Embracing complexity in landscape management: Learning and impacts of a participatory resilience assessment

References

• Abson DJ, Fischer J, Leventon J, Newig J, Schomerus T, Vilsmaier U, von Wehrden H, Abernethy P, Ives CD, Jager NW, et al. 2017. Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio. 46(1):30–39. doi:10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abson DJ, von Wehrden H, Baumgärtner S, Fischer J, Hanspach J, Härdtle W, Heinrichs H, Klein AM, Lang DJ, Martens P, et al. 2014. Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability. Ecol Econ. 103:29–37. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelstam P, Andersson K, Annerstedt M, Axelsson R, Elbakidze M, Garrido P, Grahn P, Jönsson KI, Pedersen S, Schlyter P, et al. 2013. Solving problems in social–ecological systems: definition, practice and barriers of transdisciplinary research. AMBIO. 42(2):254–265. doi:10.1007/s13280-012-0372-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashwood L, Harden N, Bell MM, Bland W. 2014. Linked and situated: grounded knowledge: linked and situated: grounded knowledge. Rural Sociol. 79(4):427–452. doi:10.1111/ruso.12042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baggio JA, Brown K, Hellebrandt D. 2015. Boundary object or bridging concept? A citation network analysis of resilience. Ecol Soc. 20(2):art2. doi:10.5751/ES-07484-200202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beery T, Stålhammar S, Jönsson KI, Wamsler C, Bramryd T, Brink E, Ekelund N, Johansson M, Palo T, Schubert P, et al. 2016. Perceptions of the ecosystem services concept: opportunities and challenges in the Swedish municipal context. Ecosyst Serv. 17:123–130. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett EM, Solan M, Biggs R, McPhearson T, Norström AV, Olsson P, Pereira L, Peterson GD, Raudsepp-Hearne C, Biermann F, et al. 2016. Bright spots: seeds of a good Anthropocene. Front Ecol Environ. 14(8):441–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes F. 2017. Environmental governance for the anthropocene? social-ecological systems, resilience, and collaborative learning. Sustainability. 9(7):1232. doi:10.3390/su9071232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs R, Schlüter M, Biggs D, Bohensky EL, BurnSilver S, Cundill G, Dakos V, Daw TM, Evans LS, Kotschy K, et al. 2012. Toward principles for enhancing the resilience of ecosystem services. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 37(1):421–448. doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-051211-123836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeraeve F, Dufrene M, De Vreese R, Jacobs S, Pipart N, Turkelboom F, Verheyden W, Dendoncker N. 2018. Participatory identification and selection of ecosystem services: building on field experiences. Ecol Soc. 23(2):art27. doi:10.5751/ES-10087-230227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohensky EL, Evans LS, Anderies JM, Biggs D, Fabricius C. 2015. 6. Principle 4 - Foster complex adaptive systems thinking. In: Biggs R, Schlüter M, Schoon ML, editors. Principles for building resilience: sustaining ecosystem services in social-ecological systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 142–173.
   Google Scholar
• Bouwma I, Schleyer C, Primmer E, Winkler KJ, Berry P, Young J, Carmen E, Špulerová J, Bezák P, Preda E, et al. 2018. Adoption of the ecosystem services concept in EU policies. Ecosyst Serv. 29:213–222. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown VA, Lambert JA. 2013. Collective learning for transformational change: a guide to collaborative action. London, UK: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell LK, Svendsen ES, Roman LA. 2016. Knowledge co-production at the research–practice interface: embedded case studies from urban forestry. Environ Manage. 57:1262–1280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmen E, Watt A, Carvalho L, Dick J, Fazey I, Garcia Blanco G, Grizzetti B, Hauck J, Izakovicova Z, Kopperoinen L, et al. 2018. Knowledge needs for the operationalisation of the concept of ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv. 29(Part C):441–451. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.10.012.
   Google Scholar
• Clark WC, van Kerkhoff L, Lebel L, Gallopin GC. 2016. Crafting usable knowledge for sustainable development. PNAS. 113:4570–4578. doi:10.1073/pnas.1601266113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ricketts TH, Salzman J, Shallenberger R. 2009. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ. 7(1):21–28. doi:10.1890/080025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daw TM, Coulthard S, Cheung WWL, Brown K, Abunge C, Galafassi D, Peterson GD, McClanahan TR, Omukoto JO, Munyi L, et al. 2015. Evaluating taboo trade-offs in ecosystems services and human well-being. PNAS. 112:6949–6954. doi:10.1073/pnas.1414900112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz S, Demissew S, Carabias J, Joly C, Lonsdale M, Ash N, Larigauderie A, Adhikari JR, Arico S, Báldi A, et al. 2015. The IPBES Conceptual Framework — connecting nature and people. Current Opin Environ Sustainability. 14:1–16. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ds 2012:23. 2012. Swedish environmental goals – specifications of the environmental quality objectives and a first set of interim targets (In Swedish) Ds 2012:23. Stockholm: Government Offices, Department of the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Elmqvist T, Andersson E, Frantzeskaki N, McPhearson T, Olsson P, Gaffney O, Takeuchi K, Folke C. 2019. Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century. Nat Sustainability. 2(4):267–273. doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enfors-Kautsky E, Järnberg L, Quinlan A, Ryan P. 2018. Wayfinder: a resilience guide for navigating towards sustainable futures. Stockholm Resilience Centre: GRAID Programme.
   Google Scholar
• Enfors-Kautsky E, Järnberg L, Quinlan A, Ryan P. 2021. Wayfinder: a new generation of resilience practice. Ecol Soc. 26(2). The Resilience Alliance. doi:10.5751/ES-12176-260239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke C, Carpenter SR, Walker B, Scheffer M, Chapin T, Rockström J. 2010. Resilience Thinking: integrating Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability. Ecol Soc. 15(4):art20. doi:10.5751/ES-03610-150420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Nieto AP, Huland E, Quintas-Soriano C, Iniesta-Arandia I, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Martín-López B. 2019. Evaluating social learning in participatory mapping of ecosystem services. Ecosyst People. 15(1):257–268. doi:10.1080/26395916.2019.1667875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Nieto AP, Quintas-Soriano C, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Montes C, Martín-López B. 2015. Collaborative mapping of ecosystem services: the role of stakeholders׳ profiles. Ecosyst Serv. 13:141–152. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grönlund K, Bächtiger A, Setälä M,ed. 2014.Deliberative mini-publics : involving citizens in the democratic process.UK:University of Essex.ECPR Press
   Google Scholar
• Gunderson L, Cosens BA, Chaffin BC, Tom Arnold CA, Fremier AK, Garmestani AS, Craig RK, Gosnell H, Birge HE, Allen CR, et al. 2017. Regime shifts and panarchies in regional scale social-ecological water systems. Ecol Soc. 22(1):art31. doi:10.5751/ES-08879-220131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta C, Kelly AB. 2014. The social relations of fieldwork: giving back in a research setting. J Res Pract. 10:11.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn T, Olsson P, Folke C, Johansson K. 2006. Trust-building, knowledge generation and organizational innovations: the role of a bridging organization for adaptive comanagement of a Wetland landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden. Hum Ecol. 34(4):573–592. doi:10.1007/s10745-006-9035-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen R, Frantzeskaki N, McPhearson T, Rall E, Kabisch N, Kaczorowska A, Kain J-H, Artmann M, Pauleit S. 2015. The uptake of the ecosystem services concept in planning discourses of European and American cities. Ecosyst Serv. 12:228–246. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holling CS, Meffe GK. 1996. Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conserv Biol. 10(2):328–337. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020328.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2019. Summary for Policymakers. In: Shukla PR, Skea J, Calvo Buendia E, Masson-Delmotte V, Pörtner H-O, Roberts DC, Zhai P, Slade R, Connors S, van Diemen, R. editors. Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Järnberg L, Enfors Kautsky E, Dagerskog L, Olsson P. 2018. Green niche actors navigating an opaque opportunity context: prospects for a sustainable transformation of Ethiopian agriculture. Land Use Policy. 71:409–421. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johannessen Å, Hahn T. 2013. Social learning towards a more adaptive paradigm? reducing flood risk in Kristianstad municipality, Sweden. Global Environ Change. 23(1):372–381. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.07.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kritzberg ES, Hasselquist EM, Škerlep M, Löfgren S, Olsson O, Stadmark J, Valinia S, Hansson L-A, Laudon H. 2020. Browning of freshwaters: consequences to ecosystem services, underlying drivers, and potential mitigation measures. Ambio. 49(2):375–390. doi:10.1007/s13280-019-01227-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lade SJ, Walker BH, Haider LJ. 2020. Resilience as pathway diversity: linking systems, individual, and temporal perspectives on resilience. Ecol Soc. 25(3):14. doi:10.5751/ES-11760-250319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam DPM, Hinz E, Lang DJ, Tengö M, von Wehrden H, Martín-López B. 2020. Indigenous and local knowledge in sustainability transformations research: a literature review. Ecol Soc. 25(1):art3. doi:10.5751/ES-11305-250103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemos MC, Morehouse BJ. 2005. The co-production of science and policy in integrated climate assessments. Global Environ Change. 15(1):57–68. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin SA. 1998. Ecosystems and the biosphere as complex adaptive systems. Ecosystems. 1(5):431–436. doi:10.1007/s100219900037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin S, Xepapadeas T, Crépin A-S, Norberg J, de Zeeuw A, Folke C, Hughes T, Arrow K, Barrett S, Daily G, et al. 2013. Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: modeling and policy implications. Environ Dev Econ. 18(2):111–132. doi:10.1017/S1355770X12000460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MA, ed. 2005. Millennium ecosystem assessment - ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malmborg K, Enfors-Kautsky E, Queiroz C, Norström A, Schultz L. 2021. Operationalizing ecosystem service bundles for strategic sustainability planning: a participatory approach. Ambio. 50(2):314–331. doi:10.1007/s13280-020-01378-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marre J-B, Billé R. 2019. A demand-driven approach to ecosystem services economic valuation: lessons from Pacific island countries and territories. Ecosyst Serv. 39:100975. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie E, Posner S, Tillmann P, Bernhardt JR, Howard K, Rosenthal A. 2014. Understanding the use of ecosystem service knowledge in decision making: lessons from international experiences of spatial planning. Environ Plann C Gov Policy. 32(2):320–340. doi:10.1068/c12292j.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadows DH. 1997. Places to intervene in a system. Whole Earth Winter. 97:78–85.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell M. 2013. From organisational learning to social learning: a tale of two organisations in the murray–darling basin. Rural Sociol. 22(3):230–241. doi:10.5172/rsj.2013.22.3.230.
   Google Scholar
• NE. 2019. Helge å Nationalencyklopedin; [accessed 2019 May 15]. http://www-ne-se.ezp.sub.su.se/uppslagsverk/encyklopedi/lång/helge-å
   Google Scholar
• Newbold T, Hudson LN, Arnell AP, Contu S, De Palma A, Ferrier S, Hill SLL, Hoskins AJ, Lysenko I, Phillips HRP, et al. 2016. Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment. Science. 353(6296):288–291. doi:10.1126/science.aaf2201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norström AV, Cvitanovic C, Löf MF, West S, Wyborn C, Balvanera P, Bednarek AT, Bennett EM, Biggs R, de Bremond A, et al. 2020. Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nat Sustainability. 3(3):182–190. doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyström M, Jouffray J-B, Norström AV, Crona B, Søgaard Jørgensen P, Carpenter SR, Bodin Ö, Galaz V, Folke C. 2019. Anatomy and resilience of the global production ecosystem. Nature. 575(7781):98–108. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1712-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson P, Folke C, Galaz V, Hahn T, Schultz L. 2007. Enhancing the fit through adaptive co-management: creating and maintaining bridging functions for matching scales in the kristianstads vattenrike biosphere reserve, Sweden. Ecol Soc. 12(1):art28. doi:10.5751/ES-01976-120128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson P, Galaz V, Boonstra WJ. 2014. Sustainability transformations: a resilience perspective. Ecol Soc. 19:art1. doi:10.5751/ES-06799-190401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plieninger T, Kizos T, Bieling C, Le Dû-Blayo L, Budniok M-A, Bürgi M, Crumley CL, Girod G, Howard P, Kolen J, et al. 2015. Exploring ecosystem-change and society through a landscape lens: recent progress in European landscape research. Ecol Soc. 20(2):art5. doi:10.5751/ES-07443-200205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preiser R, Biggs R, De Vos A, Folke C. 2018. Social-ecological systems as complex adaptive systems: organizing principles for advancing research methods and approaches. Ecol Soc. 23(4):art46. doi:10.5751/ES-10558-230446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Queiroz C, Meacham M, Richter K, Norström AV, Andersson E, Norberg J, Peterson G. 2015. Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape. AMBIO. 44(S1):89–101. doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0601-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM. 2010. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. PNAS. 107(11):5242–5247. doi:10.1073/pnas.0907284107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed MS, Evely AC, Cundill G, Fazey I, Glass J, Laing A, Newig J, Parrish B, Prell C, Raymond C, et al. 2010. What is Social Learning? Ecol Soc. 15(4): resp1. doi:10.5751/ES-03564-1504r01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed MS, Vella S, Challies E, de Vente J, Frewer L, Hohenwallner-Ries D, Huber T, Neumann RK, Oughton EA, Sidoli Del Ceno J, et al. 2018. A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work?: a theory of participation. Restor Ecol. 26:S7–S17. doi:10.1111/rec.12541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyers B, Biggs R, Cumming GS, Elmqvist T, Hejnowicz AP, Polasky S. 2013. Getting the measure of ecosystem services: a social–ecological approach. Front Ecol Environ. 11(5):268–273. doi:10.1890/120144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha J, Lanyon C, Peterson G. 2022. Upscaling the resilience assessment through comparative analysis. Global Environ Change. 72:102419. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña J. 2012. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 2nd. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Salomon AK, Quinlan AE, Pang GH, Okamoto DK, Vazquez-Vera L. 2019. Measuring social-ecological resilience reveals opportunities for transforming environmental governance. Ecol Soc. 24(3):art16. doi:10.5751/ES-11044-240316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelsson K, Giusti M, Peterson GD, Legeby A, Brandt SA, Barthel S. 2018. Impact of environment on people’s everyday experiences in Stockholm. Landsc Urban Plan. 171:7–17. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SCB. 2018. Befolkningsstatistik efter region och kön. Stockholm: Statistics Sweden Statistical Database; [ accessed 2018 May 15]. https://www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se/pxweb/sv/ssd/
   Google Scholar
• Schlüter M, Pahl-Wostl C. 2007. Mechanisms of resilience in common-pool resource management systems: an agent-based model of water use in a River Basin. Ecol Soc. 12(2):23. doi:10.5751/ES-02069-120204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoon ML, Robards MD, Brown K, Engle N, Meek CL, Biggs R. 2015. 2 Politics and the resilience of ecosystem services. In: Biggs R, Schlüter M, Schoon ML, editors. Principles for building resilience: sustaining ecosystem services in social-ecological systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 32–49.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert P, Ekelund NGA, Beery TH, Wamsler C, Jönsson KI, Roth A, Stålhammar S, Bramryd T, Johansson M, Palo T, et al. 2018. Implementation of the ecosystem services approach in Swedish municipal planning. J Environ Policy & Plann. 20(3):298–312. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2017.1396206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz L, Folke C, Österblom H, Olsson P. 2015. Adaptive governance, ecosystem management, and natural capital. PNAS. 112(24): 7369–7374. doi:10.1073/pnas.1406493112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz L, Lundholm C. 2010. Learning for resilience? Exploring learning opportunities in biosphere reserves. Environ Educ Res. 16(5–6):645–663. doi:10.1080/13504622.2010.505442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellberg MM, Norström AV, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ. 2020. Using local initiatives to envision sustainable and resilient food systems in the Stockholm city-region. Global Food Secur. 24:100334. doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2019.100334
   Google Scholar
• Sellberg M, Quinlan A, Preiser R, Malmborg K, Peterson G. 2021. Engaging with complexity in resilience practice. Ecol Soc. 26(3). The Resilience Alliance. doi:10.5751/ES-12311-260308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellberg MM, Ryan P, Borgström ST, Norström AV, Peterson GD. 2018. From resilience thinking to resilience planning: lessons from practice. J Environ Manage. 217:906–918. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tengö M, Hill R, Malmer P, Raymond CM, Spierenburg M, Danielsen F, Elmqvist T, Folke C. 2017. Weaving knowledge systems in IPBES, CBD and beyond—lessons learned for sustainability. Current Opin Environ Sustainability. 26–27:17–25. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuvendal M, Elmqvist T. 2011. Ecosystem services linking social and ecological systems: river brownification and the response of downstream stakeholders. Ecol Soc. 16(4):art21. doi:10.5751/ES-04456-160421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker B, Carpenter SR, Anderies JM, Abel N, Cumming G, Janssen MA, Lebel L, Norberg J, Peterson GD, Pritchard R, et al. 2002. Resilience management in social-ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conserv Ecol. 6(1):art14. doi:10.5751/ES-00356-060114.
   Google Scholar
• Walker B, Salt D. 2012. Resilience practice : building capacity to absorb disturbance and maintain function. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wall TU, Meadow AM, Horganic A. 2017. Developing evaluation indicators to improve the process of coproducing usable climate science. Weather Clim Soc. 9(1):95–107. doi:10.1175/WCAS-D-16-0008.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallin I, Carlsson J, Hansen HP. 2016. Envisioning future forested landscapes in Sweden – revealing local-national discrepancies through participatory action research. For Policy Econ. 73:25–40. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2016.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westley FR, Tjornbo O, Schultz L, Olsson P, Folke C, Crona B, Bodin Ö. 2013. A theory of transformative agency in linked social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc. 18(3):art27. doi:10.5751/ES-05072-180327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson C, Saarne T, Peterson GD, Colding J. 2013. Strategic spatial planning and the ecosystem services concept - an historical exploration. Ecol Soc. 18(1):art37. doi:10.5751/ES-05368-180137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar