Capacities for resilience: persisting, adapting and transforming through bricolage

References

• Alinovi L, Mane E, Romano D. 2010. Measuring household resilience to food insecurity: application to palestinian households. In Agricultural Survey Methods. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; p. 341–15. doi: 10.1002/9780470665480.ch21.
   Google Scholar
• Anderies J, Folke C, Walker B, Ostrom E. 2013. Aligning key concepts for global change policy: robustness, resilience, and sustainability. Ecol Soc. 18(2). doi: 10.5751/ES-05178-180208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad K. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Béné C, Frankenberger T, Nelson S. 2015. Design, monitoring and evaluation of resilience interventions: conceptual and empirical considerations. Institute of Development Studies. [accessed 2023 Feb 7]. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/handle/20.500.12413/6556.
   Google Scholar
• Béné C, Newsham A, Davies M, Ulrichs M, Godfrey‐Wood R. 2014. Review article: Resilience, poverty and development. J Int Dev. 26(5):598–623. doi:10.1002/jid.2992.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjaminsen G. 2017. The bricolage of REDD + in Zanzibar: from global environmental policy framework to community forest management. J East Afr Stud. 11(3):506–525. doi: 10.1080/17531055.2017.1357103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boonstra WJ. 2016. Conceptualizing power to study social-ecological interactions. Ecol Soc. 21(1):rt21. doi: 10.5751/ES-07966-210121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown K. 2015. Resilience, development and global change. London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203498095.
   Google Scholar
• Brown K, Westaway E. 2011. Agency, capacity, and resilience to environmental change: lessons from human development, well-being, and disasters. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 36(1):321–342. doi: 10.1146/ANNUREV-ENVIRON-052610-092905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkitt I. 2016. Relational agency: relational sociology, agency and interaction. Eur J Soc Theory. 19(3):322–339. doi: 10.1177/1368431015591426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charli-Joseph L, Siqueiros-García JM, Eakin H, Manuel-Navarrete D, Mazari-Hiriart M, Shelton R, Pérez-Belmont P, Ruizpalacios B. 2022. Enabling collective agency for sustainability transformations through reframing in the Xochimilco social–ecological system. Sustain Sci. 1:1215–1233. doi: 10.1007/s11625-022-01224-w.
   Google Scholar
• Chitata T, Kemerink-Seyoum J, Cleaver F. 2021. Engaging and learning with water infrastructure: Rufaro irrigation scheme, Zimbabwe. Water Altern. 14(3):690–716. https://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol14/v14issue3/640-a14-3-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitata T, Kemerink-Seyoum J, Cleaver F. 2022. ‘Our humanism cannot be captured in the bylaws’: how moral ecological rationalities and care shape a smallholder irrigation scheme in Zimbabwe. Environ Plan E. 251484862211379. doi: 10.1177/25148486221137968.
   Google Scholar
• Chitata T, Kemerink-Seyoum J, Cleaver F. 2023. Together strong or falling apart? coping with covid-19 in Rufaro smallholder irrigation scheme, Zimbabwe. Int J Commons. 17(1):87–104. doi: 10.5334/ijc.1194.
   Google Scholar
• Cleaver F. 2001. Institutional bricolage, conflict and cooperation in Usangu. IDS Bull. 32(4):26–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2001.mp32004004.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleaver F. 2002. Reinventing institutions: bricolage and the social embeddedness of natural resource management. Eur J Dev Res. 14(2):11–30. doi: 10.1080/714000425.
   Google Scholar
• Cleaver F. 2012. Development through bricolage : rethinking institutions for natural resource management. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cleaver F, Whaley L. 2018. Understanding process, power, and meaning in adaptive governance: a critical institutional reading. Ecol Soc. 23(2):art49. doi: 10.5751/ES-10212-230249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke B, West S, Boonstra WJ. 2016. Dwelling in the biosphere: exploring an embodied human–environment connection in resilience thinking. Sustain Sci. 11(5):831–843. doi: 10.1007/S11625-016-0367-3/FIGURES/3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cote M, Nightingale AJ. 2012. Resilience thinking meets social theory. Prog Hum Geogr. 36(4):475–489. doi: 10.1177/0309132511425708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darnhofer I. 2020. Farming from a process‐relational perspective: making openings for change visible. Sociol Ruralis. 60(2):505–528. doi: 10.1111/soru.12294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darnhofer I. 2021. Farming resilience: from maintaining states towards shaping transformative change processes. Sustainability. 13(6):3387. doi: 10.3390/su13063387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darnhofer I, Lamine C, Strauss A, Navarrete M. 2016. The resilience of family farms: towards a relational approach. J Rural Stud. 44:111–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Koning J (2011). Reshaping institutions: bricolage processes in smallholder forestry in the Amazon. Wageningen University (PhD Thesis). http://edepot.wur.nl/160232.
   Google Scholar
• De Koning J. 2014. Unpredictable outcomes in forestry—governance institutions in practice. Soc Nat. 27(4):358–371. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2013.861557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas M. 1987. How institutions think. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Elmqvist T, Andersson E, Frantzeskaki N, McPhearson T, Olsson P, Gaffney O, Takeuchi K, Folke C. 2019. Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century. Nat Sustain. 2(4):267–273. doi: 10.1038/s41893-019-0250-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2020). Eu’s organic farming area reaches 14.7 million hectares. [accessed 2023 Feb 7]. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/ddn-20220222-1.
   Google Scholar
• Fazey I, Schäpke N, Caniglia G, Patterson J, Hultman J, van Mierlo B, Säwe F, Wiek A, Wittmayer J, Aldunce P, et al. 2018. Ten Essentials for action-oriented and second order energy transitions, transformations and climate change research. Energy Res Social Sci. 40:54–70. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke C, Biggs R, Norström AV, Reyers B, Rockström J. 2016. Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science. Ecol Soc. 21(3). doi: 10.5751/ES-08748-210341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke C, Haider LJ, Lade SJ, Norström AV, Rocha J. 2021. Commentary: resilience and social-ecological systems: a handful of frontiers. Glob Environ Change. 71:102400–103780. doi: 10.1016/J.GLOENVCHA.2021.102400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frick-Trzebitzky F. 2017. Crafting adaptive capacity: institutional bricolage in adaptation to urban flooding in Greater Accra. Water Altern. 10(2):625–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallopín GC. 2006. Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Change. 16(3):293–303. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gebara MF. 2019. Understanding institutional bricolage: what drives behavior change towards sustainable land use in the Eastern Amazon? Int J Commons. 13(1):637. doi: 10.18352/ijc.913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens A. 1984. The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. USA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haider LJ, Schlüter M, Folke C, Reyers B. 2021. Rethinking resilience and development: a coevolutionary perspective. Ambio. 50(1):1–9. doi: 10.1007/s13280-020-01485-8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haider LJ, van Oudenhoven FJW. 2018. Food as a daily art: ideas for its use as a method in development practice. Ecol Soc. 23(3):14. doi: 10.5751/ES-10274-230314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider LJ, Boonstra WJ, Akobirshoeva A, Schlüter M. 2019. Effects of development interventions on biocultural diversity: a case study from the Pamir mountains. Agric Human Values. 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s10460-019-10005-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassenforder E, Barone S. 2019. Institutional arrangements for water governance. Int J Water Res Dev. 35(5):778–802. doi: 10.1080/07900627.2018.1431526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haverkamp J. 2021. Collaborative survival and the politics of livability: towards adaptation otherwise. World Dev. 137:105152. doi: 10.1016/J.WORLDDEV.2020.105152.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishihara H, Pascual U, Hodge I. 2017. Dancing with storks: the role of power relations in payments for ecosystem services. Ecol Econ. 139:45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karambiri M, Brockhaus M, Sehring J, Degrande A. 2020. ‘We are not bad people’ – bricolage and the rise of community forest institutions in Burkina Faso. Int J Commons. 14(1):525–538. doi: 10.5334/ijc.1061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassam K-A. 2009. Viewing Change Through the Prism of Indigenous Human Ecology: Findings from the Afghan and Tajik Pamirs. Hum Ecol. 37(6):677–690. doi: 10.1007/s10745-009-9284-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmis S, Wilkinson J, Edwards-Groves C, Hardy I, Grootenboer P, Bristol L, editors. 2013. Changing Practices, Changing Education. Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-4560-47-4_2.
   Google Scholar
• Levi-Strauss C. 1966. The savage mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Long N. 2001. Development sociology: actor perspectives. New York, USA: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mayaux P-L, Dajani M, Cleaver F, Naouri M, Kuper M, Hartani T. 2022. Explaining societal change through bricolage: transformations in regimes of water governance. Environ Plan E. 251484862211436. doi: 10.1177/25148486221143666.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas-Davies P, Fowler S, Midmore P, Coopmans I, Draganova M, Petitt A, Senni S. 2021. Evidence of resilience capacity in farmers’ narratives: Accounts of robustness, adaptability and transformability across five different European farming systems. J Rural Stud. 88:388–399. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.07.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niedermayr J, Quendler E, Resl T. 2015. ‘Family farming in Austria definition, characteristics and developments. J Agric for. 61(4). doi: 10.17707/AgricultForest.61.4.08.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson P, Galaz V, Boonstra WJ. 2014. Sustainability transformations: a resilience perspective. Ecol Soc. 19(4). [accessed 2023 June 1]. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26269651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson P, Moore M-L, Westley FR, McCarthy DDP. 2017. The concept of the Anthropocene as a game-changer: a new context for social innovation and transformations to sustainability. Ecol Soc. 22(2). doi: 10.5751/ES-09310-220231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlan AE, Berbés-Blázquez M, Haider LJ, Peterson GD. 2016. Measuring and assessing resilience: broadening understanding through multiple disciplinary perspectives. J Appl Ecol. 53(3):677–687. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redman C. 2014. Should sustainability and resilience be combined or remain distinct pursuits? Ecol Soc. 19(2). doi: 10.5751/ES-06390-190237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reyers B, Moore M-L, Haider LJ, Schlüter M. 2022. The contributions of resilience to reshaping sustainable development. Nat Sustain. 5(8):657–664. doi: 10.1038/s41893-022-00889-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sachs JD, Kroll C, Lafortune G, Fuller G, Woelm F. 2022. Sustainable development report 2022. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg J, Tsoukas H. 2011. Grasping the logic of practice: theorizing through practical rationality. Acad Manag Rev. 36(2):338–360. doi: 10.5465/amr.2009.0183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnegg M, Linke T. 2015. Living institutions: sharing and sanctioning water among pastoralists in Namibia. World Dev. 68:205–214. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.11.024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoones I, Stirling A, Abrol D, Atela J, Charli-Joseph L, Eakin H, Ely A, Olsson P, Pereira L, Priya R, et al. 2020. Transformations to sustainability: combining structural, systemic and enabling approaches. Curr Opin Env Sust. 42:65–75. [Preprint]. doi: 10.1016/J.COSUST.2019.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon S, Randalls S. 2016. Geography, ontological politics and the resilient future. Dialogues Hum Geogr. 6(1):3–18. doi: 10.1177/2043820615624047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw E. 2010. Apocalypse forever? Theor Cult Soc. 27(2–3):213–232. doi: 10.1177/0263276409358728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szaboova L, Brown K, Chaigneau T, Coulthard S, Daw TM, James T. 2018. Resilience and wellbeing for sustainability. In: Schreckenberg K, Mace G, and Poudyal M, editors. Ecosyst Serv Poverty Alleviation. London: Routledge; p. 273–287.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hecken G, Bastiaensen J, Windey C. 2015. Towards a power-sensitive and socially-informed analysis of payments for ecosystem services (PES): addressing the gaps in the current debate. Ecol Econ. 120:117–125. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Mierlo B, Totin E. 2014. Between script and improvisation: institutional conditions and their local operation. Outlook Agric. 43(3):157–163. doi: 10.5367/oa.2014.0179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oudenhoven F, Haider J. 2015. With our own hands : a celebration of food and life in the Pamir mountains of Afghanistan and Tajikistan. Netherlands: LM Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh-Dilley M, Wolford W, Mccarthy J. 2016a. Rights for resilience: food sovereignty, power, and resilience in development practice. Ecol Soc. 21(1). doi: 10.5751/ES-07981-210111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang RY, Chen T, Wang OB. 2021. Institutional bricolage in irrigation governance in rural northwest China: Diversity, legitimacy, and persistence. Water Altern. 14(2):350–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts MJ. 2011. Ecologies of rule: African environments and the climate of neoliberalism. In: Calhoun C, and Derluguian G, editors. The deepening crisis: governance challenges after neoliberalism. New York, USA: New York University; p. 67–91. doi: 10.18574/nyu/9780814772805.003.0004.
   Google Scholar
• West S, Haider LJ, Stålhammar S, Woroniecki S. 2020. A relational turn for sustainability science? Relational thinking, leverage points and transformations. Ecosyst People. 16(1):304–325. doi: 10.1080/26395916.2020.1814417.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westley F, Olsson P, Folke C, Homer-Dixon T, Vredenburg H, Loorbach D, Thompson J, Nilsson M, Lambin E, Sendzimir J, et al. 2011. Tipping toward sustainability: emerging pathways of transformation. Ambio. 40(7):762–780. doi: 10.1007/s13280-011-0186-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westley F, Tjornbo O, Schultz L, Olsson P, Folke C, Crona B, Bodin Ö. 2013. A theory of transformative agency in linked social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc. 18(3). doi: 10.5751/ES-05072-180327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whaley L. 2018. The Critical Institutional Analysis and Development (CIAD) framework. Int J Commons. 12(2):137–161. doi: 10.18352/ijc.848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whaley L, Cleaver F, Mwathunga E. 2021. Flesh and bones: working with the grain to improve community management of water. World Dev. 138(1):105286. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105286.
   Google Scholar
• Whatmore S. 2006. Materialist returns: practising cultural geography in and for a more-than-human world. Cult Geogr. doi: 10.1191/1474474006cgj377oa.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar