367
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Mestiza Methodology: Research as a Site of Healing

REFERENCES

  • Anzaldúa, G. (1999). Borderlands/La frontera: The new mestiza (2nd ed.). Aunt Lutebooks.
  • Anzaldua, G. (2009). The Gloria Anzaldúa reader. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391272
  • Blackwell, M. (2011). Chicana power!: Contested histories of feminism in the Chicano movement (1st ed.). University of Texas Press.
  • Calderon, B., Huber, M., & Velez V. N. (2012). A Chicana feminist epistemology revisited: Cultivating ideas a generation later. Harvard Educational Review, 82(4), 513–539. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.82.4.l518621577461p68
  • Calderon, D. (2016). Moving from damage‐centered research through unsettling reflexivity. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 47(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/aeq.12132
  • Collins, P. (2015). Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas. Annual Review of Sociology, 41(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142
  • Cordova, A. J. (2018). Chicana Feminism informs educational trajectories and leadership: Graduate student testimonios from Nepantla [ Doctoral dissertation]. The University of Texas at San Antonio. ProQuest.
  • Cueva, B. (2013). Theorizing the racial and gendered educational experiences of Chicanas and Native American women at the Ph.D. level in higher education: Testimonios of resistance, defiance, survival, and hope [Doctoral dissertation, UCLA]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
  • Delgado Bernal, D. (1998). Using a Chicana feminist epistemology in educational research. Harvard Educational Review, 68(4), 555–582. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.68.4.5wv1034973g22q48
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2002). The qualitative inquiry reader. Sage.
  • Elenes, C. A. (2011). Transforming borders: Chicana/o popular culture and pedagogy. Lexington Books.
  • Espino, M. M., Vega, I. I., Rendon, L. I., Ranero, J. J., & Muniz, M. M. (2012). The process of reflexion in bridging testimonios across lived experience. Equity & Excellence in Education, 45(3), 444–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2012.698188
  • Fierros, C., & Delgado Bernal, D. (2016). Vamos a platicar: The contours of pláticas as Chicana/Latina feminist methodology. Chicana/Latina Studies: The Journal of Mujeres Activas En Letras Y Cambio Social, 15(2), 98–121. https://thisbridgecalledcyberspace.net/FILES/3943.pdf
  • Guajardo, F., & Guajardo, M. (2013). The power of plática. Reflections, 13(1), 159–164. https://reflectionsjournal.net/wp-content/uploads/CopyrightUpdates/Vol13N1/Reflections13.1-The-Power-of-Platica.pdf
  • Guerra, J. C. (1998). Close to home: Oral and literate practices in a transnational Mexicano community. Teachers College Press.
  • Huber, L. P. (2009). Beautifully powerful: A LatCrit reflection on coming to an epistemological consciousness and the power of testimonio. American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy, and the Law, 18(3), 839. https://libweb.lib.utsa.edu/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.libweb.lib.utsa.edu/scholarly-journals/beautifully-powerful-latcrit-reflection-on-coming/docview/928955004/se-2?accountid=7122
  • Lather, P. (1986). Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a soft place. Interchange, 17(4), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01807017
  • Schwandt, T. A., Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2007). Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 114, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.223
  • Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. Zed Books.
  • Soto, L. D., Cervantes-Soon, C., Villarreal, E., & Campos, E. (2009). The Xicana sacred space: A communal circle of compromiso for educational researchers. Harvard Educational Review, 79(4), 755–776. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.79.4.4k3x387k74754q18
  • Urrieta, L. (2010). Working from within: Chicana and Chicano activist educators in whitestream schools. University of Arizona Press.
  • Westkott, M. (1979). Feminist criticism of social science. Harvard Educational Review, 49(4), 422–430. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.49.4.b103114415055218

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.