Inmates’ perceptions and experiences of how they were prepared for release from a Norwegian open prison

References

• Andvig, E. (2014). Förundran i hermeneutisk forskning – Ett exempel från fokusgruppsamtal. [Amazement in hermeneutic research – An example from focus group conversation]. In E. Lassenius & E. Severinsson (Eds.), Hermeneutik i vårdpraxis. Det nära, det flyktiga, det dolda. [Hermeneutic in care practices. The close, the fleeting, the hidden]. (pp. 197–207). Gleerups Utbildning AB.
   Google Scholar
• Andvig, E., & Karlsson, B. (2020). Forskningsbasert evaluering av pilotprosjektet «NAV-veiledere i Nettverk etter soning». Forskningsrapport nr. 3. [Reseach based evaluation of the pilot project “NAV-counselors in Network after Prison”. Research report no 3]. Senter for psykisk helse og rus. Universitetet i Sørøst-Norge. Retrived from https://openarchive.usn.no/usn-xmlui/handle/11250/2676546
   Google Scholar
• Auty, K. M., & Liebling, A. (2020). Exploring the relationship between prison social climate and reoffending. Justice Quarterly, 37(2), 358–381. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2018.153842
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker, V. (2018). Nordic nationalism and penal order: Walling the welfare state. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., & Shuker, R. (2018). Hope, harmony and humanity: Creating a positive social climate in a democratic therapeutic community prison and the implications for penal practice. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 8(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/JCP-06-2017-0030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, R. A. (2016). Kriminalomsorgen: A look at the world’s most humane prison system in Norway. Retrieved November 12, 2019, from.https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?Abstract_id=2883512
   Google Scholar
• Blagden, N., Winder, B., & Hames, C. (2016). ‘They treat us like human beings’: Experiencing a therapeutic sex offenders prison: Impact on prisoners and staff and implications for treatment. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(4), 103–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X14553227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg, M., Karlsson, B., Kim, H. S., & McCormack, B. (2012). Opening up for many voices in knowledge construction. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(1), Art. 1. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs120117
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, K., & Bunche, A. (2020). ‘The prison don’t talk to you about getting out of prison’: On why prisons in England and Wales fail to rehabilitate prisoners. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 20(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895818800743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly, K., & Granfield, R. (2017). Building recovery capital: The role of faith-based communities in the reintegration of formerly incarcerated drug offenders. Journal of Drug Issues, 47(3), 370–382. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022042617696916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costelloe, A. (2014). Learning for liberation, teaching for transformation: Can education in prison prepare prisoners for active citizenship? Irish Journal of Applied Social Studies, 14(1), 30–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21427/D7TM7H
   Google Scholar
• Crewe, B. (2011). Soft power in prison: Implications for staff–prisoner relationships, liberty and legitimacy. European Journal of Criminology, 8(6), 455–468. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370811413805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crewe, B., Mjåland, K., & Ievins, A. (2020). Laissez-faire inclusion and intervention in and beyond the prison (Or, what kind of mother is ´Big Mother´?). Conference paper, presented at the conference ‘Nordic Punishment at a Crossroads?’ Department of Criminology and Sociology of Law, University of Oslo, 12 March 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Day, A. (2009). Offender emotion and self-regulation: Implications for offender rehabilitation programming. Psychology, Crime & Law, 15(2–3), 119–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160802190848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, A. (2020). At a crossroads? Offender rehabilitation in Australian prisons. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2020.1751335
   Google Scholar
• Denney, A., Tewksbury, R., & Jones, R. (2014). Beyond basic needs: Social support and structure for successful offender reentry. Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice & Criminology, 2(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21428/88de04a1.d95029f6
   Google Scholar
• Doekhie, J., Dirkzwager, A., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2017). Early attempts at desistance from crime: Prisoners’ prerelease expectations and their postrelease criminal behavior. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 56(7), 473–493. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2017.1359223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, D. N., Pelletier, E., & Szkola, J. (2018). Education in prison and the self-stigma: Empowerment continuum. Crime and Delinquency, 64(2), 255–280. 255-280.https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128717714973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridhov, I. M., & Langelid, T. (2017). Importmodellen i norsk fengselsvesen [The import model in Norwegian prisons]. Nordisk Tidsskrift for Kriminalvidenskab, 104(3), 259–288. https://tidsskrift.dk/NTfK/article/view/115050
   Google Scholar
• Government White Paper No. 37. (2008). Straff som virker – Mindre kriminalitet – Tryggere samfunn [Punishments that work – Less crime – Safer societies]. Det kongelige justis- og politidepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Helgesen, J. H. I. (2018). Drug counselling behind the prison wall: Staff responses to collaborative challenges. Nordic Journal of Criminology, 20(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14043858.2018.1550244
   Google Scholar
• Järveläinen, E., & Rantanen, T. (2019). Social interaction between employee and offender in supervised probationary freedom in Finland. Nordic Journal of Criminology, 20(2), 157–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/2578983X.2019.1637093
   Google Scholar
• Kriminalomsorgen. (2019). Årsrapport. [The Norwegian Correctional Service Annual Report 2019]. https://www.kriminalomsorgen.no/getfile.php/4685011.823.zpzzabbunkuptz/Årsrapport±2019±v.±1.0.1±%281%29.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Interview: Det kvalitative forskningsinterview som håndværk [The qualitative research interview as craft]. Hans Reitzel.
   Google Scholar
• Lerdal, A., & Karlsson, B. (2008). Bruk av fokusgruppeintervju [The use of focus group interviews]. Sykepleien Forskning, 3(3), 172–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4220/sykepleienf.2008.0036
   Google Scholar
• Liebling, A., Hulley, S., & Crewe, B. (2012). Conceptualising and measuring the quality of prison life. In D. Gadd, S. Karstedt, & S. F. Messner (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of criminological research methods (pp. 358–372). SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Liebling, A., Laws, B., Lieber, E., Auty, K., Schmidt, B. E., Crewe, B., Gardom, J., Kant, D., & Morey, M. (2019). Are hope and possibility achievable in prison? The Howard Journal, 58(1), 104–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/hojo.12303
   Google Scholar
• Maguire, M., & Raynor, P. (2017). Offender management in and after prison: The end of ‘end to end’? Criminology and Criminal Justice, 17(2), 138–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895816665435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruna, S. (2001). Making good. American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Maruna, S., & Farrall, S. (2004). Desistance from crime: A theoretical reformulation. Kolner Zeitschrift fur Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 43, 171–194. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80474-7_7
   Google Scholar
• Maruna, S., & Mann, R. (2019). Reconciling ‘desistance’ and ‘what works’. HM Inspectorate of Probation, Academic Insights 2019/1. Retrieved 14 July, 2020, from. https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprobation/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2019/02/Academic-Insights-Maruna-and-Mann-Feb-19-final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, F., & Schinkel, M. (2016). Prisons and desistance. In Y. Jewkes, B. Crewe, & J. Bennett (Eds.), Handbook on prisons (pp. 607–621). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, F., & Weaver, B. (2010). Changing lives? Desistance research and offender management, Report 3 Scottish Centre for Crime & Justice Research.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill, F., & Whyte, B. (2007). Reducing reoffending: Social work and community justice in Scotland. Willan.
   Google Scholar
• Nee, C., & Vernham, Z. (2017). Expertise and its contribution to the notion of protective factors in offender rehabilitation and desistance. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 32, 37–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2016.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øster, M. K., & Rokkan, T. (2018). The Norwegian approach to electronic monitoring: changing the system and making a difference. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 31(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2018.31.1.75
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, J., & Eriksson, A. (2014). Contrasts in punishment: An explanation of anglophone excess and nordic exceptionalism. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Revold, M. K. (2015). Innsattes levekår 2014 [Inmates’ living conditions 2014]. Report No. 47. Statistics Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, M., Benedict, P., Sells, D., Dinzeo, T., Garvin, C., Schwab, L., Baranoski, M., Girard, V., & Bellamy, C. (2009). Citizenship, community, and recovery: A group- and peer-based intervention for persons with co-occurring disorders and criminal justice histories. Journal of Groups in Addiction & Recovery, 4(4), 224–244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15560350903340874
   Google Scholar
• Schalast, N., Redies, M., Collins, M., Stacey, J., & Howells, K. (2008). EssenCES, a short questionnaire for assessing the social climate of forensic psychiatric wards. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 18(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.677
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seaman, V., & Lynch, O. (2016). Learning the basics of how to live: Ex-prisoners’ accounts of doing desistance. Irish Probation Journal, 13, 65–83.
   Google Scholar
• Shammas, V. L. (2014). The pains of freedom: Assessing the ambiguity of Scandinavian penal exceptionalism on Norway’s prison island. Punishment & Society, 16(1), 104–123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474513504799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shammas, V. L. (2018). The dissolution of social democracy: How law and order came to Norway. Federal Sentencing Reporter, 31(1), 85–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2018.31.1.85
   Google Scholar
• Sivilombudsmannen. (2018/19). Særskilt melding til Stortinget om isolasjon og mangel på menneskelig kontakt i norske fengsler [Special report to the Parliament on isolation and lack of human contact in Norwegian prisons]. Document 4: 3(2018/19).
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. S., & Ugelvik, T. (2017). Punishment and welfare in Scandinavia. In S. P. Smith & T. Ugelvik (Eds.), Scandinavian penal history, culture and prison practice (pp. 511–529). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ugelvik, T. (2011). Hva er et fengsel? En analyse av manualen til en sosial teknologi [What is a prison? An analysis of the manual of a social technology]. Rætferd, 1(32), 85–100.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ginneken, E. F. (2016). Making sense of imprisonment narratives of post-traumatic growth among female prisoners. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60(2), 208–227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X14548531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vignansky, E., Addad, M., & Himi, H. (2018). Despair will hold you prisoner- hope will set you free: Hope and meaning among released prisoners. The Prison Journal, 98(3), 334–358. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885518764920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T., & Brown, M. (2004). The good lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10(3), 243–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160410001662744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, I., & Winship, G. (2018). “Homeliness, hope and humour” (H3) − Ingredients for creating a therapeutic milieu in prisons. The International Journal of Therapeutic Communities, 39(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/TC-05-2017-0016
   Google Scholar
• Woodall, J., Dixey, R., & South, J. (2013). Prisoners’ perspectives on the transition from the prison to the community: Implications for settings-based health promotion. Critical Public Health, 23(2), 188–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2012.732219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar