Property rights play a pivotal role in the distribution of ecosystem services among beneficiaries

References

• [RRI] Right and Resource Institute. 2018. At a crossroads: consequential trends in recognition of community-based forest tenure. 60. https://rightsandresources.org/en/publication/at-a-crossroads-trends-in-recognition-of-community-based-forest-tenure-from-2002-2017/#.XkwCEChKiUk.
   Google Scholar
• [USGS] United States Geological Survey. 2019. NLCD 2016 Land cover (CONUS). USA: United States Geological Survey. https://www.mrlc.gov/data.
   Google Scholar
• Atapattu SS, Kodituwakku DC. 2009. Agriculture in South Asia and its implications on downstream health and sustainability: a review. Agric Water Manage. 96:361–373. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2008.09.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ban N, Evans L, Nenadovic M, Schoon M. 2015. Interplay of multiple goods, ecosystem services, and property rights in large social-ecological marine protected areas. Ecol Soc. 20. doi:10.5751/ES-07857-200402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benra F, Nahuelhual L. 2019. A triology of inequalities: land ownership, forest cover and ecosystem services distribution. Land Use Policy. 82:247–257. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berbés-Blázquez M, González JA, Pascual U. 2016. Towards an ecosystem services approach that addresses social power relations. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability. 19:134–143. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2016.02.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromley DJ. 1991. Environment and economy: property rights and public policy. USA: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley DW. 2012. Environmental governance as stochastic Belief updating: crafting rules to live by. Ecol Soc. 17(3):14. doi:10.5751/ES-04774-170314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhard B, Kandziora M, Hou Y, Müller F. 2014. Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification. Landscape Online. 34:1–32. doi:10.3097/LO.201434.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron DR, Marty J, Holland RF. 2014. Whither the Rangeland?: protection and Conversion in California’s Rangeland Ecosystems. PLOS ONE. 9:e103468. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello C, Grainger CA. 2018. Property rights, regulatory capture, and exploitation of natural resources. J Assoc Environ Resour Econ. 5:441–479. doi:10.1086/695612.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dade MC, Mitchell MGE, Brown G, Rhodes JR. 2020. The effects of urban greenspace characteristics and socio-demographics vary among cultural ecosystem services. Urban For Urban Greening. 49:126641. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demsetz H. 2000. Toward a theory of property rights. In: Gopalakrishnan C, editor. Classic papers in natural resource economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; p. 163–177.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Environmental Conservation. 2019a. Timber Harvesting. Albany (NY): New York State Government. https://www.dec.ny.gov/lands/5242.html.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Environmental Conservation. 2019b. Fishing license. Albany (NY): New York State Government. https://www.dec.ny.gov/permits/6091.html.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Taxation and Finance. (2019). Property type classification codes – assessors’ manual. New York (NY): New York State Governmenthttps://www.tax.ny.gov/research/property/assess/manuals/prclas.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Díaz S, Pascual U, Stenseke M, Martín-López B, Watson RT, Molnár Z, Hill R, Chan KMA, Baste IA, Braumann KA, et al. 2018. Assessing nature’s contributions to people. Science. 359(6373):270–272. doi:10.1126/science.aap8826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESRI. 2011. ArcGIS desktop: release 10. Redlands (CA): Environmental Systems Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Felipe-Lucia MR, Martín-López B, Lavorel S, Berraquero-Díaz L, Escalera-Reyes J, Comín FA. 2015. Ecosystem services flows: why stakeholders’ power relationships matter. PLoS ONE. 10(7):e0132232. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0132232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felton L. 2017. Is America’s ‘Best Idea’ at stake? The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/11/public-lands-history-trump/546410/.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher B, Turner RK, Morling P. 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol Econ. 68:643–653. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabay M, Alam M. 2017. Community forestry and its mitigation potential in the Anthropocene: the importance of land tenure governance and the threat of privatization. For Policy Econ. 79:26–35. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2017.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines-Young R, and Potschin M. 2010. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In: Raffaelli, D, and Frid, C, editors. Ecosystem Ecology: A New Synthesis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 110–139.
   Google Scholar
• Harris G, Gross S, Auerbach D. 2012. Land ownership and property rights in the Adirondack Park of New York, USA. Landscape Res. 37:277–300. doi:10.1080/01426397.2011.555530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks CC, Cinner JE. 2014. Social, institutional, and knowledge mechanisms mediate diverse ecosystem service benefits from coral reefs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A 111(50):17791–17796. doi:10.1073/pnas.1413473111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPBES. 2019. Global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Brondizio ES, Settele J, Díaz S, Ngo HT, editors. Bonn (Germany): IPBES secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Kärkkäinen L, Haakana H, Hirvelä H, Lempinen R, Packalen T. 2020. Assessing the impacts of land-use zoning decisions on the supply of forest ecosystem services. Forests. 11:931. doi:10.3390/f11090931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lant CL, Ruhl JB, Kraft SE. 2008. The tragedy of ecosystem services. BioScience. 58:969–974. doi:10.1641/B581010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin AM, Beier CM. 2014. Wilderness perceptions versus management reality in the Adirondack Park, USA. Landsc Urban Plan. 130:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.06.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martín-López B, Felipe-Lucia MR, Bennett EM, Norström A, Peterson G, Plieninger T, Hicks CC, Turkelboom F, García-Llorente M, Jacobs S, et al. 2019. A novel telecoupling framework to assess social relations across spatial scales for ecosystem services research. J Environ Manage. 241:251–263. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.04.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Harms MJ, Bryan BA, Balvanera P, Law EA, Rhodes JR, Possingham HP, Wilson KA. 2015. Making decisions for managing ecosystem services. Biol Conserv. 184:229–238. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Conservation Easement Database. 2017. U.S. National Conservation Easement Database dataset. National Conservation Easement Database. https://www.conservationeasement.us/downloads/.
   Google Scholar
• New York State. 2021. Drinking water reports. Albany (NY): New York State Government. https://water.ny.gov/doh2/applinks/waterqual/#/waterSystems.
   Google Scholar
• New York State Senate. 2019. Environment conservation laws, article 15, Title 15, Section 15-1501. New York State Government, Albany (New York, USA). https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/ENV/15-1501.
   Google Scholar
• Olson M. 1971. The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. 2010. Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American economic review. 100(3):641–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pagella TF, Sinclair FL. 2014. Development and use of a typology of mapping tools to assess their fitness for supporting management of ecosystem service provision. Landsc Ecol. 29:383–399. doi:10.1007/s10980-013-9983-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinn CH, Fraser EDG, Hubacek K, Reed MS. 2010. Property rights in UK uplands and the implications for policy and management. Ecol Econ. 69:1355–1363. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2019. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Ribot JC, Peluso NL. 2003. A theory of access. Rural Sociol. 68(2):153–181. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson BE, Masuda YJ, Kelly A, Holland MB, Bedford C, Childress M, Fletschner D, Game ET, Ginsburg C, Hilhorst T, et al. 2018. Incorporating land tenure security into conservation. Conserv Lett. 11(2):1–12. doi:10.1111/conl.12383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson BE, Provencher B, Lewis DJ. 2013. Managing wild resources: institutional choice and the recovery of resource rent in Southwest China. World Dev. 48:120–132. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlager E, Ostrom E. 1992. Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis. Land Econ. 68:249–262. doi:10.2307/3146375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröter M, Stumpf KH, Loos J, van Oudenhoven APE, Böhnke-Henrichs A, Abson DJ. 2017. Refocusing ecosystem services towards sustainability. Ecosyst Serv. 25:35–43. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikor T, ed. 2013. The justices and injustices of ecosystem services. Oxfordshire, England; New York, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sikor T, He J, Lestrelin G. 2017. Property rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis revisited. World Dev. 93:337–349. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang Y, Leon AS, Kavvas ML. 2020. Impact of size and location of wetlands on watershed- scale flood control. Water Resour Manage. 34:1693–1707. doi:10.1007/s11269-020-02518-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villamagna AM, Angermeier PL, Bennett EM. 2013. Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: a conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery. Ecol Complexity. 15:114–121. doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villamagna AM, Mogollón B, Angermeier PL. 2017. Inequity in ecosystem service delivery: socioeconomic gaps in the public-private conservation network. Ecol Soc. 22(1):36. doi:10.5751/ES-09021-220136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong CP, Jiang B, Kinzig AP, Lee KN, Ouyang Z. 2015. Linking ecosystem characteristics to final ecosystem services for public policy. Ecol Lett. 18:108–118. doi:10.1111/ele.12389.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar