Systemic design practice for participatory policymaking

References

• Abercrombie, Rob, Ellen Harries, and Rachel Wharton. 2015. “Systems Change: A Guide to What It Is and How to Do It.” New Philanthropy Capital (NPC). https://www.thinknpc.org/resource-hub/systems-change-a-guide-to-what-it-is-and-how-to-do-it/.
   Google Scholar
• Aguirre Ulloa, Manuela. 2020. Transforming Public Organizations into Co-Designing Cultures: A Study of Capacity-Building Programs as Learning Ecosystems. Oslo School of Architecture and Design. https://aho.brage.unit.no/aho-xmlui/handle/11250/2654789.
   Google Scholar
• Banathy, Bela H. 1996. Designing Social Systems in a Changing World. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bason, Christian. 2014. “Introduction: The Design for Policy Nexus.” In Design for Policy, edited by Christian Bason, 1–8. Surrey, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bason, Christian. 2017. Leading Public Design: Discovering Human-Centered Governance. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bijl-Brouwer, Mieke van der, and Bridget Malcolm. 2016. “Developing a Systemic Design Practice to Support a Regulatory Agency in Addressing Complex Problems.” In Proceedings of RSD5 Symposium. Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Bijl-Brouwer, Mieke van der, and Bridget Malcolm. 2020. “Systemic Design Principles in Social Innovation: A Study of Expert Practices and Design Rationales.” She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 6 (3): 386–407. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2020.06.001.
   Google Scholar
• Bijl-Brouwer, Mieke van der. 2017. “Designing for Social Infrastructures in Complex Service Systems: A Human-Centered and Social Systems Perspective on Service Design.” She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 3 (3): 183–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2017.11.002.
   Google Scholar
• Blomkamp, Emma. 2018. “The Promise of Co-Design for Public Policy.”In Routledge Handbook of Policy Design, edited by Michael Howlett and Ishani Mukherjee, 59-73. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blomkamp, Emma. 2020a. Introducing and Testing a Systemic Design Practice Framework. India: Systemic Design Association. https://rsdsymposium.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Blomkamp, Emma. 2020b. Workplace Equality Project: Discussion Paper. Melbourne: Maroondah City Council.
   Google Scholar
• Bridgman, Peter, and Davis Glyn. 1998. Australian Policy Handbook. 2nd ed. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, Richard. 1992. “Wicked Problems in Design Thinking.” Design Issues 8 (2): 5–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637.
   Google Scholar
• Buuren, Arwin, van, Jenny M. Lewis, B. Guy Peters, and William Voorberg. 2020. “Improving Public Policy and Administration: Exploring the Potential of Design.” Policy & Politics 48 (1): 3–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, Marie, and K. Healy. 2009. “Social Work Practice Theories and Frameworks.” In Social Work: Contexts and Practice, 2nd ed, edited by Marie Connolly and Louise Harms. Australia: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Design Council 2007. “Eleven Lessons: Managing Design in Eleven Global Brands.” http://www.designcouncil.org.uk/sites/default/files/asset/document/ElevenLessons_Design_Council%20%282%29.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Dieckmann, Ulf, Hager Gerid, Magnuszewski Piotr, and Martin Lees. 2020. “Human Capabilities for Systems Leadership: Disseminating Systems Thinking Through Education and Training.” In Systemic Thinking for Policy Making: The Potential of Systems Analysis for Addressing Global Policy Challenges in the 21st Century, edited by William Hynes, Martin Lees, and Jan Marco Müller, 153–164. New Approaches to Economic Challenges. Paris: OECD. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/879c4f7a-en.
   Google Scholar
• Durose, Catherine, and Liz Richardson. 2016. Designing Public Policy for Co-Production: Theory, Practice and Change. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, Mark, and Nina Terrey. 2016. “Co-Design with Citizens and Stakeholders.” In Evidence-Based Policy Making in the Social Sciences: Methods That Matter, edited by Gerry Stoker, Mark Evans 243–262. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, Archon. 2015. “Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and Its Future.” Public Administration Review 75 (4): 513–522. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, Frank W. 2005. Technological Transitions and System Innovations: A Co-Evolutionary and Socio-Technical Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, Frances. 2019. A Relational Approach to Community and Social Innovation: Practices That Make a Difference. Auckland: Auckland Council.
   Google Scholar
• Haynes, Abby, Kate Garvey, Seanna Davidson, and Andrew Milat. 2020. “What Can Policy-Makers Get out of Systems Thinking? Policy Partners’ Experiences of a Systems-Focused Research Collaboration in Preventive Health.” International Journal of Health Policy and Management 9 (2): 65–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2019.86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, Terry. 2015. “Transition Design: A Proposal for a New Area of Design Practice, Study, and Research.” Design and Culture 7 (2): 229–246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/17547075.2015.1051829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, Peter. 2014. “Systemic Design Principles for Complex Social Systems.” In Social Systems and Design, edited by Gary Metcalf, 1:91–128. Translational Systems Science Series. Verlag: Springer. https://www.academia.edu/5063638/Systemic_Design_Principles_for_Complex_Social_Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Peter. 2018. “Contexts of Co-Creation: Designing with System Stakeholders.” In Systemic Design, edited by Peter Jones and Kyoichi Kijima, 8: 3–52. Translational Systems Sciences. Tokyo: Springer Japan. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55639-8_1.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, Lucy, and Jocelyn Bailey. 2017. “Prototyping and the New Spirit of Policy-Making.” CoDesign 13 (3): 214–226. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1355003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankelly Chase. 2020. “System Behaviours.” Lankelly Chase. 2020. https://lankellychase.org.uk/our-approach/system-behaviours/.
   Google Scholar
• Leadbeater, Charles, and Jennie Winhall. 2020. Building Better Systems: A Green Paper on System Innovation. Denmark: ROCKWOOL Foundation. systeminnovation.org.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, Jenny M., Michael McGann, and Emma Blomkamp. 2020. “When Design Meets Power: Design Thinking, Public Sector Innovation and the Politics of Policymaking.” Policy & Politics 48 (1): 111–130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1332/030557319X15579230420081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luck, Rachael. 2018. “What is It That Makes Participation in Design Participatory Design?” Design Studies 59: 1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGann, Michael, Emma Blomkamp, and Jenny M. Lewis. 2018. “The Rise of Public Sector Innovation Labs: Experiments in Design Thinking for Policy.” Policy Sciences 51 (3): 249–267. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9315-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGann, Michael, Tamas Wells, and Emma Blomkamp. 2021. “Innovation Labs and Co-Production in Public Problem Solving.” Public Management Review 23 (2): 297–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1699946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, Victoria Jane, Wayne Weavell, Rosemary Callander, Donella Piper, Lauralie Richard, Lynne Maher, Hilary Boyd, et al. 2019. “The Participatory Zeitgeist: An Explanatory Theoretical Model of Change in an Era of Coproduction and Codesign in Healthcare Improvement.” Medical Humanities 45 (3): 247–257. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2017-011398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, Alex, and Mark Leung. 2014. “Systemic Design: Two Canadian Case Studies.” FormAkademisk - forskningstidsskrift for design og designdidaktikk 7 (3): 1–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.794.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, Liz, and Pieter Jan Stappers. 2014. “From Designing to Co-Designing to Collective Dreaming: Three Slices in Time.” Interactions 21 (6): 24–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/2670616.
   Google Scholar
• Sevaldson, Birger, and Peter Jones. 2019. “An Interdiscipline Emerges: Pathways to Systemic Design.” She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation 5 (2): 75–84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2019.05.002.
   Google Scholar
• Tenbensel, Tim. 2006. “Policy Knowledge for Policy Work.” In The Work of Policy: An International Survey, edited by Hal K. Colebatch, 199–215. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Tonurist, Piret, Rovenskaya Elena, Wagner Reinhard Mechler Fabian, 2020. and, and J. Linnerooth-Bayer. “Introducing Systems Thinking into Public Sector Institutions: Learning by Doing?” In Systemic Thinking for Policy Making: The Potential of Systems Analysis for Addressing Global Policy Challenges in the 21st Century.” edited by William Hynes, Martin Lees, and Jan Marco Müller, 143–152. New Approaches to Economic Challenges. Paris: OECD. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/879c4f7a-en.
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, Jacob, Eva Sørensen, and Asbjørn Røiseland. 2019. “Transforming the Public Sector into an Arena for Co-Creation.” Administration & Society 51 (5): 795–825. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399716680057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, Dvora. 1996. How Does a Policy Mean?: Interpreting Policy and Organizational Actions. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yunkaporta, Tyson. 2019. Sand Talk: How Indigenous Thinking Can save the World. Melbourne: Text Publishing.
   Google Scholar