How Can the TPNW Regime Be Sustained?

References

• Acheson, R., R. Moyes, and T. Nash. 2014. “A Treaty Banning Nuclear Weapons: Developing A Legal Framework for the Prohibition and Elimination of Nuclear Weapons”. Article 36 and Reaching Critical Will. https://article36.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/AR06_TREATY_REPORT_27.4.14.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Arms Control Association. 2020a. The Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) at a Glance. Washington DC: Arms Control Association. https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/cwcglance
   Google Scholar
• Arms Control Association. 2020b. Timeline of Syrian Chemical Weapons Activity, 2012-2020. Washington DC: Arms Control Association. https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/Timeline-of-Syrian-Chemical-Weapons-Activity
   Google Scholar
• Article 36. 2015. “Refusal to Condemn Cluster Munitions Use Undermines UK Claims to Leadership on Protection of Civilians”. https://article36.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/UK-and-cluster-munitions-2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Berry, K., P. Lewis, B. Pélopidas, N. Sokov, and W. Wilson. 2010. “Delegitimizing Nuclear Weapons: Examining the Validity of Nuclear Deterrence”. James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies. https://www.eda.admin.ch/dam/eda/de/documents/aussenpolitik/sicherheitspolitik/Delegitimizing_Nuclear_Weapons_May_2010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, M., and E. Minor. 2020. “The Agency of International Humanitarian Disarmament Law: The Case of Advocacy for Positive Obligations in the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.” In Global Activism and Humanitarian Disarmament, edited by M. Bolton and S. Njeri, 59–101. Benjamin-Britton, and Taylor: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bolton, M., and E. Minor. 2021. “Addressing the Ongoing Humanitarian and Environmental Consequences of Nuclear Weapons: An Introductory Review.” Global Policy 12 (1): 81–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12892.
   Google Scholar
• Borrie, J. 2009. Unacceptable Harm: A History of How the Treaty to Ban Cluster Munitions Was Won. Geneva: UNIDIR.
   Google Scholar
• Borrie, J., and V. M. Randin, eds. 2006. Disarmament as Humanitarian Action: From Perspective to Practice. Geneva: UNIDIR.
   Google Scholar
• Casey-Maslen, S. 2005. The Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production, and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on Their Destruction. Oxford Commentaries on International Law: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casey-Maslen, S. 2019. The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons: A Commentary. Oxford Commentaries on International Law: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Casey-Maslen, S., and G. Nystuen, eds. 2010. The Convention on Cluster Munitions. Oxford Commentaries on International Law: Oxford University Press..
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, J. 2010. Mine Action Funding: Trends, Modalities and Future Prospects. Geneva: Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining.
   Google Scholar
• Docherty, B. 2018. “A ‘Light for All Humanity’: The Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons and the Progress of Humanitarian Disarmament.” Global Change, Peace & Security 30 (2): 163–186. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2018.1472075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Docherty, B. 2020. “From Obligation to Action: Advancing Victim Assistance and Environmental Remediation at the First Meeting of States Parties to the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.” Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament 3 (2): 253–264. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2020.1842657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, C. 2018. “The P5 Process and Approaches to Nuclear Disarmament: A New Structured Dialogue”, 18 December 2018. https://www.state.gov/the-p5-process-and-approaches-to-nuclear-disarmament-a-new-structured-dialogue/
   Google Scholar
• France. 2017. “Statement to the First Committee of the United Nations General Assembly”, 13 October 2017. https://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/1com/1com17/statements/16Oct_France.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Herby, P., and L. H. Eve. 2007. “How Does It Stack Up? the Anti-Personnel Mine Ban Convention at 10”, Arms Control Today 37: December 2007. https://www.armscontrol.org/act/2007-12/features/does-stack-up-anti-personnel-mine-ban-convention-10
   Google Scholar
• Highsmith, N., and M. Stewart. 2018. “The Nuclear Ban Treaty: A Legal Analysis.” Survival 60 (1): 129–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2018.1427371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Campaign to Ban Landmines. 2019. Landmine Monitor 2019. Geneva: International Campaign to Ban Landmines.
   Google Scholar
• International Committee of the Red Cross. 2019. “The Prohibition to Assist, Encourage or Induce Prohibited Activities under the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons.” ICRC Briefing Note. https://www.icrc.org/en/download/file/93626/assistance-treaty-prohibition-nuclear-weapons-briefing-note-icrc.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lennane, R. 2006. “Blood, Toil, Tears and Sweat: The Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention since 2001.” Disarmament Forum. 2006/3, UNIDIR. https://www.unidir.org/files/publications/pdfs/toward-a-stronger-btwc-en-336.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Littlewood, J. 2005. The Biological Weapons Convention: A Failed Revolution. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Millett, P., ed. 2011. Improving Implementation of the Biological Weapons Convention: The 2007-2010 Intersessional Process. Geneva: UNIDIR. https://unidir.org/publication/improving-implementation-biological-weapons-convention-2007-2010-intersessional-process
   Google Scholar
• Minor, E. 2015. “Changing the Discourse on Nuclear Weapons: The Humanitarian Initiative.” In International Review of the Red Cross 97 (899): 711–730. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S181638311600014X
   Google Scholar
• Nate, V. D., and A. Sanders-Zakre. 2021. “Policy Approaches Addressing the Ongoing Humanitarian and Environmental Consequences of Nuclear Weapons: A Commentary.” Global Policy 12 (1): 100–105. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12870.
   Google Scholar
• Nations, U. 2002. “President’s Paper on the Establishment of the Implementation Support Unit.” Final Report of the Third Meeting of the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Anti-Personnel Mines and on Their Destruction, Annex II. APLC/MSP.3/2001/1. http://undocs.org/APLC/MSP.3/2001/1
   Google Scholar
• Nations, U. 2006a. “Final Document of the Sixth Review Conference of the States Parties to the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction” BWC/CONF.VI/6, Part III: Decisions and Recommendations. http://undocs.org/BWC/CONF.VI/6
   Google Scholar
• Nations, U. 2006b. “Support Unit.” Working paper submitted by Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Mexico, Peru and Uruguay. BWC/CON.VI/WP.13. http://undocs.org/BWC/CONF.VI/WP.13
   Google Scholar
• Nations, U. 2006c. “Support Unit for the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention.” Working paper submitted by Norway. BWC/CON.VI/WP.16. http://undocs.org/BWC/CONF.VI/WP.16
   Google Scholar
• Nations, U. 2019. “Assessment of Member States’ Advances to the Working Capital Fund for 2020 and Contributions to the United Nations Regular Budget for 2020.” ST/ADM/SER.B/1008.
   Google Scholar
• NATO. 2020. “North Atlantic Council Statement as the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons Enters into Force”, 15 December 2020. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/news_180087.htm
   Google Scholar
• Riedel, S. 2004. “Biological Warfare and Bioterrorism: A Historical Review.” Proceedings 17 (4): 400–406. Baylor University, Medical Center. doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2004.11928002.
   Google Scholar
• Russian Federation. 2018. “Statement to the First Committee of the United Nations General Assembly”, 9 October 2018. https://reachingcriticalwill.org/images/documents/Disarmament-fora/1com/1com18/statements/9Oct_Russia.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zanders, J. P., ed. 2013. The Future of the CWC in the Post-Destruction Phase. EU ISS. https://www.iss.europa.eu/content/future-cwc-post-destruction-phase
   Google Scholar