Local perception of ecosystem services provided by symbolic wild cherry blossoms: toward community-based management of traditional forest landscapes in Japan

References

• Abram NK, Meijaard E, Ancrenaz M, Runting RK, Wells JA, Gaveau D, Pellier A-S, Mengersen K. 2014. Spatially explicit perceptions of ecosystem services and land cover change in forested regions of Borneo. Ecosys Services. 7:116–127. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alessa LN, Kliskey AA, Brown G. 2008. Social-ecological hotspots mapping: a spatial approach. for identifying coupled social-ecological space. Landscape Urban Plan. 85(1):27–39. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett JR, Maloney R, Possingham HP 2015. Biodiversity gains from efficient use of private sponsorship for flagship species conservation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 282, 20142693.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett EM, Peterson GD, Gordon LJ. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Let. 12:1394–1404. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen-Jones E, Entwistle A. 2002. Identifying appropriate flagship species: the importance of culture and. local contexts. Oryx. 36:189–195. doi:10.1017/S0030605302000261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock C, Joyce D, Collier M. 2018. An exploration of the relationships between cultural ecosystem services, socio-cultural values and well-being. Ecosys Services. 31:142–152. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camacho-Valdez V, Saenz-Arroyo A, Ghermandi A, Navarrete-Gutiérrez DA, Rodiles-Hernández R. 2020. Spatial analysis, local people’s perception and economic valuation of wetland ecosystem services in the Usumacinta floodplain, Southern Mexico. PeerJ. 8:e8395. doi:10.7717/peerj.8395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan KMA, Balvanera P, Benessaiah K, Chapman M, Díaz S, Gómez-Baggethun E, Gould R, Hannahs N, Jax K, Klain S, et al., 2016. Opinion: why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 113, 1462–1465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng X, Van Damme S, Li L, Uyttenhove P. 2019. Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services: a review of methods. Ecosys Services. 37:100925. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Conservation, New Zealand. 2021. New Zealand ferns. [Accessed 2021 May 16] https://www.doc.govt.nz/nature/native-plants/ferns/
   Google Scholar
• Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute. 2010. Handbook of transformation to broadleaf forests. [Accessed 2021 May 16] (in Japanese) https://www.ffpri.affrc.go.jp/pubs/chukiseika/documents/2nd-chuukiseika22.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fujii Y, Shiga S, Asahiro K, Shigematsu T. 2009. Growing and flowering situation of Prunus jamasakura for 9 years in urban forest reserve. Japanese Inst Landscape Arch. 72(5):523–526. (in Japanese with English summary). doi:10.5632/jila.72.523.
   Google Scholar
• García-Llorente MJ, Castro A, Quintas-Soriano C, Oteros-Rozas E, Iniesta-Arandia I, González JA, García Del Amo D, Hernández-Arroyo M, Casado-Arzuaga I, Palomo I, et al. 2020. Local perceptions of ecosystem services across multiple ecosystem types in Spain. Land. 9:330. doi:10.3390/land9090330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Nieto AP, Quintas-Soriano C, García-Llorente M, Palomo I, Montes C, Martín-López B. 2015. Collaborative mapping of ecosystem services: the role of stakeholders׳ profiles. Ecosys Services. 13:141–152. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garibaldi A, Turner N. 2004. Cultural keystone species: implications for ecological conservation and restoration. Ecol Soc. 9(3):1. [Accessed 2021 May 16]. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss3/art1/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabherr G. 2009. Biodiversity in the high ranges of the Alps: ethnobotanical and climate change perspectives. Global Environ Change. 19:167–172. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graça M, Queirós C, Farinha-Marques P, Cunha M. 2018. Street trees as cultural elements in the city: understanding how perception affects ecosystem services management in Porto, Portugal. Urban Forestry Urban Greening. 30:194–205. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattori T, Akamatsu H, Takeda Y, Kodate S, Kamihogi A, Yamazaki H. 1995. A study on the actual conditions of Satoyama (rural forests) and their management. Humans Nature. 6:1–32. (in Japanese with English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Home R, Keller C, Nagel P, Bauer N, Hunziker M. 2009. Selection criteria for flagship species by conservation organizations. Environ Conservation. 36(2):1–10. doi:10.1017/S0376892909990051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishii M, Nakagoshi N. 1997. Population structure of canopy trees and vegetation management of secondary forest in a forest-park planning. Japanese Inst Landscape Arch. 60(5):543–546. (in Japanese with English summary). doi:10.5632/jila.60.543.
   Google Scholar
• Japan Meteorological Agency. 2021. [Accessed 2021 May 16] (in Japanese) https://www.data.jma.go.jp/obd/stats/etrn/view/annually_a.php?prec_no=40&block_no=0318&year=&month=&day=&view=
   Google Scholar
• Jepson P, Barua M. 2015. A theory of flagship species action. Conservation Soc. 13:95–104. doi:10.4103/0972-4923.161228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katsuda K, Saeki I, Kamijo T. 2020. Regeneration patterns of Cerasus leveilleana (Koehne) H. Ohba and C. jamasakura (Siebold ex Koidz.) H. Ohba in Satoyama forests of Sakuragawa City, Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan. J Jap Soc Revegetation Technology. 46(1):27–32. (in Japanese with English Summary).
   Google Scholar
• Katsuki T. 2015. Cherry blossoms. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten Publishers. (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Kimpouni V, Nzila JDD, Watha-Ndoudy N, Madzella-Mbiemo MI, Yallo Mouhamed S, Kampe JP. 2021. Exploring local people’s perception of ecosystem services in Djoumouna Periurban Forest, Brazzaville, Congo. In:Źróbek-Sokolnik, A. Int J Forestry Res. 2021:6612649. doi:10.1155/2021/6612649.
   Google Scholar
• Konta F. 2016. Dendrology of cherry blossom. Tokyo: Gijutsuhyoronsha. (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Lamarque P, Tappeiner U, Turner C, Steinbacher M, Bardgett RD, Szukics U, Schermer M, Lavorel S. 2011. Stakeholder perceptions of grassland ecosystem services in relation to knowledge on soil fertility and biodiversity. Regional Environ Change. 11:791–804. doi:10.1007/s10113-011-0214-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriuchi E, Basil M. 2019. The sustainability of ohanami cherry blossom festivals as a cultural icon. Sustain MDPI Open Access J. 11(6):1–15. [Accessed 2021 May 16]. https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v11y2019i6p1820-D217389.html
   Google Scholar
• Moutouama FT, Biaou SSH, Kyereh B, Asante WA, Natta AK. 2019. Factors shaping local people’s perception of ecosystem services in the Atacora Chain of Mountains, a biodiversity hotspot in northern Benin. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 15:38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhamad D, Okubo S, Harashina K, Parikesit P, Gunawan B, Takeuchi K. 2014. Living close to. forests enhances people’s perception of ecosystem services in a forest-agricultural landscape of West Java, Indonesia. Ecosys Services. 8:197–206. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura K, Shigematsu T. 2000. A study on growing and flowering situation of Prunus jamasakura in urban forest reserve. Japanese Inst Landscape Arch. 63(5):469–472. doi:10.5632/jila.63.469.
   Google Scholar
• Ogura J. 2019. Decrease of grasslands from early to late periods of the Meiji era in Boso hills and Mt. Tsukuba area. Biol Sci. 70(4):217–224. (in Japanese).
   Google Scholar
• Orenstein DE, Groner E. 2014. In the eye of the stakeholder: changes in perceptions of ecosystem services across an international border. Ecosys Services. 8:185–196. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual U, Balvanera P, Díaz S, Pataki G, Roth E, Stenseke M, Watson RT, Başak Dessane E, Islar M, Kelemen E, et al. 2017. Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Current Opinion Environ Sustain. 26-27:7–16. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species. geographic distributions. Ecol Modelling. 190:231–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plieninger T, Bieling C, Fagerholm N, Byg A, Hartel T, Hurley P, López-Santiago CA, Nagabhatla N, Oteros-Rozas E, Raymond CM, et al. 2015. The role of cultural ecosystem services in landscape management and planning. Current Opinion Environ Sustain. 14:28–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primack RB. 2014. Essentials of conservation biology. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Primack RB, Higuchi H, Miller-Rushing AJ. 2009. The impact of climate change on cherry trees and other species in Japan. Biol Conservation. 142:1943–1949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rall E, Bieling C, Zytynska S, Haase D. 2017. Exploring city-wide patterns of cultural ecosystem service perceptions and use. Ecol Indicators. 77:80–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riper CJ, Kyle GT, Sherrouse BC, Bagstad KJ. 2017. Toward an integrated understanding of perceived biodiversity values and environmental conditions in a national park. Ecol Indicators. 72:278–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riper CJ, Kyle GT, Sutton SG, Barnes M, Sherrouse BC. 2012. Mapping outdoor recreationists’ perceived social values for ecosystem services at Hinchinbrook Island National Park, Australia. Applied Geography. 35:164–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüdisser J, Schirpke U, Tappeiner U. 2019. Symbolic entities in the European Alps: perception and use of a cultural ecosystem service. Ecosys Services. 39:100980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakuragawa City Government. 2019. Yamazakura Preservation and utilization plan in Sakuragawa City. [Accessed 2021 May 16] (in Japanese) https://www.city.sakuragawa.lg.jp/page/page006073.html
   Google Scholar
• Sakuragawa Statistical Abstract. 2020. [Accessed 2021 May 16] (in Japanese) https://www.city.sakuragawa.lg.jp/page/dir002288.html
   Google Scholar
• Sakurai R, Jacobson SK, Kobori H, Primack R, Oka K, Komatsu N, Machida R. 2011. Culture and climate change: Japanese cherry blossom festivals and stakeholders’ knowledge and attitudes about global climate change. Biol Conservation. 144:654–658.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato T. 2005. “Japan” formed by cherry blossoms. Tokyo: Iwanami Shoten, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Scheyvens H, Mader A, Lopez-Casero F, Takahashi Y. 2019. Socio-Ecological production landscapes and seascapes as regional/local circulating and ecological spheres. Hayama: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies. [Accessed 2021 May 16] https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep21789.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schirpke U, Meisch C, Tappeiner U. 2018. Symbolic species as a cultural ecosystem service in the European Alps: insights and open issues. Landscape Ecol. 33:711–730.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröter M, van der Zanden EH, van Oudenhoven APE, Remme RP, Serna-Chavez HM, de Groot RS, Opdam P. 2014. Ecosystem services as a contested concept: a synthesis of critique and counter-arguments. Conservation Let. 7:514–523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackleton S, Chinyimba A, Hebinck P, Shackleton C, Kaoma H. 2015. Multiple benefits and values of trees in urban landscapes in two towns in northern South Africa. Landscape Urban Planning. 136:76–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherrouse BC, Clement JM, Semmens DJ. 2011. A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Applied Geography. 31:748–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherrouse BC, Semmens DJ 2015. Social Values for Ecosystem Services, Version 3.0 (SolVES 3.0): documentation and user manual. U.S. Geological Survey.
   Google Scholar
• Sherrouse BC, Semmens DJ, Ancona ZH. 2022. Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES): open-source spatial modeling of cultural services. Environ Model Software. 148:105259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherrouse BC, Semmens DJ, Clement JM. 2014. An application of Social Values for Ecosystem. Services (SolVES) to three national forests in Colorado and Wyoming. Ecol Indicators. 36:68–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoyama K, Yamagata Y. 2016. Local perception of ecosystem service bundles in the Kushiro. watershed, northern Japan: application of a public participation GIS tool. Ecosys Services. 22:139–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sodhi NS, Lee TM, Sekercioglu CH, Webb EL, Prawiradilaga DM, Lohman DJ, Pierce NE, Diesmos AC, Rao M, Ehrlich PR. 2009. Local people value environmental services provided by forested parks. Biodiversity Conservation. 19:1175–1188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stålhammar S. 2021. Assessing people’s values of nature: where is the link to sustainability transformations? Frontiers Ecol Evol. 9:624084. doi:10.3389/fevo.2021.624084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takeuchi K. 2001. Nature conservation strategies for the ‘SATOYAMA’ and ‘SATOCHI’, habitats for secondary nature in Japan. Global Environ Res. 5(2):193–198.
   Google Scholar
• Torkar G. 2016. Secondary school students’ environmental concerns and attitudes toward forest ecosystem services: implications for biodiversity education. Int J Environ Sci Edu. 11(18):11019–11031.
   Google Scholar
• Washitani I. 2001. Traditional sustainable ecosystem ‘Satoyama’ and biodiversity crisis in Japan: conservation ecological perspective. Global Environ Res. 5(2):119–133.
   Google Scholar
• Yamamoto S, Takahashi R. 1991. Establishment of cherry-dotted coppice in the countryside. Japanese Institute Landscape Arch. 54(5):173–178. (in Japanese with English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Zoderer BM, Tasser E, Carver S, Tappeiner U. 2019. Stakeholder perspectives on ecosystem service supply and ecosystem service demand bundles. Ecosys Services. 37:100938.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar