Modelling landscape management scenarios for equitable and sustainable futures in rural areas based on ecosystem services

References

• Allan E, Manning P, Alt F, Binkenstein J, Blaser S, Blüthgen N, Böhm S, Grassein F, Hölzel N, Klaus VH, et al. 2015. Land use intensification alters ecosystem multifunctionality via loss of biodiversity and changes to functional composition. Ecol Lett. 18:834–843. doi:10.1111/ele.12469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APHA. 1998. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 20th ed. Washington (DC): American Public Health Association.
   Google Scholar
• Aradottir AL, Hagen D. 2013. Chapter three - ecological restoration: approaches and impacts on vegetation, soils and society. In: Sparks DL, editor. Advances in agronomy. Academic Press;p. 173–222. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-407686-0.00003-8.
   Google Scholar
• Arizpe D, Mendes A, Rabaça JE. 2008. Sustainable riparian zones. A management guide. Valencia (Spain): Ripidurable-Generalitat Valenciana.
   Google Scholar
• Arkema KK, Verutes GM, Wood SA, Clarke-Samuels C, Rosado S, Canto M, Rosenthal A, Ruckelshaus M, Guannel G, Toft J, et al. 2015. Embedding ecosystem services in coastal planning leads to better outcomes for people and nature. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 112:7390–7395. doi:10.1073/pnas.1406483112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbastro Gil L. 2005. El Monasterio de Piedra: historia y paisaje turístico Zaragoza (Spain): Ibercaja, Obra Social y Cultural.
   Google Scholar
• Baró F, Gómez-Baggethun E, Haase D. 2017. Ecosystem service bundles along the urban-rural gradient: insights for landscape planning and management. Ecosyst Serv. 24:147–159. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer A, Black AL. 1994. Quantification of the effect of soil organic matter content on soil productivity. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 58:185–193. doi:10.2136/sssaj1994.03615995005800010027x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baur P. 2020. When farmers are pulled in too many directions: comparing institutional drivers of food safety and environmental sustainability in California agriculture. Agric Hum Values. 37:1175–1194. doi:10.1007/s10460-020-10123-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett. 12:1394–1404. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benra F, Nahuelhual L, Felipe-Lucia M, Bonn A. under review. Context matters - designing equitable and balanced PES strategies. Ecosyst Serv.
   Google Scholar
• Berbés-Blázquez M, González JA, Pascual U. 2016. Towards an ecosystem services approach that addresses social power relations. Curr Opin Environ Sustain Sustainability Sci. 19:134–143. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2016.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BOE. 2008. Dominio Público Hidráulico [WWW Document]. Minist Pres Esp BOE–2008-755. [accessed 2020 April 24]. https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2008/01/16/pdfs/A03141-03149.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P. 2011. Canonical ordination. In: Borcard D, Gillet F, Legendre P, editors. Numerical ecology with R, Use R. New York (NY): Springer; p. 153–225. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-7976-6_6.
   Google Scholar
• Bruno D, Sorando R, Álvarez-Farizo B, Castellano C, Céspedes V, Gallardo B, Jiménez JJ, López MV, López-Flores R, Moret-Fernández D, et al. 2021. Depopulation impacts on ecosystem services in Mediterranean rural areas. Ecosyst Serv. 52:101369. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casalegno S, Inger R, DeSilvey C, Gaston KJ. 2013. Spatial Covariance between Aesthetic Value & Other Ecosystem Services. PLoS ONE. 8:e68437. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068437.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castro AJ, Martin-Lopez B, Garcia-llorente M, Aguilera PA, Lopez E, Cabello J. 2011. Social preferences regarding the delivery of ecosystem services in a semiarid Mediterranean region. J Arid Environ. 75:1201–1208. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.05.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CITA. 2008. Estudio sobre la funcionalidad de la vegetación leñosa de aragon como sumidero de CO2: existencias y potencialidad (estimación cuantitativa y predicciones de fijación) Informe final Diciembre. Zaragoza (Spain): Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón.
   Google Scholar
• Comín FA, Miranda B, Sorando R, Felipe‐Lucia MR, Jiménez JJ, Navarro E. 2018. Prioritizing sites for ecological restoration based on ecosystem services. J Appl Ecol. 55:1155–1163. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.13061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May. 1992. On the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora. http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/1992/43/oj/eng
   Google Scholar
• Darwiche-Criado N, Comín FA, Masip A, García M, Eismann SG, Sorando R. 2017. Effects of wetland restoration on nitrate removal in an irrigated agricultural area: the role of in-stream and off-stream wetlands. Ecol Eng. 103:426–435. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.03.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies ZG, Edmondson JL, Heinemeyer A, Leake JR, Gaston KJ. 2011. Mapping an urban ecosystem service: quantifying above-ground carbon storage at a city-wide scale. J Appl Ecol. 48:1125–1134. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02021.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Frutos A, Olea PP, Mateo-Tomás P. 2015. Responses of medium- and large-sized bird diversity to irrigation in dry cereal agroecosystems across spatial scales. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 207:141–152. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2015.04.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESPON. 2017. Policy brief on shrinking rural regions in Europe.
   Google Scholar
• ESRI. 2012. ArcGIS Desktop. Redlands (CA): Environmental Systems Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Felipe-Lucia MR, Comín FA. 2015. Ecosystem services–biodiversity relationships depend on land use type in floodplain agroecosystems. Land Use Policy. 46:201–210. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felipe-Lucia MR, Comín FA, Bennett EM. 2014. Interactions among ecosystem services across land uses in a floodplain agroecosystem. Ecol Soc. 19. doi:10.5751/ES-06249-190120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felipe-Lucia MR, Comín FA, Escalera-Reyes J. 2015a. A framework for the social valuation of ecosystem services. AMBIO. 44:308–318. doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0555-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felipe-Lucia MR, Martín-López B, Lavorel S, Berraquero-Díaz L, Escalera-Reyes J, Comín FA. 2015b. Ecosystem services flows: why stakeholders’ power relationships matter. PLoS ONE. 10:e0132232. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer J, Meacham M, Queiroz C. 2017. A plea for multifunctional landscapes. Front Ecol Environ. 15:59. doi:10.1002/fee.1464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, et al. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science. 309:570–574. doi:10.1126/science.1111772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Llorente M, Martín-López B, Iniesta-Arandia I, López-Santiago CA, Aguilera PA, Montes C. 2012. The role of multi-functionality in social preferences toward semi-arid rural landscapes: an ecosystem service approach. Environ Sci Policy. 19–20:136–146. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2012.01.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez‐Baggethun E, Mingorría S, Reyes‐García V, Calvet L, Montes C. 2010. Traditional ecological knowledge trends in the transition to a market economy: empirical study in the doñana natural areas. Conserv Biol. 24:721–729. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01401.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González del Tánago M, García de Jalón D. 2011. Riparian Quality Index (RQI): a methodology for characterising and assessing the environmental conditions of riparian zones. Limnetica. 30:235–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González E, Felipe-Lucia MR, Bourgeois B, Boz B, Nilsson C, Palmer G, Sher AA. 2017. Integrative conservation of riparian zones. Biol Conserv. 211:20–29. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodall DW. 1952. Quantitative aspects of plant distribution. Biol Rev. 27:194–242. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.1952.tb01393.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanspach J, Hartel T, Milcu AI, Mikulcak F, Dorresteijn I, Loos J, Von Wehrden H, Kuemmerle T, Abson D, Kovács-Hostyánszki A, et al. 2014. A holistic approach to studying social-ecological systems and its application to southern Transylvania. Ecol Soc. 19. doi:10.5751/ES-06915-190432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hölting L, Jacobs S, Felipe-Lucia MR, Maes J, Norström AV, Plieninger T, Cord AF. 2019. Measuring ecosystem multifunctionality across scales. Environ Res Lett. 14:124083. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab5ccb.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbart JA. 2011. An inexpensive alternative solar radiation shield for ambient air temperature and relative humidity micro-sensors. J Nat Environ Sci. 2:9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbart J, Link T, Campbell C, Cobos D. 2005. Evaluation of a low‐cost temperature measurement system for environmental applications. Hydrol Process. 19:1517–1523. doi:10.1002/hyp.5861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• INE. 2012. Anuario Estadístico Agrario. Madrid (Spain): Instituto Nacional de Estadística.
   Google Scholar
• INE. 2019. Península Ibérica en cifras. Instituto Nacional de Estadística. [accessed 2020 April 22]. https://ine.es/prodyser/pubweb/pin/pin2019/18/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Iniesta-Arandia I, Del Amo DG, García-Nieto AP, Piñeiro C, Montes C, Martín-López B. 2014a. Factors influencing local ecological knowledge maintenance in Mediterranean watersheds: insights for environmental policies. AMBIO. 1–12. doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0556-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Aguilera PA, Montes C, Martín-López B. 2014b. Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services: uncovering the links between values, drivers of change, and human well-being. Ecol Econ. 108:36–48. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs S, Zafra-Calvo N, Gonzalez-Jimenez D, Guibrunet L, Benessaiah K, Berghöfer A, Chaves-Chaparro J, Díaz S, Gomez-Baggethun E, Lele S, et al. 2020. Use your power for good: plural valuation of nature – the Oaxaca statement. Glob Sustain. 3. doi:10.1017/sus.2020.2.
   Google Scholar
• Kirchgeorg M, Jung K, Klante O. 2010. The future of trade shows: insights from a scenario analysis. J Bus Ind Mark. 25:301–312. doi:10.1108/08858621011038261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubiszewski I, Costanza R, Anderson S, Sutton P. 2017. The future value of ecosystem services: global scenarios and national implications. Ecosyst Serv. 26:289–301. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lal R. 2002. Soil carbon dynamics in cropland and rangeland. Environ Pollut. 116:353–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang F, Krüger J, Amelung W, Willbold S, Frossard E, Bünemann EK, Bauhus J, Nitschke R, Kandeler E, Marhan S, et al. 2017. Soil phosphorus supply controls P nutrition strategies of beech forest ecosystems in Central Europe. Biogeochemistry. 136:5–29. doi:10.1007/s10533-017-0375-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeBauer DS, Treseder KK. 2008. Nitrogen limitation of net primary productivity in terrestrial ecosystems is globally distributed. Ecology. 89:371–379. doi:10.1890/06-2057.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerouge F, Gulinck H, Vranken L. 2017. Valuing ecosystem services to explore scenarios for adaptive spatial planning. Ecol Indic. 81:30–40. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Li X. 2017. Global understanding of farmland abandonment: a review and prospects. J Geogr Sci. 27:1123–1150. doi:10.1007/s11442-017-1426-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liekens I, Schaafsma M, De Nocker L, Broekx S, Staes J, Aertsens J, Brouwer R. 2013. Developing a value function for nature development and land use policy in Flanders, Belgium. Land Use Policy. 30:549–559. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.04.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning P, Plas F, Soliveres S, Allan E, Maestre FT, Mace G, Whittingham MJ, Fischer M. 2018. Redefining ecosystem multifunctionality. Nat Ecol Evol. 2:427–436. doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0461-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin-Lopez B, Felipe-Lucia MR, Bennett EM, Norstrom A, Peterson G, Plieninger T, Hicks CC, Turkelboom F, Garcia-Llorente M, Jacobs S, et al. 2019. A novel telecoupling framework to assess social relations across spatial scales for ecosystem services research. J Environ Manage. 241:251–263. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-López B, Gómez-Baggethun E, García-Llorente M, Montes C. 2014. Trade-offs across value-domains in ecosystem services assessment. Ecol Indic Part A. 37:220–228. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez Pastur G, Peri PL, Lencinas MV, García-Llorente M, Martín-López B. 2016. Spatial patterns of cultural ecosystem services provision in Southern Patagonia. Landsc Ecol. 31:383–399. doi:10.1007/s10980-015-0254-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Sastre R, Ravera F, Gonzalez JA, Lopez Santiago C, Bidegain I, Munda G. 2017. Mediterranean landscapes under change: combining social multicriteria evaluation and the ecosystem services framework for land use planning. LAND USE POLICY. 67:472–486. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MMAMRM. 2009. Mapa de cultivos y aprovechamientos, actualización 2000–2009. Escala 1:50000. Madrid (Spain): Ministerio de Medio Ambiente Y Medio Rural y Marino.
   Google Scholar
• Montero G, Ruiz-Peinado R, Muñoz M. 2005. Producción de biomasa y fijación de CO2 por los bosques españoles. Madrid: Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Técnica Agraria y Alimentaria.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno-Mateos D, Power ME, Comín FA, Yockteng R. 2012. Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems. PLoS Biol. 10:e1001247. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagendra H, Ostrom E. 2012. Polycentric governance of multifunctional forested landscapes. Int J Commons. 6(2):104. doi:10.18352/ijc.321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahuelhual L, Vergara X, Kusch A, Campos G, Droguett D. 2017. Mapping ecosystem services for marine spatial planning: recreation opportunities in Sub-Antarctic Chile. Mar Policy. 81:211–218. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2017.03.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarro LM, Pereira HM. 2015. Rewilding abandoned landscapes in Europe. In: Pereira HM, and Navarro LM, editors. Rewilding European landscapes. Springer International Publishing; p. 3–23 doi:10.1007/978-3-319-12039-3.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron D, Chan KM, Daily GC, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, et al. 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ. 7:4–11. doi:10.1890/080023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newbold T, Hudson LN, Hill SLL, Contu S, Lysenko I, Senior RA, Börger L, Bennett DJ, Choimes A, Collen B, et al. 2015. Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature. 520:45–50. doi:10.1038/nature14324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oksanen J, Blanche G, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D. 2013. Vegan: community ecology package. R Package Version. 2 0.10 [WWW Document]. [accessed 2020 April 24]. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/vegan/vegan.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen SR, Cole CV, Watanabe FS, Dean LA. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA Circular. Washington (DC): Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson L, Ardö J. 2002. Soil carbon sequestration in degraded semiarid agro-ecosystems—perils and potentials. Ambio. 31:471–477. doi:10.1639/0044-7447(2002)031[0471:SCSIDS2.0.CO;2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne LL, Kovacic DA. 1993. Riparian vegetated buffer strips in water-quality restoration and stream management. Freshw Biol. 29:243–258. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.1993.tb00761.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oteros-Rozas E, Martín-López B, Fagerholm N, Bieling C, Plieninger T. 2017. Using social media photos to explore the relation between cultural ecosystem services and landscape features across five European sites. Ecol Indic. 94. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkyn S. 2004. Review of riparian buffer zone effectiveness. Wellington (UK): Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry.
   Google Scholar
• Pe’er G, Bonn A, Bruelheide H, Dieker P, Eisenhauer N, Feindt PH, Hagedorn G, Hansjürgens B, Herzon I, Lomba Â, et al. 2020. Action needed for the EU Common Agricultural Policy to address sustainability challenges. People Nat. 2:305–316. doi:10.1002/pan3.10080.
   Google Scholar
• Pe’er G, Zinngrebe Y, Moreira F, Sirami C, Schindler S, Müller R, Bontzorlos V, Clough D, Bezák P, Bonn A, et al. 2019. A greener path for the EU Common Agricultural Policy. Science. 365:449–451. doi:10.1126/science.aax3146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plieninger T, Bieling C, Ohnesorge B, Schaich H, Schleyer C, Wolff F. 2013. Exploring futures of ecosystem services in cultural landscapes through participatory scenario development in the Swabian Alb, Germany. Ecol Soc. 18. doi:10.5751/ES-05802-180339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posthumus H, Rouquette JR, Morris J, Gowing DJG, Hess TM. 2010. A framework for the assessment of ecosystem goods and services; a case study on lowland floodplains in England. Ecol Econ. 69:1510–1523. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretty J. 2008. Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 363:447–465. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu J, Carpenter SR, Booth EG, Motew M, Zipper SC, Kucharik CJ, Loheide SP II, Turner MG. 2018. Understanding relationships among ecosystem services across spatial scales and over time. Environ Res Lett. 13:054020. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aabb87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu J, Queiroz C, Bennett EM, Cord AF, Crouzat E, Lavorel S, Maes J, Meacham M, Norström AV, Peterson GD, et al. 2021. Land-use intensity mediates ecosystem service tradeoffs across regional social-ecological systems. Ecosyst People. 17:264–278. doi:10.1080/26395916.2021.1925743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu J, Turner MG. 2013. Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 201310539. doi:10.1073/pnas.1310539110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quantum GIS Development Team. 2012. Quantum GIS Desktop (1.8.0). Beaverton (Oregon): Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project.
   Google Scholar
• Queiroz C, Meacham M, Richter K, Norström AV, Andersson E, Norberg J, Peterson G. 2015. Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape. AMBIO. 44:89–101. doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0601-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quintas-Soriano C, García-Llorente M, Norström A, Meacham M, Peterson G, Castro AJ. 2019. Integrating supply and demand in ecosystem service bundles characterization across Mediterranean transformed landscapes. Landsc Ecol. 34:1619–1633. doi:10.1007/s10980-019-00826-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2019. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. [WWW Document]. Vienna Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [accessed 2020 April 24]. https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/indicators/oxygen-consuming-substances-in-rivers/r-development-core-team-2006.
   Google Scholar
• Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM. 2010. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci. doi:10.1073/pnas.0907284107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raworth K. 2017. A Doughnut for the Anthropocene: humanity’s compass in the 21st century. Lancet Planet Health. 1:e48–e49. doi:10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30028-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reed MS, Graves A, Dandy N, Posthumus H, Hubacek K, Morris J, Prell C, Quinn CH, Stringer LC. 2009. Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J Environ Manage. 90:1933–1949. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosa IMD, Pereira HM, Ferrier S, Alkemade R, Acosta LA, Akcakaya HR, Den Belder E, Fazel AM, Fujimori S, Harfoot M, et al. 2017. Multiscale scenarios for nature futures. Nat Ecol Evol. 1:1416–1419. doi:10.1038/s41559-017-0273-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouquette JR, Posthumus H, Morris J, Hess TM, Dawson QL, Gowing DJG. 2011. Synergies and trade-offs in the management of lowland rural floodplains: an ecosystem services approach. Hydrol Sci J -J Sci Hydrol. 56:1566–1581. doi:10.1080/02626667.2011.629785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheitlin KN, Dixon PG. 2010. Diurnal temperature range variability due to land cover and airmass types in the southeast. J Appl Meteorol Climatol. 49:879–888. doi:10.1175/2009JAMC2322.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soliveres S, van der Plas F, Manning P, Prati D, Gossner MM, Renner SC, Alt F, Arndt H, Baumgartner V, Binkenstein J, et al. 2016. Biodiversity at multiple trophic levels is needed for ecosystem multifunctionality. Nature. 536:456–459. doi:10.1038/nature19092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tockner K, Bunn SE, Gordon C, Naiman RJ, Quinn GP, Stanford JA. 2008. Flood plains: critically threatened ecosystems. In: Polunin NVC, editor. Aquatic ecosystems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 45–62. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511751790.006.
   Google Scholar
• Trabucchi M, O’Farrell PJ, Notivol E, Comín FA. 2014. Mapping ecological processes and ecosystem services for prioritizing restoration efforts in a semi-arid mediterranean River Basin. Environ Manage. 1–14. doi:10.1007/s00267-014-0264-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tscharntke T, Grass I, Wanger TC, Westphal C, Batáry P. 2021. Beyond organic farming – harnessing biodiversity-friendly landscapes. Trends Ecol Evol. 36:919–930. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2021.06.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. 2018. The World’s Cities in 2018 - Data Booklet, Statistical Papers - United Nations (Ser. A), Population and Vital Statistics Report. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. doi:10.18356/8519891f-en.
   Google Scholar
• Vallet A, Locatelli B, Levrel H, Dendoncker N, Barnaud C, Quispe Conde Y. 2019. Linking equity, power, and stakeholders’ roles in relation to ecosystem services. Ecol Soc. 24. doi:10.5751/ES-10904-240214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkel DB, Verburg PH. 2012. Combining exploratory scenarios and participatory backcasting: using an agent-based model in participatory policy design for a multi-functional landscape. Landsc Ecol. 27:641–658. doi:10.1007/s10980-012-9730-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitousek PM, Howarth R. 1991. Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: how can it occur? Biogeochemistry. 13:87–115. doi:10.1007/BF00002772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitousek PM, Porder S, Houlton BZ, Chadwick OA. 2010. Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen–phosphorus interactions. Ecol Appl. 20:5–15. doi:10.1890/08-0127.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler KJ, Rodrigues JG, Albrecht E, Crockett ETH. 2021. Governance of ecosystem services: a review of empirical literature. Ecosyst People. 17:306–319. doi:10.1080/26395916.2021.1938235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafra-Calvo N, Garmendia E, Pascual U, Palomo I, Gross-Camp N, Brockington D, Cortes-Vazquez J-A, Coolsaet B, Burgess ND. 2019. Progress toward equitably managed protected areas in Aichi Target 11: a global survey. BioScience. 69:191–197. doi:10.1093/biosci/biy143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafra-Calvo N, Pascual U, Brockington D, Coolsaet B, Cortes-Vazquez JA, Gross-Camp N, Palomo I, Burgess ND. 2017. Towards an indicator system to assess equitable management in protected areas. Biol Conserv. 211:134–141. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2017.05.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoderer BM, Tasser E, Carver S, Tappeiner U. 2019. Stakeholder perspectives on ecosystem service supply and ecosystem service demand bundles. Ecosyst Serv. 37:100938. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar