Academic Motherhood: Considerations of STEM Postdoctoral Scholar Women

REFERENCES

• Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchies, jobs, bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, 4(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124390004002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad, S. (2017). Family or future in the academy? Research of Educational Research, 87(1), 204–239. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316631626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen-Ramdial, S.-A.-A., & Campbell, A. G. (2014). Reimagining the pipeline: Advancing STEM diversity, persistence, and success. BioScience, 64(7), 612–618. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biu076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anfara, V. A., Jr., & Mertz, N. T. (Eds.). (2014). Theoretical frameworks in qualitative research (2nd ed.). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, S., Litt, J., & Wang, Y. (2004). Creating status of women reports: Institutional housekeeping as “women’s work.” National Women’s Studies Association Journal, 16(1), 194–206. https://doi.org/10.2979/NWS.2004.16.1.194
   Google Scholar
• Bird, S. R., & Rhoton, L. A. (2021). Seeing isn’t always believing: Gender, academic STEM, and women scientists’ perceptions of career opportunities. Gender and Society, 35(3), 422–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432211008814
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blake, D. J. (2022). Gendered and racialized career sacrifices of women faculty accepting dual-career offers. Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education, 15(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/26379112.2022.2067168
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, L. (2000). Inclusions and exclusions in work-family policy: The public values and moral code embedded in the Family and Medical Leave Act. Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 10(1), 80–124. https://doi.org/10.7916/cjgl.v10i1.2426
   Google Scholar
• Canti, L., Chrzanowska, A., Doglio, M. G., Martina, L., & Van Den Bossche, T. (2021). Research culture: Science from bench to society. Biology Open, 10(8), bio058919. https://doi.org/10.1242/bio.058919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casad, B. J., Franks, J. E., Garasky, C. E., Kittleman, M. M., Roesler, A. C., Hall, D. Y., & Petzel, Z. W. (2020). Gender inequality in academia: Problems and solutions for women faculty in STEM. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 99(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.24631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cech, E. A., & Blair-Loy, M. (2019). The changing career trajectory of new parents in STEM. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(10), 4182–4187. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1810862116
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, S. D., & Rosenbloom, J. L. (2023). What’s another year? The lengthening training and career paths of scientists. PLoS One, 18(5), e0285550. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0285550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CohenMiller, A. S., Demers, D., Schnackenberg, H., & Izekenova, Z. (2022). “You are seen; you matter:” Applying the theory of gendered organizations to equity and inclusion for motherscholars in higher education. Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education, 15(1), 87–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/26379112.2022.2025816
   Google Scholar
• Collins, C. (2019). Making motherhood work: How women manage careers and caregiving. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, A. R., & Frink, B. D. (2014). The origins of the ideal worker: The separation of work and home in the United States from the market revolution to 1950. Work and Occupations, 4(1), 18–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0730888413515893
   Google Scholar
• Ecklund, E. H., & Lincoln, A. E. (2011). Scientists want more children. PLoS One, 6(8), e22590. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022590
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahlon, G., Acheson-Field, H., Edwards, K. A., Rennane, S., & Zaber, M. (2022, January 12). ‘Leaking’ female doctorates in the U.S. STEM academy: A review and thematic synthesis. Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4007603
   Google Scholar
• Glass, J. L., Sassler, S., Levitte, Y., & Michelmore, K. M. (2013). What’s so special about STEM? A comparison of women’s retention in STEM and professional occupations. Social Forces, 92(2), 723–756. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sot092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregor, M. A., Weigold, I. K., Martin-Wagar, C. A., & Campbell-Halfaker, D. (2022). Tenure expectations and career aspirations among female assistant professors in STEM. Journal of Career Development, 49(4), 890–905. https://doi.org/10.1177/08948453211005032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, J. (2016). Dissecting a gendered organization: Implications for career trajectories for mid-career faculty women in STEM. The Journal of Higher Education, 87(5), 605–634. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2016.0024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, J. L., Modjaz, M., West, A. A., & Graham, J. R. (2009, October 21–23). Transitional states: Addressing the gender imbalance among postdoctoral researchers at UC Berkeley [Conference session]. In Women in Astronomy and space science: Meeting the challenges of an increasingly diverse workforce conference. University of Maryland University College.
   Google Scholar
• Hsain, H. A., Tam, R., Kamboj, I., Berman, H., & Dudek, R. (2020). Paid family leave to strengthen the STEM workforce [Policy memo: Paid family leave]. Journal of Science Policy & Governance, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.38126/JSPG170207
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, B. E., Smith, J. L., Bruun, M., Shanahan, E. A., Rushing, S., Intemann, K., Handley, I. M., Belou, R., Stoop, C., & Sterman, L. (2022). Department leaders as critical conduits for the advancement of gender equity programs. Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education, 15(1), 41–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/26379112.2022.2034122
   Google Scholar
• Kachchaf, R., Ko, L., Hodari, A., & Ong, M. (2015). Career-life balance for Women of Color: Experiences in science and engineering academia. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 8(3), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, S., & Ginther, D. (2017, June). Women and STEM. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 23525. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w23525/w23525.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kossek, E. E., Perrigino, M., & Rock, A. G. (2021). From ideal workers to ideal work for all: A 50-year review integrating careers and work-family research with a future research agenda. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 126, 103504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laursen, S., & Austin, A. E. (2020). Building gender equity in the academy: Institutional strategies for change. Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J., Williams, J. C., & Li, S. (2017). Parents in the pipeline: Retaining postdoctoral researchers with families. The Pregnant Scholar. https://thepregnantscholar.org/parents-in-the-pipeline/
   Google Scholar
• Lester, J. (2008). Performing gender in the workplace: Gender socialization, power, and identity among women faculty members. Community College Review, 35(4), 277–305. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552108314756
   Google Scholar
• Levitt, H. M., Schuyler, S. W., Chickerella, R., Elber, A., White, L., Troeger, R. L., Karter, J. M., Preston, J. M., & Collins, K. M. (2020). How discrimination in adoptive, foster, and medical systems harms LGBTQ+ families: Research on the experiences of prospective parents. Journal of Gay and Lesbian Social Services, 32(3), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10538720.2020.1728461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Lindqvist, A., Sendén, M. G., & Renström, E. A. (2020). What is gender, anyway: A review of the options for operationalizing gender. Psychology and Sexuality, 12(4), 332–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2020.1729844
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lufler, R. S., & McNulty, M. A. (2022). The glass ceiling thickens: The impact of COVID-19 on academic medicine faculty in the United States. Medical Education Online, 27(1), 2058314. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2022.2058314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez, E. D., Botos, J., Dohoney, K. M., Geiman, T. M., Kolla, S. S., Olivera, A., Qiu, Y., Rayasam, G. V., Stavreva, D. A., & Cohen-Fix, O. (2007). Falling off the academic bandwagon. Women are more likely to quit at the postdoc to principal investigator transition. European Molecular Biology Organization, 8(11), 977–981. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7401110
   Google Scholar
• Mason, M. A., Wolfinger, N. H., & Goulden, M. (2013). Do babies matter?: Gender and family in the ivory tower. Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon-Crowley, S., Bukoski, B., Black, V., Burmicky, J., Molina, V., & Chacon, K. (2021). “I had to jump through a lot of hoops”: How working mothers in student affairs navigate institutional policies and student affairs norms. Journal of Women and Gender in Higher Education, 15(1), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/26379112.2021.1990076
   Google Scholar
• Miller, K. E., & Riley, J. (2022). Changed landscape, unchanged norms: Work-family conflict and the persistence of the academic mother ideal. Innovative Higher Education, 47(3), 471–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-021-09586-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miner, K. N., Walker, J. M., Bergman, M. E., Jean, V. A., Carter-Sowell, A., January, S. C., & Kaunas, C. (2019). From “her” problem to “our” problem: Using an individual lens versus a social-structural lens to understand gender inequity in STEM. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 11(2), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2018.7
   Google Scholar
• National Postdoctoral Association ADVANCE. (2011, March 2). Postdoctoral scholars, gender, and the academic career pipeline: A fact sheet. https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.nationalpostdoc.org/resource/resmgr/Docs/ postdoc-gender-fact-sheet-20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Science Board & National Science Foundation. (2022). Science and engineering indicators 2022: The state of U.S. science and engineering [NSB-2022-1]. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20221/
   Google Scholar
• National Science Foundation National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2019, March 8). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2019 (Special report NSF 19-304). https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsf19304/
   Google Scholar
• Onwuachi-Sanders, C., Dang, P. Q., & Murray, J. (2019). Reproductive rights, reproductive justice: Redefining challenges to create optimal health for all women. Journal of Healthcare, Science and the Humanities, 9(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.28.3.143
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reddick, R. J., Rochlen, A. B., Grasso, J. R., Reilly, E. D., & Spikes, D. D. (2012). Academic fathers pursuing tenure: A qualitative study of work-family conflict, coping strategies, and departmental culture. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 13(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruder, B., Plaza, D., Warner, R., & Bothwell, M. (2018). STEM women faculty struggling for recognition and advancement in a “men’s club” culture. In C. L. Cho, J. K. Corkett, & A. Steele (Eds.), Exploring the toxicity of lateral violence and microaggressions: Poison in the water cooler (pp. 121–149). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rybarczyk, B. J., Lerea, L., Whittington, D., Dykstra, L., & Gibbs, K. (2016). Analysis of postdoctoral training outcomes that broaden participation in science careers. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(3), ar33. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-01-0032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallee, M. W. (2012). The ideal worker or the ideal father: Organizational structures and culture in the gendered university. Research in Higher Education, 53(7), 782–802. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-012-9256-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sallee, M. W. (2014). Faculty fathers: Toward a new ideal in the research university. State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sallee, M. W. (Ed.). (2020). Creating sustainable careers in student affairs: What ideal worker norms get wrong and how to make it right. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2019). Interpreting qualitative data (6th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J. L., Vidler, L. L., & Moses, M. S. (2022). The “gift” of time: Documenting faculty decisions to stop the tenure clock during a pandemic. Innovative Higher Education, 47(5), 875–893. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-022-09603-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Talarid, S. (2023, May 6). In the post-Roe era, letting pregnancy patients get sicker—by design. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/news/dispatch/in-the-post-roe-era-letting-pregnant-patients-get-sicker-by-design
   Google Scholar
• Tanenbaum, C., & Upton, R. (2014, March). Early academic career pathways in STEM: Do gender and family status matter? [Issue brief]. STEM at American Institutes for Research. https://www.air.org/sites/default/files/STEM%20PhD%20Early% 20Academic%20Career%20Pathway_March%202014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Thébaud, S., & Taylor, C. J. (2021). The specter of motherhood: Culture and the production of gendered career aspirations in science and engineering. Gender and Society, 35(3), 395–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432211006037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Weijden, I., Teelken, C., de Boer, M., & Drost, M. (2016). Career satisfaction of postdoctoral researchers in relation to their expectations for the future. Higher Education, 72(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9936-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, K., & Wolf-Wendel, L. E. (2012). Academic motherhood: How faculty manage work and family. Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watt, D. (2007). On becoming a qualitative researcher: The value of reflexivity. The Qualitative Report, 12(1), 82–101. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1645
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. C. (1989). Deconstructing gender. Michigan Law Review, 87(4), 797–845. https://doi.org/10.2307/1289293
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, W. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2012). When scientists choose motherhood: A single factor goes a long way in explaining the dearth of women in math-intensive fields. How can we address it? American Science, 100(2), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1511/2012.95.138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witteman, H. O., Haverfield, J., & Tannenbaum, C. (2021). COVID-19 gender policy changes support female scientists and improve research quality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(6), e2023476118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023476118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf-Wendel, L., & Ward, K. (2015). Academic mothers: Exploring disciplinary perspectives. Innovative Higher Education, 40(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-014-9293-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wonch Hill, P., Holmes, M. A., & McQuillan, J. (2014). The new STEM faculty profile: Balancing family and dual careers. Papers in the Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, 19, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1529-212620140000019001
   Google Scholar
• Yadav, A., Seals, C. D., Soto Sullivan, C. M., Lachney, M., Clark, Q., Dixon, K. G., & Smith, M. J. T. (2020). The forgotten scholar: Underrepresented minority postdoc experiences in STEM fields. Educational Studies, 56(2), 160–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2019.1702552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ysseldyk, R., Greenaway, K. H., Hassinger, E., Zutrauen, S., Lintz, J., Bhatia, M. P., Frye, M., Starkenburg, E., & Tai, V. (2019). A leak in the academic pipeline: Identity and health among postdoctoral women. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1297. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01297
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar