Characteristics and recidivism in relation to arrest: differentiating between partner violent perpetrator subtypes

References

• Belfrage, H., & Strand, S. (2008). Structured spousal violence risk assessment: Combining risk factors and victim vulnerability factors. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 7(1), 39–46.
   Google Scholar
• Berk, R. A., Campbell, A., Klap, R., & Western, B. (1992). The deterrent effect of arrest in incidents of domestic violence: A Bayesian analysis of four field experiments. American Sociological Review, 57, 698–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyle, D. J., O’Leary, K. D., Rosenbaum, A., & Hassett-Walker, C. (2008). Differentiating between generally and partner-only violent subgroups: Lifetime antisocial behavior, family of origin violence, and impulsivity. Journal of Family Violence, 23, 47–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broidy, L., Albright, D., & Denman, K. (2016). Deterring future incidents of intimate partner violence: Does type of formal intervention matter? Violence Against Women, 22(9), 1113–1133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantos, A. L., Goldstein, D. A., Brenner, L., O’Leary, K. D., & Verborg, R. (2015). Correlates and program completion of family-only and generally violent perpetrators of intimate partner violence. Behavioral Psychology, 23(3), 549–569.
   Google Scholar
• Cantos, A. L., & O’Leary, D. K. (2014). One size does not fit all in treatment of intimate partner violence. Partner Abuse, 5(2), 204–236.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, M. M., & Gelles, R. J. (2005). The utility of male domestic violence offender typologies. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(2), 155–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, H., & Wilke, D. J. (2010). Gender differences in the nature of the intimate partner violence and effects of perpetrator arrest on revictimization. Journal of Family Violence, 25, 393–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunha, O., & Gonçalves, R. A. (2013). Intimate partner violence offenders: Generating a data-based typology of batterers and implications for treatment. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 5, 131–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delsol, C., Margolin, G., & John, R. S. (2003). A typology of maritally violent men and correlates of violence in a community sample. Journal of Marriage and Family, 65(3), 635–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunford, F., Huizinga, D., & Elliot, D. S. (1990). The role of arrest in domestic assault: The Omaha experiment. Criminology, 28, 183–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felson, R. B., Ackerman, J. M., & Gallagher, C. A. (2005). Police intervention and the repeat of domestic assault. Criminology, 43, 563–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerbrandij, J., Rosenfeld, B., Nijdam-Jones, A., & Galietta, M. (2018). Evaluating risk assessment instruments for intimate partner stalking and intimate partner violence. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 5(2), 103–118.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, D. A., Cantos, A. L., Brenner, L. H., Verborg, R. J., & Kosson, D. S. (2016). Perpetrator type moderates the relationship between severity of intimate partner violence and recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(7), 879–989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graña, J. L., Redondo, N., Muñoz-Rivas, M. J., & Cantos, A. L. (2014). Subtypes of batterers in treatment: Empirical support for a distinction between Type I, Type II and Type III. PLos ONE, 9(10), 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and Fire & Rescue Services. (2017). A progress report on the police response to domestic abuse. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Herrero, J., Torres, A., Fernández-Suárez, A., & Rodríguez-Díaz, J. F. (2016). Generalist versus specialists: Toward a typology of batterers in prison. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 8, 19–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton, N. Z., Harris, G. T., & Rice, M. E. (2007). The effect of arrest on wife assault recidivism: Controlling for pre-arrest risk. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34, 1334–1344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Meehan, J. C., Herron, K., Rehman, U., & Stuart, G. L. (2000). Testing the Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart (1994) batterer typology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(6), 1000–1019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtzworth-Munroe, A., Meehan, J. C., Herron, K., Rehman, U., & Stuart, G. L. (2003). Do subtypes of maritally violent men continue to differ over time? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(4), 728–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtzworth-Munroe, A., & Stuart, G. L. (1994). Typologies of male batterers: Three subtypes and the differences among them. Psychological Bulletin, 116(3), 476–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huss, M. T., & Ralston, A. (2008). Do batterer subtypes actually matter? Treatment completion, treatment response, and recidivism across a batterer typology. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35(6), 710–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R., Gilchrist, E., Beech, A. R., Weston, S., Takriti, R., & Freeman, R. (2006). A psychometric typology of U.K domestic violence offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 21(10), 1270–1285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. R., & Goodlin-Fahncke, W. (2015). Exploring the effect of arrest across a domestic batterer typology. Juvenile & Family Court Journal, 66(1), 15–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, L., Adler, J. R., Horvath, M. A. H., Lovett, J., Coulson, M., Kernohan, D., & Gray, M. (2013). Evaluation of the pilot of domestic violence protection orders. Research report 79. London: Home Office.
   Google Scholar
• Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., & Belfrage, H. (2008). Bedömning av risk för upprepat partnervåld (SARA:SV: Version 2). Användarmanual. Sundsvall: Rättspsykiatriska Regionkliniken. [Swedish translation of the Brief spousal assault form for the evaluation of risk (B-SAFER)]. User manual. Vancouver: Proactive Resolutions.
   Google Scholar
• Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J., Huss, M. T., & Ramsey, S. (2000). The clinical utility of batterer typologies. Journal of Family Violence, 15(1), 37–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohr, J. M., Bonge, D., Witte, T. H., Hamberger, L. K., & Langhinrichsen-Rohling, J. (2005). Consistency and accuracy of batterer typology identification. Journal of Family Violence, 20(4), 253–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mach, J. L., Cantos, A. L., Weber, E. N., & Kosson, D. S. (2017). The impact of perpetrator characteristics on the completion of a partner abuse intervention program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, C. D., Garner, J. H., & Fagan, J. A. (2001). The effects of arrest on intimate partner violence: New Evidence from the spouse assault replication program. Washington DC: National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Crime Prevention. (2008). Polisens utredningar av våld mot kvinnor i nära relationer. [Police investigations of violence against women]. Stockholm: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Council for Crime Prevention. (2017). Polisiära arbetssätt för att förebygga upprepat partnervåld – Med fokus på våldsutövaren. [Police methods to prevent intimate partner violence recidivism – Focusing on the perpetrator]. Stockholm: Author.
   Google Scholar
• O’Leary, K. D. (1999). Psychological abuse: A variable deserving critical attention in domestic violence. Violence and Victims, 14(1), 3–23.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Neal, E. N., & Spohn, C. (2017). When the perpetrator is a partner: Arrest and charging decisions in intimate partner sexual assault cases – A focal concerns analysis. Violence Against Women, 23, 707–729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersson, J., & Strand, S. (2017). Recidivism in intimate partner violence among antisocial and family-only perpetrators. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(11), 1477–1495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersson, J., & Strand, S. (2018). Family-only perpetrators of intimate partner violence: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence & Abuse. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/1524838018770410.
   Google Scholar
• Petersson, J., Strand, S., & Selenius, H. (2019). Risk factors for intimate partner violence: A comparison of antisocial and family-only perpetrators. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(2), 219–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serie, C. M. B., van Tilburg, C. A., van Dam, A., & de Ruiter, C. (2015). Spousal assaulters in outpatient mental health care: The relevance of structured risk assessment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1, 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W. (1992). Policing domestic violence: Experiments and dilemmas. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W., & Berk, R. A. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 261–272.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W., Schmidt, J. D., Rogan, D. P., Smith, D. A., Gartin, P. R., Cohn, E. G., … Bacich, A. R. (1992a). The variable effects of arrest on criminal careers: The Milwaukee domestic violence experiment. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 83(1), 137–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, L. W., Smith, D. A., Schmidt, J. D., & Rogan, D. P. (1992b). Crime, punishment, and stake in conformity: Legal and informal control of domestic violence. American Sociological Review, 57(5), 680–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey, J. E., Kropp, R. P., Hart, S. D., Belfrage, H., & Strand, S. (2014). Assessment and management of risk for intimate partner violence by police officers using the brief spousal assault form for the evaluation of risk. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(2), 256–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Swedish National Police Board. (2010). Riktlinjer för polisiära riskanalyser vid våld på individnivå. [Guidelines for police risk assessments of interpersonal violence.]. Stockholm: Swedish National Police Board.
   Google Scholar
• Theobald, D., Farrington, D. P., Coid, J. W., & Piquero, A. R. (2015). Are male perpetrators of intimate partner violence different from convicted violent offenders? Examination of psychopathic traits and life success in males from a community survey. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31, 1687–1718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Full report of the Prevalence, Incidence, and consequences of violence against women. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Toby, J. (1957). Social disorganization and stake in conformity: Complementary factors in the predatory behavior of hoodlums. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 48(1), 12–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigurs, C., Wire, J., Myhill, A., & Gough, D. (2016). Police initial responses to domestic abuse: A systematic review. London: College of Policing.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, Z., Swogger, M. T., O’Connor, B. P., Chatav Schonbrun, Y., Shea, M. T., & Stuart, G. L. (2010). Subtypes of partner violence perpetrators among male and female psychiatric patients. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 119(3), 563–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K. R. (2005). Arrest and intimate partner violence: Toward a more complete application of deterrence theory. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10, 660–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, M., & Lynch, J. P. (2017). The effects of arrest, reporting to the police, and victim services on intimate partner violence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 54, 338–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar