2,881
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Paper

Integrating stakeholder preferences into ecosystem services mapping in Yala wetland, Kenya

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon &
Pages 146-163 | Received 07 Jan 2021, Accepted 02 Feb 2022, Published online: 11 Mar 2022

References

  • Abila R. 2002. Utilization and economic valuation of the Yala Swamp, Kenya. In: Gawler M, editor. Strategies for wise use of wetlands: best practices in participatory management. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wetlands International IUCN, WWF; p. 89–96.
  • Abila R. 2005. Biodiversity and sustainable management of a tropical wetland lake ecosystem: a case study of Lake Kanyaboli, Kenya. Summer Sch. 3:1–11; [accessed 2020 May 12]. http://www.oceandocs.net/handle/1834/1272.
  • Abila R, Barluenga M, Engelken J, Meyer A, Salzburger W. 2004. Population-structure and genetic diversity in a haplochromine fish cichlid of a satellite lake of Lake Victoria. Mol Ecol. 13(9):2589–2602. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02270.x.
  • Abila R, Salzburger W, Ndonga MF, Owiti DO, Barluenga M, Meyer A. 2008. The role of the Yala swamp lakes in the conservation of Lake Victoria region haplochromine cichlids: evidence from genetic and trophic ecology studies. Lakes Reserv. 13(2):95–104. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1770.2008.00366.x.
  • Adekola O, Morardet S, de Groot R, Grelot F. 2012. Contribution of provisioning services of the Ga- Mampa wetland, South Africa, to local livelihoods. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag. 8(3):248–264. doi:10.1080/21513732.2012.671191.
  • Aloo PA. 2003. Biological diversity of the Yala Swamp lakes, with special emphasis on fish species composition, in relation to changes in the Lake Victoria Basin (Kenya): threats and conservation measures. Biodivers Conserv. 12(5):905–920. doi:10.1023/A:1022869624524.
  • Angienda PO, Lee HJ, Elmer KR, Abila R, Waindi EN, Meyer A. 2011. Genetic structure and gene flow in an endangered native tilapia fish (Oreochromis esculentus) compared to invasive Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in Yala swamp, East Africa. Conserv Genet. 12(1):243–255. doi:10.1007/s10592-010-0136-2.
  • Bennun L, Njoroge P. 2000. Important bird areas in Kenya. Ostrich. 71(1–2):164–167. doi:10.1080/00306525.2000.9639900.
  • Brown K, Fortnam M. 2018. Gender and ecosystem services: a blind spot. In: Schrekenberg K, Mace G, Poudyal M, editors. Ecosystem services and poverty alleviation: trade-offs and governance. Oxford: Routledge; p. 257–272. doi:10.4324/9780429507090
  • Burdon D, Potts T, Barbone C, Mander L. 2017. The matrix revisited: a bird’s-eye view of marine ecosystem service provision. Mar Policy. 77:78–89. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2016.12.015
  • Burkhard B, Kandziora M, Hou Y, Müller F. 2014. Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands-concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification. Landscape Online. 34(1):1–32. doi:10.3097/LO.201434.
  • Burkhard B, Kroll F, Müller F, and Windhorst W. 2009. Landscapes ‘ capacities to provide ecosystem services – a concept for land-cover based assessments. Landscape Online. 1–22. doi:10.3097/LO.200915.
  • Burkhard B, Kroll F, Nedkov S, Müller F. 2012. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol Indic. 21:17–29. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019
  • Burkhard B, Müller A, Müller F, Grescho V, Anh Q, Arida G, Bustamante JVJ, Chien HV, Heong KL, and Escalada M, et al, 2015. Land cover-based ecosystem service assessment of irrigated rice cropping systems in southeast Asia-An explorative study. Ecosyst Serv. 14:76–87. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.05.005.
  • Campagne CS, Roche P, Gosselin F, Tschanz L, Tatoni T. 2017. Expert-based ecosystem services capacity matrices: dealing with scoring variability. Ecol Indic. 79:63–72. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.043
  • Campagne CS, Roche P, Müller F, Burkhard B. 2020. Ten years of ecosystem services matrix: review of a ®evolution. One Ecosyst. 5:1–23. doi:10.3897/oneeco.5.e51103
  • Campagne CS, Roche PK, Salles JM. 2018. Looking into Pandora’s Box: ecosystem disservices assessment and correlations with ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv. 30:126–136. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.005
  • Carpenter SR, Stanley EH, Vander Zanden MJ. 2011. State of the world’s freshwater ecosystems: physical, chemical, and biological changes. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 36(1):75–99. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-021810-094524.
  • Chebet C. 2021, September 21. Siaya, Busia step up efforts to have Yala wetland recognised globally. The Standard; [accessed 2021 Oct 1]. https://www.standardmedia.co.ke/western/article/2001424058/siaya-busia-counties-step-up-efforts-to-have-yala-swamp-recognised-globally
  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O'Neill RV, Paruelo J. et al. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 387:253–260. doi:10.1038/387253a0
  • Cuni-Sanchez A, Imani G, Bulonvu F, Batumike R, Baruka G, Burgess ND, Klein JA, Marchant R. 2019. Social perceptions of forest ecosystem services in the Democratic Republic Of Congo. Hum Ecol. 47(6):839–853. doi:10.1007/s10745-019-00115-6.
  • Daw T, Brown K, Rosendo S, Pomeroy R. 2011. Applying the ecosystem services concept to poverty alleviation: the need to disaggregate human well-being. Environ Conserv. 38(4):370–379. doi:10.1017/S0376892911000506.
  • de Groot R, Brander L, van der Ploeg S, Costanza R, Bernard F, Braat L, van Beukering P, Crossman N, Ghermandi A, Hein L, et al. 2012. Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosyst Serv. 1(1):50–61. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.005.
  • de Groot R, Fisher B, Christie M, Aronson J, Braat L, …Haines-Young R, Gowdy J, Maltby E, Neuville A, Polasky S, et al. 2010. Integrating the ecological and economic dimensions in biodiversity and ecosystem service valuation. In: Kumar P, editor. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB): ecological and economic foundations. London: Earthscan; p. 4–9.
  • Depellegrin D, Pereira P, Misiunė I, Egarter-Vigl L. 2016. Mapping ecosystem services potential in Lithuania. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 23(5):441–455. doi:10.1080/13504509.2016.1146176.
  • Díaz S, Pascual U, Stenseke M, Martín-López B, Watson R, Molnár Z, Shirayama Y, Chan KMA, Baste IA, Brauman KA, et al. 2018. An inclusive approach to assess nature’ s contributions to people. Science. 359(6373):270–272. doi:10.1126/science.aap8826.
  • Dorresteijn I, Schultner J, Collier NF, Hylander K, Senbeta F, Fischer J. 2017. Disaggregating ecosystem services and disservices in the cultural landscapes of southwestern Ethiopia: a study of rural perceptions. Landsc Ecol. 32(11):2151–2165. doi:10.1007/s10980-017-0552-5.
  • Fortnam M, Brown K, Chaigneau T, Crona B, Daw TM, Gonçalves D, Hicks C, Revmatas M, Sandbrook C, Schulte-Herbruggen B. 2019. The gendered nature of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ. 159:312–325. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.018
  • Geange S, Townsend M, Clark D, Ellis JI, Lohrer AM. 2019. Communicating the value of marine conservation using an ecosystem service matrix approach. Ecosyst Serv. 35:150–163. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.12.004
  • Haines-Young RH, Potschin MB. 2010. The links between biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In: Rafaelli D, Frid C, editors. Ecosystem ecology: a new synthesis. Cambridge: BES Ecological Reviews Series; p. 110–139.
  • Harper D, Mavuti K. 1996. Freshwater wetlands and marshes. In: Maclanahan TR, Young TP, editors. East African ecosystems and their conservation. New York: Oxford University Press; p. 217–240.
  • Hou Y, Burkhard B, Müller F. 2013. Uncertainties in landscape analysis and ecosystem service assessment. J Environ Manage. 127:S117–S131. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.12.002
  • Ikiara MM, Mwakubo SM, Nyangoro O. 2010. To convert of conserve the Yala wetland: an economic valuation (No. 116/ 2010). Nairobi: Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis (KIPPRA).
  • Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Aguilera PA, Montes C, Martín-López B. 2014. Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services: uncovering the links between values, drivers of change, and human well-being. Ecol Econ. 108(C):36–48. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.028.
  • Jacobs S, Burkhard B, Van Daele T, Staes J, Schneiders A. 2015. ‘ The Matrix Reloaded ’ : a review of expert knowledge use for mapping ecosystem services. Ecol Modell. 295:21–30. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.024
  • Junk WJ, An S, Finlayson CM, Gopal B, Květ J, Mitchell SA, Mitsch WJ, Robarts RD. 2013. Current state of knowledge regarding the world’s wetlands and their future under global climate change: a synthesis. Aquat Sci. 75(1):151–167. doi:10.1007/s00027-012-0278-z.
  • Kandziora M, Burkhard B, Müller F. 2013. Interactions of ecosystem properties, ecosystem integrity and ecosystem service indicators: a theoretical matrix exercise. Ecol Indic. 28:54–78. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.09.006
  • Khan AS, Yi H, Zhang L, Yu X, Mbanzamihigo E, Umuhumuza G, Ngoga T, Yevide SIA. 2019. An integrated social-ecological assessment of ecosystem service benefits in the Kagera River Basin in Eastern Africa. Reg Environ Change. 19(1):39–53. doi:10.1007/s10113-018-1356-0.
  • Kinaro ZO. 2008. Wetland conversion to large scale agricultural production: implications on the livelihoods of local communities, Yala Swamp, L. Victoria basin, Kenya. Linkoping: Linkoping University.
  • Kolka RK, Murdiyarso D, Kauffman JB, Birdsey RA. 2016. Tropical wetlands, climate, and land-use change: adaptation and mitigation opportunities. Wetl Ecol Manag. 24(2):107–112. doi:10.1007/s11273-016-9487-x.
  • Lamarque P, Tappeiner U, Turner C, Steinbacher M, Bardgett RD, Szukics U, Schermer M, Lavorel S. 2011. Stakeholder perceptions of grassland ecosystem services in relation to knowledge on soil fertility and biodiversity. Reg Environ Change. 11(4):791–804. doi:10.1007/s10113-011-0214-0.
  • Lau JD, Hicks CC, Gurney GG, Cinner JE. 2018. Disaggregating ecosystem service values and priorities by wealth, age, and education. Ecosyst Serv. 29:91–98. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.12.005
  • Mahajan SL, Daw T. 2016. Perceptions of ecosystem services and benefits to human well-being from community-based marine protected areas in Kenya. Mar Policy. 74(February):108–119. doi:10.1016/j.marpol.2016.09.005.
  • Martínez-Harms MJ, and Balvanera P. 2012. Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply : a review. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag. 8(1–2):17–25. doi:10.1080/21513732.2012.663792.
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human wellbeing: wetlands and water. Washington D.C: World Resources Institute.
  • Ministry of Environment and Mineral Resources. 2012. Kenya wetlands Atlas. Nairobi: Ministry of Environment and Mineral Resources.
  • Mitsch WJ, Bernal B, Hernandez ME. 2015. Ecosystem services of wetlands. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag. 11(1):1–4. doi:10.1080/21513732.2015.1006250.
  • Moutouama FT, Biaou SSH, Kyereh B, Asante WA, Natta AK. 2019. Factors shaping local people’s perception of ecosystem services in the Atacora Chain of Mountains, a biodiversity hotspot in northern Benin. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 15(1):1–10. doi:10.1186/s13002-019-0317-0.
  • Muhamad D, Okubo S, Harashina K, Parikesit GB, Takeuchi K. 2014. Living close to forests enhances people’s perception of ecosystem services in a forest-agricultural landscape of West Java, Indonesia. Ecosyst Serv. 8:197–206. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.04.003
  • Müller F, Burkhard B. 2012. The indicator side of ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv. 1(1):26–30. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.06.001.
  • Müller A, Maes J. 2015. Arguments for biodiversity conservation in Natura 2000 sites: an analysis based on LIFE projects. Nat Conserv. 12:1–26. doi:10.3897/natureconservation.12.4848
  • Muoria P, Field R, Matiku P, Munguti S, Mateche E, Shati S, Odeny D. 2015. Yala Swamp ecosystem service assessment. Nairobi: Nature Kenya.
  • Mwakubo SM, Ikiara MM. 2009. Determinants of papyrus harvesting in Yala Swamp, Kenya. Afr J Bus Econ. 31(1):75–95.
  • Mwaura F, M N, Were E, Kagure E, Wanjohi L, Mbuthia J, Otieno J, and Makala M, 2003. Options of the Yala wetland management for sustainable development and biodiversity conservation. Nairobi: Conservation Leadership Programme.
  • Nahuelhual L, Benra Ochoa F, Rojas F, Ignacio Díaz G, Carmona A. 2016. Mapping social values of ecosystem services: what is behind the map? Ecol Soc. 21(3). doi:10.5751/ES-08676-210324.
  • Ochumba PBO, Goshen M, Pollinger U. 1992. Ecological changes in Lake Victoria after the invasion of Nile Perch (Lates niloticus): the Catchment, waters quality and fisheries management introduction. In: Okemwa E, Wakwabi E, Getabu A, editors. Recent trends of research on L. Victoria fisheries. Nairobi: Kenya Marine Fisheries Research Institute; p. 29–39.
  • Odhiambo O. 2018, July 31. Invaders scramble for a piece of Yala swamp as US investor quits. Standard Newspaper; [accessed 2020 Mar 3]. https://www.standardmedia.co.ke/article/2001290122/invaders-scramble-for-a-piece-of-yala-swamp-as-us-investor-quits
  • Okeyo-Owour JB, Raburu PO, Masese FO, Omari SN. 2012. Wetlands of Lake Victoria Basin, Kenya: distribution, current status and conservation challenges. In: Raburu PO, Okeyo-Owuor JB, and Kwena F, editors. Community based approach to the management of Nyando Wetland. Lake Victoria Basin, Kenya. Nairobi: UNDP; p. 1–14.
  • Ondiek RA, Kitaka N, Oduor SO. 2016. Assessment of provisioning and cultural ecosystem services in natural wetlands and rice fields in Kano floodplain, Kenya. Ecosyst Serv. 21:166–173. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.08.008
  • Osumba JJL, Okeyo-Owuor JB, Raburu PO. 2010. Effect of harvesting on temporal papyrus (Cyperus papyrus) biomass regeneration potential among swamps in Winam Gulf wetlands of Lake Victoria Basin, Kenya. Wetl Ecol. 18:331–341. doi:10.1007/s11273-010-9174-2
  • Ouko C, Mulwa R, Kibugi R, Owuor M, Zaehringer J, Oguge N. 2018. Community perceptions of ecosystem services and the management of Mt. Marsabit Forest in Northern Kenya. Environments. 5(11):121. doi:10.3390/environments5110121.
  • Outa NO, Yongo EO, Keyombe JLA, Ogello EO, Wanjala DN. 2020. A review on the status of some major fish species in Lake Victoria and possible conservation strategies. Lakes Reserv. 25(1):105–111. doi:10.1111/lre.12299.
  • Owuor MA, Icely J, Newton A, Nyunja J, Otieno P, Tuda AO, Oduor N. 2017. Mapping of ecosystem services flow in Mida Creek, Kenya. Ocean Coast Manag. 140:11–21. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.02.013
  • Palomo I, Martín-López B, Zorrilla-Miras P, García Del Amo D, Montes C. 2014. Deliberative mapping of ecosystem services within and around Doñana National Park (SW Spain) in relation to land use change. Reg Environ Change. 14(1):237–251. doi:10.1007/s10113-013-0488-5.
  • Quintas-Soriano C, Brandt JS, Running K, Baxter CV, Gibson DM, Narducci J, Castro AJ. 2018. Social-ecological systems influence ecosystem service perception: a programme on ecosystem change and society (PECS) analysis. Ecol Soc. 23(3). doi:10.5751/ES-10226-230303.
  • Rebelo L-M, Mccartney M, Finlayson M. 2010. Wetlands of Sub-Saharan Africa: distribution and contribution of agriculture to livelihoods. Wetl Ecol Manag. 18(5):557–572. doi:10.1007/s11273-009-9142-x.
  • Rocheleau DE, Thomas-Slayter BP, Wangari E. 1996. Feminist political ecology: global issues and local experiences. New York: Routledge.
  • Rongoei PJK, Kipkemboi J, Van Dam AA. 2013. Ecosystem services and drivers of change in Nyando floodplain wetland, Kenya. Afr J Environ Sci Tech. 7:274–291. doi:10.5897/AJEST12.224
  • Schuyt KD. 2005. Economic consequences of wetland degradation for local populations in Africa. Ecol Econ. 53(2):177–190. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.08.003.
  • Siaya County Assembly. 2015. Republic of Kenya County Assembly of Siaya First Assembly- Third Session 2015 Report of the Joint Committee on Agriculture, Tourism, Water and Delegated legislation on Yala Swamp. Siaya, Kenya: Siaya County Government.
  • Siaya County Government. 2018a. Siaya county integrated development plan 2018-2022. Siaya, Kenya: Siaya County Government.
  • Siaya County Government. 2018b. Siaya county spatial plan 2018-2028. Siaya, Kenya: Siaya County Government.
  • Sinclair AJ, Collins SA, Spaling H. 2011. The role of participant learning in community conservation in the Arabuko-Sokoke Forest, Kenya. Conserv Soc. 9(1):42–53. doi:10.4103/0972-4923.79187.
  • Stoll S, Frenzel M, Burkhard B, Adamescu M, Augustaitis A, Baeßler C, Müller F, Carranza ML, Cazacu C, Cosor GL, et al. 2015. Assessment of ecosystem integrity and service gradients across Europe using the LTER Europe network. Ecol Modell. 295:75–87. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.06.019
  • Thenya T, Ngecu WM. 2017. Dynamics of resource utilisation in a tropical wetland, Yala swamp, Lake Victoria basin-Statistical analysis of land use change. Int J Sci Art Commerce. 2; [accessed 2020 Jan 29]. http://www.ijsac.net/node/184
  • Thenya T, Wassmann R, Verchot L, Mungai D. 2006. Degradation of the riparian wetlands in the Lake Victoria basin - Yala swamp case study. In: Odada E, Olago DO, Ochola W, Ntiba M, Wandiga S, Gichuki N, Oyieke H, editors. Proceedings of the 11th World Lakes Conference - Volume 2. Nairobi; p. 483–494. http://hdl.handle.net/1834/5313
  • Turner K, van den Bergh JCJ, Soderqvist T, Barendregt A, van der Straaten J, Maltby E, van Ierland EC. 2000. Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy. Ecol Econ. 35(1):7–23. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00164-6.
  • Turyahabwe N, Tumusiime D, Byakagaba P, Tumwebaze S. 2013. Impact of collaborative forest management on forest status and local perceptions of contribution to livelihoods in Uganda. J Sustainable Dev. 6(10). doi:10.5539/jsd.v6n10p36.
  • van Dam AA, Kipkemboi J, Mazvimavi D, Irvine K. 2014. A synthesis of past, current and future research for protection and management of papyrus (Cyperus papyrus L.) wetlands in Africa. Wetl Ecol Manag. 99–114. doi:10.1007/s11273-013-9335-1.
  • van Dam AA, Kipkemboi J, Rahman MM, Gettel GM. 2013. Linking hydrology, ecosystem function, and livelihood outcomes in African papyrus wetlands using a Bayesian network model. Wetlands. 33(3):381–397. doi:10.1007/s13157-013-0395-z.
  • van Heukelom TS. 2013. Food as security: the controversy of foreign agricultural investment in Yala Swamp, Kenya. Sidney: University of Sidney.
  • Vrebos D, Staes J, Vandenbroucke T, D’Haeyer T, Johnston R, Muhumuza M, Meire P, Meire P. 2015. Mapping ecosystem service flows with land cover scoring maps for data-scarce regions. Ecosyst Serv. 13:28–40. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.005
  • Wang X, Dong X, Liu H, Wei H, Fan W, Lu N, Xu Z, Ren J, and Xing, K. 2017. Linking land use change, ecosystem services and human well-being: A case study of the Manas River Basin of Xinjiang, China. Ecosyst Serv. 27:113–123. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.08.013.
  • Wangai PW, Burkhard B, Müller F. 2018. Quantifying and mapping land use changes and regulating ecosystem service potentials in a data-scarce peri-urban region in Kenya. Ecosyst People. 15(1):11–32. doi:10.1080/21513732.2018.1529708.
  • Yang YCE, Passarelli S, Lovell RJ, Ringler C. 2018. Gendered perspectives of ecosystem services: a systematic review. Ecosyst Serv. 31:58–67. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.03.015
  • Zhang W, Kato E, Bhandary P, Nkonya E, Ibrahim HI, Agbonlahor M, Ibrahim HY. 2015. Communities’ Perceptions and Knowledge of Ecosystem Service. Washinton D.C: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
  • Zorilla-Miras P, Palomo I, Gomez-Baggethun E, Martin-Lopez B, Lomas PL, Montes C. 2014. Effects of land-use change on wetland ecosystem services: a case study in the Doñana marshes (SW Spain). Landsc Urban Plan. 22(160–174). doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.09.013