1,564
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Bringing nature into decision-making and policy design: Experiences from overseas Europe

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 226-244 | Received 04 Sep 2020, Accepted 01 Feb 2021, Published online: 24 Feb 2021

References

  • Archer, E., L. E. Dziba, K. J. Mulongoy, M. A. Maoela, M. Walters, R. Biggs, M.-C. Cormier-Salem, et al. 2018. Summary for Policymakers of the Regional Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services for Africa of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn, Germany: IPBES secretariat.
  • Arkema, K., D. Fisher, and K. Wyatt. 2017. “Economic Valuation of Ecosystem Services in Bahamian Marine Protected Areas.” Paper prepared for BREEF by The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, 22 November.
  • Arjjumend, H., K. Koutouki, and S. Alam. 2016. “Evolution of International Governance of Biodiversity.” Journal of Global Resources 3: 1–15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/311841506_Evolution_of_International_Governance_of_Biodiversity
  • Azevedo, F. 2017. “Outermost Regions.” Factsheets of the European Union, 1–3. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/fiches_techniques/2013/050107/04A_FT(2013)050107_EN.pdf
  • Bagstad, K. J., D. J. Semmens, S. Waage, and R. Winthrop. 2013. “A Comparative Assessment of Decision-Support Tools for Ecosystem Services Quantification and Valuation.” Ecosystem Services 5: 27–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.07.004.
  • Barton, D. N., I. Ring, and G. Rusch. 2014. “Policyscapes – Nature-Based Policy Mixes for Biodiversity Conservation and Ecosystem Services Provision.” Policymix Project, Policy Brief No. 2.
  • Benzaken, D., and Y. Renard. 2011. Future Directions for Biodiversity Action in Europe Overseas: Outcomes of the Review of the Implementation of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
  • BSR (Business for Social Responsibility). 2013. “Private Sector Uptake of Ecosystem Services Concepts and Frameworks – The Current State of Play.” https://www.bsr.org/reports/BSR_Private_Sector_Uptake_Ecosystem_Services.pdf.
  • CEU (Council of the European Union). 2020. Conclusions on Biodiversity – the Need for Urgent Action. Brussels, (accessed October 16 2020). https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-11829-2020-INIT/en/pdf
  • Cohen-Shacham, E., G. Walters, C. Janzen, and S. Maginnis, eds. 2016. Nature-Based Solutions to Address Global Societal Challenges. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
  • EC (European Commission). 2020a. “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – EU Biodiversity Strategy For 2030. Bringing nature back into our lives.” EC, Brussels. Accessed June 20 2020). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0380
  • EC (European Commission). 2020b. Biodiversity and Nature-based Solutions – Analysis of EU-funded projects. EC, Brussels. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/d7e8f4d4-c577-11ea-b3a4-01aa75ed71a1.
  • EEA (European Environment Agency). 2015. EU 2010 Biodiversity Baseline – Adapted to the MAES Typology Copenhagen: EEA.
  • EEA (European Environment Agency). 2019. The European Environment – State and Outlook 2020. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
  • Eggermont, H., E. Balian, J. Manuel, N. Azevedo, V. Beumer, T. Brodin, J. Claudet, et al. 2015. “Nature-Based Solutions: New Influence for Environmental Management and Research in Europe.” GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 24 (4): 243–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.24.4.9.
  • EU (European Union) 2011. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – Our Life Insurance, Our Natural Capital: An EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Brussels: European Commission.
  • EU BEST. 2016. Regional ecosystem profile – Macaronesian Region. Brussels: European Commission.
  • Failler, P., E. Petre, F. Charrier, and J.-P. Marechal. 2010. Détermination de la valeur socio-économique des récifs coralliens et écosystèmes associés (mangroves, herbiers de phanérogames, zones littorales envasées) de Martinique [Determination of the socio-economic value of coral reefs and associated ecosystems (mangroves, phanerogam meadows, silted coastal areas) of Martinique]. Plan d'actions national IFRECOR 2006–2010. Fort-de-France, Martinique: Ministry of Ecology. Spanish.
  • Failler, P., J.-P. Maréchal, E. Petre, and T. Binet. 2015. “Valuation of Marine and Coastal Ecosystem Services as a Tool for Conservation: The Case of Martinique in the Caribbean.” Journal of Ecosystem Services 11: 67–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.011..
  • Faivre, N., M. Fritz, T. Freitas, B. de Boissezon, and S. Vandewoestijne. 2017. “Nature-Based Solutions in the EU: Innovating with Nature to Address Social, Economic and Environmental Challenges.” Environmental Research 159: 509–518. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.032..
  • Farrell, H., and M. Finnemore. 2016. “Global Institutions without a Global State.” In The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism, edited by O. Fioretos, T.G. Falleti, and A. Sheingate, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 572-589.
  • Ferraro, G. 2019. The Public and the Politics of Radioactive Waste Management: Public Involvement and Policy-Making in the European Union. London: Routledge.
  • Gauvin, F.-P. 2014. Understanding Policy Developments and Choices through the “3-i” Framework: Interests, Ideas and Institutions. Montréal, Québec: National Collaborating Centre for Healthy Public Policy.
  • Geneletti, D., B. Adem Esmail, C. Cortinovis, I. Arany, M. Balzan, P. van Beukering, S. Bicking, et al. 2020. “Ecosystem Services Mapping and Assessment for Policy- and Decision-Making: Lessons Learned from a Comparative Analysis of European Case Studies.” One Ecosystem 5: e53111. doi:https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.5.e53111.
  • Grêt-Regamey, A., E. Sirén, S. H. Brunner, and B. Weibel. 2017. “Review of Decision Support Tools to Operationalize the Ecosystem Services Concept.” Ecosystem Services 26: 306–315. doi: 0.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.012. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.012.
  • Hagerman, S. M., and R. Pelai. 2016. “As Far as Possible and as Appropriate: Implementing the Aichi Biodiversity Targets.” Conservation Letters 9 (6): 469–478. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12290.
  • Hall, P. 1993. “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State – the Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain.” Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275–296. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/422246.
  • IPBES. 2019. Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services, Bonn, Germany: IPBES.
  • IUCN 2018. Strengthening Global Biodiversity Governance Post-2020: lessons from the Climate Regime?, Information Paper, International Union for Conservation of Nature. Gland: IUCN.
  • Kabisch, N., N. Frantzeskaki, S. Pauleit, S. Naumann, M. Davis, M. Artmann, D. Haase, et al. 2016. “Nature-Based Solutions to Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation in Urban Areas: perspectives on Indicators, Knowledge Gaps, Barriers, and Opportunities for Action.” Ecology and Society 21(2): 39. doi:https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-08373-210239.
  • Kettunen, M., and N. P. Bezerra. 2008. Brussels in Brief: Conserving Biodiversity in the EU Overseas Entities. Institute for European Environmental Policy, Brussels.
  • Laine, S. 2020. Valuation of the Blue Economy in Seychelles. UNECA project of Blue Economy Valuation Toolkit.
  • Madruga, L., F. Wallenstein, and J. M. N. Azevedo. 2016. Regional Ecosystem Profile – Macaronesian Region. EU Outermost Regions and Overseas Countries and Territories. European Commission.
  • Maes, J., A. Teller, and M. Erhard. 2014. Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services. Indicators for Ecosystem Assessments Under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020, European Union, Luxembourg.
  • Maes, J., and S. Jacobs. 2017. “Nature-Based Solutions for Europe’s Sustainable Development.” Conservation Letters 10 (1): 121–124. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12216.
  • Maes, J., A. Teller, M. Erhard, B. Grizzetti, J. I. Barredo, M. L. Paracchini, S. Condé, et al. 2018. Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and Their Services: An Analytical Framework for Ecosystem Condition. European Union, Luxembourg.
  • McFarland, K., and H. Gerdes. 2016. Uptake of Ecosystem Valuations in Policymaking in Europe’s Overseas Entities: Application, Barriers to Use, and Opportunities for Improved Uptake. NetBiome-CSA, Grant Agreement n° 603710.
  • Menini, E., F. Halim, D. Gabriel, J. L. Suarez de Vivero, H. Calado, F. Moniz, and M. Caña Varona. 2018. Geopolitical Framework of the Macaronesia Region. GPS Azores Project, Ponta Delgada.
  • MACOBIOS. 2019. Marine Coastal Ecosystems Biodiversity and Services in a Changing World, MACOVIOS Project.
  • MOVE. 2020. Scientific research on mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services in the EU Overseas. MOVE Project, Grant Agreement n° 07.027735/2018/776517/SUB/ENV.D2.
  • Nesshöver, C., T. Assmuth, K. N. Irvine, G. M. Rusch, K. A. Waylen, B. Delbaere, D. Haase, et al. 2017. “The Science, Policy and Practice of Nature-Based Solutions: An Interdisciplinary Perspective.” The Science of the Total Environment 579: 1215–1227. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106.
  • OCEANA. 2010. Sustainable Development Manuals Restoration of Seagrass Meadows. Madrid: OCEANA.
  • OECD. 2015. OECD Environmental Performance Review-Spain 2015. Paris: OECD.
  • OECD. 2018. Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environment: Further Developments and Policy Use. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • OSE. 2012. Biodiversity in Spain. The Basis for Sustainability in the Face of Global Change, Madrid: Observatorio de la Sostenibilidad en España.
  • Petit, J., and G. Prudent. 2008. Climate Change and Biodiversity in the European Union Overseas Entities. Brussels: IUCN.
  • Puppim de Oliveira, J. A., O. Balaban, C. N. H. Doll, R. Moreno-Peñaranda, A. Gasparatos, D. Iossifova, and A. Suwa. 2011. “Cities and Biodiversity: Perspectives and Governance Challenges for Implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) at the City Level.” Biological Conservation 144 (5): 1302–1313. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.12.007.
  • Ministry of the Environment, and Rural and Marine Affairs. (2011). Real Decreto 1274/2011, de 16 de septiembre, por el que se aprueba el Plan estratégico del patrimonio natural y de la biodiversidad 2011-2017, en aplicación de la Ley 42/2007, de 13 de diciembre, del Patrimonio Natural y de la Biodiversidad [Royal Decree 1274/2011, of September 16, approving the Strategic Plan for Natural Heritage and Biodiversity 2011-2017, in application of Law 42/2007, of December 13, on Natural Heritage and the Biodiversity]. Spanish. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/rd/2011/09/16/1274
  • Rouillard, J., M. Lago, K. Abhold, L. Roeschel, T. Kafyeke, H. Klimmek, and V. Mattheiß. 2016. Synergies and Differences between Biodiversity, Nature, Water and Marine Environment EU Policies, Aquacross project, Deliverable 2.1. https://aquacross.eu/sites/default/files/D2.1_Synergies%20and%20Differences%20between%20EU%20Policies%20with%20Annexes%2003112016.pdf
  • SAPEA. 2019. Making Sense of Science for Policy Under Conditions of Complexity and Uncertainty. Science Advice for Policy by European Academies (SAPEA). SAPEA, Berlin.
  • Soler Luque, Z., and J. Kostecka.2019. “Biodiversity Loss, the Causes, the State and Basic Form of Nature Protection in Spain and Poland.” Polish Journal for Sustainable Development 22 (2): 75–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.15584/pjsd.2018.22.2.9.
  • Thomas, J. C. 2012. Citizen, Customer, Partner: Engaging the Public in Public Management. Routledge: Oxon and New York.
  • Trégarot, E., P. Failler, and J.-P. Maréchal. 2017. “Evaluation of Coastal and Marine Ecosystem Services of Mayotte: Indirect Use Values of Coral Reefs and Associated Ecosystems.” International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 13 (3): 19–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2017.1407361.
  • Tuya, F., and R. J. Haroun. 2009. “Phytogeography of Lusitanian Macaronesia: biogeographic Affinities in Species Richness and Assemblage Composition.” European Journal of Phycology 44 (3): 405–413. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09670260902836246.
  • UN. 1992. Convention on Biological Diversity. Rio de Janeiro: United Nations.
  • UNEP. 2020. Out of the Blue: The Value of Seagrasses to the Environment and to People. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.
  • UNEP-Nairobi Convention/USAID/WIOMSA. 2020. Guidelines on Mangrove Ecosystem Restoration for the Western Indian Ocean Region. Nairobi: UNEP.
  • UNSD. 1997. Glossary of Environment Statistics. Studies in Methods, Series F, No. 67. New York: United Nations.
  • Walter, S. G. 2017. “Nature-based Solutions: Pandora box or reconciling concept?” IUCN Webinar. October 4 2017. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dzBsIy9P5Bc&feature=youtu.be
  • Wanjui, J. 2013. “Biodiversity Conservation Needs and Method to Conserve the Biological Diversity.” Journal of Biodiversity and Endangered Species 1: 1–2. doi:https://doi.org/10.4172/2332-2543.1000113.
  • Whittaker, R. J., and J. M. Fernández‐Palacios. 2007. Island Biogeography. Ecology, Evolution and Conservation. London: Oxford University Press.
  • World Bank. 2008. Biodiversity, Climate Change and Adaptation: Nature-Based Solutions from the World Bank Portfolio. Washington DC: World Bank.