1,398
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Just trust me and you’ll make a fortune – relationships between offenders and victims of human trafficking

Pages 196-212 | Received 05 Oct 2018, Accepted 04 Mar 2019, Published online: 22 Mar 2019

References

  • Anthias, F. (2013): The intersections of class, gender, sexuality and ‘race’: The political economy of gendered violence, special issue on ‘Gender, Sexuality and Political Economy’, International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, published online 29 Sep 2013 http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10767-013-9152-9#page-2.
  • Baker, C. N. (2013). Moving beyond “slaves, sinners, and saviors”: An intersectional feminist analysis of US sex-trafficking discourses, law and policy. Journal of Feminist Scholarship, 4.
  • Castren, A.-M. (2018). Lojaaliuden vaativat sidokset. In P. Eerola & H. Pirskanen (Eds.), Perhe ja tunteet [Family and emotions] (pp. 165−181). Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241−1299.
  • Erez, E., Adelman, M., & Gregory, C. (2009). Intersections of immigration and domestic violence. Voices of battered immigrant women. Feminist Criminology, 4(1), 32−56.
  • Gordon, T. (2005). Toimijuuden käsitteen dilemmoja [Dilemmas of the notion of agency]. In A. Meurman-Solin & I. Pyysiäinen (Eds.), Ihmistieteet tänään [Human sciences today] (pp. 114−130). Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
  • Hamal Gurung, S. (2014). Sex trafficking and the sex industry: The processes and experiences of nepali women. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 35(2), 163−181.
  • Henne, K., & Troshynski, E. (2013). Mapping the margins of intersectionality: Criminological possibilities in a transnational world. Theoretical Criminology, 17(4), 455−473.
  • Joseph, J. (2012): Victims of human trafficking: Intersectionality of gender, class, ethnicity, and migration. Presentation at the World Society of Victimology Conference, May 2012, Hague.
  • Karkulehto, S., Saresma, T., Harjunen, H., & Kantola, J. (2012). Intersektionaalisuus metodologiana ja performatiivisen intersektionaalisuuden haaste. [Intersectionality as a methodology, and the challenge of performative intersectionality]. Naistutkimus, 4/2012, 17−28.
  • Lobash, J. K. (2009). Beyond border security: Feminist approaches to human trafficking. Security Studies, 18, 319−344.
  • Nixon, J., & Humphreys, C. (2010). Marshalling the evidence: Using intersectionality in the domestic violence frame. Social Politics, 17(2), 137−158.
  • Paasche, E., Skilbrei, M.-L., & Plambech, S. (2018). Vulnerable here or there? Examining the vulnerability of victims of human trafficking before and after return. Anti-Trafficking Review, 10, 34–51. www.antitraffickingreview.org
  • Paik, L. (2017). Critical perspectives on intersectionality and criminology: Introduction. Theoretical Criminology, 21(1), 4−10.
  • Pirskanen, H., & Eerola, P. (2018). Johdanto: Tunteet perhe- ja läheissuhteissa [Introduction: Emotions in family and close relationships]. In P. Eerola & H. Pirskanen (Eds.), Perhe ja tunteet [Family and emotions] (pp. 7−27). Helsinki: Gaudeamus.
  • Plambech, S. (2014): Points of departure. Migration control and anti-trafficking in the lives of nigerian sex worker migrants after deportation from Europe (PhD Dissertation). Copenhagen: Department of Anthropology, University of Copenhagen & Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS).
  • Roe-Sepowitz, D. E., Hickle, K. E., Dahlstedt, J., & Gallagher, J. (2014). Victim or whore: The similarities and differences between victim’s experiences of domestic violence and sex trafficking. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 24, 883−898.
  • Roth, V. (2016). Invisible victims: Trafficking in human beings for the purpose of sexual exploitation. The implementation of directive 2011/36/EU from a gender perspective: Analysis of the situation in Finland. Brussels: European Union.
  • Ruuskanen, M. (2006). Tuomioistuinratkaisut diskurssianalyysin kohteina. [Court decisions as objects of discourse analysis]. In J. Niemi-Kiesiläinen, P. Honkatukia, H. Karma, & M. Ruuskanen (Eds.), Oikeuden tekstit diskursseina [Legal texts as discourses] (pp. 43−60). Helsinki: Suomalaisen lakimiesyhdistyksen julkaisuja, E-sarja N: o13.
  • Sokoloff, N. J. (2008). Expanding the intersectional paradigm to better understanding domestic violence in immigrant communities. Critical Criminology, 16, 229−255.
  • Sokoloff, N. J., & Dupont, I. (2005). Domestic violence at the intersections of race, class, and gender. Challenges and contributions to understanding violence against marginalized women in diverse communities. Violence against Women, 11(1), 38−64.
  • UNODC. (2004). United nations convention against transnational organized crime and the protocols thereto. New York: United Nations.
  • Valovirta, E. (2010). Ylirajaisten erojen politiikkaa [The politics of transnational distinctions]. In T. Saresma, L.-M. Rossi, & T. Juvonen (Eds.), Käsikirja sukupuoleen [Handbook on gender] (pp. 92−105). Helsinki: Vastapaino.
  • Verhoeven, M., van Gestel, B., de Jong, D., & Kleemans, E. (2015). Relationships between suspects and victims of sex trafficking. Exploitation of prostitutes and domestic violence parallels in dutch trafficking cases. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 21(1), 49−64.
  • Viuhko, M. (2013). Aktiivisia toimijoita vai passiivisia ideaaliuhreja? Ihmiskaupan uhrien rajoitettu toimijuus [Active agents or passive ideal victims? Restricted agency of human trafficking victims]. Oikeus, 42(4), 385−404.
  • Viuhko, M. (2017): Hardened professional criminals, or just friends and relatives? The diversity of offenders in human trafficking. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice doi:10.1080/01924036.2017.1391106
  • Vuolajärvi, N. (2018). Precarious intimacies – Europeanised border regime and migrant sex work. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2018.1430558
  • Walby, S., Amstrong, J., & Strid, S. (2012). Intersectionality: Multiple inequalities in social theory. Sociology, 46(2), 224−240.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.