017. “Evidence-Based Policymaking is Not Like Evidence-Based Medicine, So How Far Should You Go to Bridge the Divide Between Evidence and Policy?” Health Research Policy and Systems 15 (1): 35. doi:10.1186/s12961-017-0192-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carey, G., H. Dickinson, E. Malbon, and D. Reeders. 2017. “The Vexed Question of Market Stewardship in the Public Sector: Examining Equity and the Social Contract Through the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme.” Social Policy & Administration 52: 387–407. doi:10.1111/spol.12321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogan, J. F., R. G. Hubbard, and D. P. Kessler. 2005. “Making Markets Work: Five Steps to a Better Health Care System.” Health Affairs 24 (6): 1447–1457. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.24.6.1447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Considine, M., J. Lewis, and S. O’Sullivan. 2011. “Quasi-Markets and Service Delivery Flexibility Following a Decade of Employment Assistance Reform in Australia.” Journal of Social Policy 40 (4): 811–833. doi:10.1017/S0047279411000213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Considine, M., and S. O’Sullivan. 2015. Contracting-Out Welfare Services. Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Cutler, T., and B. Waine. 1997. “The Politics of Quasi-Markets How Quasi-Markets Have Been Analysed and How They Might Be Analysed.” Critical Social Policy 17 (51): 3–26. doi:10.1177/026101839701705101.
   Google Scholar
• Dearnaley, P. 2013. “Competitive Advantage in the New Contrived Social Care Marketplace: How Did We Get Here?” Housing, Care and Support 16 (2): 76–84. doi:10.1108/HCS-03-2013-0002.
   Google Scholar
• Defourny, J., A. Henry, S. Nassaut, and M. Nyssens. 2010. “Does the Mission of Providers Matter on a Quasi-Market? The Case of the Belgian ‘Service Voucher’ Scheme: Does the Mission of Providers Matter on a Quasi-Market?” Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 81 (4): 583–610. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8292.2010.00423.x.
   Google Scholar
• Destler, K., and S. B. Page. (2010). Building Supply in Thin Markets: Districts’ Efforts to Promote the Growth of Autonomous Schools. Working Paper. Bellingham, WA: Western Washington University.
   Google Scholar
• Dickinson, H., and J. Glasby. 2010. The Personalisation Agenda: Implications for the Third Sector. Working Paper. Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods, M., S. Agarwal, D. Jones, B. Young, and A. Sutton. 2005. “Synthesising Qualitative and Quantiative Evidence: A Review of Possible Methods.” Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 10 (1): 45–53. doi:10.1177/135581960501000110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dow, K., and V. Braithwaite. 2013. Review of Higher Education Regulation Report. Canberra : Department of Innovation. file: http:///Users/Gem/Desktop/finalreviewreport.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Exworthy, M., M. Powell, and J. Mohan. 1999. “The NHS: Quasi-Market, Quasi-Hierarchy and Quasi-Network?” Public Money and Management 19 (4): 15–22. doi:10.1111/1467-9302.00184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gash, T. 2014. Professionalising Government’s Approach to Commissioning and Market Stewardship. London: Institute of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Gash, T., N. Panchamia, S. Sims, and L. Hotson. 2013. Making Public Service Markets Work. London: Institute of Government.
   Google Scholar
• Girth, A. M, A. Hefetz, J. M. Johnston, and M. E. Warner. 2012. “Outsourcing Public Service Delivery: Management Responses in Noncompetitive Markets.” Public Administration Review 72 (6): 887–900. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02596.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasby, J., and R. Littlechild. 2009. Putting Personalisation into Practice. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” The American Economic Review 35 (4): 519–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. 2008. “Three Lenses of Evidence-Based Policy.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 67 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00564.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. W. 2010. “Reconsidering Evidence-Based Policy: Key Issues and Challenges.” Policy and Society 29 (2): 77–94. doi:10.1016/j.polsoc.2010.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, B. 2015. “Dealing with Market Failure: A New Dilemma in UK Health and Social Care Policy?” Critical Social Policy 35 (2): 281–292. doi:10.1177/0261018314563037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeGrand, J. 2007. Delivering Public Services through Choice and Competition: The Other Invisible Hand. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• LeGrand, J., and W. Bartlett. 1993. Quasi-Markets and Social Policy. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lindholst, A. C., O. H. Petersen, and K. Houlberg. 2018. “Contracting Out Local Road and Park Services: Economic Effects and Their Strategic, Contractual and Competitive Conditions.” Local Government Studies 44 (1): 64–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowery, D. 1998. “Consumer Sovereignty and Quasi-Market Failure.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8 (2): 137–172. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024376.
   Google Scholar
• Moon, K., D. Marsh, H. Dickinson, and G. Carey. 2017. Is All Stewardship Equal? Developing a Typology of Stewardship Approaches. Canberra, Australia: University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Needham, C. 2010. “Debate: Personalized Public Services – a New State/Citizen Contract?” Public Money & Management 30 (3): 136–138. doi:10.1080/09540961003794246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needham, C., and J. Glasby. 2014. Debates in Personalisation. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Needham, C., and J. Glasby. 2015. “Personalisation – Love It or Hate It?” Journal of Integrated Care 23 (5): 268–276. doi:10.1108/JICA-08-2015-0034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Needham, C., K. Hall, K. Allen, E. Burn, C. Mangan, and M. Henwood. 2018. Market-Shaping and Personalisation, A Realist Review of the Literature. Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. 2010. “Public Governance and Public Service Delivery: A Research Agenda for the Future.” In The New Public Governance, edited by S. Osborne, 413–429. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., and T. Gaebler. 1992. Reinventing Government. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Penn, H. 2007. “Childcare Market Management: How the United Kingdom Government Has Reshaped Its Role in Developing Early Childhood Education and Care.” Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 8 (3): 192–207. doi:10.2304/ciec.2007.8.3.192.
   Google Scholar
• Ranerup, A. 2007. Rationalities in the Design of Public E-Services. Journal of E-Government 3 (4): 39–64. doi:10.1300/J399v03n04_03.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. 2007. “Understanding Governance: Ten Years On.” Organization Studies 28 (8): 1243–1264. doi:10.1177/0170840607076586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scotton, R. 1999. “Managed Competition:The Policy Context.” Australian Health Review 22 (2): 103. doi:10.1071/AH990103.
   Google Scholar
• Siegfried, N. 2014. “Does Banning or Restricting Advertising for Alcohol Result in Less Drinking of Alcohol?” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Drug and Alcohol Group).
   Google Scholar
• Siegfried, N., D. C. Pienaar, J. E. Ataguba, J. Volmink, T. Kredo, M. Jere, and C. D. Parry. 2014. Restricting or Banning Alcohol Advertising to Reduce Alcohol Consumption in Adults and Adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 11: CD010704. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010704.pub2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, D., and F. Tonkiss. 2001. Market Society: Markets and Modern Social Theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Sumsion, J. 2012. “ABC Learning and Australian Early Education and Care: A Retrospective Ethical Audit of a Radical Experiment.” Chapter 12. In Childcare Markets Local and Global: Can They Deliver Equitable Service, edited by E. Lloyd, & H. Penn, 209–225. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor-Gooby, P. 2008. “Choice and Values: Individualised Rational Action and Social Goals.” Journal of Social Policy 37 (2): 167–185. doi:10.1017/S0047279407001699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple, P. 2006. “Intervention in a Higher Education Market: A Case Study.” Higher Education Quarterly 60 (3): 257–269. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2273.2006.00320.x.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, R., L. Barker, G. Rubin, and A. Dahlmann-Noor. 2015. “Assistive Technology for Children and Young People With Low Vision.” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (6): CD011350. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011350.pub2.
   Google Scholar
• Viitanen, T. K. 2011. Child Care Voucher and Labour Market Behaviour: Experimental Evidence from Finland. Applied Economics 43 (23): 3203–3212. doi:10.1080/00036840903508346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, I., and H. Dickinson. 2016. “Going It Alone or Playing to the Crowd? A Critique of Individual Budgets and the Personalisation of Health Care in the English National Health Service: Individual Budgets and the Personalisation of Health Care.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 75 (2): 149–158. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Workman, S., B. D. Jones, and A. E. Jochim. 2009. “Information Processing and Policy Dynamics.” Policy Studies Journal 37 (1): 75–92. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00296.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K., J. Y. Hsieh, and T. S. Li. 2009. “Contracting Capacity and Perceived Contracting Performance: Nonlinear Effects and the Role of Time.” Public Administration Review 69 (4): 681–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahariadis, N. 2014. “Ambiguity and Multiple Streams.” In Theories of the Policy Process. 3rd ed, edited by Paul A. Sabatier and C. M. Weible. New York: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar