5,190
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

The state’s role in governing artificial intelligence: development, control, and promotion through national strategies

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 79-102 | Received 31 Jul 2022, Accepted 22 Nov 2022, Published online: 10 Jan 2023

References

  • Abbott, K. 2013. “Introduction: The Challenges of Oversight for Emerging Technologies.” In Innovative Governance Models for Emerging Technologies, edited by G. Marchant, K. Abbott, and B. Allenby, 1–16. Edward Elgar Publishing. doi:10.4337/9781782545644.00006.
  • Abbott, K. W., G. E. Marchant, and E. A. Corley. 2012. “Soft Law Oversight Mechanisms for Nanotechnology.” Jurimetrics 52 (3): 279–312.
  • Algorithm Watch. 2022. AI Ethics Guidelines Global Inventory. https://inventory.algorithmwatch.org/
  • Alokaili, A., N. Aletras, and M. Stevenson. 2019. “Re-Ranking Words to Improve Interpretability of Automatically Generated Topics.” ArXiv:1903.12542 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1903.12542
  • Altaweel, M., C. Bone, and J. Abrams. 2019. “Documents as Data: A Content Analysis and Topic Modeling Approach for Analyzing Responses to Ecological Disturbances.” Ecological Informatics 51: 82–95. doi:10.1016/j.ecoinf.2019.02.014.
  • Arun, R., V. Suresh, C. E. Veni Madhavan, and M. N. Narasimha Murthy. 2010. “On Finding the Natural Number of Topics with Latent Dirichlet Allocation: Some Observations.” In Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, edited by M. J. Zaki, J. X. Yu, B. Ravindran, and V. Pudi, 391–402. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13657-3_43.
  • Bareis, J., and C. Katzenbach. 2022. “Talking AI into Being: The Narratives and Imaginaries of National AI Strategies and Their Performative Politics.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 47 (5): 855–881. doi:10.1177/01622439211030007.
  • Bellanova, R., and M. de Goede. 2022. “The Algorithmic Regulation of Security: An Infrastructural Perspective.” Regulation & Governance 16 (1): 102–118. doi:10.1111/rego.12338.
  • Binns, R. 2022. “Human Judgment in Algorithmic Loops: Individual Justice and Automated Decision-Making.” Regulation & Governance 16 (1): 197–211. doi:10.1111/rego.12358.
  • Borras, S., and J. Edler. 2014. The Governance of Socio-Technical Systems: Explaining Change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Borrás, S., and J. Edler. 2020. “The Roles of the State in the Governance of Socio-Technical Systems’ Transformation.” Research Policy 49 (5): 103971. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2020.103971.
  • Cao, J., T. Xia, J. Li, Y. Zhang, and S. Tang. 2009. “A Density-Based Method for Adaptive LDA Model Selection.” Neurocomputing 72 (7–9): 1775–1781. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2008.06.011.
  • Chang, J. 2015. LDA: Collapsed Gibbs Sampling. Methods for Topic Models. R package version 1.4.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lda
  • Chatterjee, S. 2020. “AI Strategy of India: Policy Framework, Adoption Challenges and Actions for Government.” Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 14 (5): 757–775. doi:10.1108/TG-05-2019-0031.
  • Coglianese, C., and D. Lehr. 2018. Transparency and Algorithmic Governance (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3293008). Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3293008
  • Debnath, R., and R. Bardhan. 2020. “India Nudges to Contain COVID-19 Pandemic: A Reactive Public Policy Analysis Using Machine-Learning Based Topic Modelling.” PLOS One 15 (9): e0238972. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0238972.
  • Deveaud, R., E. Sanjuan, and P. Bellot. 2014. “Accurate and Effective Latent Concept Modeling for Ad Hoc Information Retrieval.” Document Numérique 17 (1): 61–84. doi:10.3166/dn.17.1.61-84.
  • Eyert, F., F. Irgmaier, and L. Ulbricht. 2022. “Extending the Framework of Algorithmic Regulation. The Uber Case.” Regulation & Governance 16 (1): 23–44. doi:10.1111/rego.12371.
  • Feinerer, I., and K. Hornik. 2020. tm: Text mining package. R package version 0.7-8. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tm
  • Fjeld, J., N. Achten, H. Hilligoss, A. Nagy, and M. Srikumar. 2020. Principled Artificial Intelligence: Mapping Consensus in Ethical and Rights-based Approaches to Principles for AI. https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/42160420
  • Griffiths, T. L., and M. Steyvers. 2004. “Finding Scientific Topics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101 (suppl_1): 5228–5235. doi:10.1073/pnas.0307752101.
  • Gritsenko, D., and M. Wood. 2022. “Algorithmic Governance: A Modes of Governance Approach.” Regulation & Governance 16 (1): 45–62. doi:10.1111/rego.12367.
  • Grün, B., and K. Hornik. 2011. “Topicmodels: An R Package for Fitting Topic Models.” Journal of Statistical Software 40 (13): 1–30. doi:10.18637/jss.v040.i13.
  • Gutierrez, C. I., and G. E. Marchant. 2021. A Global Perspective of Soft Law Programs for the Governance of Artificial Intelligence (SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3855171). Social Science Research Network. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3855171.
  • Guttierez, and Marchant 2021. How soft law is used in AI governance. Brookings, May 27. https://www.brookings.edu/techstream/how-soft-law-is-used-in-ai-governance/
  • Hagendorff, T. 2020. “The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines.” Minds and Machines 30 (1): 99–120. doi:10.1007/s11023-020-09517-8.
  • Isoaho, K., D. Gritsenko, and E. Mäkelä. 2021. “Topic Modeling and Text Analysis for Qualitative Policy Research.” Policy Studies Journal 49 (1): 300–324. doi:10.1111/psj.12343.
  • Jelodar, H., Y. Wang, C. Yuan, X. Feng, X. Jiang, Y. Li, and L. Zhao. 2019. “Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) and Topic Modeling: Models, Applications, A Survey.” Multimedia Tools and Applications 78 (11): 15169–15211. doi:10.1007/s11042-018-6894-4.
  • Jobin, A., M. Ienca, and E. Vayena. 2019. “The Global Landscape of AI Ethics Guidelines.” Nature Machine Intelligence 1 (9): 389–399. doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2.
  • Katzenbach, C., and L. Ulbricht. 2019. “Algorithmic Governance.” Internet Policy Review 8 (4): 1–18. doi:10.14763/2019.4.1424.
  • Kosta, E. 2022. “Algorithmic State Surveillance: Challenging the Notion of Agency in Human Rights.” Regulation & Governance 16 (1): 212–224. doi:10.1111/rego.12331.
  • Kumar, A. 2021. National AI Policy/Strategy of India and China: A Comparative Analysis. https://ris.org.in/sites/default/files/Publication%20File/DP%20265%20Amit%20Kumar.pdf
  • Li, Y., B. Rapkin, T. M. Atkinson, E. Schofield, and B. H. Bochner. 2019. “Leveraging Latent Dirichlet Allocation in Processing Free-Text Personal Goals among Patients Undergoing Bladder Cancer Surgery.” Quality of Life Research 28 (6): 1441–1455. doi:10.1007/s11136-019-02132-w.
  • Marchant, G. 2019. ‘Soft Law’ Governance Of Artificial Intelligence | AI Pulse. https://aipulse.org/soft-law-governance-of-artificial-intelligence/
  • Morley, J., A. Elhalal, F. Garcia, L. Kinsey, J. Mökander, and L. Floridi. 2021. “Ethics as a Service: A Pragmatic Operationalisation of AI Ethics.” Minds and Machines 31 (2): 239–256. doi:10.1007/s11023-021-09563-w.
  • Morley, J., L. Floridi, L. Kinsey, and A. Elhalal. 2020. “From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices.” Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (4): 2141–2168. doi:10.1007/s11948-019-00165-5.
  • Morley, J., L. Kinsey, A. Elhalal, F. Garcia, M. Ziosi, and L. Floridi. 2021. “Operationalising AI Ethics: Barriers, Enablers and Next Steps.” AI & Society. doi:10.1007/s00146-021-01308-8.
  • Murzintcev, N. 2020. ldatuning: Tuning of the Latent Dirichlet Allocation Models Parameters. R package version 1.0.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=ldatuning
  • Nesta. 2022. AI Governance Database. https://www.nesta.org.uk/data-visualisation-and-interactive/ai-governance-database/
  • OECD. 2022. OECD AI Policy Observatory. https://www.oecd.ai/
  • ÓhÉigeartaigh, S. S., J. Whittlestone, Y. Liu, Y. Zeng, and Z. Liu. 2020. “Overcoming Barriers to Cross-Cultural Cooperation in AI Ethics and Governance.” Philosophy & Technology 33 (4): 571–593. doi:10.1007/s13347-020-00402-x.
  • R Core Team. 2022. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
  • Radu, R. 2021. “Steering the Governance of Artificial Intelligence: National Strategies in Perspective.” Policy and Society 40 (2): 178–193. doi:10.1080/14494035.2021.1929728.
  • Roberts, H., J. Cowls, J. Morley, M. Taddeo, V. Wang, and L. Floridi. 2021. “The Chinese Approach to Artificial Intelligence: An Analysis of Policy, Ethics, and Regulation.” AI & Society 36 (1): 59–77. doi:10.1007/s00146-020-00992-2.
  • Schiff, D., J. Biddle, J. Borenstein, and K. Laas. 2020. “What’s Next for AI Ethics, Policy, and Governance? A Global Overview.” Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 153–158. doi:10.1145/3375627.3375804.
  • Taylor, R. 2020. “Quantum Artificial Intelligence: A “Precautionary” U.S. Approach?” Telecommunications Policy 44 (6): 101909. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2020.101909.
  • Tong, Z., and H. Zhang. 2016. “A Text Mining Research Based on LDA Topic Modelling.” Computer Science & Information Technology (CS & IT) Conference Proceedings 6 (6): 201–210. doi:10.5121/csit.2016.60616.
  • Tzachor, A., J. Whittlestone, L. Sundaram, and S. Ó. hÉigeartaigh. 2020. “Artificial Intelligence in a Crisis Needs Ethics with Urgency.” Nature Machine Intelligence 2 (7): 365–366. doi:10.1038/s42256-020-0195-0.
  • Ulnicane, I., W. Knight, T. Leach, B. C. Stahl, and W.-G. Wanjiku. 2021. “Framing Governance for a Contested Emerging Technology: Insights from AI Policy.” Policy and Society 40 (2): 158–177. doi:10.1080/14494035.2020.1855800.
  • van Berkel, N., E. Papachristos, A. Giachanou, S. Hosio, and M. B. Skov. 2020. “A Systematic Assessment of National Artificial Intelligence Policies: Perspectives from the Nordics and Beyond.” Proceedings of the 11th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Shaping Experiences, Shaping Society, 1–12. doi:10.1145/3419249.3420106.
  • Van Roy, V., Rossetti, F., Perset, K., Galindo-Romero, L. (2021) AI Watch - National strategies on Artificial Intelligence: A European perspective, 2021 edition. EUR 30745 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, ISBN 978-92- 76-39081-7, doi:10.2760/069178, JRC122684.
  • Walker, Richard M., Yanto Chandra, Jiasheng Zhang, and Arjen Witteloostuijn. 2019. “Topic Modeling the Research-Practice Gap in Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 79 (6): 931–937. doi:10.1111/puar.13095.
  • Whittlestone, J., R. Nyrup, A. Alexandrova, and S. Cave. 2019. “The Role and Limits of Principles in AI Ethics: Towards a Focus on Tensions.” Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 195–200. doi:10.1145/3306618.3314289.
  • Wickham, H. 2016. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  • Wicks, D. 2017. “The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd Edition).” Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal 12 (2): 169–170. doi:10.1108/QROM-08-2016-1408.
  • Yeung, K. 2018. “Algorithmic Regulation: A Critical Interrogation.” Regulation & Governance 12 (4): 505–523. doi:10.1111/rego.12158.
  • Yeung, K., and L. A. Bygrave. 2022. “Demystifying the Modernized European Data Protection Regime: Cross-Disciplinary Insights from Legal and Regulatory Governance Scholarship.” Regulation & Governance 16 (1): 137–155. doi:10.1111/rego.12401.
  • Zeng, Y., E. Lu, and C. Huangfu. 2018. “Linking Artificial Intelligence Principles.” ArXiv:1812.04814. http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.04814