Advanced search
Publication Cover
Ecosystems and People Volume 18, 2022 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
5,847
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research: Ten Years of the Program on Ecosystem Change and Society

Advancing research on ecosystem service bundles for comparative assessments and synthesis

Megan Meachama Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, SwedenCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3626-967X
ORCID Icon,
Albert V. Norströma Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Sweden;b Global Resilience Partnership, Stockholm University, SwedenORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0706-9233
ORCID Icon,
Garry D. Petersona Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, SwedenORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0173-0112
ORCID Icon,
Erik Anderssona Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Sweden;c Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South AfricaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2716-5502
ORCID Icon,
Elena M. Bennettd Department of Natural Resource Sciences and McGill School of Environment, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, CanadaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3944-2925
ORCID Icon,
Reinette (Oonsie) Biggsa Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Sweden;e Centre for Sustainability Transitions, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
,
Emilie Crouzatf University Grenoble Alpes, INRAE, LESSEM, Grenoble, France;g Laboratoire d’Ecologie Alpine, CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Institut Ecologie et Environnement, Grenoble, FranceORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5765-6543
ORCID Icon,
Anna F. Cordh Ufz – Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, Permoserstr. 15, Leipzig, Germany;i Chair of Computational Landscape Ecology, Institute of Geography, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, GermanyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3183-8482
ORCID Icon,
Elin Enforsa Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, SwedenORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3719-792X
ORCID Icon,
María R. Felipe-Luciaj Department of Ecosystem Services. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - Ufz. Puschstrasse 5, Leipzig, Germany;k Department of Ecosystem Services. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (Idiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, GermanyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1915-8169
ORCID Icon,
Joern Fischerl Faculty of Sustainability, Leuphana University Lüneburg, GermanyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-3187-8978
ORCID Icon,
Maike Hamanne Centre for Sustainability Transitions, Stellenbosch University, South AfricaORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2906-4043
ORCID Icon,
Jan Hanspachl Faculty of Sustainability, Leuphana University Lüneburg, GermanyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-6638-8699
ORCID Icon,
Christina Hicksm Arc Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia;n Lancaster University, Lancaster, Lancashire, UKORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7399-4603
ORCID Icon,
Sander Jacobso Research Institute for Nature and Forest Inbo - Nature & Society Research Group;p Belgian Biodiversity Platform BBPFORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-4674-4817
ORCID Icon,
Sandra Lavorelg Laboratoire d’Ecologie Alpine, CNRS, Université Grenoble Alpes, Université Savoie Mont Blanc, Institut Ecologie et Environnement, Grenoble, FranceORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7300-2811
ORCID Icon,
Bruno Locatelliq Forests and Societies, Cirad, University of Montpellier, Montpellier France;r Cifor, Lima, PeruORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2983-1644
ORCID Icon,
Berta Martín-Lópezl Faculty of Sustainability, Leuphana University Lüneburg, GermanyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2622-0135
ORCID Icon,
Tobias Plieningers Faculty of Organic Agricultural Sciences, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany;t Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, GermanyORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1478-2587
ORCID Icon &
Cibele Queiroza Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Sweden;b Global Resilience Partnership, Stockholm University, SwedenORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1124-306X
ORCID Icon show all
Pages 99-111 | Received 14 Sep 2020, Accepted 17 Jan 2022, Published online: 20 Feb 2022

References

  • Abson DJ, Von Wehrden H, Baumgärtner S, Fischer J, Hanspach J, Härdtle W, Heinrichs H, Klein AM, Lang DJ, Martens P, et al. 2014. Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability. Ecol Econ. 103:29–37. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.012.
  • Albon S, Turner K, Watson R, Anger A, Baker J, Bateman I, Bentley S, Blyth N, Bowles-Newark N, Brown C, et al. 2014. UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow on: Synthesis of the Key Findings.
  • Allison H, Brown C. 2017. A review of recent developments in ecosystem assessment and its role in policy evolution. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 29:57–62. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2017.11.006.
  • Anderson BJ, Armsworth PR, Eigenbrod F, Thomas CD, Gillings S, Heinemeyer A, Roy DB, Gaston KJ. 2009. Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities. J Appl Ecol. 46(4):888–896. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01666.x.
  • Andersson E, Borgström S, Haase D, Langemeyer J, Mascarenhas A, McPhearson T, Wolff M, Łaszkiewicz E, Kronenberg J, Barton DN, et al. 2021. A context sensitive systems approach for understanding and enabling ecosystem service realisation in cities. Ecol Soc. 26(2):35. doi:10.5751/ES-12411-260235.
  • Andersson E, McPhearson T, Kremer P, Gomez-Baggethun E, Haase D, Tuvendal M, Wurster D. 2015. Scale and Context Dependence of Ecosystem Service Providing Units. Ecosyst Ser. 12:157–164. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.08.001.
  • Arias-Arévalo P, Martín-López B, Gómez-Baggethun E. 2017. Exploring intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values for sustainable management of social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc. 22(4). doi:10.5751/ES-09812-220443.
  • Baró F, Gómez-Baggethun E, Haase D. 2017. Ecosystem service bundles along the urban-rural gradient: insights for landscape planning and management. Ecosyst Ser. 24:147–159. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.021.
  • Bennett EM, Cramer W, Begossi A, Cundill G, Díaz S, Egoh BN, Geijzendorffer IR, Krug CB, Lavorel S, Lazos E, et al. 2015. Linking biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human well-being: three challenges for designing research for sustainability. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. ( open issue 14):76–85. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.007.
  • Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett. 12(12):1394–1404. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x.
  • Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Müller F. 2012. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol Indic. 21:17–29. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019.
  • Burkhard B, and Maes J. 2017. Mapping Ecosystem Services. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia(Bulgaria); p. 374.
  • Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, Venail P, Narwani A, Mace GM, Tilman D, Wardle DA, et al. 2012. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature. 486(7401):59. doi:10.1038/nature11148.
  • Carpenter SR, Mooney HA, Agard J, Capistrano D, DeFries RS, Díaz S, Dietz T, Duraiappah AK, Oteng-Yeboah A, Pereira HM, et al. 2009. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 106(5):1305–1312. doi:10.1073/pnas.0808772106.
  • Chan KM, Balvanera P, Benessaiah K, Chapman M, Díaz S, Gómez-Baggethun E, Gould R, Hannahs N, Jax K, Klain S, et al. 2016. Opinion: why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 113(6):1462–1465. doi:10.1073/pnas.1525002113.
  • Chan KM, Satterfield T, Goldstein J. 2012. Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values. Ecol Econ. 74:8–18. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.011.
  • Christie M, Martín-López B, Church A, Siwicka E, Szymonczyk P, Sauterel JM. 2019. Understanding the diversity of values of “Nature’s contributions to people”: insights from the IPBES Assessment of Europe and Central Asia. Sustain Sci. 14(5):1267–1282. doi:10.1007/s11625-019-00716-6.
  • Costanza R, Fioramonti L, Kubiszewski I. 2016. The UN Sustainable Development Goals and the dynamics of well‐being. Front Ecol Environ. 14(2):59. doi:10.1002/fee.1231.
  • Crouzat E, Mouchet M, Turkelboom F, Byczek C, Meersmans J, Berger F, Verkerk PJ, Lavorel S. 2015. Assessing bundles of ecosystem services from regional to landscape scale: insights from the French Alps. J Appl Ecol. 52(5):1145–1155. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12502.
  • Crouzat E, Zawada M, Grigulis K, Lavorel S. 2019. Design and implementation of a national ecosystem assessment–insights from the French mountain systems’ experience. Ecosyst People. 15(1):288–302. doi:10.1080/26395916.2019.1674383.
  • Díaz S, Demissew S, Carabias J, Joly C, Lonsdale M, Ash N, Larigauderie A, Adhikari JR, Arico S, Báldi A, et al. 2015. The IPBES conceptual framework — connecting nature and people. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 14:1–16. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002.
  • Dimopoulos P, Drakou E, Kokkoris I, Katsanevakis S, Kallimanis A, Tsiafouli M, Bormpoudakis D, Kormas K, Arends J. 2017. The need for the implementation of an Ecosystem Services assessment in Greece: drafting the national agenda. One Ecosyst. 2:e13714. doi:10.3897/oneeco.2.e13714.
  • Dittrich A, Seppelt R, Václavík T, Cord AF. 2017. Integrating ecosystem service bundles and socio-environmental conditions–A national scale analysis from Germany. Ecosyst Ser. 28:273–282. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.007.
  • Dorresteijn I, Schultner J, Collier NF, Hylander K, Senbeta F, Fischer J. 2017. Disaggregating ecosystem services and disservices in the cultural landscapes of southwestern Ethiopia: a study of rural perceptions. Landsc Ecol. 32(11):2151–2165. doi:10.1007/s10980-017-0552-5.
  • Egoh B, Rouget M, Reyers B, Knight AT, Cowling RM, van Jaarsveld AS, Welz A. 2007. Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: a review. Ecol Econ. 63(4):714–721. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.04.007.
  • Eigenbrod F, Bell VA, Davies HN, Heinemeyer A, Armsworth PR, and Gaston KJ. 2011. The impact of projected increases in urbanization on ecosystem services. Proc. R. Soc. Biological Sciences. 278(1722):3201–3208.
  • European Commission. 2020. Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions: EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030. Bringing nature back into our lives.
  • Felipe-Lucia MR, Comín FA, Bennett EM. 2014. Interactions among ecosystem services across land uses in a floodplain agroecosystem. Ecol Soc. 19(1):20. doi:10.5751/ES-06249-190120.
  • Felipe-Lucia MR, de Frutos, and Comín FA. 2022. Modelling landscape management scenarios for equitable and sustainable futures in rural areas based on ecosystem services. Ecosystems and People. 18(1):76–94.
  • Felipe-Lucia MR, Martín-López B, Lavorel S, Berraquero-Díaz L, Escalera-Reyes J, Comín FA. 2015. Ecosystem services flows: why stakeholders’ power relationships matter. PloS One. 10(7):e0132232. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132232.
  • Felipe-Lucia MR, Soliveres S, Penone C, Manning P, van der Plas F, Boch S, Prati D, Ammer C, Schall P, Gossner MM, et al. 2018. Multiple forest attributes underpin the supply of multiple ecosystem services. Nat Commun. 9(1):1–11. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07082-4.
  • Fisher JA, Patenaude G, Giri K, Lewis K, Meir P, Pinho P, Rounsevell MD, Williams M. 2014. Understanding the relationships between ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: a conceptual framework. Ecosyst Ser. 7:34–45. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.08.002.
  • Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP, Barford C, Bonan G, Carpenter SR, Chapin FS, Coe MT, Daily GC, Gibbs HK, et al. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science. 309(5734):570–574. doi:10.1126/science.1111772.
  • Folke C, Biggs R, Norström AV, Reyers B, Rockström J. 2016. Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecol Soc. 21(3):41. doi:10.5751/ES-08748-210341.
  • Gómez-Baggethun E, Ruiz-Pérez M. 2011. Economic valuation and the commodification of ecosystem services. Prog Physic Geogr. 35(5):613–628. doi:10.1177/0309133311421708.
  • Haines-Young R, and Potschin M. 2010. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. Ecosyst Ecol New Synth. 1:110–139.
  • Hamann M, Biggs R, Reyers B. 2015. Mapping social–ecological systems: identifying ‘green-loop’ and ‘red-loop’ dynamics based on characteristic bundles of ecosystem service use. Glob Environ Change. 34:218–226. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.07.008.
  • Hanspach J, Hartel T, Milcu A, Mikulcak F, Dorresteijn I, Kovács-Hostyánszki A, Báldi A. 2014. A holistic approach to studying social-ecological systems and its application to southern Transylvania. Ecol Soc. 19(4). doi:10.5751/ES-06915-190432.
  • Harrison PA, Dunford R, Savin C, Rounsevell MDA, Holman IP, Kebede AS, Stuch B. 2015. Cross-sectoral impacts of climate change and socio-economic change for multiple, European land- and water-based sectors. Clim Change. 128(3–4):279–294. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1239-4.
  • Hartel T, Fischer J, Câmpeanu C, Milcu A, Hanspach J, Fazey I. 2014. The importance of ecosystem services for rural inhabitants in a changing cultural landscape in Romania. Ecol Soc. 19(2):42. doi:10.5751/ES-06333-190242.
  • He Q, Bertness MD, Bruno JF, Li B, Chen G, Coverdale TC, Altieri AH, Bai J, Sun T, and Pennings SC, et al. 2014. Economic development and coastal ecosystem change in China. Sci Rep, 4(1):1-9.
  • Hein L, Van Koppen K, De Groot RS, Van Ierland EC. 2006. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ. 57(2):209–228. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.005.
  • Hicks CC, Cinner JE. 2014. Social, institutional, and knowledge mechanisms mediate diverse ecosystem service benefits from coral reefs. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 111(50):17791–17796. doi:10.1073/pnas.1413473111.
  • Himes A, Muraca B. 2018. Relational values: the key to pluralistic valuation of ecosystem services. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 35:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2018.09.005.
  • Hölting L, Jacobs S, Felipe-Lucia MR, Maes J, Norström AV, Plieninger T, Cord AF. 2019. Measuring ecosystem multifunctionality across scales. Environ Res Lett. 14(12):124083. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab5ccb.
  • IPBES. 2016. The methodological assessment report on scenarios and models of biodiversity and ecosystem services. In: Ferrier S, Ninan KN, Leadley P, Alkemade R, Acosta LA, Akçakaya HR, Brotons L, Cheung WWL, Christensen V, and Harhash KA, et al. editors. Secretariat of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES. Bonn (Germany). p. 348.
  • IPBES. 2019. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Brondizio ES, Settele J, Díaz S, Ngo HT (editors). IPBES secretariat, Bonn (Germany). 1148 .
  • Jax K, Calestani M, Chan KM, Eser U, Keune H, Muraca B, O’Brien L, Potthast T, Voget-Kleschin L, Wittmer H. 2018. Caring for nature matters: a relational approach for understanding nature’s contributions to human well-being. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 35:22–29. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2018.10.009.
  • Jopke C, Kreyling J, Maes J, Koellner T. 2015. Interactions among ecosystem services across Europe: bagplots and cumulative correlation coefficients reveal synergies, trade-offs, and regional patterns. Ecol Indic. 49:46–52. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.037.
  • Khoshkar S, Hammer M, Borgström S, Dinnétz P, Balfors B. 2020. Moving from vision to action- integrating ecosystem services in the Swedish local planning context. Land Use Policy. 97:104791. Elsevier Ltd. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104791.
  • Kosanic A, Petzold J. 2020. A systematic review of cultural ecosystem services and human wellbeing. Ecosyst Ser. 45:101168. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101168.
  • Kronenberg J, Andersson E. 2019. Integrating social values with other value dimensions: parallel use vs. combination vs. full integration. Sustain Sci. 14(5):1283–1295. doi:10.1007/s11625-019-00688-7.
  • Lambin EF, Turner BL, Geist HJ, Agbola SB, Angelsen A, Bruce JW, Coomes OT, Dirzo R, Fischer G, Folke C, et al. 2001. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Glob Environ Change. 11(4):261–269. doi:10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3.
  • Lau JD, Hicks CC, Gurney GG, Cinner JE. 2019. What matters to whom and why? Understanding the importance of coastal ecosystem services in developing coastal communities. Ecosyst Ser. 35:219–230. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.12.012.
  • Lavorel S. 2013. Plant functional effects on ecosystem services. J Ecol. 101(1):4–8. doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12031.
  • Lavorel S, Grigulis K. 2012. How fundamental plant functional trait relationships scale‐up to trade‐offs and synergies in ecosystem services. J Ecol. 100(1):128–140. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01914.x.
  • Lavorel S, Grigulis K, Leitinger G, Kohler M, Kohler M, Tappeiner U. 2017. Historical trajectories in land use pattern and grassland ecosystem services in two contrasted alpine landscapes. Reg Environ Change. 17(8):2251–2264. doi:10.1007/s10113-017-1207-4.
  • Layke C, Mapendembe A, Brown C, Walpole M, Winn J. 2012. Indicators from the global and sub-global Millennium Ecosystem Assessments: an analysis and next steps. Ecol Indic. 17:77–87. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.04.025.
  • Locatelli B, Lavorel S, Sloan S, Tappeiner U, Geneletti D. 2017. Characteristic trajectories of ecosystem services in mountains. Front Ecol Environ. 15(3):150–159. doi:10.1002/fee.1470.
  • MA. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington DC. (USA).
  • Mace GM, Norris K, Fitter AH. 2012. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol Evol. 27(1):19–26. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.08.006.
  • Maes J, Egoh B, Willemen L, Liquete C, Vihervaara P, Schägner JP, Grizzetti B, Drakou EG, La Notte A, and Zulian G, et al. 2012. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosyst Ser. 1(1):31–39. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.004.
  • Martín-López B, Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Casado-Arzuaga I, Del Amo DG, Gómez-Baggethun E, Oteros-Rozas E, Palacios-Agundez I, Willaarts B, et al. 2012. Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS One. 7(6):e38970. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038970.
  • Martín-López B, Leister I, Lorenzo Cruz P, Palomo I, Grêt-Regamey A, Harrison PA, Lavorel S, Locatelli B, Luque S, Walz A. 2019. Nature’s contributions to people in mountains: a review. PloS One. 14(6):e0217847. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0217847.
  • Meacham M, Queiroz C, Norström AV, Peterson GD. 2016. Social-ecological drivers of multiple ecosystem services: what variables explain patterns of ecosystem services across the Norrström drainage basin? Ecol Soc. 21(1). doi:10.5751/ES-08077-210114.
  • Metzger MJ, Rounsevell MDA, Acosta-Michlik L, Leemans R, Schröter D. 2006. The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 114(1):69–85. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.025.
  • Milcu A, Hanspach J, Abson D, Fischer J. 2013. Cultural ecosystem services: a literature review and prospects for future research. Ecol Soc. 18(3). doi:10.5751/ES-05790-180344.
  • Mouchet M, Rega C, Lasseur R, Georges D, Paracchini M-L, Renaud J, Stürck J, Schulp CJE, Verburg PH, Verkerk PJ, et al. 2017. Ecosystem service supply by European landscapes under alternative land use and environmental policies. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Ser Manage. 13(1):342–354. doi:10.1080/21513732.2017.1381167.
  • Odgaard MV, Turner KG, Bøcher PK, Svenning JC, Dalgaard T. 2017. A multi-criteria, ecosystem-service value method used to assess catchment suitability for potential wetland reconstruction in Denmark. Ecol Indic. 77:151–165. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.001.
  • Palomo I, Martín-López B, López-Santiago C, Montes C. 2011. Participatory scenario planning for protected areas management under the ecosystem services framework: the Doñana social-ecological system in southwestern Spain. Ecol Soc. 16(1). doi:10.5751/ES-03862-160123.
  • Pascual U, Muradian R, Brander L, Gómez-Baggethun E, Martín-López B, Verma M, Armsworth P, Christie M, Cornelissen H, and Eppink F, et al. 2010. The economics of valuing ecosystem services and biodiversity. TEEB–Ecol Econ Found. 183–256.
  • Plieninger T, Ferranto S, Huntsinger L, Kelly M, Getz C. 2012. Appreciation, use, and management of biodiversity and ecosystem services in California’s working landscapes. Environ Manage. 50(3):427–440. doi:10.1007/s00267-012-9900-z.
  • Plieninger T, Torralba M, Hartel T, Fagerholm N. 2019. Perceived ecosystem services synergies, trade-offs, and bundles in European high nature value farming landscapes. Landsc Ecol. 34(7):1565–1581. doi:10.1007/s10980-019-00775-1.
  • Polishchuk Y, Rauschmayer F. 2012. Beyond “benefits”? Looking at ecosystem services through the capability approach. Ecol Econ. 81:103–111. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.06.010.
  • Qiu J, Carpenter SR, Booth EG, Motew M, Zipper SC, Kucharik CJ, Loheide SP II, Turner MG. 2018. Understanding relationships among ecosystem services across spatial scales and over time. Environ Res Lett. 13(5):054020. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aabb87.
  • Qiu J, Queiroz C, Bennett EM, Cord AF, Crouzat E, Lavorel S, Maes J, Meacham M, Norström AV, Peterson GD, et al. 2021. Land-use intensity mediates ecosystem service tradeoffs across regional social-ecological systems. Ecosyst People. 17(1):264–278. doi:10.1080/26395916.2021.1925743.
  • Qiu J, Turner MG. 2013. Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 110(29):12149–12154. doi:10.1073/pnas.1310539110.
  • Queiroz C, Meacham M, Richter K, Norström AV, Andersson E, Norberg J, Peterson G. 2015. Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape. Ambio. 44(1):89–101. doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0601-0.
  • Quintas-Soriano C, García-Llorente M, Norström A, Meacham M, Peterson G, Castro AJ. 2019. Integrating supply and demand in ecosystem service bundles characterization across Mediterranean transformed landscapes. Landsc Ecol. 34(7):1619–1633. doi:10.1007/s10980-019-00826-7.
  • Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson G. 2016. Scale and ecosystem services: how do observation, management, and analysis shift with scale—lessons from Québec. Ecol Soc. 21(3). doi:10.5751/ES-08605-210316.
  • Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM. 2010. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 107(11):5242–5247. doi:10.1073/pnas.0907284107.
  • Renard D, Rhemtulla JM, Bennett EM. 2015. Historical dynamics in ecosystem service bundles. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 112(43):13411–13416. doi:10.1073/pnas.1502565112.
  • Reyers B, Biggs R, Cumming GS, Elmqvist T, Hejnowicz AP, Polasky S. 2013. Getting the measure of ecosystem services: a social-ecological approach. Front Ecol Environ. 11(5):268–273. doi:10.1890/120144.
  • Rieb JT, Chaplin-Kramer R, Daily GC, Armsworth PR, Böhning-Gaese K, Bonn A, Cumming GS, Eigenbrod F, Grimm V, Jackson BM, et al. 2017. When, where, and how nature matters for ecosystem services: challenges for the next generation of ecosystem service models. BioScience. 67(9):820–833. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix075.
  • Riechers M, Balázsi Á, Betz L, Jiren TS, Fischer J. 2020. The erosion of relational values resulting from landscape simplification. Landsc Ecol. 35(11):2601–2612. doi:10.1007/s10980-020-01012-w.
  • Robards MD, Schoon ML, Meek CL, Engle NL. 2011. The importance of social drivers in the resilient provision of ecosystem services. Glob Environ Change. 21(2):522–529. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.12.004.
  • Rounsevell MDA, Dawson TP, Harrison PA. 2010. A conceptual framework to assess the effects of environmental change on ecosystem services. Biodivers Conserv. 19(10):2823–2842. doi:10.1007/s10531-010-9838-5.
  • Saidi N, Spray C. 2018. Ecosystem services bundles: challenges and opportunities for implementation and further research. Environ Res Lett. 13(11):113001. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aae5e0.
  • Santos-Martín F, García Llorente M, Quintas-Soriano C, Zorrilla-Miras P, Martín-Lopez B, Loureiro M, Benayas J, Montes M. 2016. Spanish National Ecosystem Assessment: socio-economic valuation of ecosystem services in Spain. Synthesis of the key findings. Food and Environment, Madrid, Spain.
  • Santos-Martín F, García-Mon BG, González JA, Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Montes C, Ravera F, López-Santiago CA, Carpintero Ó, Benayas J, et al. 2019. Identifying past social-ecological thresholds to understand long-term temporal dynamics in Spain. Ecol Soc. 24(2). doi:10.5751/ES-10734-240210.
  • Scholes RJ, Reyers B, Biggs R, Spierenburg MJ, Duriappah A. 2013. Multi-scale and cross-scale assessments of social–ecological systems and their ecosystem services. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 5(1):16–25. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.01.004.
  • Schröter M, Albert C, Marques A, Tobon W, Lavorel S, Maes J, Brown C, Klotz S, Bonn A. 2016. National ecosystem assessments in Europe: a review. BioScience. 66(10):813–828. doi:10.1093/biosci/biw101.
  • Schröter D, Cramer W, Leemans R, Prentice IC, Araújo MB, Arnell NW, Bondeau A, Bugmann H, Carter TR, Gracia CA, et al. 2005. Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science. 310(5752):1333–1337. doi:10.1126/science.1115233.
  • Seppelt R, Dormann CF, Eppink FV, Lautenbach S, Schmidt S. 2011. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J Appl Ecol. 48(3):630–636. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x.
  • Sharp R, Douglass J, Wolny S, Arkema K, Bernhardt J, Bierbower W, Chaumont N, Denu D, Fisher D, and Glowinski K, et al. 2020. InVEST 3.8.5.post0+ug.gdd887c5.d20201118 User’s Guide. In: The Natural Capital Project. Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund.
  • Spake R, Lasseur R, Crouzat E, Bullock JM, Lavorel S, Parks KE, Schaafsma M, Bennett EM, Maes J, Mulligan M, et al. 2017. Unpacking ecosystem service bundles: towards predictive mapping of synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services. Glob Environ Change. 47:37–50. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.08.004.
  • Tomscha SA, Sutherland IJ, Renard D, Gergel SE, Rhemtulla JM, Bennett EM, Daniels LD, Eddy IM, Clark EE. 2016. A guide to historical data sets for reconstructing ecosystem service change over time. BioScience. 66(9):747–762. doi:10.1093/biosci/biw086.
  • Turner KG, Odgaard MV, Bøcher PK, Dalgaard T, Svenning JC. 2014. Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape. Landsc Urban Plan. 125:89–104. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.007.
  • Vannier C, Lasseur R, Crouzat E, Byczek C, Lafond V, Cordonnier T, Longaretti PY, Lavorel S. 2019. Mapping ecosystem services bundles in a heterogeneous mountain region. Ecosyst People. 15(1):74–88. doi:10.1080/26395916.2019.1570971.
  • Yang G, Ge Y, Xue H, Yang W, Shi Y, Peng C, Du Y, Fan X, Ren Y, Chang J. 2015. Using ecosystem service bundles to detect trade-offs and synergies across urban–rural complexes. Landsc Urban Plan. 136:110–121. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.12.006.
  • Zhang H, Huang R, Zhang Y, Buhalis D. 2020. Cultural ecosystem services evaluation using geolocated social media data: a review. Tourism Geogr. 1–23. doi:10.1080/14616688.2020.1801828.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.