Are research-policy engagement activities informed by policy theory and evidence? 7 challenges to the UK impact agenda

References

• Bacchi, C. 2009. Analysing Policy: What’s the Problem Represented to Be? NSW: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Bardach, E., and E. Patashnik. 2020. A Practical Guide for Policy Analysis. 6th ed. (International student edition). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bastow, S., P. Dunleavy, and J. Tinkler. 2014. The Impact of the Social Sciences: How Academics and Their Research Make a Difference. London: SAGE Publishing Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Best, A., and B. Holmes. 2010. “Systems Thinking, Knowledge and Action: Towards Better Models and Methods.” Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 6 (2): 145–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1332/174426410X502284.
   Google Scholar
• Boaz, A., S. Hanney, T. Jones, and B. Soper. 2015. “Does the Engagement of Clinicians and Organisations in Research Improve Healthcare Performance: A Three-Stage Review.” BMJ Open 5 (12): e009415. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaz, A., and S. Nutley. 2019. “Using Evidence.” In What Works Now? Evidence-Informed Policy and Practice, edited by A. Boaz, H. Davies, A. Fraser, and S. Nutley. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brans, M., I. Geva-May, and M. Howlett, eds. 2017. Routledge Handbook of Comparative Policy Analysis. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. 2015. “How Can Policy Theory Have an Impact on Policy Making?” Teaching Public Administration 33 (1): 22–39. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739414532284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. 2016. The Politics of Evidence-Based Policymaking. London: Palgrave Pivot.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. 2017. “Evidence-Based Best Practice is More Political than It Looks: A Case Study of the “Scottish Approach.” Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 13 (3): 499–515. doi:https://doi.org/10.1332/174426416X14609261565901.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. 2018. “Three Habits of Successful Policy Entrepreneurs.” Policy & Politics 46 (2): 199–217. doi:https://doi.org/10.1332/030557318X15230056771696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. 2019. “Evidence and Policymaking’” In What Works Now? Evidence-Informed Policy and Practice, edited by A. Boaz, H. Davies, A. Fraser, and S. Nutley. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. 2020. Understanding Public Policy. 2nd ed. London: Red Globe.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. 2021. The Politics of Policy Analysis. London: Palgrave Pivot. Early draft https://paulcairney.files.wordpress.com/2020/02/paul-cairney-the-politics-of-policy-analysis-palgrave-pivot-full-draft-27.2.20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P., T. Heikkila, and M. Wood. 2019. Making Policy in a Complex World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cairney, P., and K. Oliver. 2017. “Evidence-Based Policymaking is Not Like Evidence-Based Medicine, so How Far Should You Go to Bridge the Divide Between Evidence and Policy?” Health Research Policy and Systems 15 (1): 35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0192-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cairney, P., and K. Oliver. 2020. “How Should Academics Engage in Policymaking to Achieve Impact?” Political Studies Review 18 (2): 228–244. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929918807714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, N. 1979. “The Two Communities Theory and Knowledge Utilization.” American Behavioral Scientist 22 (3): 459–470. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/000276427902200308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chubb, J., and G. E. Derrick. 2020. “The Impact a-Gender: Gendered Orientations Towards Research Impact and Its Evaluation.” Palgrave Communications 6 (1): 72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0438-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derrick, G. 2018. The Evaluators’ Eye: Impact Assessment and Academic Peer Review. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Doucet, F. 2019. Centering the Margins: (Re)Defining Useful Research Evidence Through Critical Perspectives. New York: William T. Grant Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, W. 2017. Public Policy Analysis. 6th ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC). 2019. Delivery Plan 2019. Swindon: ESRC. https://www.ukri.org/files/about/dps/esrc-dp-2019/
   Google Scholar
• Gunn, A., and M. Mintrom. 2017. “Evaluating the Non-Academic Impact of Academic Research: Design Considerations.” Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 39 (1): 20–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2016.1254429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, L., J. Tripney, and D. Gough. 2016. The Science of Using Science: Researching the Use of Research Evidence in Decision-Making. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education, University College London.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, I., C. E. van Daalen, and P. Bots. 2013. “Perspectives on Policy Analysis: A Framework for Understanding and Design.” In Public Policy Analysis: New Developments, edited by W. Thissen and W. Walker, 41–64. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Meltzer, R., and A. Schwartz. 2019. Policy Analysis as Problem Solving. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Michener, J. 2019. “Policy Feedback in a Racialized Polity.” Policy Studies Journal 47 (2): 423–450. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mijumbi-Deve, Rhona, Sarah E. Rosenbaum, Andrew D. Oxman, John N. Lavis, and Nelson K. Sewankambo. 2017. “Policymaker Experiences with Rapid Response Briefs to Address Health-System and Technology Questions in Uganda.” Health Research Policy and Systems 15 (1): 37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0200-1.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M. 2012. Contemporary Policy Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M. 2019. “So You Want to Be a Policy Entrepreneur?” Policy Design and Practice 2 (4): 307–323. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2019.1675989.
   Google Scholar
• Murji, K. 2017. Racism, Policy and Politics. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, K., and P. Cairney. 2019. “The Dos and Don’ts of Influencing Policy: A Systematic Review of Advice to Academics.” Palgrave Communications 5 (21): 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0232-y.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, K., A. Hopkins, A. Boaz, and S. Guillot-Wright. (forthcoming 2021). “Who Undertakes What Strategies to Promote Academic-Government Engagement?” Report for ESRC.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, K., A. Hopkins, A. Boaz, S. Guillot-Wright, and P. Cairney. 2020. Research Engagement with Government: Insights from Research on Impact Initiatives, Policy Analysis, and Policymaking. (ESRC briefing).https://paulcairney.files.wordpress.com/2020/01/esrc-government-engagement-reports-final-version-24.6.20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, K., S. Innvar, T. Lorenc, J. Woodman, and J. Thomas. 2014. “A Systematic Review of Barriers to and Facilitators of the Use of Evidence by Policymakers.” BMC Health Services Research 14 (1): 2. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/14/2. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-14-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, K., A. Kothari, and N. Mays. 2019. “The Dark Side of Coproduction: Do the Costs Outweigh the Benefits for Health Research?” Health Research Policy and Systems 17 (1): 33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0432-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkhurst, J. 2017. The Politics of Evidence. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen, D. B., J. F. Grønvad, and R. Hvidtfeldt. 2020. “Methods for Mapping the Impact of Social Sciences and Humanities – a Literature Review.” Research Evaluation 29 (1): 4–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvz033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phoenix, J., L. Atkinson, and H. Baker. 2019. “Creating and Communicating Social Research for Policymakers in Government.” Palgrave Communications 5 (1): 98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0310-1.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, S., and C. Cvitanovic. 2019. “Evaluating the Impacts of Boundary-Spanning Activities at the Interface of Environmental Science and Policy: A Review of Progress and Future Research Needs.” Environmental Science & Policy 92: 141–151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, A. E., H. T. O. Davies, and S. M. Nutley. 2018. “Facing the Challenges of Research-Informed Knowledge Mobilization: ‘Practising What we Preach.” Public Administration 96 (1): 36–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radin, B. 2019. Policy Analysis in the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ravenscroft, J., M. Liakata, A. Clare, and D. Duma. 2017. “Measuring Scientific Impact Beyond Academia: An Assessment of Existing Impact Metrics and Proposed improvements.” PloS One 12 (3): e0173152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, A., and H. Ingram. 1997. Policy Design for Democracy. Kansas: University of Kansas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K., and E. Stewart. 2017. “We Need to Talk About Impact: Why Social Policy Academics Need to Engage with the UK’s Research Impact Agenda.” Journal of Social Policy 46 (1): 109–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279416000283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. T. 2012. Decolonizing Methodologies. 2nd ed. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. 2012. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. 3rd ed. London: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Weimer, D., and A. Vining. 2017. Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice. 6th ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• What Works Network. 2018. The Rise of Experimental Government. London: Cabinet Office and ESRC.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, K., and J. Grant. 2018. “A Comparative Review of How the Policy and Procedures to Assess Research Impact Evolved in Australia and the UK.” Research Evaluation 27 (2): 93–105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Oli, Sophie Sarre, Stan Constantina Papoulias, Sarah Knowles, Glenn Robert, Peter Beresford, Diana Rose, et al. 2020. “Lost in the Shadows: Reflections on the Dark Side of Co-Production.” Health Research Policy and Systems 18 (1): 43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00558-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar