Between cultural performance and cultural activism: contemporary documentary film festivals in India

References

• Acland, C., ed. 2007. Residual Media. London: University of Minnesota Press
   Google Scholar
• Aljazeera. 2004. “Indian Filmmakers Tackle the Taboo.” February 8. Accessed 30 December 2014. http://english.aljazeera.net/archive/2004/02/20084913115164590.html
   Google Scholar
• Altman, R. 1999. Film/Genre. London: British Film Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Bandopadhyay, S. 1995. “The Early Years of Calcutta Cinema.” In Calcutta, The Living City, edited by C. Sukanta, 293. Vol. II. Calcutta: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnouw, E. [1973] 1993. Documentary: A History of the Non-fiction Film. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barnouw, E., and S. Krishnaswamy. 1980. Indian Film. London: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barsam, R. M. [1973] 1992. Non-fiction Film: A Critical History. Revised and Expanded. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Battaglia, G. 2018. Documentary Film in India: An Anthropological History. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. 2004. “Film Festival War Erupts in Bombay.” February 6. Accessed 30 December 2014. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/3466691.stm
   Google Scholar
• Beeman, W. 1993. “The Anthropology of Theatre and Spectacle.” Annual Review of Anthropology 22 (1): 369–393. doi:10.1146/annurev.an.22.100193.002101.
   Google Scholar
• Bharucha, R. 1998. In the Name of the Secular: Cultural Practice and Activism in India Today. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bottomore, S. 1995. “An Amazing Quarter Mile of Moving Gold, Gems and Genealogy’: Filming India’s 1902/03 Delhi Durbar.” Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television 15 (4): 495–515. doi:10.1080/01439689500260371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottomore, S. 1997. “Have You Seen the Gaekwar Bob?: Filming the 1911 Delhi Durbar.” Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television 17 (3): 309–345. doi:10.1080/01439689700260761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1996. The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, R. 2011. “Journeys in and beyond the City: Cinema in Calcutta 1897–1939.” PhD Diss., University of Westminster.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, R. 2012. “Cinema in the Colonial City: Early Film Audiences in Calcutta.” In Audiences, edited by I. Christie, 66–80. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Couldry, N., and J. Curran. 2003. Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Deprez, C. 2015. ‘A Space in Between: the Legacy of the Activity Documentary Film in India.’ In Post-1990 Documentary: Reconfiguring Independence, edited by Deprez, C., and J. Pernin. Edinburgh: University Press
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, J. C., and B. A. McLane. 2005. A New History of Documentary Film. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, R., and O. Starn. 1997. Between Resistance and Revolution: Cultural Politics and Social Protest. London: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gangar, A. 2006. “The Cinemā of Prayōga.” In Cinema of Prayoga. Indian Experimental Film and Video 1913–2006, edited by B. Butler and K. Mirza, 9–26. London: no.w.here Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Garga, B. D. 2007. From Raj to Swaraj. The Non-fiction Film in India. New Delhi: Penguin Viking.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, F. 1993. “Aboriginal Media and the Australian Imaginary.” Public Culture 5 (3): 557–578. doi:10.1215/08992363-5-3-557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, F. 1997. “From Little Things, Small Things Grow: Indigenous Media and Cultural Activism.” In Between Resistance and Revolution: Cultural Politics and Social Protest, edited by R. Fox and O. Starn, 118–144. London: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, F. 2011. “A Short History of Debates on Indigenous Media and Ethnographic Film.” In Made to Be Seen: Perspectives on the History of Visual Anthropology, edited by M. Banks and J. Ruby, 234–235. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giorgi, L. 2011. “Between Tradition, Vision, and Imagination: The Public Sphere of Literature Festivals.” In Festivals and the Cultural Public Sphere, edited by G. Delanty, L. Giorgi, and M. Sassatelli, 29. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, S., and L. McKernan, eds. 1996. Who’s Who of Victorian Cinema: A Worldwide Survey. Imprint London: British Film Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hindustan Times. 2004. “Vikalp Generates More Response than MIFF.” February 6. Accessed 2 February 2009. www.hindustantimes.com/onlineCDA/PFVersion.jsp?article=http://10.81.141.122/news/181_562758,0110030009.html
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, P. S. 2003. “Pride of Place: Rethinking Exhibition for the Study of Cinema in India.” Seminar: The Monthly Symposium 525: 28–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, P. S. 2006. “House Full: Silent Film Genre, Exhibition and Audiences in South India.” Indian Economic and Social History Review 43 (1): 31–62. doi:10.1177/001946460504300102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, P. S. 2010. “When Film Came to Madras.” Bioscope 1 (2): 147–168.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, P. S. 2011. “Anthropology and the Problem of Audience Reception.” In Made to Be Seen: Perspectives on the History of Visual Anthropology, edited by M. Banks and J. Ruby, 288–312. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iordanova, D., and L. Torchin. 2012. Film Festival Yearbook 4: Film Festivals and Activism. St Andrews: St Andrews Film Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Kapur, G. 2007. “Secular Artist, Citizen Artist.” In Art and Social Change, edited by W. Bradley and C. Esche, 422–439. London: Tate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Karlekar, T. 2019. “Can There Be Another Vikalp? Documentary Film, Censorship Histories, and Film Festival Publics in India.” South Asian History and Culture 10 (4): 422–442. doi:10.1080/19472498.2019.1694624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaul, G. 1998. Cinema and the Indian Freedom Struggle. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers Private Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Kishore, S. 2013. “The Political in Indian Documentary Film: Material Andaesthetic Interventions, Post-economic Liberalization.” Studies in Documentary Film 7 (2): 119–133. doi:10.1386/sdf.7.2.119_1.
   Google Scholar
• Lal, V. 2005. “Travails of the Nation. Some Notes on Indian Documentaries.” Third Text 19 (2): 175–185. doi:10.1080/0952882052000343298.
   Google Scholar
• MacAloon, J. 1984. “Olympic Games and the Theory of Spectacle in Modern Societies.” In Rite, Drama, Festival, Spectacle: Rehearsals toward a Theory of Cultural Performance, edited by J. MacAloon, 24180. Philadelphia University Penn. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Madianou, M., and D. Miller. 2012. Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Majumdar, R. 2012. “Debating Radical Cinema: A History of the Film Society Movement in India.” Modern Asian Studies 46 (3): 731–767. doi:10.1017/S0026749X11000710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzarella, W. 2013. Censorium: Cinema and the Open Edge of Mass Publicity. Delhi: Oriental BlackSwan.
   Google Scholar
• Mohan, J. 1987. “Movement. Contribution of the Independence.” In Docu-Scene India. Bombay: Indian Documentary Producers Association, edited by O. Chanana, 9–19.
   Google Scholar
• Monteiro, A., and K. P. Jayasankar. 2004. “Vikalp: Films for Freedom.” Infochange India. http://infochangeindia.org/film-forum
   Google Scholar
• Porton, R., ed. 2009. On Film Festivals. London: Wallflower Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rajadhyaksha, A., and P. Willemen. 1994. Encyclopaedia of Indian Cinema. New Revisited ed. London: Fitzroy Dearborn.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, M. S. 1991. “Social Documentary in India. An Overview.” In The Short Film Scene in India, edited by P. Maitra, 1–6. Calcutta: Nandan Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, G. 1993. Communications and the “Third World”. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shoesmith, B. 1988. ‘The problem of film: A reassessment of the significance of the Indian cinematograph committee, 1927–1928.’ Continuum: Journal of Media, Culture and Society 2 (1): 74–89.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstone, R. 1999. ‘What’s New about New Media?’ New Media and Society 1 (1): 10–82.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, M. 1972. When a Great Tradition Modernizes: An Anthropological Approach to Indian Civilization. London: Pall Mall Press.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, D. 2014. New media, development and globalization: making connections in the global South. John Wiley & Sons
   Google Scholar
• Slater, D., J. Tacchi, and P. Lewis. 2002. “Ethnographic Monitoring and Evaluation of Community Multimedia Centres: A Study of Kothmale Community Radio Internet Project, Sri Lanka.” Accessed 30 December 2013. http://eprints.qut.edu.au/8701/1/8701.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Straw, W. 2005. “Pathways of Cultural Movement.” In Accounting for Culture: Thinking through Cultural Citizenship, edited by C. Andrew, M. Gattinger, M. Jannotte, and W. Straw, 183–197. University of Ottawa Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Guardian 2004. “Miffed Film-makers Shun Mumbai Fest.” February 3. Accessed 30 December 2014. http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2004/feb/03/festivals/print
   Google Scholar
• The Hindu. 2003a. “Film-makers to Boycott Mumbai Festival.” September 16, p.4.
   Google Scholar
• The Hindu. 2003b. “No Censorship for Film Festival.” September 19, p. 4.
   Google Scholar
• The Hindu. 2004. “Positive Protest.” February 22, p. 5.
   Google Scholar
• The Hindustan Times. 2003. “Filmmakers Protest Censorship in Fest.” September 16, p. 5.
   Google Scholar
• The Indian Express. 2003a. “Censor: MIFFed Filmmakers to Boycott Festival.” September 17, p. 5.
   Google Scholar
• The Indian Express. 2003b. “Prasad Says No Censor for Docus.” September 19, p. 5.
   Google Scholar
• The Indian Express. 2004. “Film-makers Protest Fest, Organise Parallel Event.” January 25. Accessed 2 February 2009. http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=74190
   Google Scholar
• The Telegraph India. 2004. “Karnad Quit Blow to Film Big Brother.” January 28. Accessed 2 February 2009. www.telegraphindia.com/1040129/asp/others/print.html
   Google Scholar
• The Times of India. 2003. “Docu-makers are MIFFed No More.” September 19, p.6.
   Google Scholar
• Varma, M. 1997. “Documentary in India: A Historical Perspective.” In Sakshi Cinema as Witness to Our Times, 11–14. Bangalore: Festival Booklet.
   Google Scholar
• Watve, B. 2004. Dadasaheb Phalke: The Father of Indian Cinema. Translated by S. A. Virkar. Delhi: National Book Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Waugh, T. 2012. “Miffed! or ‘Grasping for [Polluted?] Air’.” Bioscope: South Asian Screen Studies 3 (1): 87–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar