Continuity between Cauchy and Bolzano: issues of antecedents and priority

References

• Bair, J; Błaszczyk, P, Ely, R, Heinig, P, and Katz, M, ‘Leibniz's well-founded fictions and their interpretations’, Matematychni Studii, 49(2) (2018), 186–224. See http://doi.org/10.15330/ms.49.2.186-224 and https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.00226.
   Google Scholar
• Bair, J; Błaszczyk, P, Ely, R, Henry, V, Kanovei, V, Katz, K, Katz, M, Kudryk, T, Kutateladze, S, McGaffey, T, Mormann, T, Schaps, D, and Sherry, D, ‘Cauchy, infinitesimals and ghosts of departed quantifiers’, Matematychni Studii, 47(2) (2017a), 115–144. See http://doi.org/10.15330/ms.47.2.115-144 and https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.00226.
   Google Scholar
• Bair, J; Błaszczyk, P, Ely, R, Henry, V, Kanovei, V, Katz, K, Katz, M, Kutateladze, S, McGaffey, T, Reeder, P, Schaps, D, Sherry, D, and Shnider, S, ‘Interpreting the infinitesimal mathematics of Leibniz and Euler’, Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 48(2) (2017b), 195–238. See http://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-016-9334-z and https://arxiv.org/abs/1605.00455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bair, J; Błaszczyk, P, Heinig, P, Kanovei, V, and Katz, M, ‘19th century real analysis, forward and backward’, Antiquitates Mathematicae, 13 (2019), 19–49. See http://doi.org/10.14708/am.v13i1.6440 and https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.07451.
   Google Scholar
• Bair, J; Błaszczyk, P, Heinig, P, Kanovei, V, and Katz, M, ‘Cauchy's work on integral geometry, centers of curvature, and other applications of infinitesimals’, Real Analysis Exchange, 45(1) (2020), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bascelli, T; Błaszczyk, P, Borovik, A, Kanovei, V, Katz, K, Katz, M, Kutateladze, S, McGaffey, T, Schaps, D, and Sherry, D, ‘Cauchy's infinitesimals, his sum theorem, and foundational paradigms’, Foundations of Science, 23(2) (2018), 267–296. See http://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-017-9534-y and https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.07723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bascelli, T; Błaszczyk, P, Kanovei, V, Katz, K, Katz, M, Schaps, D, and Sherry, D, ‘Leibniz versus Ishiguro: closing a quarter century of syncategoremania’, HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science, 6(1) (2016), 117–147. See http://doi.org/10.1086/685645 and https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.07209.
   Google Scholar
• Belhoste, B, Augustin-Louis Cauchy. A biography, New York: Springer-Verlag, 1991. Translated from the French and with a foreword by Frank Ragland.
   Google Scholar
• Blåsjö, V, and Hogendijk, J, ‘On translating mathematics’, Isis; An International Review Devoted to the History of Science and its Cultural Influences, 109(4) (2018), 774–781. See https://doi.org/10.1086/701258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Błaszczyk, P; Kanovei, V, Katz, K, Katz, M, Kutateladze, S, and Sherry, D, ‘Toward a history of mathematics focused on procedures’, Foundations of Science, 22(4) (2017), 763–783. See http://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-016-9498-3 and https://arxiv.org/abs/1609.04531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolzano, B, Der binomische Lehrsatz, und als Folgerung aus ihm der polynomische, und die Reihen, die zur Berechnung der Logarithmen und Exponentialgrößen dienen, genauer als bisher erwiesen, Prague, 1816.
   Google Scholar
• Bolzano, B, Rein analytischer Beweis des Lehrsatzes, dass zwischen je zwey Werthen, die ein entgegengesetztes Resultat gewähren, wenigstens eine reelle Wurzel der Gleichung liege, Prague: Abh. Königh Böhm. Gesell. Wiss., 1817. (3) 5 (1814–1817; publ. 1818), 60 p. Translations in Ewald (1996) and Russ (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Bolzano, B, ‘Miscellanea Mathematica 10’ in B van Rootselaar and A van der Lugt (eds), Bernard Bolzano Gesamtausgabe (BGA). Band 2B6/2, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Bolzano, B, ‘Miscellanea Mathematica 12’ in B van Rootselaar and A van der Lugt (eds), Bernard Bolzano Gesamtausgabe (BGA). Band 2B7/2, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Bolzano, B, ‘Miscellanea Mathematica 20’ in van B Rootselaar and A van der Lugt (eds), Bernard Bolzano Gesamtausgabe (BGA). Band 2B11/2, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Frommann-Holzboog, 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, R, and Sandifer, C (eds), Cauchy's Cours d'analyse. An annotated translation, (Sources and Studies in the History of Mathematics and Physical Sciences), New York: Springer, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Bråting, K, ‘A new look at E. G. Björling and the Cauchy sum theorem’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 61(5) (2007), 519–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carnot, L, Réflexions sur la Métaphysique du Calcul Infinitésimal, Paris: Duprat, 1797.
   Google Scholar
• Cauchy, A L, Cours d'Analyse de L’École Royale Polytechnique. Première Partie. Analyse algébrique, Paris: Imprimérie Royale, 1821. Translation in Bradley–Sandifer (Bradley and Sandifer 2009, 2009).
   Google Scholar
• Crelle, A, Versuch einer rein algebraischen und dem gegenwärtigen zustande der mathematik, etc. Vandenhoek und Ruprecht, 1813. See https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=hDo7AQAAIAAJ.
   Google Scholar
• Dani, S, and Papadopoulos, A (eds), Geometry in history, Cham: Springer, 2019. See http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13609-3.
   Google Scholar
• De Marco, G, ‘An almost everywhere constant function surjective on every interval’, The American Mathematical Monthly, 125(1) (2018), 75–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evenhuis, N, ‘Dates of the Leipzig book fairs (1758–1860), with notes on the book catalogs’, Sherbornia, 1(1) (2014), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Ewald, W (ed), From Kant to Hilbert: a source book in the foundations of mathematics. Vol. I, II. Compiled, edited and with introductions by William Ewald. Oxford Science Publications. New York: The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Fila, M, ‘Why and how did Bernhard Bolzano develop calculus of the infinite quantities’ in Paradoxien des Unendlichen? In preparation, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Freudenthal, H, ‘Did Cauchy plagiarize Bolzano?’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 7 (1971), 375–392.
   Google Scholar
• Fuentes Guillén, E, and Martínez Adame, C, ‘The notion of variable quantities ω in Bolzano's early works’, Historia Mathematica, 50 (2020), 25–49. See https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hm.2019.07.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldbring, I, and Walsh, S, ‘An invitation to nonstandard analysis and its recent applications’, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 66(6) (2019), 842–851.
   Google Scholar
• Grabiner, J, The origins of Cauchy's rigorous calculus, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Grabiner, J, ‘Cauchy and Bolzano. Tradition and transformation in the history of mathematics.’ in E Mendelsohn (ed), Chapter 5 in Transformation and tradition in the sciences: essays in honour of I Bernard Cohen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984, 105–124. See https://books.google.co.il/books?id=mJ_u4t1wrLsC.
   Google Scholar
• Grattan-Guinness, I, ‘Bolzano, Cauchy and the ‘new analysis’ of the early nineteenth century’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 6(5) (1970), 372–400.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J, The real and the complex: a history of analysis in the 19th century, (Springer Undergraduate Mathematics Series), Cham: Springer, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Guitard, T, ‘La querelle des infiniment petits à l’École Polytechnique au XIXe siècle', Historia Scientiarum, 30 (1986), 1–61.
   Google Scholar
• Heuser, H, Lehrbuch der analysis. Teil 2, (12th edition, Mathematische Leitfäden), Stuttgart: B. G. Teubner, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Jarník, V, Bolzano and the foundations of mathematical analysis, Praha: Society of Czechoslovak Mathematicians and Physicists, 1981, 33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Karsten, W J G, Lehrbegrif der gesamten Mathematik: Die Rechenkunst und Geometrie. 1, Greifswald: Röse, 1767.
   Google Scholar
• Karsten, W J G, Lehrbegrif der gesamten Mathematik: Die Mechanik der festen Körper. 4, Greifswald: Röse, 1769. See https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=CNxEAAAAcAAJ.
   Google Scholar
• Kästner, A G, Anfangsgründe der Arithmetik, Geometrie, ebenen und sphärischen Trigonometrie und Perspectiv, Göttingen: Witwe Vandenhoeck, 1758.
   Google Scholar
• Kästner, A G, Anfangsgründe der Analysis endlicher Größen, Göttingen: Wittwe Vandenhoeck, 1760. See http://gdz.sub.uni-goettingen.de/no_cache/dms/load/img/?IDDOC=116776.
   Google Scholar
• Kästner, A G, Anfangsgründe der höhern Mechanik, Göttingen: Verlag der Wittwe Vandenhoek, 1766.
   Google Scholar
• Kästner, A G, Anfangsgründe der höhern Mechanik, Auflage 2, Göttingen: Verlag der Wittwe Vandenhoek, 1793.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, M, ‘Mathematical conquerors, Unguru polarity, and the task of history’, Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 10(1) (2020), 475–515. See http://doi.org/10.5642/jhummath.202001.27 and https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.00249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, M, and Sherry, D, ‘Leibniz's infinitesimals: their fictionality, their modern implementations, and their foes from Berkeley to Russell and beyond’, Erkenntnis, 78(3) (2013), 571–625. See http://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-012-9370-y and https://arxiv.org/abs/1205.0174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kröger, D, Abraham Gotthelf Kästner als Lehrbuchautor. Dissertation, Bergische Universität Wuppertal, 2014. urn:nbn:de:hbz:468-20150311-103303-7.
   Google Scholar
• Leibniz, G, Philosophical papers and letters, Synthese historical library, Vol. 2. Leroy E. Loemker, Editor and Translator. Dordrecht–Boston–London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2nd edition, 1989
   Google Scholar
• Lützen, J, ‘The foundation of analysis in the 19th century’ in H Jahnke (ed), Chapter 6 in A history of analysis, (History of Mathematics, 24), Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 2003, 155–195.
   Google Scholar
• Olms (publisher), Allgemeines Verzeichniß der Bücher, welche in der Frankfurter und Leipziger Ostermesse des Jahres entweder ganz neu gedruckt, oder sonst verbessert, wieder aufgelegt worden sind … (1817). Accessible to registered libraries at http://www.olmsonline.de/en/dms/toc/?IDDOC=12308 and accessible also at https://books.google.de/books?id=DlpeAAAAcAAJpg=PA1 See also Evenhuis (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Oman, G, ‘The converse of the intermediate value theorem: from Conway to Cantor to cosets and beyond’, Missouri Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 26(2) (2014), 134–150.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, D, ‘A function that is surjective on every interval’, The American Mathematical Monthly, 123(1) (2016), 88–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusnock, P, ‘Philosophy of mathematics: Bolzano's responses to Kant and Lagrange. Mathématique et logique chez Bolzano’, Revue d'histoire des Sciences, 52(3–4) (1999), 399–428.
   Google Scholar
• Rusnock, P, and Kerr-Lawson, A, ‘Bolzano and uniform continuity’, Historia Mathematica, 32(3) (2005), 303–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rusnock, P, and Šebestík, J, Bernard Bolzano: his life and work, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Russ, S, The mathematical works of Bernard Bolzano, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Schubring, G, ‘Bernard Bolzano–not as unknown to his contemporaries as is commonly believed?’, Historia Mathematica, 20(1) (1993), 45–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sebestik, J, Logique et mathématique chez Bernard Bolzano (L'Histoire des Sciences: Textes et Études), Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Segre, M, ‘Peano's axioms in their historical context’, Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 48(3–4) (1994), 201–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherry, D, and Katz, M, ‘Infinitesimals, imaginaries, ideals, and fictions’, Studia Leibnitiana, 44(2) (2012), 166–192. See http://www.jstor.org/stable/43695539 and https://arxiv.org/abs/1304.2137 (Article was published in 2014 even though the journal issue lists the year as 2012).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegmund-Schultze, R, Review of Bradley–Sandifer (Bradley and Sandifer 2009) for Zentralblatt (2009). See https://zbmath.org/?q=an%3A1189.26001.
   Google Scholar
• Sinaceur, H, ‘Cauchy et Bolzano’, Revue d'histoire des Sciences, 26(2) (1973), 97–112.
   Google Scholar
• Smoryński, C, MVT: a most valuable theorem, Cham: Springer, 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Spalt, D, Die Analysis im Wandel und Widerstreit, Verlag Karl Auber, 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Trlifajová, K, ‘Bolzano's infinite quantities’, Foundations of Science, 23(4) (2018), 681–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Väth, M, Nonstandard analysis, Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag, 2007.
   Google Scholar