Global to local tensions in the production and enactment of Physical education curriculum policy reforms

References

• Apple, M. (2003). Competition, knowledge, and the loss of educational Vision. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 11(1), 3–22. doi: 10.2979/PME.2003.11.1.3
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, P. (1979). Meaning in movement, sport and physical education. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). (2012). Draft shape of the Australian curriculum: Health and physical education. Sydney, NSW: ACARA.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (1994). Education reform a critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S., Maguire, M., & Braun, A. (2012). How schools do policy: Policy enactments in secondary schools. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2013). ‘In, through and about’ movement: Is there a place for the Arnoldian dimensions in the new Australian curriculum for health and physical education? Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 4(2), 143–157. doi: 10.1080/18377122.2013.801107
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T., & Penney, D. (2013). Learning ‘in’, ‘through’ and ‘about’ movement in senior physical education? The new victorian certificate of education physical education. European Physical Education Review, 19(1), 39–61. doi: 10.1177/1356336X12465508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell, R. (2013). The neoliberal cascade and education: An essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 99–112. doi: 10.1080/17508487.2013.776990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. St Leonards, NSW: Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Culpan, I., & Bruce, J. (2007). New Zealand physical education and critical pedagogy: Refocussing the curriculum. International Journal of Sport and Health Science, 5, 1–11. doi: 10.5432/ijshs.5.1
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. (2003). Public pedagogy and the politics of resistance: Notes on a critical theory of educational struggle. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35(1), 5–16. doi: 10.1111/1469-5812.00002
   Google Scholar
• Keddie, A. (2015). School autonomy, accountability and collaboration: A critical review. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 47(1), 1–17. doi: 10.1080/00220620.2015.974146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lingard, B. (2014). A critical reflection on the Donnelly/Wiltshire review of the Australian curriculum. Professional Educator, 13(6), 10–13.
   Google Scholar
• Lingard, B., & Keddie, A. (2013). Redistribution, recognition and representation: Working against pedagogies of indifference. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 21, 427–447. doi: 10.1080/14681366.2013.809373
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, D. (2011). Like a fish in water: Physical education policy and practice in the era of neoliberal globalization. Quest, 63(1), 36–45. doi: 10.1080/00336297.2011.10483661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, D. (2013). The new Australian health and physical education curriculum: A case of/for gradualism in curriculum reform? Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 4(2), 95–108. doi: 10.1080/18377122.2013.801104
   Google Scholar
• Macdonald, D. (2014). Is global neo-liberalism shaping the future of physical education? Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 19(5), 494–499. doi: 10.1080/17408989.2014.920496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macdonald, D. (2015). Teacher-as-knowledge-broker in a futures-oriented health and physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 20(1), 27–41. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2014.935320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, C. (2011). A story of collaboration and friction: Curriculum making in Western Australia, 1970s–2010. In L. Yates, C. Collins, & K. O’Connor (Eds.), Australia’s curriculum dilemmas: State cultures and the big issues (pp. 276–288). Carlton, VIC: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M., Huberman, A., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs [MCEETYA]. (2008). Melbourne declaration on educational goals for young Australians: Ministerial council on education, employment, training and youth affairs. Canberra, Australian Capital Territory: MCEETYA. https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv%3A27124.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donoghue, T. (2019). Planning your qualitative research thesis and project: An introduction to interpretivist research in education and the social sciences (2nd ed.). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, M. (2013). New directions, new questions: Relationships between curriculum, pedagogy, and assessment in physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 18(1), 1–5. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2012.719868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penney, D. (2013). Points of tension and possibility: Boundaries in and of physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 18(1), 6–20. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2012.713862
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penney, D. (2017). Big policies and a small world: An analysis of policy problems and solutions in physical education. Sport, Education and Society, 22(5), 569–585. doi: 10.1080/13573322.2016.1242066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, A. (2011). HPE and capabilities: Towards an active national curriculum. Asia-Pacific Journal of Health, Sport and Physical Education, 2(2), 79–92. doi: 10.1080/18377122.2011.9730353
   Google Scholar
• Rizvi, J., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing educational policy. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vickers, M. (2013). Curriculum. In R. Connell, A. Welch, M. Vickers, D. Foley, N. Bagnall, D. Hayes, H. Procotor, A. Sriprakash, & C. Campbell (Eds.), Education, change and society (3rd ed., pp. 234–260). South Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vidovich, L. (2007). Removing policy from its pedestal: Some theoretical framings and practical possibilities. Educational Review, 59(3), 285–298. doi: 10.1080/00131910701427231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidovich, L. (2013). Policy research in higher education: Theories and methods for globalizing times? In J. Huisman & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and method in higher education research (international perspectives on higher education research, volume 9) (pp. 21–39). Bingley: Emerald Insight.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, L. (2013). Revisiting curriculum, the numbers game and the inequality problem. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 45(1), 39–51. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2012.754949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, L., Collins, C., & O’Connor, K. (2011). Australian curriculum making. In L. Yates, C. Collins, & K. O’Connor (Eds.), Australia’s curriculum dilemmas: State cultures and the big issues (pp. 3–23). Carlton, VIC: Melbourne University Press.
   Google Scholar