Forming issues and publics: participatory design things and uncertain rural futures

References

• Arnstein, S. R. 1969. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35 (4): 216–224. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baerenholdt, J. O., M. Büscher, J. D. Scheuer, and J. Simonsen. 2010. “Perspectives on Design Research.” In Design research. Synergies from interdisciplinary perspectives, edited by J. Simonsen, J. O. Baerenholdt, M. Büscher and J. D. Scheuer, 1–15. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bjögvinsson, Erling, Pelle Ehn, and Per-Anders Hillgren. 2012. “Design Things and Design Thinking: Contemporary Participatory Design Challenges.” Design Issues 28 (3): 101–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C. 2009. “Design and the Construction of Publics.” Design Issues 25 (1): 48–63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/desi.2009.25.1.48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C. 2016. “The Irony of Drones for Foraging: Exploring the Work of Speculative Interventions.” In Design Anthropological Futures, edited by R. C. Smith, K. T. Vangkilde, M. G. Kjaersgaard, T. Otto, J. Halse, and T. Binder, 139–154. London: Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• DiSalvo, C., T. Lodato, T. Jenkins, J. Lukens, and T. Kim. 2014. “Making Public Things: How HCI Design Can Express Matters of Concern.” In CHI 14 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Toronto: ACM Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunne, A., and F. Raby. 2013. Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaardmand, A. 1993. Dansk Byplanlaegning 1938–1992. Copenhagen: Arkitektens Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• He, B. 2011. “Civic Engagement through Participatory Budgeting in China: Three Different Logics at Work.” Public Administration and Development 31 (2): 122–133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hjørring Municipality. 2017. Samling Og Sammenhold: Landdistriktsstrategi for Hjørring Kommune. Hjørring: Hjørring Kommune.
   Google Scholar
• Hospers, G. J., and J. Syssner. 2018. “Introduction – Urbanization, Shrinkage and (in)Formality.” In Dealing with Urban and Rural Shrinkage: Formal and Informal Strategies, edited by G. J. Hospers and J. Syssner, 9–16. Zurich: Lit Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Huybrechts, L., H. Benesch, and J. Geib. 2017. “Institutioning: Participatory Design, Co-Design and the Public Realm.” CoDesign 13 (3): 148–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2017.1355006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. 2019. “Towards Ethical Principles for Participatory Design Practice.” CoDesign 15 (4): 329–344. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2018.1502324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225–248. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/421123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005a. Re-Assembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. 2005b. “From Realpolitik to Dingpolitik, or How to Make Things Public.” In Making Things Publics. Atmospheres of Democracy, edited by B. Latour and P. Weibel, 14–41. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laursen, L. H., J. Møller, and M. Knudsen. 2017. “Forsknings- Og Udviklingsprojekt om muligheder og barrierer for at oprette og udvikle landsbyklynger.” In Architecture & Design Series (A&D Files). 105th ed. Aalborg: Aalborg University.
   Google Scholar
• Le Dantec, C. A., and C. DiSalvo. 2013. “Infrastructuring and the Formation of Publics in Participatory Design.” Social Studies of Science 43 (2): 241–264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312712471581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitas, R. 2013. Utopia as Method: The Imaginary Reconstitution of Society. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Linde, P. 2014. “Emerging Public: Totem-Poling the ‘We’s and ‘Me’s of Citizen Participation.” In Making Futures: Marginal Notes on Innovation, Democracy, and Design, edited by P. Ehn, E. M. Nilsson, and R. Topgaard, 269–276. Cambridge: the MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linde, P., and K. Book. 2014. “Performing the City: Exploring the Bandwidth of Urban Place-Making Through New-Media Tactics.” In Making Futures: Marginal Notes on Innovation, Design, and Democracy, edited by P. Ehn, E. M. Nilsson, and R. Topgaard, 277–302. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, N. 2007. “The Issues Deserve More Credit: Pragmatist Contributions to the Study of Public Involvement in Controversy.” Social Studies of Science 37 (5): 759–780. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312706077367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P. J. 1991. “Reconsidering Policy Design: Policies and Publics.” Journal of Public Policy 11 (2): 187–206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X0000619X.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of the Environment. 2013. Green Transition – New Possibilities for Denmark. Copenhagen: Danish Ministry of the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Urban and Rural Affairs 2013. Regional-og landdistriktspolitisk redegørelse 2013 (Regional and rural policy report 2013). Retrieved from. https://www.livogland.dk/files/dokumenter/publikationer/regional-_og_landdistriktspolitisk_redegoerelse_2013.pdf accessed May 2020
   Google Scholar
• Møller, J. 2016. “Udfordringer og mulige løsninger for fremtidens landsbyer.” Futuriblerne 44 (5–7): 21–31. doi:https://doi.org/10.7146/ntik.v5i3.25787.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2004. “Pluralism, Dissensus and Democratic Citizenship.” In Education and the Good Society, edited by F. Inglis, 42–53. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Pink, S., Y. Akama, and A. Fergusson. 2017. “Researching Future as an Alterity of the Present.” In Anthropologies and Futures: Researching Emerging and Unknown Worlds, edited by F. Salazar, S. Pink, A. Erwing, and J. Sjöberg, 133–150. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Realdania and BARK Rådgivning A/S. 2017. Stedet Taeller: Perspektiver og erfaringer. København: Tarm Bogtryk A/S.
   Google Scholar
• Ripley, C., G. Thün, and K. Velikov. 2009. “Matters of Concern.” Journal of Architectural Education 62 (4): 6–14. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1531-314X.2009.00999.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoffelen, J., S. Claes, L. Huybrechts, S. Martens, A. Chua, and A. Moere. 2015. “Visualising Things. Perspectives on How to Make Things Public Through Visualisation.” CoDesign 11 (3–4): 179–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1081240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloth Hansen, S., S. Møller Christensen, and K. Skou. 2012. Mulighedernes land: Nye veje til udvikling i yderområder. Copenhagen: Realdania.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. C., K. T. Vangkilde, M. G. Kjaersgaard, T. Otto, J. Halse, and T. Binder, eds. 2016. Design Anthropological Futures. London: Bloomsbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Svendsen, G. L. H. 2007. Hvorfor klarer nogle udkantssamfund sig bedre end andre? En analyse af udnyttelsen af stedbundne ressourcer i to danske udkantssamfund. IFUL REPORT 2/2007. Esbjerg: Syddansk Universitet, Institut for Forskning og Udvikling i Landdistrikter.
   Google Scholar
• Tietjen, A., and G. Jørgensen. 2016. “Translating a Wicked Problem: A Strategic Planning Approach to Rural Shrinkage in Denmark.” Landscape and Urban Planning 154: 29–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urry, J. 2016. What is the Future? 1st ed. Cambridge, Malden: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yaneva, A. 2005. “A Building is a Multiverse.” In Making Things Publics. Atmospheres of Democracy, edited by B. Latour and P. Weibel, 530–535. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yaneva, A. 2012. Mapping Controversies in Architecture. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar